Beginning at the Beginning...!

[Guest guest]

Beginning at the " beginning " ...

 

Were the FIRST Human beings that GOD/NATURE create Hindus? What was the religion

of the very first man and/or woman that was created by GOD?

 

Did God create just one of each or a FEW, during the very FIRST experiment to

create human beings?

 

Or was Darwin right or approximately right, at the very least?

 

 

 

, " utkal.panigrahi " <utkal.panigrahi

wrote:

>

>

> While defining collective attributes to houses, Some bhransha sanskrit

> terms are used in classics of Jyotish or vedic astrology, bhransh terms

> shows foreign influence on our culture, Our ancient universities were

> burnt to ashes and when after the chaos, we restored ourselves back, Our

> Jyotish had become Darbari as it required protection and recognition

> both for it's survival.

>

> There has been a downside of the Darbari Jyotish, Varah Mihira like

> astrologers had become over influencial as they were dominating the

> tradition due to their position.

>

> The classics composed in this era though contains the Vedic Knolwedge in

> essence, The manner they are written still exhibit deterioration of

> culture because of firstly attacks and subsequent business exchange.

>

> In Jyotish, four kendras signifies - 1. Atma (Self) , 4. Matra

> (Mother) 7. Kalatra (Spouse) 10. Pitra (Father).

>

> In Sanskrit, the term - " Krama " signifies - sequence or order, Added

> with prefix (Upsarga), it makes other terms to tell about - In the

> defined order (Anu-Krama) or Reverse order (Ut-Krama).

>

> Houses in the reverse of Kendras are - 12, 9, 6, 3 which are

> collectively known as AAP-OKLIM.

>

> The term AAP-OKLIM IS bhransha of ATM-OKTRAM as it's clearly seen by the

> houses signified by it.

>

> Bhranshita AAPOKLIM looks so much alien to hindi or to sanskrit, It's

> origin is not understood by some of new age jyotish scholars, and they

> mis interpreted that Jyotish is not Indian.

>

> Availability of One or two such terms in Jyotish classics is made a tool

> to propogate false theories that Jyotish is of Greek origin.

>

> This is the reason vedic scholars like BANA BHATTA of Gupta age and

> post Gupta age badly criticized Varah-Mihira and others like him for

> introducing such a impurity in Jyotish.

>

> Utkal .

>