Guest guest Posted March 15, 2010 Report Share Posted March 15, 2010 Dear Mr Mathur and everyone, , DS Mathur <mathurastro wrote: > > JHora is an excellent software in the freeware category. It will be a sad day for astrology if it is transferred to other hands from the hands of the developer. I have not been fully following the discussion that went on many jyotish and SJC lists, except for one point made by Sanjay Rath's wife about erroneous calculations on many parts of the software, espacially about Narayana Dasa. When asked about these «bugs», Sarbani never answered. I concluded then that her point was only to add fuel to the flames of the conflict that is/was going on. Thankfully, Mr Bhanu Pinnamaneni, who now lives in Paris, France, and is a member of the French Jyotish list on , kindly checked the calculations and concluded calculations were correct. Formerly, I ask the French jyotish list, «Astrologie-vedique», if someone wanted to check this dasa with Parashara Light 7, which I don't have. Also, apparently Sri Jyoti Star 6 is wrong on this issue (as it do not seems to use the calculations exceptions as explained in Vedic Astrology: an Integrated Approach, from P.V.R. N. Rao). Of course, I expect an answer from Mr Andrew Foss, its designer and owner. Now, just before Mr Bhanu Pinnamaneni's check-up, I emailed Mr P.V.R. N. Rao about this Narayana dasa supposedly bug. He assured me that he calculated and encoded the software accordingly to Rath's teachings. From what I have read on lists, Mr P.V.R. N. Rao's Guru asked him not to transfer Jagannatha Hora to the public domain (that is, to become open source), since he believes it would do wrong for the sake of the software. Never have I read either that P.V.R. N. Rao intended to sell the software in the future. -- Best regards, François Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 15, 2010 Report Share Posted March 15, 2010 Hello everyone, I got an answer from Mr Andrew Foss and the Narayana Dasa , " Francois CARRIERE " <yl.car.fr wrote: > Also, apparently Sri Jyoti Star 6 is wrong on this issue (as it do not seems to use the calculations exceptions as explained in Vedic Astrology: an Integrated Approach, from P.V.R. N. Rao). Of course, I expect an answer from Mr Andrew Foss, its designer and owner. For those who use Sri Jyoti Star, there is a global option that must be set-up: Where it is written " Arudhas and Rashi Dashas " (Global Options), make sure that " Strongest " is set to " Sanjay " (for Sanjay Rath). With this option, Narayana will be calculated as thaught by Samjay Rath himself and will give the same results as Jagannatha Hora! Mr Foss also told me he also had this dasa *checked* by Sanjay Rath himself! -- Best regards, François Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 16, 2010 Report Share Posted March 16, 2010 Cher Francois, Your posting is very confusing, malheureusment! :-( Difficult to make out what came from your keyboard and what from the keyboard/email from Mr. Foss. Please take the time to repost clearly indicating who said what or the confusion will not only continue but be further amplified! Just a thought... Rohiniranjan , " Francois CARRIERE " <yl.car.fr wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > I got an answer from Mr Andrew Foss and the Narayana Dasa > > , " Francois CARRIERE " <yl.car.fr@> wrote: > > > Also, apparently Sri Jyoti Star 6 is wrong on this issue (as it do not seems to use the calculations exceptions as explained in Vedic Astrology: an Integrated Approach, from P.V.R. N. Rao). Of course, I expect an answer from Mr Andrew Foss, its designer and owner. > > For those who use Sri Jyoti Star, there is a global option that must be set-up: Where it is written " Arudhas and Rashi Dashas " (Global Options), make sure that " Strongest " is set to " Sanjay " (for Sanjay Rath). With this option, Narayana will be calculated as thaught by Samjay Rath himself and will give the same results as Jagannatha Hora! Mr Foss also told me he also had this dasa *checked* by Sanjay Rath himself! > > -- > Best regards, > François > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 16, 2010 Report Share Posted March 16, 2010 Dear Rohini, >>> [FC] Also, apparently Sri Jyoti Star 6 is wrong on this issue (as it do >>> not seems to use the calculations exceptions as explained in Vedic >>> Astrology: an Integrated Approach, from P.V.R. N. Rao). Of course, I >>> expect an answer from Mr Andrew Foss, its designer and owner. >> [FC] For those who use Sri Jyoti Star, there is a global option that must >> be set-up: Where it is written " Arudhas and Rashi Dashas " (Global >> Options), make sure that " Strongest " is set to " Sanjay " (for Sanjay >> Rath). With this option, Narayana will be calculated as thaught by Samjay >> Rath himself and will give the same results as Jagannatha Hora! Mr Foss >> also told me he also had this