Guest guest Posted February 17, 2001 Report Share Posted February 17, 2001 Dear Margarita, Regarding no childern: With the given data, the ascendent is Gemini. Even If the DST considered it remain same. My Ayannansha came as 22:10:16, as per my computer. You have given Taurus ascendent. Please check the same. All other planets are within reasonable limit. The Moon ( lord of house D, gives zero in 12th house (A) and Saturn gives zero in 5th house (B). Lord of house C is situated in 12th from B. The F.Karak planet Venus, is in Ararda, which spoils it. and It is with in 3 degrees from Sun. So the F. Karak looses its karakatva. Zero Points due to Saturn in 5th house and zero points due to Moon in 12th house indicates no child. The Natural karak Jupiter is in the sight of Sixth lord ( of the chart), Mars, and also it is situated in the sign of mars. All these clealy indicates no child. krushna > " Lettens " <dmlettens > > > children >Mon, 12 Feb 2001 16:19:45 +0100 > >Respected Krushna, >This is the chart of a person who has no children >I tried to understand why >female born 23 of june 1952 at 03.30 hours, zone -1 >lat 7E29 >Long 48N32 >asc 23°26 taurus CHECK THIS IT SHOULD BE GEMINI 21:17 Sun 9°22 gemini - 3 >bindus >Moon 17°38 gemini - 3 bindus >Mars 10°03 Libra - 4 bindus >Mercury 25°06 gemini - bindus >Jupiter 20°05 aries 6 bindus >Venus 8°52 gemini 5 bindus >Saturn 16°08 virgo 3 bindus >By taking the 5th house (virgo) as B the Sun becomes the 12th lord and >influences other plantes. BUT Sun canot take this negative signification of >12th lord. >I feel Saturn's presence in the 5th is not a sufficient reason to deny >children >If I think about conception I can look at the 12th as B and there Jupiter >as 12th lord is of course a restricting influence. But conception could >have happend in other sub periods. >If I look at the 9th house as B, Jupiter becomes again lord of the 12th >from B and I have the same question >This person said she didn't want any children. So where do I situate that ? >Does your system explain the possibility of having or not having children, >and/or also the possibility of not wanting any. >By looking at her chart I have the feeling that she is too involved with >herself to think about having children, but this has nothing to do with >strenght of planets in worksheet. >Could you comment on this chart please >Many thanks >Margarita _______________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 17, 2001 Report Share Posted February 17, 2001 Respected Krushna, Thanks for answering my question. I understand perfectly the reasoning. The only problem is the asc. At that given time and place the Sun is far from up because it's if fact only 02h30 in the morning. Even if it's the longest day of the year in these latitudes, it's still night. I tried three different programs and with the same ayanamsa I obtain 23° Taurus. So the only possible error must be that the birthtime is not correct otherwise this problem cannot be explained. Thanks anyway for looking at the problem Best regards Margarita - krushna kalani J.K. <krushanain Saturday, February 17, 2001 11:44 AM Re: children > > Dear Margarita, > Regarding no childern: > With the given data, the ascendent is Gemini. Even If the DST considered > it remain same. My Ayannansha came as 22:10:16, as per my computer. You have > given Taurus ascendent. Please check the same. > All other planets are within reasonable limit. > The Moon ( lord of house D, gives zero in 12th house (A) and Saturn gives > zero in 5th house (B). Lord of house C is situated in 12th from B. > The F.Karak planet Venus, is in Ararda, which spoils it. and It is > with in 3 degrees from Sun. So the F. Karak looses its karakatva. > Zero Points due to Saturn in 5th house and zero points due to Moon in > 12th house indicates no child. > The Natural karak Jupiter is in the sight of Sixth lord ( of the > chart), Mars, and also it is situated in the sign of mars. > > All these clealy indicates no child. > krushna > > > " Lettens " <dmlettens > > > > > > children > >Mon, 12 Feb 2001 16:19:45 +0100 > > > >Respected Krushna, > >This is the chart of a person who has no children > >I tried to understand why > >female born 23 of june 1952 at 03.30 hours, zone -1 > >lat 7E29 > >Long 48N32 > >asc 23°26 taurus CHECK THIS IT SHOULD BE GEMINI 21:17 Sun 9°22 gemini - 3 > >bindus > >Moon 17°38 gemini - 3 bindus > >Mars 10°03 Libra - 4 bindus > >Mercury 25°06 gemini - bindus > >Jupiter 20°05 aries 6 bindus > >Venus 8°52 gemini 5 bindus > >Saturn 16°08 virgo 3 bindus > >By taking the 5th house (virgo) as B the Sun becomes the 12th lord and > >influences other plantes. BUT Sun canot take this negative signification of > >12th lord. > >I feel Saturn's presence in the 5th is not a sufficient reason to deny > >children > >If I think about conception I can look at the 12th as B and there Jupiter > >as 12th lord is of course a restricting influence. But conception could > >have happend in other sub periods. > >If I look at the 9th house as B, Jupiter becomes again lord of the 12th > >from B and I have the same question > >This person said she didn't want any children. So where do I situate that ? > >Does your system explain the possibility of having or not having children, > >and/or also the possibility of not wanting any. > >By looking at her chart I have the feeling that she is too involved with > >herself to think about having children, but this has nothing to do with > >strenght of planets in worksheet. > >Could you comment on this chart please > >Many thanks > >Margarita > > _______________________ > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 17, 2001 Report Share Posted February 17, 2001 Dear Margarita, The Sun rise for the place is 2:34:34 am and sun set is 06:29:40 pm for the day. the Gemini ascendent starts at 1:54:57 am and ends 04:14:01. I think this will clear the matter. krushna > " Lettens " <dmlettens > > >Re: children >Sat, 17 Feb 2001 15:22:04 +0100 > >Respected Krushna, >Thanks for answering my question. I understand perfectly the reasoning. The >only problem is the asc. At that given time and place the Sun is far from >up >because it's if fact only 02h30 in the morning. Even if it's the longest >day >of the year in these latitudes, it's still night. I tried three different >programs and with the same ayanamsa I obtain 23° Taurus. So the only >possible error must be that the birthtime is not correct otherwise this >problem cannot be explained. >Thanks anyway for looking at the problem >Best regards >Margarita >- >krushna kalani J.K. <krushanain > >Saturday, February 17, 2001 11:44 AM >Re: children > > > > > > Dear