Guest guest Posted September 13, 2009 Report Share Posted September 13, 2009 Mr Kaul should give his own calculations to prove that the date arrived at is wrong and why it is wrong.Mr Kaul's post does not contain any cogent reasons but only criticism.Even his assumption that the date arrived at must be wrong is without any scientific argument.Mr Kaul please rebut each and every point made in arriving at the date of Ramayana by giving scientific(with references of scientific journals preferably) instead of simply dismissing the painstaking research done by others by using the derisive language that he has used.This is not acceptable I hope to others also on this list.This is not done. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 14, 2009 Report Share Posted September 14, 2009 He wants to prove that Lord Rama was mythical person. Otherwise he would have come out with his own date for Lord Rama. --- On Sun, 9/13/09, hattangadi_suresh <hattangadi_suresh wrote: hattangadi_suresh <hattangadi_suresh Dating of Ramayana period. Sunday, September 13, 2009, 6:45 AM Mr Kaul should give his own calculations to prove that the date arrived at is wrong and why it is wrong.Mr Kaul's post does not contain any cogent reasons but only criticism.Even his assumption that the date arrived at must be wrong is without any scientific argument.Mr Kaul please rebut each and every point made in arriving at the date of Ramayana by giving scientific(with references of scientific journals preferably) instead of simply dismissing the painstaking research done by others by using the derisive language that he has used.This is not acceptable I hope to others also on this list.This is not done. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.