dasa *checked* by Sanjay Rath himself! > Your posting is very confusing, malheureusment! :-( Difficult to make > out what came from your keyboard and what from the keyboard/email from Mr. > Foss. Please take the time to repost clearly indicating who said what or > the confusion will not only continue but be further amplified! Well all come from my keyboard ;-) I read my posts few times before answering yours this morning and I hardly understand what is unclear. Anyway, English is a second language for me!... I did not (and will not) copy the email from Mr Foss neither was it my intention, but rather I summarized it. As all members should know there has been a major conflict on Vedic-Astrology list, there has been a conflict between some SJC members (espacially Sanjay Rath and his wife) and P.V.R. N. Rao. Rath's wife stated Rao's freeware was erroneous on many calculations and espacially Narayana Dasa, which prompted to ask her what exactly was wrong on this specific dasa. She never answered (and I don't even expect her to do so). Rather, I checked with Sri Jyoti Star if the calculations the same. They were not. So I emailed P.V.R. N. Rao (with a report of Sri Jyoti Star), who told me he encoded these dasa as taught by Sanjay Rath and thought there might be be something wrong with Foss' software. Then I emailed Foss, who told me there was an option on his software, Sri Jyoti Star, that had to be chosen (as explained in the above paragraph). The bottom line is that both programmers had their software checked by Sanjay Rath for Narayana dasa and it is not a surprise they both give the same results with the proper options chosen. Hope it is more clear, since I do not know how to make clearer then that :-) -- With my best regards, François Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 17, 2010 Report Share Posted March 17, 2010 Simply stated, you should have used [FC] just as you did this time to indicate that those were your words and not [AF]'s! It has nothing to do with first, second or third language, Fran¢ois! Your english is pretty good! My comment was not about the clarity of language but the clarity of CITATION! That creats the confusion, even if unintentionally in certain cases!! ;-) Rohiniranjan , " CARRIERE Francois " <yl.car.fr wrote: > > Dear Rohini, > > >>> [FC] Also, apparently Sri Jyoti Star 6 is wrong on this issue (as it do > >>> not seems to use the calculations exceptions as explained in Vedic > >>> Astrology: an Integrated Approach, from P.V.R. N. Rao). Of course, I > >>> expect an answer from Mr Andrew Foss, its designer and owner. > > >> [FC] For those who use Sri Jyoti Star, there is a global option that must > >> be set-up: Where it is written " Arudhas and Rashi Dashas " (Global > >> Options), make sure that " Strongest " is set to " Sanjay " (for Sanjay > >> Rath). With this option, Narayana will be calculated as thaught by Samjay > >> Rath himself and will give the same results as Jagannatha Hora! Mr Foss > >> also told me he also had this dasa *checked* by Sanjay Rath himself! > > > Your posting is very confusing, malheureusment! :-( Difficult to make > > out what came from your keyboard and what from the keyboard/email from Mr. > > Foss. Please take the time to repost clearly indicating who said what or > > the confusion will not only continue but be further amplified! > > Well all come from my keyboard ;-) I read my posts few times before > answering yours this morning and I hardly understand what is unclear. > Anyway, English is a second language for me!... I did not (and will not) > copy the email from Mr Foss neither was it my intention, but rather I > summarized it. > > As all members should know there has been a major conflict on > Vedic-Astrology list, there has been a conflict between some SJC > members (espacially Sanjay Rath and his wife) and P.V.R. N. Rao. Rath's wife > stated Rao's freeware was erroneous on many calculations and espacially > Narayana Dasa, which prompted to ask her what exactly was wrong on this > specific dasa. She never answered (and I don't even expect her to do so). > > Rather, I checked with Sri Jyoti Star if the calculations the same. They > were not. So I emailed P.V.R. N. Rao (with a report of Sri Jyoti Star), who > told me he encoded these dasa as taught by Sanjay Rath and thought there > might be be something wrong with Foss' software. Then I emailed Foss, who > told me there was an option on his software, Sri Jyoti Star, that had to be > chosen (as explained in the above paragraph). > > The bottom line is that both programmers had their software checked by > Sanjay Rath for Narayana dasa and it is not a surprise they both give the > same results with the proper options chosen. > > Hope it is more clear, since I do not know how to make clearer then that :-) > > -- > With my best regards, > François > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.