Margarita, > > Regarding no childern: > > With the given data, the ascendent is Gemini. Even If the DST >considered > > it remain same. My Ayannansha came as 22:10:16, as per my computer. You >have > > given Taurus ascendent. Please check the same. > > All other planets are within reasonable limit. > > The Moon ( lord of house D, gives zero in 12th house (A) and Saturn >gives > > zero in 5th house (B). Lord of house C is situated in 12th from B. > > The F.Karak planet Venus, is in Ararda, which spoils it. and It >is > > with in 3 degrees from Sun. So the F. Karak looses its karakatva. > > Zero Points due to Saturn in 5th house and zero points due to >Moon >in > > 12th house indicates no child. > > The Natural karak Jupiter is in the sight of Sixth lord ( of >the > > chart), Mars, and also it is situated in the sign of mars. > > > > All these clealy indicates no child. > > krushna > > > > > " Lettens " <dmlettens > > > > > > > > > children > > >Mon, 12 Feb 2001 16:19:45 +0100 > > > > > >Respected Krushna, > > >This is the chart of a person who has no children > > >I tried to understand why > > >female born 23 of june 1952 at 03.30 hours, zone -1 > > >lat 7E29 > > >Long 48N32 > > >asc 23°26 taurus CHECK THIS IT SHOULD BE GEMINI 21:17 Sun 9°22 gemini - >3 > > >bindus > > >Moon 17°38 gemini - 3 bindus > > >Mars 10°03 Libra - 4 bindus > > >Mercury 25°06 gemini - bindus > > >Jupiter 20°05 aries 6 bindus > > >Venus 8°52 gemini 5 bindus > > >Saturn 16°08 virgo 3 bindus > > >By taking the 5th house (virgo) as B the Sun becomes the 12th lord and > > >influences other plantes. BUT Sun canot take this negative >signification >of > > >12th lord. > > >I feel Saturn's presence in the 5th is not a sufficient reason to deny > > >children > > >If I think about conception I can look at the 12th as B and there >Jupiter > > >as 12th lord is of course a restricting influence. But conception could > > >have happend in other sub periods. > > >If I look at the 9th house as B, Jupiter becomes again lord of the 12th > > >from B and I have the same question > > >This person said she didn't want any children. So where do I situate >that >? > > >Does your system explain the possibility of having or not having >children, > > >and/or also the possibility of not wanting any. > > >By looking at her chart I have the feeling that she is too involved >with > > >herself to think about having children, but this has nothing to do with > > >strenght of planets in worksheet. > > >Could you comment on this chart please > > >Many thanks > > >Margarita > > > > >_______________________ > > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at >http://www.hotmail.com. > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 29, 2001 Report Share Posted March 29, 2001 Dear Margarita, I am writing few laws about children. To day I will post part of it. and remaining tomorrow. If any law or point remains I will, explain time to time. This will help for other members also to under stand. I will take the example given by you for complete analysis with the lesson. thanks krushna > " Lettens " <dmlettens > > > children >Thu, 29 Mar 2001 17:36:13 +0200 > >Respected Krushna, listmembers, >As we were discussing " children " I was thinking about following charts of a >couple that married about 2 years ago;they have no children. But I think >they never will have any. Could you look if my reasoning is correct Krushna >? >Female born 20 january 1973 at 10h47 a.m >Long 4E20 - lat 50N50 >asc 9°11 pisces > >Male born 15 april 1960 at 09h40 a.m. >long 4E20 - lat 50N50 >asc 16°27 gemini > >Her chart >Looking at the 5th house as B we see that Saturn aspects houses A, B and C, >so there certainly must be a delay in having children. Saturn is also lord >of A >Saturn is also the 12th from rashi asc >The 12th from B (Mercury) aspects house B >Looking at the " origin " of children and the 12th as B we see that the lord >of the 12 (Saturn) again aspects B >Mercury the FK of 12 and lord of C is in the 12th from B >The lord of the 6th aspects the 5th >In navamsha, Moon, lord of 5th is with lord of 6th and Saturn moves to >Moonsign. >Even if all planets have good points for the fifth, Mars has 0 points in >the 2nd which is house D for children > >His chart >His main period of Venus FK of the 5th has passed. >Mercury who is samdharmi is lord of the 12th from B, so will not give >results, neither will Ketu. Other significator planets cannot give results >because of aspect on house A, B or C. >Venus, lord of B is with Mercury, the 12th lord. >Venus being NK for the 12th and FK for the 5th is with Saturn in navamsha >Looking at the 12th as B, we see how Mars, the 12th from B aspects B and C >All planets also have good points in the worksheet for this 5th house > >I have nevertheless the feeling that there will be no children. >Thanks and best regards >Margarita > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 1, 2001 Report Share Posted April 1, 2001 Dear Margarita, You have given two charts, for children. For femal chart you have taken Summer time saving one hour. Is it correct? You have not mentioned DST in the data. Please confirm. I think in Jan 1973 there was no DST. For male chart DST was in force from 10th April 1960. So DST should be considered. You have not mentioned it. Please confirm. krushna > " Lettens " <dmlettens > > > children >Thu, 29 Mar 2001 17:36:13 +0200 > >Respected Krushna, listmembers, >As we were discussing " children " I was thinking about following charts of a >couple that married about 2 years ago;they have no children. But I think >they never will have any. Could you look if my reasoning is correct Krushna >? >Female born 20 january 1973 at 10h47 a.m >Long 4E20 - lat 50N50 >asc 9°11 pisces > >Male born 15 april 1960 at 09h40 a.m. >long 4E20 - lat 50N50 >asc 16°27 gemini > >Her chart >Looking at the 5th house as B we see that Saturn aspects houses A, B and C, >so there certainly must be a delay in having children. Saturn is also lord >of A >Saturn is also the 12th from rashi asc >The 12th from B (Mercury) aspects house B >Looking at the " origin " of children and the 12th as B we see that the lord >of the 12 (Saturn) again aspects B >Mercury the FK of 12 and lord of C is in the 12th from B >The lord of the 6th aspects the 5th >In navamsha, Moon, lord of 5th is with lord of 6th and Saturn moves to >Moonsign. >Even if all planets have good points for the fifth, Mars has 0 points in >the 2nd which is house D for children > >His chart >His main period of Venus FK of the 5th has passed. >Mercury who is samdharmi is lord of the 12th from B, so will not give >results, neither will Ketu. Other significator planets