Guest guest Posted April 1, 2010 Report Share Posted April 1, 2010 Re: FW: Ancient arithmatics and numbers recorded in Purans and Ramayan Dear Dr.BHUDIA-Science Group Of INDIA, Here is a friendly tip for you to consider. I feel you are wasting your time. Ram is not a historical person like you and me. He is God. God is expereinced at the equinoctical lunar bary center. It is in this spirit that Ram chandra's (lunar barycenter's) story is constructed. The Puranas use symbolic language as to how one can expereince God, who is actually eternal.If you treat these figures as historical figures you will neither experience God nor give any historial instances from the Puranas.So please give up your wild goose chase and try to understand the mathematics of the Puranas as symblic language of the vedas. Regards, Hari Malla , " jyotirved " <jyotirved wrote: > > > > > > _____ > > Dr Bhudia Kutch Science Foundation > [kutchsciencefoundation] > Tuesday, March 30, 2010 7:28 PM > AKGHOSH; aash_rum; amalava; > akkulshrestha100; Ashit GUHA; annamraju_2000; > balachandra_rao; bharathgyan; BIMAL BUCH; > bntiwari56; charitarth vyas; Dr Ayenger; Dr. Alok Tripathi; > Dr. Rajiv Nigam; drbhudia; hv_tiwary; > jyotirved; kanu166; knjoshipura; lalit > pandey; mivaishnav; prabodhsharma1; Ramji Lachhani; > ramram2you; ryadubir; raykalyan; > rcmehrotra; Valji Mepani; tuli.hazra; VASANT DAVE; > vedakavi; vedastudy; vikasupadhyay > FW:Ancient arithmatics and numbers recorded in Purans and Ramayan > > > > <kutchsciencefoundation@From> > <kutchsciencefoundation > kutchsciencefoundation > > Dear friends of Mythologies, geology, paleontology, , science, Maths and > Astronomy > > I AM PLEASED that so many people are studying RAMAYAN and giving their > personal opinions, BUT every thing is like a " TUNDE: TUNDE: MATI: BHINHA: " > Every one says they gone through all of these RAMAYAN events and calculated > all events of astronomical phenomenon¡¯s, But have they really calculated? > or just copying all incorrect data believing that all data available is > correct. > > If they are following Ramayana correctly and claiming they have got all > correct then why they IGNORE reality of Shrimad BHAGAVAT PURANS - denouncing > the writer of BHAGVATAM and following RAMAYAN ? > > see the mathematics of SMALLEST COMMON MULTIPLES of the COMMOM man and > understand the events of mathematical series and prime numbers > > DOES fossil formation occurs in 10000 years time? > > Is planetarium data is correct from recorded readings at that time or > derived by mathematical predictions only > > Does the event do not happen in rhythmic sunrises > > Is the programs of planetarium is correct without errors? > > Is the time of YUGAS in BHAGAWATAM is incorrect? and are we beyond the all > writers of PURANS? > > > BEFORE any thing first we need to understand these mathematics correctly > > Ancient arithmatics and numbers recorded in Purans and Ramayan > > Sat, 31 May 2008 10:14:37 +0000 > > Dear friends of Ancient astronomical histories, Maths and science, > > 1) Planetary timings and its use in astronomy and Horoscope numerics. > > Rahu and Ketu timings 18 years = 2x3x3 means in 180 years Rahu Ketu has 10 > Cycles. > > > > Sani - Saturn has timing 30 years= 2x3x5 means in 180 years SATURN has 6 > Cycles. > > > > Guru - Jupiter has timing 12 years= 2x3x2x means in 180 years SATURN has > 15 Cycles > > > > Mangal - MARS has timing of 1.88years means in 180 years SATURN has 96 > Cycles > > > > Sukra - Venus has timing of 224 days means in 180 years VENUS has 293 > Cycles > > > > > > Calculating the L SA = Smallest Common Multiple of those numbers 2x2x3 x3 x5 > =180 years. > > > > Means at this interval all those planets are in same position as before 180 > years. > > > > So Horoscope do not see the difference of those of horoscopes of 180 years > apart and human do not survive beyond this time. Though data are available > up to 100 years of PANCHANGs but not recorded before 180 years ago. But > oldest observatory do have those records recorded at that time eg. JAIPUR > Observatory. > > > > NASA did not have that