Single position and degree - Lagna and Planet

[Guest guest]

PVR NARSIMHA is completely wrong in his understanding of Bhavas.

 

Utkal.

 

 

, " Vijayadas " <vijayadas_pradeep

wrote:

>

> Dear All

>

> A planet or Lagna will only have a single point in space at a point in

time. This is the only degree that can be ascribed. From this one can

compute anyother sphuta by multipliying with the relevant number to

arrive at sphutas like navamsha, dwadashamsha, navanavamsha. These

sphutas are only to derive/identify the RASHI on to which PLANETS/LAGNA

etc have attained such relationship.

> There is no (second)degree within ''navamsha or dashamsha'' for a

planet.One who is serious can learn about these(computation/application

of lagna dwadashamsha) by studying classics.

>

> Eg. If Mars is at 1 degree in Aries - 1X9 =9 degrees , Thus its

navamsha is Aries itslef(less than 30 degrees).

>

> If it is at 2 degrees - 2X9 =18, ie its navamsha rashi is still Aries.

>

> If it is at 3 degrees - 3X9 =27, ie still its navamsha is Aries Rashi.

>

> If it is 4 degrees - 4x9 =36 Degrees, ie its amsha rashi is Taurus (

as it exceeds 30 and is less than 60 degrees)

>

> This is the sole purpose.

>

> Here the goal is not to see WHERE in Taurus or Aries. Where is a

PHYSICAL question. Navamsha is not about a physical degree. It is about

finding the Prana sambandha of a graha or Lagna Bindu. It is an intimate

subtle relation a planet or Lagna is having with a rashi by virtue of

its physical(Kshethra) position within another or same(in case of

vargottama) rashi.

>

> As many new theories are floated , every other day,having NO CLASSICAL

backing, this write up is to ignite the thoughts of seekers from a

fresh,pure and classical benchmarking.

>

> Those who are better learned are requested to give their

arguments,logic and classical references and correct us if we are wrong.

>

> Thanks

> Pradeep

>

[Guest guest]

Dear Utkal ji,

You have mentioned :

'PVR NARSIMHA is completely wrong in his understanding of Bhavas.'

Who knows the truth accept GOD.

PVR's argument has lot of worth.

There are many solutions to a problem.

Regards,

 

 

 

G. K. Goel

 

 

 

address: L-409 Sarita Vihar, New Delhi - 110076

 

tel: 011-26943689, 011-41403352,

 

mobile: 09350311433

 

 

 

 

 

utkal.panigrahi

Sun, 7 Mar 2010 19:18:42 +0000

Re: Single position and degree - Lagna and Planet

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PVR NARSIMHA is completely wrong in his understanding of Bhavas.

 

 

 

Utkal.

 

 

 

, " Vijayadas " <vijayadas_pradeep

 

wrote:

 

>

 

> Dear All

 

>

 

> A planet or Lagna will only have a single point in space at a point in

 

time. This is the only degree that can be ascribed. From this one can

 

compute anyother sphuta by multipliying with the relevant number to

 

arrive at sphutas like navamsha, dwadashamsha, navanavamsha. These

 

sphutas are only to derive/identify the RASHI on to which PLANETS/LAGNA

 

etc have attained such relationship.

 

> There is no (second)degree within ''navamsha or dashamsha'' for a

 

planet.One who is serious can learn about these(computation/application

 

of lagna dwadashamsha) by studying classics.

 

>

 

> Eg. If Mars is at 1 degree in Aries - 1X9 =9 degrees , Thus its

 

navamsha is Aries itslef(less than 30 degrees).

 

>

 

> If it is at 2 degrees - 2X9 =18, ie its navamsha rashi is still Aries.

 

>

 

> If it is at 3 degrees - 3X9 =27, ie still its navamsha is Aries Rashi.

 

>

 

> If it is 4 degrees - 4x9 =36 Degrees, ie its amsha rashi is Taurus (

 

as it exceeds 30 and is less than 60 degrees)

 

>

 

> This is the sole purpose.

 

>

 

> Here the goal is not to see WHERE in Taurus or Aries. Where is a

 

PHYSICAL question. Navamsha is not about a physical degree. It is about

 

finding the Prana sambandha of a graha or Lagna Bindu. It is an intimate

 

subtle relation a planet or Lagna is having with a rashi by virtue of

 

its physical(Kshethra) position within another or same(in case of

 

vargottama) rashi.

 

>

 

> As many new theories are floated , every other day,having NO CLASSICAL

 

backing, this write up is to ignite the thoughts of seekers from a

 

fresh,pure and classical benchmarking.

 

>

 

> Those who are better learned are requested to give their

 

arguments,logic and classical references and correct us if we are wrong.

 

>

 

> Thanks

 

> Pradeep

 

>

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

_______________

Fight for the top Test spot

http://sports.in.msn.com/cricket/