cannot give results >because of aspect on house A, B or C. >Venus, lord of B is with Mercury, the 12th lord. >Venus being NK for the 12th and FK for the 5th is with Saturn in navamsha >Looking at the 12th as B, we see how Mars, the 12th from B aspects B and C >All planets also have good points in the worksheet for this 5th house > >I have nevertheless the feeling that there will be no children. >Thanks and best regards >Margarita > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 2, 2001 Report Share Posted April 2, 2001 Respected Krushna, The data are correct. For the female there is no DST (born in winter)but she is born at 09h45 GMT or 10h45 CET (GMT+1) For the male there is no DST at that time (not between 1946 and 1976) in western Europe, so his data are correct for 08h40 GMT or 09h40 CET (GMT+1) Best regards Margarita - krushna kalani J.K. <krushanain Monday, April 02, 2001 7:05 AM Re: children > Dear Margarita, > You have given two charts, for children. > For femal chart you have taken Summer time saving one hour. Is it correct? > You have not mentioned DST in the data. Please confirm. I think in Jan 1973 > there was no DST. > For male chart DST was in force from 10th April 1960. So DST should be > considered. You have not mentioned it. Please confirm. > krushna > > > > " Lettens " <dmlettens > > > > > > children > >Thu, 29 Mar 2001 17:36:13 +0200 > > > >Respected Krushna, listmembers, > >As we were discussing " children " I was thinking about following charts of a > >couple that married about 2 years ago;they have no children. But I think > >they never will have any. Could you look if my reasoning is correct Krushna > >? > >Female born 20 january 1973 at 10h47 a.m > >Long 4E20 - lat 50N50 > >asc 9°11 pisces > > > >Male born 15 april 1960 at 09h40 a.m. > >long 4E20 - lat 50N50 > >asc 16°27 gemini > > > >Her chart > >Looking at the 5th house as B we see that Saturn aspects houses A, B and C, > >so there certainly must be a delay in having children. Saturn is also lord > >of A > >Saturn is also the 12th from rashi asc > >The 12th from B (Mercury) aspects house B > >Looking at the " origin " of children and the 12th as B we see that the lord > >of the 12 (Saturn) again aspects B > >Mercury the FK of 12 and lord of C is in the 12th from B > >The lord of the 6th aspects the 5th > >In navamsha, Moon, lord of 5th is with lord of 6th and Saturn moves to > >Moonsign. > >Even if all planets have good points for the fifth, Mars has 0 points in > >the 2nd which is house D for children > > > >His chart > >His main period of Venus FK of the 5th has passed. > >Mercury who is samdharmi is lord of the 12th from B, so will not give > >results, neither will Ketu. Other significator planets cannot give results > >because of aspect on house A, B or C. > >Venus, lord of B is with Mercury, the 12th lord. > >Venus being NK for the 12th and FK for the 5th is with Saturn in navamsha > >Looking at the 12th as B, we see how Mars, the 12th from B aspects B and C > >All planets also have good points in the worksheet for this 5th house > > > >I have nevertheless the feeling that there will be no children. > >Thanks and best regards > >Margarita > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________ > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 2, 2001 Report Share Posted April 2, 2001 Fear Margarita, It's O.K. Now. Considering the long and lat. I have taken GMT, So got difference. With GMT +1 It is O.K. krushna > " Lettens " <dmlettens > > >Re: children >Mon, 2 Apr 2001 08:31:11 +0200 > >Respected Krushna, >The data are correct. >For the female there is no DST (born in winter)but she is born at 09h45 GMT >or 10h45 CET (GMT+1) >For the male there is no DST at that time (not between 1946 and 1976) in >western Europe, so his data are correct for 08h40 GMT or 09h40 CET (GMT+1) >Best regards >Margarita >- >krushna kalani J.K. <krushanain > >Monday, April 02, 2001 7:05 AM >Re: children > > > > Dear Margarita, > > You have given two charts, for children. > > For femal chart you have taken Summer time saving one hour. Is it >correct? > > You have not mentioned DST in the data. Please confirm. I think in Jan >1973 > > there was no DST. > > For male chart DST was in force from 10th April 1960. So DST >should >be > > considered. You have not mentioned it. Please confirm. > > krushna > > > > > > > " Lettens " <dmlettens > > > > > > > > > children > > >Thu, 29 Mar 2001 17:36:13 +0200 > > > > > >Respected Krushna, listmembers, > > >As we were discussing " children " I was thinking about following charts >of >a > > >couple that married about 2 years ago;they have no children. But I >think > > >they never will have any. Could you look if my reasoning is correct >Krushna > > >? > > >Female born 20 january 1973 at 10h47 a.m > > >Long 4E20 - lat 50N50 > > >asc 9°11 pisces > > > > > >Male born 15 april 1960 at 09h40 a.m. > > >long 4E20 - lat 50N50 > > >asc 16°27 gemini > > > > > >Her chart > > >Looking at the 5th house as B we see that Saturn aspects houses A, B >and >C, > > >so there certainly must be a delay in having children. Saturn is also >lord > > >of A > > >Saturn is also the 12th from rashi asc > > >The 12th from B (Mercury) aspects house B > > >Looking at the " origin " of children and the 12th as B we see that the >lord > > >of the 12 (Saturn) again aspects B > > >Mercury the FK of 12 and lord of C is in the 12th from B > > >The lord of the 6th aspects the 5th > > >In navamsha, Moon, lord of 5th is with lord of 6th and Saturn moves to > > >Moonsign. > > >Even if all planets have good points for the fifth, Mars has 0 points >in > > >the 2nd which is house D for children > > > > > >His chart > > >His main period of Venus FK of the 5th has passed. > > >Mercury who is samdharmi is lord of the 12th from B, so will not give > > >results, neither will Ketu. Other significator planets cannot give >results > > >because of aspect on house A, B or C. > > >Venus, lord of B is with Mercury, the 12th lord. > > >Venus being NK for the 12th and FK for the 5th is with Saturn in >navamsha > > >Looking at the 12th as B, we see how Mars, the 12th from B aspects B >and >C > > >All planets also have good points in the worksheet for this 5th house > > > > > >I have nevertheless the feeling that there will be no children. > > >Thanks and best regards > > >Margarita > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >_______________________ > > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at >http://www.hotmail.com. > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 25, 2001 Report Share Posted June 25, 2001 Dear Margarita, You are correct, I made the mistake in D.O.B., and not checked again. You are correct with your findings. But still I see some Dim light in the Rahu sub in Moon Main. Rahu is situated in 10th house 'E'. Ofcource the moon is in no way connected to Jupiter which is NK and FK. This lady may not be having her M.C. period regular. It may be delayed. The Mars is also not good. Her health may not be very good. She might be having some type of complaint daily. Instead of going for negative result, I take some +ve side. Other wise I am agree with you. One more check is there, such persons marry in the period of planet having less points. krushna , " Lettens " <dmlettens@s...