Date of Birth of Bhagwan Ram!

[Guest guest]

Dear freidns,

 

Jai Shri Ram!

 

<So Mr. Krishen admits that he has not understood the ramifications. I hope

he will understand it after pondering over the same for more time.>

 

This is yet another funny twist to his own statement by Shri Bhattacharjya

himself since his original question was, " It seems Mr. Krishen did not read

my earlier mail explaining the ramifications of projecting Lord Rama as God

in the Balakanda, either by Valmiki himself or subsequently by another

sage. "

 

Can there be any Hindu who does not know that Bhagwan Ram is a divine

incarnation of Vishnu and Valmiki Maharshi also has depicted Him like that

in Balakanda and Uttarakanda? If some " vedic astrologer " does not believe

Bhagwan Ram to be an Incarnation of Vishnu, that is his fault! But why

should he present Maharshi Valmiki as the villain of the peace who would not

like Bhagwan Ram to be presented as a divine Incarnations? it is therefore

actually for Shri Bhattacharjya to understand the ramifications of his own

statement/stand of denying the status of a divine Incarnation to Bhagwan

Ram!

 

< Secondly he is lying when he says that I agreed to the date December 3,

7323 BCE as Lord Rama's birth. I said that Dr. Vartak gave a ballpark figure

around 7323 BCE from the precessional data and a historian would be

satisfied with that. One may question the exact date given by Dr. Vartak

but should not question the ballpark figure given from the precessional

data.>

 

Yet another confusing statement from Shri Bhattacharjya! When did Bhagwan

Ram Incarnate according to him, if not on December 4, 7323 BCE? What type

of agreement does he have with the “ballpark” figure of Dr. Vartak then,

since Dr. Vartak claims that Shri Ram Incarnated on that date but Shri

Bhattacharjya says He did not incarnate on that date exactly!

 

<Mr. Krishen is talking about millions of years. Has he gone out of mind?>

 

On the one hand, Shri Bhattacharjya wants everybody to believe in the gospel

truth of the Surya Sidahnta, since that is an aarsha work of astronomy

according to him. And if it is the same Surya Sidhanta, that talks of Treta

Yuga, when Bhagwan Ram incarnated, having occurred millions of years back,

it means that Maya the mlechha had gone out of mind actually! Naturally,

Shri Bhattacharjya will have to decide whether to believe in Maya the

mlechha or not!

 

Secondly, if the Valmiki Ramayana itself says that Bhagwan Ram was destined

to rule for eleven thousand years and He did actually rule for eleven

thousand years, how could He have incarnated in 7323 BCE as per the same

Valmiki Ramayana? And the Valmiki Ramayana also says that He incarnated in

Treta Yuga. When did that yuga start according to Shri Bhattacharjya and

how and why?

 

<Let Mr. Krishen spell out what according to him is the date of Lord Rama

even if it is a ballpark figure. If he has no idea what could be Lord Rama's

date then let keep his mouth shut.>

 

Mr. Bhatacharjya has no faith in the Valmiki Ramayana, since that claims

that Bhagwan Ram was a divine incarnation whereas Mr. Bhattacharjya does not

believe in that! Mr. Bhattacharjya has no faith in the Surya Sidhanta since

that claims that Treta Yuga did actually take place millions of years back!

He has faith only in " Vedic astrology " , obviously! As such, he should " do

some nashta-jataka prashna " himself and try to establish the date of birth

of Bhagwan Ram himself, instead of asking others to do that job for him. If

he cannot do that job himself, in spite of being a “Vedic astrologer”then

" let him keep his mouth shut " .

 

Jai Shri Ram!

 

A K Kaul

 

 

 

, Sunil Bhattacharjya

<sunil_bhattacharjya wrote:

 

>

 

Re: [VRI] Fwd: [ind. & West. Astrology] Fw: Re:

Dating of Ramayana Period

 

 

 

Dear friends,

 

So Mr. Krishen admits that he has not understood the ramifications. I hope

he

will understand it after pondering over the same for more time. Let him not

be

impatient.

 

Secondly he is lying when he says that I agreed to the date December 3, 7323

BCE

as Lord Rama's birth. I said that Dr. Vartak gave a ballpark figure around

7323

BCE from the precessional data and a historian would be satisfied withÂ

that. One may question the exact date given by Dr. Vartak but should not

question the ballpark figure given from the precessional data. Mr. Krishen

is

talking about millions of years. Has he gone out of mind?

 

Let Mr. Krishen spell out what according to him is the date of Lord Rama

even if

it is a ballpark figure. If he has no idea what could be Lord Rama's date

then

let keep his mouth shut.

 

Regards,

 

Sunil K. Bhattacharjya

 

 

 

--- On Fri, 11/6/09, Krishen <jyotirved

</post?postID=0nSNId0Hg-1grV4PHGvp

dd_s_hPoTfKakiWU0dxmaohO4wdAclGDE-zshajsX-EGg6g8-vYKv_uqtPU> > wrote:

 

Krishen <jyotirved

</post?postID=0nSNId0Hg-1grV4PHGvp

dd_s_hPoTfKakiWU0dxmaohO4wdAclGDE-zshajsX-EGg6g8-vYKv_uqtPU> >

[VRI] Fwd: [ind. & West. Astrology] Fw:

Re:

Dating of Ramayana Period

vedic_research_institute

</post?postID=aERAvm_y4g0n-AkWHTne

9U6ptt9QYSExakPHvLCAWTHsZteMAcV84tAhF92-nB3gSBK8BWY4-XU-kLASWGhIbshCt2g3xF8T

ICj6ii2906Nq>

Friday, November 6, 2009, 12:20 AM

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Â

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear friends,

 

Jai Shri Ram!

 

<It seems Mr. Krishen did not read my earlier mail explaining the

 

ramifications of projecting Lord Rama as God in the Balakanda, either by

 

Valmiki himself or.subsequently by another sage.>

 

 

 

My simple question was---and still is----that if Bhagwan Ram was

 

destined to rule for eleven thousand years as per 97th mantra of the

 

very first sarga of Balakanda and if He did rule for eleven thousand

 

years as per shlokas 12 to 14 of almost the last sarga i.e. 104 of

 

Uttarakanda i.e. the last Kanda of the Valmiki Ramayana itself, how

 

could Bhagwan Ram have incarnated on December 4, 7323 BCE, as per Dr.

 

Vartak, with whom Shri Bhattacharjya also agrees.

 

 

 

Shri Bhattacharjya must certainly ponder on the " ramifications " of his

 

self-contradictory statements, since it means that we are still living

 

in Rama Rajya and Kali yuga is still away by millions of years according

 

to Messrs Vartak and Bhattacharjya!

 

Jai Shri Ram!

 

A K Kaul

 

vedic_research_ institute, Sunil Bhattacharjya

 

<sunil_bhattacharjy a wrote:

 

>

 

> Dear friends,