Guest guest Posted October 22, 2009 Report Share Posted October 22, 2009 The post event analysis (22 Oct 2009...) of SENSEX Forecast posted today morning by me has been uploaded 15 minutes ago at http://kundalee.wikidot.com/ <http://kundalee.wikidot.com/> -VJ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 23, 2009 Report Share Posted October 23, 2009 To All, Please read the following explanation carefully, which will convince you that ASTROLOGY is fully cable of 100% accurate forecasting of SENSEX, and the drawbacks are merely due to our human limitations : we falter either in selecting the right method and approach or in complete evaluation and comparison of charts. First of all, let me clear the confusion. 57th segment is the LINE-SEGMENT following 57th POINT. Evaluate not the point but the succeeding the line-segment. 57th POINT signifies the horoscope of Bombay made at that particular time, and this horoscope remained effective for that duration following 57th POINT which is dilineated by 57th LINE-SEGMENT. The 57th line-segment is AFTER the 57th point. Do not analyze or compare POINTS, but analyze LINE-SEGMENTS. The slope of 57th LINE-SEGMENT of my prediction and that of SENSEX exactly match each other. Hence, my prediction was almost 100% accurate as far as 57th horoscope was concerned. But 56th segment, marked with a big red dot in the post-event analysis file, proved to be opposite in slope, and the reason was found to be navamsha chart which I could not analyze in the forecast but now I am including navamsha module in my stock-software. Let me explain the method. Most of D1 charts are near-replica of D1 charts of one day before by an average time lag of 3.94 minutes ((1 day / 365.25 days), same phenomenon occurs in the case of D9 charts too. If Sensex-graph of Oct-21 is superimposed over that of Oct-22 after advancing the former graph by 3.94 minutes, we will instantly notice some remarkable similarity in waveform over considerable portion of 6-hour stretch. But ther are important differences, which must be known beforeford for successful prediction of SENSEX. For prediction, I compare all 26 horoscopes of Bombay of today with those of tomorrow, and make corrections in the graph of today to prepare the graph of tomorrow. Thus, 26 x 2 = 52 horoscopes need to be judged and then mutually compared. Then, two 12-hour national charts of today need to be compared with those of tomorrow. In addition, national chart of Nakshatra (eg, currently Chitra, lasting for ~14 days) and Chaitraadi year need to be evaluated for predicting general gradient of the day in question. In additiopn to these 58 charts, navamsha charts also need to be evaluated, which make the task onerous. If popular method of D9 is used, there will be 27 D9 charts in 6 hours, but if bhaavachalita is divided into 9 parts and D9 is cast in the manner of bhaavachalita, then there may be 26 x 9 = 234 D9 charts in 6 hours. I currently use the popular method, which has worked admirably so far in all cases and I do not feel the need to make D9 according to detailed method. Still, it is hard to evaluate and compare 58 + (27 x 2) = 112 charts per 6 hour. I compare main bhaava-chalita charts (D1) of Bombay from 9:55 am to 16:00 pm, and used to ignore D9 (navamsha charts) due to time constraints. Normally, D9 charts are less significant than D1, but D9 becomes more potent when some powerful influence is working positively or negatively on 2nd house in D9 and D1 has relatively weaker forces operating on 2nd house at that time. Now, let me illustrate the most glaring error in my forecast for 22 Oct, which was 56th line-segment ending at 57th point : it was result of 56th D1. 56th D1 of Oct-21 and Oct-22 had negligible differences. But D9 had one difference in the initial portion of 56th line-segment (before 14:19:50 pm on Oct-21) : Navaamshesh (ie, lord of 1rst house in D9) Moon was in 4th house of its strong enemy svagrihi Venus on Oct-21 but was in 8th house with Saturn of moolatrikona on 22nd Oct, all other things remaining unchanged, which made the curve on 22-Oct go UP in the initial portion of segment-56 because Moon's aspect on 2nd house was full from 8th house. But in the latter portion of segment-56, curve changed in the reverse direction (after 14:32:07 pm on Oct-22) because lord 0f 11th Moon was in 2nd house on 21-Oct but in 6th house on 22-Oct, all other things remaining unchanged, which made the curve on 22-Oct go DOWN in the latter portion of segment-56. In the middle portion of segment-56, we find no difference in waveform. Thus, there are three parts of segment-56 analytically. On Oct-21, segment-56 was initially lower and went to higher point, thus making an ascending gradient, while the opposite occurred on 22nd Oct. Neglecting D9, I found no difference in D1 of both days and therefore projected same gradient for segment-56. But D9 suggested opposite gradient for same segment. Since D1 of both days were