Assyrians and Antiquity of VEDAS

[Guest guest]

Dear Sunil, Prashant,

 

There is some research published in Astrological Magazines by a American

Mike Davis, later changed to Pavan kumar.

 

where in he says all the European nations r agraharams or colonies of

fidderent Rishies

 

Maharishi Atri=Italy

Skanda= scandaniva

Brighu-Brihat or briton

Swetha Maha Muni-Sweeden and so on

 

I am recalliong bits of it came as a series

 

so if u have access to them well and good else will hunt for them and scan

them in my collection

 

my collections is from May 85-Dec 07 and now again.

 

Max Muller is a touge with a hidden agenda of denigrating, twisting our

culture with the lowest meansings tanken conveniently as sanskrit is a multi

layered language and at times contextual use of a word cangive differentt

meanings and a deliberate mischief maker esp his work on Manusmrithis is

one that has caused havoc, with no one reading the original sanskrit work

many grat features r built in to protect the weaker sections weaker sex in

diff cstes say interest on borrowings r higher for higher castes and lower

for lower ones

punishments were also ssevere higher the caste.

 

grace time, or mercy petitons were also considered more inthe favor of the

lower sections.

 

in practice some have also misused it esp the last 300 odd years

so adds weight ot Max mullers works than reality

 

 

Best wishes

Prashant

 

On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 9:31 PM, prashant <praspandey wrote:

 

>

>

> There have been two major waves of AVESTA which we can trace from history.

>

> In my view first and ancient wave would have taken birth near about

> 4000-3500 BCE

> but one of the greatest historian(First Historian of the world) of his

> times Herodotus has said that, that ancient wave would have been around

> 6000-8000 BCE (10,000yrs older) and it is fantastic.

>

> If conflict between Vedic ppl is of 8000-10,000 yrs older (in my view

> 6000yrs old) than certainly VEDAS could be 10,000 yrs old when Sapta Sindhu

> part was not having rivers and it is also supported by VEDAS as VEDIC ppl

> learnt Farming slowly slowly.

>

> But it looks that Herodotus point is correct that first wave of AVESTA

> would have emerged near about in 6000-8000BCE as in Ashur Banipal's ( Plz

> notice his name, they use to write their name as Ashur something something

> so you may guess who were they , they were the other section of VEDIC ppl

> who parted because of some controversies near Himalaya ) library there have

> been talk of cardinal points (and after analyzing the time when VE was there

> means in Taurus, it gives date of 3100 BCE) but in tablets there is no talk

> of NKS, but according to texts which are available in India in Sanskrit

> those shows that around 4500 BCE NKS were already there so Herodotus point

> looks correct that Assyrians would have parted in very ancient time(means 2

> waves of AVESTA) means when Indians were aware of only Cardinal points.

> Concept of 360 degree around one point in 2-D and Sexagesimal system was

> penetrated in Egypt by Assyrians and they also gave mathematics to construct

> Pyramid (Pythagorean Triplets) and I am sure when they parted, that time

> circles theory were not discovered by VEDIC ppl.

>

> I was having one wrong impression that 36 part of Zodiac( Enuma anu enlil

> ie MUL-APIN tablets ) was given by Egyptian, it was my mistake as ppl had

> floated wrong theory on internet (Approx all person on internet have floated

> this wrong detail), one Historian of Europe corrected me and he said all

> those tablets (MUL-APIN tablets) which we know of Egyptians and of

> Babylonians(Old Babylonaians not Neo Bablylonains who were Zoroasterians)

> are of Assyrians, yes later same theory was replicated there ie in EGYPT as

> ASSYRIANS dynasty was also there after some time and near about 2000 BCE.

> Interesting thing in those tablets there is talk of cardinal point and of

> Enuma anu enlil but not of NKS, but when Zoroasterians took control of

> Chaldeans(Neo Babylonian) area in the form of Achaemenian Dynasty than there

> were NKS.

>

> New wave of AVESTA which ZOROASETR tried to revive was in the form of

> Achaemenian Dynasty and Sassnid dynasty and it was near about 1200 BCE, I am

> talking of revival and Migration from Himalayan region so it takes time to

> make Dynasty as those ppl didn't attack on Persia and they migrated over

> there and in Persia at the time of ZOROASTER there was already worship of

> ASHURA but ZOROASTER concentrated only on AHURA-MAZDA so they were different

> ppl so new wave took birth in the form of new religion ie Zoroasterian.

>

> ANCIENT WAVE WAS ASSYRIAN (REAL NAME - ASHURA) AND NOW THOSE ASSYRIANS ARE

> IN GERMANY, FRANCE, DUTCH and all have been converted to Christian religion.

>

> GERMANS(in the form of Assyrians) ARE CLOSE PPL OF HIMALAYAN PPL as

> Swastika have been found over there, and they have been arch enemy of JEWS

> as same JEWS has thrown them out from their ancient land(SYRIA, IRAQ etc

> etc…), i think ADOLF HITLER was aware of real ancient history (not

> propounded by Max-Muller) so he was against JEWS.

>

> Now all Assyrians have been converted to Christianity due to Muslims

> invasion in their area. And they migrated to Europe through Turkey and near

> Shore of Black and Caspian Sea. Assyrians also took with them Swastik and

> which were found with them in GERMANY.

>

> So through Assyrians one major chuck of Sanskrit speaking ppl reached over

> there and so we find Sanskrit language over there.

>

> Document which have been presented to Hittie in Sanskrit in 1600 BCE were

> by Assyrians not by Indians.

>

> I am sure that if archaeologist excavates Syrian and Iraqi places than

> definitely they will get the inscriptions of Sanskrit in Cuneiform script

> over there and also sign of Swastika like which have been found in GERMANY.

> Some archaeologist already guessed in Assyrian region there would be big

> civilization like of Harappa.

>

> Indra are the same Assyrians who used to attack in ancient times due to

> religious conflict in the region which were DEVA worship populated areas,So

> imagine about ROMILAS thnking what she talks, I have shown ASHURA were

> already ther in ASSYRIANS but she says they would be EURASIAN Ha Ha Ha Ha

> Ha…..

>

> Sathiya gayi hai in the greed of Klugne award (Noble Prize)

>

> Dasyu was very old dynasty which also came in existence from same VEDIC ppl

> because they also wanted to worship Ashuras etc etc but they were defeated

> and about them there is talk in VEDAS. But listen stories of ROMILA and Max

> Muller….

>

> Darius the great of Achaemenian dynasty (Basically Dasyu, Dasyu means slave

> for Deva worshippers, not for ASHURA worshipper), christened himself in the

> same name from that old dynasty.

>

> Regs,

> Prashant Pandey

>

> <%40>,

> Sunil Bhattacharjya <sunil_bhattacharjya wrote:

> >

> > Dear friends,

> >

> > David Pingree's chronology is not correct as he followed the Max

> Mullerian chronology. If you want to relate the ancient Indian chronology

> with the chronology of the Zorastrianism you have to remember that the

> Zorastrian tradition places Zarathustra around 300 years before Alexander's

> invasion of Iran. Inscriptions of Archimenian kings also support that, The

> date of Zarathustra is around 630 BCE.

> >

> > Regards,

> >

> > Sunil K. Bhattacharjya

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >