Guest guest Posted March 7, 2010 Report Share Posted March 7, 2010 HinduCalendar , " Krishen " <jyotirved wrote: Re: Any chance of Tests Shri Devi Singhji, Jai Shri Ram! <I want to say that using Math calculations and having required data something can be said which comes true.....> 1. What do you mean by " Math calculations " ? 2. What do you mean by " required data " ? 3. What do you mean by " something " ? What is the ratio of that " something " to the " whole thing " ? 4. What do you mean by " prediction " ? <If you want i can give some examples which can tells after 'n' number of days what would be Quantity/work/pressure/Torque/Dilution........any many more which is practically true for prediction after taking required data and using respective calculation methods.......> 1. How relevant/apploicable are these examples of " Torque and pressure and Dilution " etc. " data " to birth charts, which are " delineated " on the basis of twelve imaginary equal divisioins known as Mesha etc. rashis, which in themselves are fragments of a still more imaginary circle known as ecliptic? And these imaginary " twelve divisions " are supposed to have further subdivsions like navamsha and dwadashmasha so much so that even a shashtyamsha is supposed to be relevant and of immense value in giving " correct predictions " ? Further more, these imaginary twelve divisions are supposed to be ruled and even populated by inanimate wandering bodies like Mangal, Shani etc. and even the mathematical points like Rahu and Kethu, which are supposed to be most " effective " via Kalasarpa-dosha and so on? Then again, these inanimate " grahas " are supposed to make or mar a " jataka's " life through intangible dasha bhuktis which no " Maths wizard " is sure as to whether it should be Vimshotari or Ashtottari or Yogini or Kalachakra and so on or whether it should be all of them put together! Is that the " Maths calculation " you are talking about? If " Maths calculations " can " predict " everything correctly, why have the jyotishis, instead of being highly computer suavey and software experts and even mathemtaical wizards like you not been able to " predict " at least the most accurate Ayanamsha, if there exists any, in spite of having raked their brains for the last couple of thousand years? Last but not the least, do you mean to say that Bhagwan Krishna, in spite of being Omnipresent, Omnipotent and Omniscient, did not know as much " Math calculatoins " as you and that is why He did not tell Arjuna before hand whether the Kauruavas or Pandavas would win the war? Jai Shri Ram! A K Kaul HinduCalendar , devisigh <devisingh.rajput wrote: Re: [HinduCalendar] Re: Any chance of Tests Dear Krishen JI, I want to say that using Math calculations and having required data something can be said which comes true..... If you want i can give some examples which can tells after 'n' number of days what would be Quantity/work/pressure/Torque/Dilution........any many more which is practically true for prediction after taking required data and using respective calculation methods....... one can not say 'No Prediction can be possible' I am not saying anything for such gimmicks and prediction.....it is more Scientific way to look prediction.... let me know where you differ...if you agree upto this then i will continue more .... ------------------ Regards, Devisingh Krishen wrote: Shri Devi Singhji, Jai Shri Ram! <Let me know where you want from me to say Math can not predict.....> I am unable to understand what you want to convey. <--prediction not gimmicks!!!!!> Is this part a separate sentence or is it a part of the above sentence. Jai Shri Ram! A K Kaul HinduCalendar <HinduCalendar/post?postID=SH4eWyfwUQ1_SOD\ QoqWKDW8uQYNxUKudcVc5Yq4d42_Wzq165PfZH85jyX7276kt5erobT3Q3aSGc7HN0UEeiFr\ Ah0BoYt_R8Ss> , devisigh <devisingh.rajput wrote: > > Dear Krishen JI, > > I appologies due to delay in responce caused in between due to Holi and > other reasons. > > //In other words, every mathematician should know when he or she will die!// > --no,not that > > //BTW, you " appear " to be a mathematician yourself and as such// > --i do not want to comment .... " appear " ....does not matter....take time > before prediction > > //should know what is going to happen tomorrow!// > --Jim micks i never passed anything such... > > Let me know where you want from me to say Math can not predict..... > > --prediction not gimmicks!!!!! > ----------------- > Regards, > Devisingh > > > a_krishen wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Shri Devi Singhji, > > > > Jai ShriRam! > > > > <And yes...Krishna/Buddha nobody nows math that they told in their > > dialog...........buddha says i do not know how to accomplish work which > > a simple man can do...> > > > > In other words, every mathematician should know when he or she will die! > > Nay, they must even know as to when their teachers/students etc. etc. > > also will die! > > > > BTW, you " appear " to be a mathematician yourself and as such, should > > know what is going to happen tomorrow! > > > > Sharad Pawar said he did not know as to when edibles will become > > cheaper, since he was not a jyotishi, but maybe you can tell us as to > > when edible items will become within the budget of a common man like me! > > > > Jai Shri Ram! > > > > AKK > > > > HinduCalendar <HinduCalendar/post?postID=x8scaGQmvDJLGVQ\ V7L0JOe-1kTvHirF6OCf0bje3rFmZpTLfoUuahMRqnIkrmTIuUZldf1YNwHNwnVNlvqhTrlT\ wUTIlKg> > > <HinduCalend <HinduCalendar/post?postID=v9Kmw4h5Em_Ljqq\ _sm-pg9arDLXHabLX2qMFyj8vZKPBamgS1y2eGn5I3qYrB96CAA> ar%40>, devisigh devisingh.rajput@ > > wrote: > > > > > > Dear Krishen JI, > > > > > > Using Math one can predict...he need to do some calculations....that > > is > > > one dimension...that has other dimension as well....