> wrote: > Respected Krushna, > This is a chart of female with relatively low points. Up to now she has no children. I think she can nevertheless conceive in this Sun/Venus period . > Here are her data 20th of may 1972 at Samsun Turkey at 04h 15 am. DTS on; zone 2 (makes 01:15 G.M.T.) > lat : 41N17 - long 36E20. > Asc Aries - Sun & Saturn Taurus - Venus & Mars Gemini - Moon Leo - Jupiter Sag - Ketu Cancer. > My reasoning goes as follows: Sun , Venus and Saturn have enough points to give results. Venus and Saturn are Samdharmi and Venus is in Saturn navamsha. Sun is with Saturn in D Venus is lord of D and aspecting the lord of the 12th in house C. Saturn is lord of E in D, so these 3 seem to act together. For the 12th house, the combination seens also to work. Conception could then take place. Of course the child will then be born in Moon/Moon, but then Moon is having weak points for houses related to childbirth except the 12th. How do I figure this out please ? Or is it indicated in the chart that she will not have children ? Jupiter of course takes points from the Moon and as lord of the 12th he is responsible for the overall low points in the worksheet. Is this enough to deny children altogether ? Moon will also give results for the 8th and 12th houses and this doesn't seem connected to birth ? > Thanks and best regards > Margarita Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 25, 2001 Report Share Posted June 25, 2001 Respected Krushna, Thanks you so much for your feedback. In this way I learn to reason according to the system which up to now (in my opinion) is giving best results. She married in march 1995; that was in Venus/Ketu and that works fine and planets giving results are not too low. But, as you say, there is always something wrong and her health is not strong; she is the worrying type and this takes up a lot of her energy so there is not much energy left to enjoy life. Kind regards Margarita - krushanain Monday, June 25, 2001 12:09 PM Re: children Dear Margarita, You are correct, I made the mistake in D.O.B., and not checked again. You are correct with your findings. But still I see some Dim light in the Rahu sub in Moon Main. Rahu is situated in 10th house 'E'. Ofcource the moon is in no way connected to Jupiter which is NK and FK. This lady may not be having her M.C. period regular. It may be delayed. The Mars is also not good. Her health may not be very good. She might be having some type of complaint daily. Instead of going for negative result, I take some +ve side. Other wise I am agree with you. One more check is there, such persons marry in the period of planet having less points.krushna , "Lettens" <dmlettens@s...> wrote:> Respected Krushna,> This is a chart of female with relatively low points. Up to now she has no children. I think she can nevertheless conceive in this Sun/Venus period .> Here are her data 20th of may 1972 at Samsun Turkey at 04h 15 am. DTS on; zone 2 (makes 01:15 G.M.T.)> lat : 41N17 - long 36E20.> Asc Aries - Sun & Saturn Taurus - Venus & Mars Gemini - Moon Leo - Jupiter Sag - Ketu Cancer.> My reasoning goes as follows: Sun , Venus and Saturn have enough points to give results. Venus and Saturn are Samdharmi and Venus is in Saturn navamsha. Sun is with Saturn in D Venus is lord of D and aspecting the lord of the 12th in house C. Saturn is lord of E in D, so these 3 seem to act together. For the 12th house, the combination seens also to work. Conception could then take place. Of course the child will then be born in Moon/Moon, but then Moon is having weak points for houses related to childbirth except the 12th. How do I figure this out please ? Or is it indicated in the chart that she will not have children ? Jupiter of course takes points from the Moon and as lord of the 12th he is responsible for the overall low points in the worksheet. Is this enough to deny children altogether ? Moon will also give results for the 8th and 12th houses and this doesn't seem connected to birth ?> Thanks and best regards> Margarita Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 25, 2001 Report Share Posted June 25, 2001 Dear Margarita, She married in Ketu sub, which represents Saturn and Moon. As a natural trend of Ketu is more to wards Saturn. Saturn here is having 11 points for 7th house, which are less. When the person is devoid of Child, marriage is generaly performed in the sub of weak planet (Having less points for 7th house). This case is of same type. Let us hope some thing good in sub of Rahu. Your study for the system is very satisfactory. Soon you will have good authority in the system. krushna , " Lettens " <dmlettens@s...> wrote: > Respected Krushna, > Thanks you so much for your feedback. In this way I learn to reason according to the system which up to now (in my opinion) is giving best results. She married in march 1995; that was in Venus/Ketu and that works fine and planets giving results are not too low. But, as you say, there is always something wrong and her health is not strong; she is the worrying type and this takes up a lot of her energy so there is not much energy left to enjoy life. > Kind regards > Margarita > - > krushanain > > Monday, June 25, 2001 12:09 PM > Re: children > > > Dear Margarita, > You are correct, I made the mistake in D.O.B., and not checked > again. > You are correct with your findings. But still I see some Dim > light in the Rahu sub in Moon Main. Rahu is situated in 10th > house 'E'. Ofcource the moon is in no way connected to Jupiter which > is NK and FK. > This lady may not be having her M.C. period regular. It may be > delayed. The Mars is also not good. Her health may not be very good. > She might be having some type of complaint daily. > Instead of going for negative result, I take some +ve side. > Other wise I am agree with you. > One more check is there, such persons marry in the period of > planet having less points. > krushna > > > > > , " Lettens " <dmlettens@s...