same, results of D9 must be added to those of D1, which will reverse the gradient of D1. In this case, differences in D9 charts of both days are related to aspects of strong planets on 2nd house, the role of D9 should be higher. I am now including D9 in my stock-software, but I will not be able to evaluate 112 charts per day because I have other assignments too. But it is clear that if D1 and D9 are both used, a correct prediction of stock prices is feasible ASTROLOGICALLY, which is almost impossible otherwise. For initial 3.4 hours, my prediction was very near the actual graph, and later important differences in D9 made 2-3 major errors out of 26 segments. As far as individuals are concerned, stock trading is related to speculation & c, but when cumulative stock prices of the whole country is concerned, it is related SOLELY to 2nd house of wealth, because it reflects the Market-capitalization of all companies which form a good part of national wealth and influence the remaining sectores of national economy. Influence of D9 suggests that 10th house in D1 may be important too, although I have not analyzed any other house than 2nd GRAPHICALLY till now. I have no respect for theories not founded on practical tests. Most of the time, I read theoretical messages, few astrologers have time for practical, because stock-prediction is difficult and risky. You can skip the following paragraph if you wish : Whether one uses physical astronomy or Suryasiddhanta, graph based on D1 will show minor differences, but D9 will show major differences and Suryasiddhanta proves to be superior astrologically. In national charts, Suryasiddhanta is far more reliable astrologically even in the case of D1. Suryasiddhanta proves to be accurate astrologically, and physical astronomy is correct PHYSICALLY. The criterion of test is examination of phalita results, and not academic debates over vain ideas. But I have concluded that the very mention of Suryasiddhanta is repugnant to many astrologers. I have no desire to waste my time over vain debates devoid of practical test, and most of these astrologers are in no mood to test Suryasiddhanta. Hence, any dialogue with them is meaningless. I am perfecting my software for stock-trading, and I will post forecasts from time to time. -Vinay Jha =================== ====== vedic astrology , " VJha " <vinayjhaa16 wrote: > > The post event analysis (22 Oct 2009...) of SENSEX Forecast posted today > morning by me has been uploaded 15 minutes ago at > http://kundalee.wikidot.com/ <http://kundalee.wikidot.com/> > > -VJ > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 23, 2009 Report Share Posted October 23, 2009 To All, Please read the following explanation carefully (after reading the previous post and the linked analysis file), which will convince you that ASTROLOGY is fully cable of 100% accurate forecasting of SENSEX, and the drawbacks are merely due to our human limitations : we falter either in selecting the right method and approach or in complete evaluation and comparison of charts. First of all, let me clear the confusion. 57th segment is the LINE-SEGMENT following 57th POINT. Evaluate not the point but the succeeding the line-segment. 57th POINT signifies the horoscope of Bombay made at that particular time, and this horoscope remained effective for that duration following 57th POINT which is dilineated by 57th LINE-SEGMENT. The 57th line-segment is AFTER the 57th point. Do not analyze or compare POINTS, but analyze LINE-SEGMENTS. The slope of 57th LINE-SEGMENT of my prediction and that of SENSEX exactly match each other. Hence, my prediction was almost 100% accurate as far as 57th horoscope was concerned. But 56th segment, marked with a big red dot in the post-event analysis file, proved to be opposite in slope, and the reason was found to be navamsha chart which I could not analyze in the forecast but now I am including navamsha module in my stock-software. Let me explain the method. Most of D1 charts are near-replica of D1 charts of one day before by an average time lag of 3.94 minutes ((1 day / 365.25 days), same phenomenon occurs in the case of D9 charts too. If Sensex-graph of Oct-21 is superimposed over that of Oct-22 after advancing the former graph by 3.94 minutes, we will instantly notice some remarkable similarity in waveform over considerable portion of 6-hour stretch. But ther are important differences, which must be known beforeford for successful prediction of SENSEX. For prediction, I compare all 26 horoscopes of Bombay of today with those of tomorrow, and make corrections in the graph of today to prepare the graph of tomorrow. Thus, 26 x 2 = 52 horoscopes need to be judged and then mutually compared. Then, two 12-hour national charts of today need to be compared with those of tomorrow. In addition, national chart of Nakshatra (eg, currently Chitra, lasting for ~14 days) and Chaitraadi year need to be evaluated for predicting general gradient of the