before so they just put calculated figures and not > the real DATA fact sheet. Which may be in accurate /errors of calculations > as those are not the actual measured and recorded results? Even > > > > > <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gregorian_calendar> Gregorian calendar is > inaccurate and so need changing every few centuries and has not been done > since last 3 centuries. > > <http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/89/Gregoriancalendarleap. > png<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gregorian_calendar> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gregorian_calendar > > > Since the introduction of the Gregorian calendar, the difference between > Gregorian and Julian calendar dates has increased by three days every four > centuries: > > > > > > > Gregorian range > > > > > > Julian range > > > > Difference > > From <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/October_15> 15 October > <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1582> 1582 > to <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/February_28> 28 February > <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1700> 1700 > > > > > > From <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/October_5> 5 October > <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1582> 1582 > to <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/February_18> 18 February > <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1700> 1700 > > > > > > 10days LAST CHANGE of 10days DONE HERE > > From <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/March_1> 1 March > <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1700> 1700 > to <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/February_28> 28 February > <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1800> 1800 > > > > > > From <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/February_19> 19 February > <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1700> 1700 > to <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/February_17> 17 February > <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1800> 1800 > > > > > > 11 days > > From <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/March_1> 1 March > <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1800> 1800 > to <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/February_28> 28 February > <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1900> 1900 > > > > > > From <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/February_18> 18 February > <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1800> 1800 > to <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/February_16> 16 February > <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1900> 1900 > > > > > > 12 days > > From <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/March_1> 1 March > <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1900> 1900 > to <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/February_28> 28 February > <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2100> 2100 > > > > > > From <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/February_17> 17 February > <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1900> 1900 > to <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/February_15> 15 February > <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2100> 2100 > > > > > > 13 days > > > > 2) Now according to PURANas let us check those with this astronomical data > > > > > > MahaYUGA is said timing of 4 320000 years means it has 24000 cycles of 180 > years > > > > KALIYUGA is said timing of 4 32000 years means it has 2400 cycles of 180 > years > > > > A) Present Time of Kaliyuga has passed 5116 years means at least 28 cycles > of 180 years has passed. > > > > B) DWAPARYUGA is said timing of 8 64000 years means it has 4800 cycles of > 180 years > > > > C) Rama Rajya said to be of 10 000 years before DWAPARYUGA means at least 55 > cycle of 180 years has passed during RAM RAJYA. > > > > > > RAMA timings can be calculated as