> > wrote: > > Respected Krushna, > > This is a chart of female with relatively low points. Up to now she > has no children. I think she can nevertheless conceive in this > Sun/Venus period . > > Here are her data 20th of may 1972 at Samsun Turkey at 04h 15 am. > DTS on; zone 2 (makes 01:15 G.M.T.) > > lat : 41N17 - long 36E20. > > Asc Aries - Sun & Saturn Taurus - Venus & Mars Gemini - Moon Leo - > Jupiter Sag - Ketu Cancer. > > My reasoning goes as follows: Sun , Venus and Saturn have enough > points to give results. Venus and Saturn are Samdharmi and Venus is > in Saturn navamsha. Sun is with Saturn in D Venus is lord of D and > aspecting the lord of the 12th in house C. Saturn is lord of E in D, > so these 3 seem to act together. For the 12th house, the combination > seens also to work. Conception could then take place. Of course the > child will then be born in Moon/Moon, but then Moon is having weak > points for houses related to childbirth except the 12th. How do I > figure this out please ? Or is it indicated in the chart that she > will not have children ? Jupiter of course takes points from the Moon > and as lord of the 12th he is responsible for the overall low points > in the worksheet. Is this enough to deny children altogether ? Moon > will also give results for the 8th and 12th houses and this doesn't > seem connected to birth ? > > Thanks and best regards > > Margarita > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 19, 2001 Report Share Posted November 19, 2001 Dear Margarita, Actually 1st house is ninth from 5th. which gives result for last birth of the child (Punarjanma). More over 1st and 5th lords are lord of D and E for 3rd house (Parakram), If these lords are not powerful for 5th house reduces one of the parakram, {As per Hindu mythology, there are three types of parakram, in short 1) Upgrading self, aquiring good knowedge, serving the socity 2)Earning good money, upgrading family, parents, and giving good name to the family 3) Giving birth to the good children, teaching good habits good education to them, etc etc. ( Sorry I cant explain in proper way)} One more yoga: If ninth house is having zero point due to any planet there is chances for no child. This law depends upon situation of other significators. krushna , " dmlettens " <dmlettens@s...> wrote: > Respected Krushna, > Following rule denies children : Lords of 1st, 5th and 7th with low points. > OK > 5th lord with low points I understand > 7th lord with low points I can also agree because 7th is house A for the 12 > (conception) > 1st lord with low points I don't grasp very well. Is this because this is > house A for the 6th and one has to be " healthy " to have children ? > Could you tell me if my reasoning is right. If not, could you explain > please. > Many thanks and best regards > Margarita Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 20, 2001 Report Share Posted November 20, 2001 Thank you Krushna, I'm not very familiar with all this but I will try to grasp things Best regards Margarita krushanain [krushanain]Monday, November 19, 2001 8:42 PM Subject: Re: childrenDear Margarita, Actually 1st house is ninth from 5th. which gives result for last birth of the child (Punarjanma). More over 1st and 5th lords are lord of D and E for 3rd house (Parakram), If these lords are not powerful for 5th house reduces one of the parakram, {As per Hindu mythology, there are three types of parakram, in short 1) Upgrading self, aquiring good knowedge, serving the socity 2)Earning good money, upgrading family, parents, and giving good name to the family 3) Giving birth to the good children, teaching good habits good education to them, etc etc. ( Sorry I cant explain in proper way)} One more yoga: If ninth house is having zero point due to any planet there is chances for no child. This law depends upon situation of other significators.krushna , "dmlettens" <dmlettens@s...> wrote:> Respected Krushna,> Following rule denies children : Lords of 1st, 5th and 7th with low points.> OK> 5th lord with low points I understand> 7th lord with low points I can also agree because 7th is house A for the 12> (conception)> 1st lord with low points I don't grasp very well. Is this because this is> house A for the 6th and one has to be "healthy" to have children ?> Could you tell me if my reasoning is right. If not, could you explain> please.> Many thanks and best regards> Margarita Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 15, 2004 Report Share Posted January 15, 2004 Dear Dadhi, From you wifes worksheet its very clear from the points that last 1/3rd sector of Guru antra will give her conception. If you study the status and are not clear if a planet can give results then you can go to Saptamsa and gauge the status. For studying sex of the child Krushnaji has given in the lesson for child birth he has discolsed a chart that was given to him by his Guru Shri Brij Gopal Shastriji. In that you find out the running age of the girl and the aadhana nakshatra and you can get the sex of the child from the chart. That chart cannot be found anywhere else except in the lesson. All these things are given in quite detail in the lessons. Please go through them it will clear such questions. Hope that helps, Thanking you, Cheers !!! Ash --- Dadhi <denis wrote: > > Dear Ash, > > If we study conception time or birth time, does it > have anything to do with samptamsa chart ? > > Also, how we determine sex of child in KAS? > > Thank you for help, > > All the best, > Dadhi > > > > Dear Dadhi, > For child birth we study the conception time which > falls in Guru > antra in the last 1/3rd sector. Guru has become > strong due to Mars > i.e Mars gives its points to Guru and Guru > controls it. > Guru is also LoE for 11th house and is situated > with LoD and is > Naturak Karak. > Thanking you, > Cheers !!! > Ash > > > Hotjobs: Enter the " Signing Bonus " Sweepstakes http://hotjobs.sweepstakes./signingbonus Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 16, 2004 Report Share Posted January 16, 2004 Dear Ash, Thank you very much for your answers. I do not undestand first sentence. Which wife ? All the best, Dadhi - Ash Sam Thursday, January 15, 2004 5:06 PM Re: Children Dear Dadhi,From you wifes worksheet its very clear from thepoints that last 1/3rd sector of Guru antra will giveher conception. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 16, 2004 Report Share Posted January 16, 2004 Dear Dadhi, My appologies. I meant your Friends wifes chart. Sorry about that, Cheers !!! Ash , " Dadhi " <denis@d...