[WAVES-Vedic] The Views of Patrizia Norelli-Bachelet

[Guest guest]

Dear friends,

Jai Shri Ram!

< All the Rashis mentioned in the puranas are Sidereal as shown in the Vamana

purana and no other purana had contradicted that. No purana ever said that the

rashis are not sidereal.>

Rashis are imaginary twelve equal animal divisions of twelve/thirteen unequal

animal divisions of an imaginary circle called zodiac which ranges between nine

degrees aboe and nine degrees below of yet another imaginary circle known as

ecliptic. Thus those " equal aninmals " can neither be sidereal nor tropical!

The myth of nirayana and sayana rashis is also a creation of jyotishis without

any scientic basis.

As such, if Shri Bhattacharjya believes that even the Pauranic rishis had no

idea about rashi divisions being imaginary, that is his prerogative, and nobody

can help him!

Jai Shri Ram!

A K Kaul

 

, Sunil Bhattacharjya

<sunil_bhattacharjya wrote:

>

> Dear friends,

>

> All the Rashis mentioned in the puranas are Sidereal as shown in the Vamana

purana and no other purana had contradicted that. No purana ever said that the

rashis are not sidereal. Let Jyotirved show a single statement if any purana

specifically mentioned that the Rashis are not sidereeal. All  the Rashis

mentioned in the Puranas, as quoted by  Jyotirved in his  BVB6.doc,   are

sidereal. His assertions that the Rashis are not sidereal would not change what

Vamana purana says about the rashis. The Vamana purana tells us which ar the

nakshatras in a particular Rashi.. Puranas have not talked about Sayana rashi

chakra. Jyotirved is shamelessly continuing your bluffs.

>

> Regards,

>

> Sunil K. Bhattacharjya

>

>

>

> --- On Tue, 12/1/09, Krishen <jyotirved wrote:

>

> Krishen <jyotirved

> [WAVES-Vedic] Re: The Views of Patrizia

Norelli-Bachelet

>

> Tuesday, December 1, 2009, 4:22 AM

>

>