A) + B) + C) = DWAPARYUGA is said timing > of 8 64000 years + Kaliyuga has passed 5116 + 10 000 Rama. = 8 79116 years > is about 4883 cycles of 180 years (4800 cycles + 55 cycle + 28 cycles) > > So we see those planetary events before 879116 years as it has happened some > where in series of 180X time line. eg 180 x 40 = 7200 years ago. But that is > not the fact but the cyclic series phenomenon of time. > > > > Some believe that RAMA birth time was 7100 to7200 (180 x 40 cycles) years > ago as said in RAMAYANA and PURANs. It may be in multiples of those numbers > in Series. > > > > > > But when said that those information are in PURANs and in VALMIK RAMAYANA > one can not ignore the Time scale of YUGA and MAHAYUGA said in PURANs and > VEDAs. > 3) RAMA JANMA HOROSCOPES as said in Valmik RAMAYAN ¨C appropriate Original > Ramayan pages attached scanned and attach¨¦ for each description. > > > > > > Rama was born on CHAITRA SUD NAVMI at 12 PM AYODYA /KASI / VARANASI time in > KARK LAGANAM rising at horizon. > > > > BHARAT was Born Next morning but before sun rise at about 4AM as MEEN Lagnam > was rising means at least. 8 Rashi has moved to take 16 hours difference. > BUT as sun was risen it was RAMNAVMI as well. But not the DASMI. > > > > LAXMAN and SHATRUGHNA was born next NOON again at 12 PM when KARK lagnam was > rising at horizon. Means was DASMI but some says that was an EKADASHi in > that case DASMI was KSHAYA tithi and EKASDASHI followed By RAMA NAVAMI. > > > > > > Geographically Chaitra SUD 9 comes near End of MARCH and in April in the > next year after the EXTRA-ADHIK MONTH (PURSHOTTAM MONTH) year. Which is near > EQUINOX timings. So day is about 12 hours and Sun rise/Sunset around the > 6:30 in AYODHYA/VARANASI /KASI. > > > > Birth Time of Bharat is in NEXT early morning 4AM BUT as Sun rise is about > 6:30 the tithi remained RAMNAVMI /CHAITRA SUD NAVMI.. > > > > > > LAXMAN and SHTRUGHNA were born after another 8 hours as when again KARK > lagnam was rising at horizon. Which means that NEXT day 12 PM which is > CHAITRA SUD DASHAMI. BUT many SHASHTRIES AND KATHAKARS says that was CHATRA > SUD EKADASHI according to their belief, though it has not been said in > RAMAYAN. In that case DASHMI was a LAPSED and KSHAY TITHI and RAMNAVMI > (CHAITRA SUD NAVMI) followed by EKADASHI (CHAITRA SUD EKADASHI) according to > RAMAYAN. > > > > > > 4) ALSO an astronomical observations SUN and MOON during near time of > Equinox and RAMNAVMI. Are as follows > > A) MOON: Moon near Earth 20 March 2007 and as higher gravitation and > Kepler's Laws Object has higher speed when close to centre ¨C MOON has moved > 15.1 degree in 24 hours. > > > > B) And when Moon was FARTHEST from the Earth on 3 APRIL 2007 LOWER > gravitation and Kepler's Laws Object has SLOWER speed when further away from > the centre ¨C MOON has moved 12 degree in 24 hours > > > > > > AVERAGE speed of the MOON remains about 13 Degree and when the moon remains > at MEAN distance from the Earth in the middle timings of A (20 March 2007) > and B (3 APRIL 2007). > > > > ALSO MOON Month is about 28 and a half day but as LUNAR distance is variable > the duration of the LUNAR month is also variable. In past time LUNAR month > was 30 days as said in PURANs. So can you calculate the LUNAR distance for > the 30 days Lunar MONTH ! also when it was possible and when again as moon > is slowly going away from the Earth. > > > > C) EARTH near SUN on 4 Jan 2007 and as higher gravitation and Kepler's > Laws EARTH has higher speed when close to SUN and so Earth moved 1.01¡¯11¡± > > 1 degree in 24 hours. > > > > D) And when EARTH was FARTHEST from the SUN on 8 JULY 2007 LOWER > gravitation and Kepler's Laws EARTH has SLOWER speed when further away from > the SUN ¨C EARTH has moved 0.57¡¯ 11¡± < 1 degree in 24 hours. > > > > AVERAGE speed of the EARTH remains about <1 Degree and when the Earth > remains at MEAN AU distance from the SUN at present time in the timings of > EQUNOX days. 20/21 MARCH and 22/23 September. > > > > ALSO EARTH YEAR is about 365.25 days but as AU distance is variable the > duration of the EARTH¡¯s