> wrote: > Dear Ash, > Thank you very much for your answers. > > I do not undestand first sentence. Which wife ? > > All the best, > Dadhi > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 3, 2006 Report Share Posted May 3, 2006 Hello Preeya, Just for knowledge , did this couple marry in 1997 ? Thanks and regards. Ramesh Mishra preekaria <preekaria wrote: Respected Members, Below are the details-- Husband--- Aug 7, 1970/ 2.38 a.m/Chennai Wife----june 11, 1971/9.40 p.m./ Mumbai I request you all to kindly analyse their charts for progeny. I would like to know if they are going to have any more children. They have a daughter born on 28 aug 2001/0.33 a.m./ abington, PA(40n07, 75w07). If yes, when are they going to have another baby? Thank you very much in advance Preeya Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 3, 2006 Report Share Posted May 3, 2006 Yes, you are right...they got married in march 1997 let me know if you need any other details Thank you, Preeya , ramesh mishra <aarceemastro2002 wrote: > > Hello Preeya, Just for knowledge , did this couple marry in 1997 ? Thanks and regards. > Ramesh Mishra > > preekaria <preekaria wrote: > Respected Members, > Below are the details-- > Husband--- Aug 7, 1970/ 2.38 a.m/Chennai > Wife----june 11, 1971/9.40 p.m./ Mumbai > > I request you all to kindly analyse their charts for progeny. I would > like to know if they are going to have any more children. They have a > daughter born on 28 aug 2001/0.33 a.m./ abington, PA(40n07, 75w07). If > yes, when are they going to have another baby? > > Thank you very much in advance > > Preeya > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 4, 2006 Report Share Posted May 4, 2006 Respected members, Could you please analyse the charts to see if the couple can and will have more children...if so when. they have been trying to have another child for last 3 years with no luck. the wife is very depressed. your insight into this will be very much appreciated thank you very much preeya Below are the details-- Husband--- Aug 7, 1970/ 2.38 a.m/Chennai Wife----june 11, 1971/9.40 p.m./ Mumbai , " Manoshi Chatterjee " <khallopapa wrote: > > Dear Ramesh, > > could you please let us know how did arrived at the conclusion? We > can all learn from your analysis. Congrats on your timing the > marriage right. > > --Manoshi > > > > , " preekaria " > <preekaria@> wrote: > > > > Yes, you are right...they got married in march 1997 > > let me know if you need any other details > > > > Thank you, > > Preeya > > > > , ramesh mishra > > <aarceemastro2002@> wrote: > > > > > > Hello Preeya, Just for knowledge , did this couple marry in > 1997 ? > > Thanks and regards. > > > Ramesh Mishra > > > > > > preekaria <preekaria@> wrote: > > > Respected Members, > > > Below are the details-- > > > Husband--- Aug 7, 1970/ 2.38 a.m/Chennai > > > Wife----june 11, 1971/9.40 p.m./ Mumbai > > > > > > I request you all to kindly analyse their charts for progeny. I > > would > > > like to know if they are going to have any more children. They > > have a > > > daughter born on 28 aug 2001/0.33 a.m./ abington, PA(40n07, > > 75w07). If > > > yes, when are they going to have another baby? > > > > > > Thank you very much in advance > > > > > > Preeya > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 4, 2006 Report Share Posted May 4, 2006 Dear Preeya, Namaskar, I am just checking the husband's chart. He is running through Jup antara in Jup MD up to 09 Jun 2006. Jup has 14 points for 12th house and 16 points for 5th house. Jup is LoE for 5th and he is in house E for 12th with good points. But he is aspected by three malefics Sa, Ma and Ra. I want to know whether his wife is in conception period now or was there any miscarriage earlier.?. I may check the chart of wife during my next leisure time. Till then please feed me back.on my above querry. Thanks and regards. Ramesh Mishra preekaria <preekaria wrote: Respected members, Could you please analyse the charts to see if the couple can and will have more children...if so when. they have been trying to have another child for last 3 years with no luck. the wife is very depressed. your insight into this will be very much appreciated thank you very much preeya Below are the details-- Husband--- Aug 7, 1970/ 2.38 a.m/Chennai Wife----june 11, 1971/9.40 p.m./ Mumbai , " Manoshi Chatterjee " <khallopapa wrote: > > Dear Ramesh, > > could you please let us know how did arrived at the conclusion? We > can all learn from your analysis. Congrats on your timing the > marriage right. > > --Manoshi > > > > , " preekaria " > <preekaria@> wrote: > > > > Yes, you are right...they got married in march 1997 > > let me know if you need any other details > > > > Thank you, > > Preeya > > > > , ramesh mishra > > <aarceemastro2002@> wrote: > > > > > > Hello Preeya, Just for knowledge , did this couple marry in > 1997 ? > > Thanks and regards. > > > Ramesh Mishra > > > > > > preekaria <preekaria@> wrote: > > > Respected Members, > > > Below are the details-- > > > Husband--- Aug 7, 1970/ 2.38 a.m/Chennai > > > Wife----june 11, 1971/9.40 p.m./ Mumbai > > > > > > I request you all to kindly analyse their charts for progeny. I > > would > > > like to know if they are going to have any more children. They > > have a > > > daughter born on 28 aug 2001/0.33 a.m./ abington, PA(40n07, > > 75w07). If > > > yes, when are they going to have another baby? > > > > > > Thank you very much in advance > > > > > > Preeya > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 4, 2006 Report Share Posted May 4, 2006 Namaskar Rameshji, Thank you for your response. As per my knowledge, the wife is not pregnant at this time. Thanks Preeya , ramesh mishra <aarceemastro2002 wrote: > > Dear Preeya, Namaskar, > I am just checking the husband's chart. He is running through Jup antara in Jup MD up to 09 Jun 2006. Jup has 14 points for 12th house and 16 points for 5th house. Jup is LoE for 5th and he is in house E for 12th with good points. But he is aspected by three malefics Sa, Ma and Ra. I want to know whether his wife is in conception period now or was there any miscarriage earlier.?. I may check the chart of wife during my next leisure time. Till then please feed me back.on my above querry. Thanks and regards. > Ramesh Mishra > > preekaria <preekaria wrote: > Respected members, > Could you please analyse the charts to see if the couple can and > will have more children...if so when. > they have been trying to have another child for last 3 years with no > luck. the wife is very depressed. > your insight into this will be very much appreciated > thank you very much > preeya > > Below are the details-- > Husband--- Aug 7, 1970/ 2.38 a.m/Chennai > Wife----june 11, 1971/9.40 p.m./ Mumbai > > , " Manoshi > Chatterjee " <khallopapa@> wrote: > > > > Dear Ramesh, > > > > could you please let us