(i have not said > > > anything for gimmick) > > > Anyone can not deny prediction...predictions are always there.... > > > everything is predicted in life too.... > > > > > > when one become free from math or transcendence.....no prediction can > > be > > > applied to him and then he become Krushna.... > > > > > > Since you raised dialog of arjuna and krushna.....krushna suggested > > what > > > next required for arjuna to get journey start at next level.... > > > And yes...Krishna/Buddha nobody nows math that they told in their > > > dialog...........buddha says i do not know how to accomplish work > > which > > > a simple man can do... > > > > > > ------------------ > > > Regards, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 9, 2010 Report Share Posted March 9, 2010 HinduCalendar , " Krishen " <jyotirved wrote: Re: Any chance of Tests Shri Devi Singhji, Jai Shri Ram! <Any way my point was that Prediction can not be denied....what we see i real life that Using Math one can predict.....This is what i mean by predictions.....It is worth to say more if you have doubt here......here let me know you agree that Math can be used to predict....I definately do not mean here for Jyotish predictions...hope you take this as pure scientific predictions......One must be open that Prediction can be possible> The two programs viz. Mahesh.exe and Vasishtha.exe are examples of " using Math to make predictions " . Mahesh program gives the luni solar data, apart for Rahu/Kethu, tithi, nakshtra, Obliquity of the Ecliptic etc. from 10000 BCE to 12030 AD. Vasishtha.exe " predicts " the position of about sixty important stars from 10000 BCE to 12030 AD. But then these are not " predictions " in the sense being used these days! That is why I had asked as to why Bhagwan Krishna " did not " predict the outcome of the Mahabharata war before hand which you replied that He did not know Maths! The fact of the matter is that He was not interested in predicting those things before hand. That itself should serve as an example to the Hindu community as a whole that " those who can foresee things before hand " do not predict them because that is against the nature of Nature itself. Predicting eclipses or weather conditions is enitrely different from predicting the outcome of human efforts. Let us not confuse the two issues. Last but not the least, phalita- jyotisha has been the greatest hindrance in streamlining the Hindu calendar whereas " Maths calculations " are the greatest asset in arriveing at the correct moments of tithi, eclipses, solar ingress into Madhu, Madhava etc. months and so on. It is only through " Maths calculations " that we want to arrive at some conclusion about the nakshtras used in the Vedas and Hindu astronomers like Bhaskara and Brahmagupta etc. Jai Shri Ram! A K Kaul HinduCalendar , devisigh <devisingh.rajput wrote: > Re: [HinduCalendar] Re: Any chance of Tests Dear Krishen JI, //Is that the " Maths calculation " you are talking about?// No that is not my point....i never said anything related to such predictions.......You might surprise that all are of no use Ayanmsa and all.....rather they are Simply Tools used for predictions.....Let's not bring Jyotish....forgot that as useless system for now Any way my point was that Prediction can not be denied....what we see i real life that Using Math one can predict.....This is what i mean by predictions.....It is worth to say more if you have doubt here......here let me know you agree that Math can be used to predict....I definately do not mean here for Jyotish predictions...hope you take this as pure scientific predictions......One must be open that Prediction can be possible --hope i am clear upto this point ------------------ Regards, Devisingh Krishen wrote: Shri Devi Singhji, Jai Shri Ram! <I want to say that using Math calculations and having required data something can be said which comes true.....> 1. What do you mean by " Math calculations " ? 2. What do you mean by " required data " ? 3. What do you mean by " something " ? What is the ratio of that " something " to the " whole thing " ? 4. What do you mean by " prediction " ? <If you want i can give some examples which can tells after 'n' number of days what would be Quantity/work/pressure/Torque/Dilution........any many more which is practically true for prediction after taking required data and using respective calculation methods.......> 1. How relevant/apploicable are these examples of " Torque and pressure and Dilution " etc. " data " to birth charts, which are " delineated " on the basis of twelve imaginary equal divisioins known as Mesha etc. rashis, which in themselves are fragments of a still more imaginary circle known as ecliptic? And these imaginary " twelve divisions " are supposed to have further subdivsions like navamsha and dwadashmasha so much so that even a shashtyamsha is supposed to be relevant and of immense value in giving " correct predictions " ? Further more, these imaginary twelve divisions are supposed to be ruled and even populated by inanimate wandering bodies like Mangal, Shani etc. and even the mathematical points like Rahu and Kethu, which are supposed to be most " effective " via Kalasarpa-dosha and so on? Then again, these inanimate " grahas " are supposed to make or mar a " jataka's " life through intangible dasha bhuktis which no " Maths wizard " is sure as to whether it should be Vimshotari or Ashtottari or Yogini or Kalachakra and so on or whether it should be all of them put together! Is that the " Maths calculation " you are talking about? If " Maths calculations " can " predict " everything correctly, why have the jyotishis, instead of being highly computer suavey and software experts and even mathemtaical wizards like you not been able to " predict " at least the most accurate Ayanamsha, if there exists any, in spite of having raked their brains for the last couple of thousand years? Last but not the least, do you mean to say that Bhagwan Krishna, in spite of being Omnipresent, Omnipotent and Omniscient, did not know as much " Math calculatoins " as you and that is why He did not tell Arjuna before hand whether the Kauruavas or Pandavas would win the war? Jai Shri Ram! A K Kaul Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.