Year is also variable. In past time EARTH¡¯s Year > was 360 days as said in PURANs. So can you calculate the AU ¨C SUN EARTH > distance for the 360 days EARTH¡¯s Year! also when it was possible and when > again the EARTH is closing to the SUN to make Year of 360 days? > > > > Hints What should be MEAN AU distance to make the Earth speed of 1 degree > around the sun? use Capler¡¯s calculations. And reduce the AU by some 1% and > calculate and try again to find out accurate AU distance for EARTH year of > 360 days. > > > > > > > > > > year > > > > > > Equinox > Mar > > > > > > Solstice > June > > > > > > Equinox > Sept > > > > > > Solstice > Dec > > day > > > > > > time > > > > > > day > > > > > > time > > > > > > day > > > > > > time > > > > > > day > > > > > > time > > 2002 > > > > > > 20 > > > > > > 19:16 > > > > > > 21 > > > > > > 13:24 > > > > > > 23 > > > > > > 04:55 > > > > > > 22 > > > > > > 01:14 > > 2003 > > > > > > 21 > > > > > > 01:00 > > > > > > 21 > > > > > > 19:10 > > > > > > 23 > > > > > > 10:47 > > > > > > 22 > > > > > > 07:04 > > 2004 > > > > > > 20 > > > > > > 06:49 > > > > > > 21 > > > > > > 00:57 > > > > > > 22 > > > > > > 16:30 > > > > > > 21 > > > > > > 12:42 > > 2005 > > > > > > 20 > > > > > > 12:33 > > > > > > 21 > > > > > > 06:46 > > > > > > 22 > > > > > > 22:23 > > > > > > 21 > > > > > > 18:35 > > 2006 > > > > > > 20 > > > > > > 18:26 > > > > > > 21 > > > > > > 12:26 > > > > > > 23 > > > > > > 04:03 > > > > > > 22 > > > > > > 00:22 > > 2007 > > > > > > 21 > > > > > > 00:07 > > > > > > 21 > > > > > > 18:06 > > > > > > 23 > > > > > > 09:51 > > > > > > 22 > > > > > > 06:08 > > 2008 > > > > > > 20 > > > > > > 05:48 > > > > > > 20 > > > > > > 23:59 > > > > > > 22 > > > > > > 15:44 > > > > > > 21 > > > > > > 12:04 > > 2009 > > > > > > 20 > > > > > > 11:44 > > > > > > 21 > > > > > > 05:45 > > > > > > 22 > > > > > > 21:18 > > > > > > 21 > > > > > > 17:47 > > 2010 > > > > > > 20 > > > > > > 17:32 > > > > > > 21 > > > > > > 11:28 > > > > > > 23 > > > > > > 03:09 > > > > > > 21 > > > > > > 23:38 > > 2011 > > > > > > 20 > > > > > > 23:21 > > > > > > 21 > > > > > > 17:16 > > > > > > 23 > > > > > > 09:04 > > > > > > 22 > > > > > > 05:30 > > 2012 > > > > > > 20 > > > > > > 05:14 > > > > > > 20 > > > > > > 23:09 > > > > > > 22 > > > > > > 14:49 > > > > > > 21 > > > > > > 11:11 > > 2013 > > > > > > 20 > > > > > > 11:02 > > > > > > 21 > > > > > > 05:04 > > > > > > 22 > > > > > > 20:44 > > > > > > 21 > > > > > > 17:11 > > 2014 > > > > > > 20 > > > > > > 16:57 > > > > > > 21 > > > > > > 10:51 > > > > > > 23 > > > > > > 02:29 > > > > > > 21 > > > > > > 23:03 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kepler's laws > > > > > Though originally stated to describe the motion of planets around the sun, > Kepler's Laws also apply to comets > <http://www.theworks.com/users/bdrennon/comet.htm> . > > LAW 1: The orbit of a planet/comet about the Sun is an ellipse with the > Sun's center of mass at one focus > This is the equation for an ellipse: > LAW 2: A line joining a planet/comet and the Sun sweeps out equal areas in > equal intervals of time > Click here to see larger <http://home.cvc.org/science/kepler.gif> animation > > LAW 3: The squares of the periods of the planets are proportional to the > cubes of their semimajor axes: > > Ta2 / Tb2 = Ra3 / Rb3 > > > * Square of any planet's orbital period (sidereal) is proportional to > cube of its mean distance (semi-major axis) from Sun > > > > * Mathematical statement: T = kR3/2 , where T = sideral period, and R > = semi-major axis > > > > * Example - If a is measured in astronomical units (AU = semi-major > axis of Earth's orbit) and sidereal period in years (Earth's sidereal > period), then the constant k in mathematical expression for Kepler's third > law is equal to 1, and the mathematical relation becomes T2 = R3 > > > > > Examples of Kepler's Third Law > > > > > > > Planet > > > > > > P (yr) > > > > > > a (AU) > > > > > > T2 > > > > > > R3 > > Mercury > > > > > > 0.24 > > > > > > 0.39 > > > > > > 0.06 > > > > > > 0.06 > > Venus > > > > > > 0.62 > > > > > > 0.72 > > > > > > 0.39 > > > > > > 0.37 > > Earth > > > > > > 1.00 > > > > > > 1.00 > > > > > > 1.00 > > > > > > 1.00 > > Mars > > > > > > 1.88 > > > > > > 1.52 > > > > > > 3.53 > > > > > > 3.51 > > Jupiter > > > > > > 11.9 > > > > > > 5.20 > > > > > > 142 > > > > > > 141 > > Saturn > > > > > > 29.5 > > > > > > 9.54 > > > > > > 870 > > > > > > 868 > 5 ) Astronomical names of stars, planets, galaxies and clusters are in > relation to Puranic names, VASUKI, AGATSYA, Yayati, Saptarshi, etc Planet > JUPITER was known to be the biggest of all SOLAR planets and so NAMED as > GURU (GURU has to be Mahan GURU ¨C Biggest of the all). > Most of the names of the astronomical names are in the relations of Puranic > names eg A) Andromeda GALAXY named as DEVIYANI and B) our Milky way GALAXY > as MANDAKINI both were queens of KING YAYATI (Vega) etc. difficult to name > all here else it will be long listing. > 6 ) Half RAADIUS rules of present Astronomical and mathematical formulations > explained in Purans. > This is also relates to above rules of KEPLER¡¯s as below where Ta2 / Tb2 = > Ra3 / Rb3 and T2 = R3 > > > > > > > > > > Planet > > > > > > P (yr) > > > > > > a (AU) > > > > > > T2 > > > > > > R3 > > Earth > > > > > > 1.00 > > > > > > 1.00 > > > > > > 1.00 > > > > > > 1.00 > > Jupiter > > > > > > 11.9 > > > > > > 5.20 > > > > > > 142 > > > > > > 141 > > Saturn > > > > > > 29.5 > > > > > > 9.54 > > > > > > 870 > > > > > > 868 > Here Number2 has been used for Binary computerised system applications. > Planets distance use 2 and timing of the planet and speed of planet/sec use > of ¡Ì 2 e.g. Saturn is 2times far away than Jupiter so timing of Saturn > will be 2 x ¡Ì 2 compared to Jupiter and speed of Saturn will be less by ¡Ì > 2 compared to Jupiter > Square roots of integers <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Integers> that are > not perfect squares <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Square_number> are always > irrational numbers <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irrational_number> : > numbers not expressible as a ratio <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ratio> of > two integers. For example, ¡Ì2 cannot be written exactly as m/n, where n and > m are integers. Nonetheless, it is exactly the length of the diagonal > <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diagonal> of a square > <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Square_(geometry)> with side length 1. This > has been known since ancient times, with the discovery that ¡Ì2 is > irrational attributed to Hipparchus > <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hipparchus> , a disciple of Pythagoras > <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pythagoras> > > > > The square root of 2, also known as Pythagoras' > <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constant> constant, often denoted by ¡Ì2 but > can also be written as > > > > 21 / 2, OR ¡Ì2=1.4142135623 7309504880 1688724209 6980785696 7187537694 > 8073176679 7379907324 78462 > > > > More detailed information of it can be read from > <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Square_root_of_2> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Square_root_of_2 > Planet Jupiter is half way to the distance of Saturn and so Saturn is half > way to the distance of Uranus and Uranus is half way to the distance of the > Neptune as well. > > > > 7 ) Maths Figures according to the PURANs > > > > > > English Word > > > > > > Gujarati Word > > > > > > Veidik > > > > > In Figures > > Zero > > > > > > Mindu > > > > > > Sunya > > > > > 0 > > One > > > > > > Aek > > > > > > Aekam > > > > > > 100 > > > > > > 1 > > Ten > > > > > > Dash > > > > > > Dasham > > > > > > 101 > > > > > > 10 > > Hundred > > > > > > So > > > > > > Satam smat > > > > > > 102 > > > > > > 100 > > Thousand > > > > > > Hajar > > > > > > Sahastram > > > > > > 103 > > > > > > 1000 > > Ten Thousand > > > > > > Dash Hajar > > > > > > Ayutam(Dash Sahastram) > > > > > > 104 > > > > > > 10,000 > > Hundred Thousand > > > > > > 1Lakh > > > > > > Laxam > > > > > > 105 > > > > > > 100,000 > > 1Millions > > > > > > Dash Lakh > > > > > > Prayutam(Dash Laxam) > > > > > > 106 > > > > > > 1000,000 > > 10 Millions > > > > > > 1Cror > > > > > > Kotimaya > > > > > > 107 > > > > > > 10,000,000 > > 100 Millions > > > > > > Dash cror > > > > > > Dasham Kotimaya > > > > > > 108 > > > > > > 100,000,000 > > 1Billions > > > > > > 1Arbuj > > > > > > Abudam(DashKotimaya) > > > > > > 109 > > > > > > 1000,000,000 > > 10 Billions > > > > > > Dash Arbuj > > > > > > Vunda > > > > > > 1010 > > > > > > 10,000,000,000 > > 100 Billions > > > > > > So Arbuja > > > > > > Kharve (Dasham Vunde) > > > > > > 1011 > > > > > > 100,000,000,000 > > 1Trillions > > > > > Nikharve > > > > > > 1012 > > > > > > 1000,000,000,000 > > 10 Trillions > > > > > Maha Padhyam(Dasham Nikharve) > > > > > > 1013 > > > > > > 10,000,000,000,000 > > 100 Trillions > > > > > Shanku > > > > > > 1014 > > > > > > 100,000,000,000,000 > > 1Zillions > > > > > Samundram (Dashm Shanku) > > > > > > 1015 > > > > > > 1000,000,000,000,000 > > 10 Zillions > > > > > Antyam > > > > > > 1016 > > > > > > 10,000,000,000,000,000 > > 100 Zillions > > > > > Madhya (Dasham Antay) > > > > > > 1017 > > > > > > 100,000,000,000,000,000 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Parardhe-Paradham > > > > > > 1018 > > > > > > 1000,000,000,000,000,000 > > 1Google > > > > > > > > > > > 10100 > > > > > > 1 followed by 100 Zeroes > 8 ) Numbers of AKSHOUNI in Mahabharata. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1 AKSHOUHINI - SENA > > > > > 21830 Ratha > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 21870 Elephant > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 65610 Horse > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 109350 Para? (Pada) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1 Akshohini > > > > > 218700 Total > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1 PATI > > > > > 1 Rath > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1 Elephant > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 3 Horse > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 5 Para (Pada) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 10 Total=1PATI > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1 GRUH - PATI > > > > > 1 Bharya > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2 Putram > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2 Putriyam > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1 Gruhe > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1 Krushtiyam > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1 Goum > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2 Nandi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 10 Total = 1 GRUH PATI > > > > ATTCHED FILES :- > > > Complete Ramayan Information.jpg > Ramayan timing 180 years of cycle. LSA CMF and GSA CSF > 18 Akshini.jpg > HOROSCOPE OF RAMA.jpg > RAM LAX BHARAT SATRU BIRTH times.jpg > Places of RAMAYAN.jpg > RAMNAVMI PANCHANG CALANDER.jpg > RAM ni VANAR SENA.jpg > REGARDS AND WISH YOU BEST WISHES > > > > From yours Dr.BHUDIA-Science Group Of INDIA. > http://uk.venustransit_2004/ > President:'Kutch Science Foundation'. > Founder :'Kutch Amateurs Astronomers Club - Bhuj - Kutch'. > Life Member:'kutch Itihaas Parishad'. > kutchscience > <http://in.scienceclubofindia/post?postID=3WfT8SadTMH > LXgqwwC9ywcOqtucxc6kyjftiMrm-zTI9z68AgWSMnDgrTT3mJbOc2lH--fwlC62Sso6FoL65gA> > , kutchscience > <http://in.scienceclubofindia/post?postID=p-hY89RH_74 > 1FYRwp0-Aac4c9-55yOFfiTHsaQebfZY0PklKp5mJwrWQzyGOs4qlkL6wEy_kYgqb24cGCug> , > http://uk.geocities.com/wildlifeofkutch/ > http://www.geocities.com/kutchscience > > > > http://profiles./kutchscience2000 > http://in.scienceclubofindia > http://in.kutchscience > http://in.kachchh > http://in.bhuj > > > > Do visit our ABOVE Clubs/Groups of Science club of India, Science Group of > India & kutch science foundation and ALSO JOIN US. > > > > _____ > > Do you want a Hotmail account? Sign-up > <http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/197222280/direct/01/> now - Free > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.