know how did arrived at the conclusion? We > > can all learn from your analysis. Congrats on your timing the > > marriage right. > > > > --Manoshi > > > > > > > > , " preekaria " > > <preekaria@> wrote: > > > > > > Yes, you are right...they got married in march 1997 > > > let me know if you need any other details > > > > > > Thank you, > > > Preeya > > > > > > , ramesh mishra > > > <aarceemastro2002@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hello Preeya, Just for knowledge , did this couple marry in > > 1997 ? > > > Thanks and regards. > > > > Ramesh Mishra > > > > > > > > preekaria <preekaria@> wrote: > > > > Respected Members, > > > > Below are the details-- > > > > Husband--- Aug 7, 1970/ 2.38 a.m/Chennai > > > > Wife----june 11, 1971/9.40 p.m./ Mumbai > > > > > > > > I request you all to kindly analyse their charts for progeny. > I > > > would > > > > like to know if they are going to have any more children. They > > > have a > > > > daughter born on 28 aug 2001/0.33 a.m./ abington, PA(40n07, > > > 75w07). If > > > > yes, when are they going to have another baby? > > > > > > > > Thank you very much in advance > > > > > > > > Preeya > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 5, 2006 Report Share Posted May 5, 2006 Dear Preeya, Namaskar, I analysed both the charts of female and male. Female chart does indicate conception and birth of second child during Venus and Sun antara. I may say that female may deliver second child by Oct 2007. But I am facing difficulties to time the birth of child in male chart. His chart is showing conception during his Sat antara but delivery of child is going out of line. His Jup is spoiled due to occupation in Libra rasi. His Venus is also spoiled being >43 deg from Sun.Therefore I am stuck up to this point. If Sat is giving child then he is not coming in line to 5th house. I think Manoshi and Ash may help you as well as us also. Manoshi and Ash please help us and look into this chart. Thanks and regards. Ramesh Mishra preekaria <preekaria wrote: Respected members, Could you please analyse the charts to see if the couple can and will have more children...if so when. they have been trying to have another child for last 3 years with no luck. the wife is very depressed. your insight into this will be very much appreciated thank you very much preeya Below are the details-- Husband--- Aug 7, 1970/ 2.38 a.m/Chennai Wife----june 11, 1971/9.40 p.m./ Mumbai , " Manoshi Chatterjee " <khallopapa wrote: > > Dear Ramesh, > > could you please let us know how did arrived at the conclusion? We > can all learn from your analysis. Congrats on your timing the > marriage right. > > --Manoshi > > > > , " preekaria " > <preekaria@> wrote: > > > > Yes, you are right...they got married in march 1997 > > let me know if you need any other details > > > > Thank you, > > Preeya > > > > , ramesh mishra > > <aarceemastro2002@> wrote: > > > > > > Hello Preeya, Just for knowledge , did this couple marry in > 1997 ? > > Thanks and regards. > > > Ramesh Mishra > > > > > > preekaria <preekaria@> wrote: > > > Respected Members, > > > Below are the details-- > > > Husband--- Aug 7, 1970/ 2.38 a.m/Chennai > > > Wife----june 11, 1971/9.40 p.m./ Mumbai > > > > > > I request you all to kindly analyse their charts for progeny. I > > would > > > like to know if they are going to have any more children. They > > have a > > > daughter born on 28 aug 2001/0.33 a.m./ abington, PA(40n07, > > 75w07). If > > > yes, when are they going to have another baby? > > > > > > Thank you very much in advance > > > > > > Preeya > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 6, 2006 Report Share Posted May 6, 2006 Dear Manoshiji and Ashji, I request you both to kindly analyze the charts and give an insight regarding progeny for this couple Below are the details-- Husband--- Aug 7, 1970/ 2.38 a.m/Chennai Wife----june 11, 1971/9.40 p.m./ Mumbai Thank you very much in advance Preeya , ramesh mishra <aarceemastro2002 wrote: > > Dear Preeya, Namaskar, > I analysed both the charts of female and male. Female chart does indicate conception and birth of second child during Venus and Sun antara. I may say that female may deliver second child by Oct 2007. > But I am facing difficulties to time the birth of child in male chart. His chart is showing conception during his Sat antara but delivery of child is going out of line. His Jup is spoiled due to occupation in Libra rasi. His Venus is also spoiled being >43 deg from Sun.Therefore I am stuck up to this point. If Sat is giving child then he is not coming in line to 5th house. > I think Manoshi and Ash may help you as well as us also. Manoshi and Ash please help us and look into this chart. > Thanks and regards. > Ramesh Mishra > > preekaria <preekaria wrote: > Respected members, > Could you please analyse the charts to see if the couple can and > will have more children...if so when. > they have been trying to have another child for last 3 years with no > luck. the wife is very depressed. > your insight into this will be very much appreciated > thank you very much > preeya > > Below are the details-- > Husband--- Aug 7, 1970/ 2.38 a.m/Chennai > Wife----june 11, 1971/9.40 p.m./ Mumbai > > , " Manoshi > Chatterjee " <khallopapa@> wrote: > > > > Dear Ramesh, > > > > could you please let us know how did arrived at the conclusion? We > > can all learn from your analysis. Congrats on your timing the > > marriage right. > > > > --Manoshi > > > > > > > > , " preekaria " > > <preekaria@> wrote: > > > > > > Yes, you are right...they got married in march 1997 > > > let me know if you need any other details > > > > > > Thank you, > > > Preeya > > > > > > , ramesh mishra > > > <aarceemastro2002@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hello Preeya, Just for knowledge , did this couple marry in > > 1997 ? > > > Thanks and regards. > > > > Ramesh Mishra > > > > > > > > preekaria <preekaria@> wrote: > > > > Respected Members, > > > > Below are the details-- > > > > Husband--- Aug 7, 1970/ 2.38 a.m/Chennai > > > > Wife----june 11, 1971/9.40 p.m./ Mumbai > > > > > > > > I request you all to kindly analyse their charts for progeny. > I > > > would > > > > like to know if they are going to have any more children. They > > > have a > > > > daughter born on 28 aug 2001/0.33 a.m./ abington, PA(40n07, > > > 75w07). If > > > > yes, when are they going to have another baby? > > > > > > > > Thank you very much in advance > > > > > > > > Preeya > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 6, 2006 Report Share Posted May 6, 2006 Dear Preeya, Ramesh has answered your query well. Next antra is powerful for the lady i.e. sun