Guest guest Posted November 22, 2009 Report Share Posted November 22, 2009 Dear friends, I repeat that Jyotirved had failed to give reference to Makar Rekha in any of the ancient Indian texts and this is his usual trick to bluff and then try to divert attention of the members when he is asked to substantiate what he says. Now he is making another false statement that Makara Rashi, like all the other rashis, itself is an import in about early centuries of Christian era from Greco-Chaldean, without giving any Proof. Let him first conclusively prove that the Chaldeans and the Greeks did not learn about the Rashis from India by giving ancient documentary evidence, which will require him to give the dates of any Greek / Chaldean sources, which mention rashi versus the dates of the puranas such as Vamana, Bhagavata purana and Narada Purana, which mention rashi. Till then nobody will pay attention to his ever increasing number of bluffs. Regards, Sunil K. Bhattacharjya --- On Sun, 11/22/09, jyotirved wrote: jyotirved [VRI] FW: New Vedic Panchang indiaarchaeology Cc: hinducalendar , , " 'subash razdan' " Sunday, November 22, 2009, 7:26 AM  Dear friends, Jai Shri Ram! In the above post, there has been an oversight in one of the paras, which pl. read as, “…….. as it states clearly, “agnir jyotir ahah shuklah  shanmasah uttarayanam†in place of “dhoomo ratris tatha krishnah shanmasah uttarayanamâ€. .. The oversight is regretted. Jai Shri Ram! A K Kaul   jyotirved [jyotirved@ sify.com] Sunday, November 22, 2009 3:31 PM 'indiaarchaeology' Dear friends, Jai Shri Ram! < Jyotirved has failed to give reference to Makar Rekha in ancient Indian texts and this is his usual practice. > Makara Rashi, like all the other rashis, itself is an import in about early centuries of Christian era from Greco-Chaldean  Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 22, 2009 Report Share Posted November 22, 2009 Dear friends, I repeat that Jyotirved had failed to give reference to Makar Rekha in any of the ancient Indian texts and this is his usual trick to bluff and then try to divert attention of the members when he is asked to substantiate what he says. Now he is making another false statement that Makara Rashi, like all the other rashis, itself is an import in about early centuries of Christian era from Greco-Chaldean, without giving any Proof. Let him first conclusively prove that the Chaldeans and the Greeks did not learn about the Rashis from India by giving ancient documentary evidence, which will require him to give the dates of any Greek / Chaldean sources, which mention rashi versus the dates of the puranas such as Vamana, Bhagavata purana and Narada Purana, which mention rashi. Till then nobody will pay attention to his ever increasing number of bluffs. Regards, Sunil K. Bhattacharjya --- On Sun, 11/22/09, jyotirved wrote: jyotirved [VRI] FW: New Vedic Panchang indiaarchaeology Cc: hinducalendar , , " 'subash razdan' " Sunday, November 22, 2009, 7:26 AM  Dear friends, Jai Shri Ram! In the above post, there has been an oversight in one of the paras, which pl. read as, “…….. as it states clearly, “agnir jyotir ahah shuklah  shanmasah uttarayanam†in place of “dhoomo ratris tatha krishnah shanmasah uttarayanamâ€. .. The oversight is regretted. Jai Shri Ram! A K Kaul   jyotirved [jyotirved@ sify.com] Sunday, November 22, 2009 3:31 PM 'indiaarchaeology' Dear friends, Jai Shri Ram! < Jyotirved has failed to give reference to Makar Rekha in ancient Indian texts and this is his usual practice. > Makara Rashi, like all the other rashis, itself is an import in about early centuries of Christian era from Greco-Chaldean  Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.