day in question. In additiopn to these 58 charts, navamsha charts also need to be evaluated, which make the task onerous. If popular method of D9 is used, there will be 27 D9 charts in 6 hours, but if bhaavachalita is divided into 9 parts and D9 is cast in the manner of bhaavachalita, then there may be 26 x 9 = 234 D9 charts in 6 hours. I currently use the popular method, which has worked admirably so far in all cases and I do not feel the need to make D9 according to detailed method. Still, it is hard to evaluate and compare 58 + (27 x 2) = 112 charts per 6 hour. I compare main bhaava-chalita charts (D1) of Bombay from 9:55 am to 16:00 pm, and used to ignore D9 (navamsha charts) due to time constraints. Normally, D9 charts are less significant than D1, but D9 becomes more potent when some powerful influence is working positively or negatively on 2nd house in D9 and D1 has relatively weaker forces operating on 2nd house at that time. Now, let me illustrate the most glaring error in my forecast for 22 Oct, which was 56th line-segment ending at 57th point : it was result of 56th D1. 56th D1 of Oct-21 and Oct-22 had negligible differences. But D9 had one difference in the initial portion of 56th line-segment (before 14:19:50 pm on Oct-21) : Navaamshesh (ie, lord of 1rst house in D9) Moon was in 4th house of its strong enemy svagrihi Venus on Oct-21 but was in 8th house with Saturn of moolatrikona on 22nd Oct, all other things remaining unchanged, which made the curve on 22-Oct go UP in the initial portion of segment-56 because Moon's aspect on 2nd house was full from 8th house. But in the latter portion of segment-56, curve changed in the reverse direction (after 14:32:07 pm on Oct-22) because lord 0f 11th Moon was in 2nd house on 21-Oct but in 6th house on 22-Oct, all other things remaining unchanged, which made the curve on 22-Oct go DOWN in the latter portion of segment-56. In the middle portion of segment-56, we find no difference in waveform. Thus, there are three parts of segment-56 analytically. On Oct-21, segment-56 was initially lower and went to higher point, thus making an ascending gradient, while the opposite occurred on 22nd Oct. Neglecting D9, I found no difference in D1 of both days and therefore projected same gradient for segment-56. But D9 suggested opposite gradient for same segment. Since D1 of both days were same, results of D9 must be added to those of D1, which will reverse the gradient of D1. In this case, differences in D9 charts of both days are related to aspects of strong planets on 2nd house, the role of D9 should be higher. I am now including D9 in my stock-software, but I will not be able to evaluate 112 charts per day because I have other assignments too. But it is clear that if D1 and D9 are both used, a correct prediction of stock prices is feasible ASTROLOGICALLY, which is almost impossible otherwise. For initial 3.4 hours, my prediction was very near the actual graph, and later important differences in D9 made 2-3 major errors out of 26 segments. As far as individuals are concerned, stock trading is related to speculation & c, but when cumulative stock prices of the whole country is concerned, it is related SOLELY to 2nd house of wealth, because it reflects the Market-capitalization of all companies which form a good part of national wealth and influence the remaining sectores of national economy. Influence of D9 suggests that 10th house in D1 may be important too, although I have not analyzed any other house than 2nd GRAPHICALLY till now. I have no respect for theories not founded on practical tests. Most of the time, I read theoretical messages, few astrologers have time for practical, because stock-prediction is difficult and risky. You can skip the following paragraph if you wish : Whether one uses physical astronomy or Suryasiddhanta, graph based on D1 will show minor differences, but D9 will show major differences and Suryasiddhanta proves to be superior astrologically. In national charts, Suryasiddhanta is far more reliable astrologically even in the case of D1. Suryasiddhanta proves to be accurate astrologically, and physical astronomy is correct PHYSICALLY. The criterion of test is examination of phalita results, and not academic debates over vain ideas. But I have concluded that the very mention of Suryasiddhanta is repugnant to many astrologers. I have no desire to waste my time over vain debates devoid of practical test, and most of these astrologers are in no mood to test Suryasiddhanta. Hence, any dialogue with them is meaningless. I am perfecting my software for stock-trading, and I will post forecasts from time to time. -Vinay Jha =================== ====== , " VJha " <vinayjhaa16 wrote: > > The post event analysis (22 Oct 2009...) of SENSEX Forecast posted today > morning by me has been uploaded 15 minutes ago at > http://kundalee.wikidot.com/ <http://kundalee.wikidot.com/> > > -VJ > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.