antra but at the same time the boy is running sa which is weak for 5th. Currently the lady is running venus antra who is weak for 11th. Please overlap the charts and check the strong planet that might give result for the boy for 5th house and for the girls for 5th and 11th. The boy has ve to sun > 43deg20 asp by sa and with ju in libra. The girl has Ve in krittika. I think some one asked Manoshi about happiness in marriage and for that one would need the chart of spouse. Then again, why do both charts or couple that marry show problems.... something to ponder... Cheers !!! Ash , " preekaria " <preekaria wrote: > > Dear Manoshiji and Ashji, > I request you both to kindly analyze the charts and give an insight > regarding progeny for this couple > Below are the details-- > Husband--- Aug 7, 1970/ 2.38 a.m/Chennai > Wife----june 11, 1971/9.40 p.m./ Mumbai > > Thank you very much in advance > Preeya > , ramesh mishra > <aarceemastro2002@> wrote: > > > > Dear Preeya, Namaskar, > > I analysed both the charts of female and male. Female chart does > indicate conception and birth of second child during Venus and Sun > antara. I may say that female may deliver second child by Oct 2007. > > But I am facing difficulties to time the birth of child in male > chart. His chart is showing conception during his Sat antara but > delivery of child is going out of line. His Jup is spoiled due to > occupation in Libra rasi. His Venus is also spoiled being >43 deg > from Sun.Therefore I am stuck up to this point. If Sat is giving > child then he is not coming in line to 5th house. > > I think Manoshi and Ash may help you as well as us also. Manoshi > and Ash please help us and look into this chart. > > Thanks and regards. > > Ramesh Mishra > > > > preekaria <preekaria@> wrote: > > Respected members, > > Could you please analyse the charts to see if the couple can and > > will have more children...if so when. > > they have been trying to have another child for last 3 years with > no > > luck. the wife is very depressed. > > your insight into this will be very much appreciated > > thank you very much > > preeya > > > > Below are the details-- > > Husband--- Aug 7, 1970/ 2.38 a.m/Chennai > > Wife----june 11, 1971/9.40 p.m./ Mumbai > > > > , " Manoshi > > Chatterjee " <khallopapa@> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Ramesh, > > > > > > could you please let us know how did arrived at the conclusion? > We > > > can all learn from your analysis. Congrats on your timing the > > > marriage right. > > > > > > --Manoshi > > > > > > > > > > > > , " preekaria " > > > <preekaria@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Yes, you are right...they got married in march 1997 > > > > let me know if you need any other details > > > > > > > > Thank you, > > > > Preeya > > > > > > > > , ramesh mishra > > > > <aarceemastro2002@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hello Preeya, Just for knowledge , did this couple marry in > > > 1997 ? > > > > Thanks and regards. > > > > > Ramesh Mishra > > > > > > > > > > preekaria <preekaria@> wrote: > > > > > Respected Members, > > > > > Below are the details-- > > > > > Husband--- Aug 7, 1970/ 2.38 a.m/Chennai > > > > > Wife----june 11, 1971/9.40 p.m./ Mumbai > > > > > > > > > > I request you all to kindly analyse their charts for > progeny. > > I > > > > would > > > > > like to know if they are going to have any more children. > They > > > > have a > > > > > daughter born on 28 aug 2001/0.33 a.m./ abington, PA (40n07, > > > > 75w07). If > > > > > yes, when are they going to have another baby? > > > > > > > > > > Thank you very much in advance > > > > > > > > > > Preeya > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 13, 2006 Report Share Posted December 13, 2006 Dear Prema, I would like to attempt your chart. Please reply with a few significant events in your life (to validate your time of birth time). Regards, Gita , " ksprema " <ksprema wrote: > > Hello Bala and respected members, > > Recently I went thru IVF treatment and the results came negative > again. This was my 3rd attempt. I am disappointed and also > frustrated. I've also posted my concern on vedic astro group. > What does my chart say? is there denial of children? Will I ever > have children? I am posting my birth details again for you to > provide your opinion. > > DOB : 3rd June 1970 > POB : Calcutta, India > TOB : 9:15 PM (IST) > > My husband's DOB : 3rd Feb 1964 > POB : Hyderabad, India > TOB : not known > > should I try again, if yes, when is the best time? This will be my > last attempt. I would really appreciate your views. > > THank you > Prema > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 14, 2006 Report Share Posted December 14, 2006 Hello Gita and other respected list memebers, Here are some of the events : I have 2 sisters, 1 elder to me and 1 younger. All of us did post graduation. Father retd.as head master, mother housewife. Both my sisters are gold medalists and university toppers. I am average student(first class student but no distinction).Completed M.Sc (Statictics) and P.G. Dip. in CS from India ( no breaks in education). Started working from Oct'1993 - first job as a computer instructor for couple of months, then worked as admn. assistant for about 2.5years. Oct'1996 - Got appointed as Comp. Programmer in a Public Sector Feb 1999 - Landed in USA. Nov 1999 - Got married in India. Apr 2002 - Bought house in USA Sept 2004 - Got a good break in a law firm in IT dept with good pay and recognition. No children, went for IVF treatment thrice, no success. Let me know if you need any more details. Thanks. Prema , " kaslearner " <kaslearner wrote: > > Dear Prema, > > I would like to attempt your chart. Please reply with a few > significant events in your life (to validate your time of birth time). > > Regards, > Gita > > > > > , " ksprema " > <ksprema@> wrote: > > > > Hello Bala and respected members, > > > > Recently I went thru IVF treatment and the results came negative > > again. This was my 3rd attempt. I am disappointed and also > > frustrated. I've also posted my concern on vedic astro > group. > > What does my chart say? is there denial of children? Will I ever > > have children? I am posting my birth details again for you to > > provide your opinion. > > > > DOB : 3rd June 1970 > > POB : Calcutta, India > > TOB : 9:15 PM (IST) > > > > My husband's DOB : 3rd Feb 1964 > > POB : Hyderabad, India > > TOB : not known > > > > should I try again, if yes, when is the best time? This will be my > > last attempt. I would really appreciate your views. > > > > THank you > > Prema > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.