Assyrians and Antiquity of VEDAS

[Guest guest]

There have been two major waves of AVESTA which we can trace from history.

 

In my view first and ancient wave would have taken birth near about 4000-3500

BCE

but one of the greatest historian(First Historian of the world) of his times

Herodotus has said that, that ancient wave would have been around 6000-8000 BCE

(10,000yrs older) and it is fantastic.

 

If conflict between Vedic ppl is of 8000-10,000 yrs older (in my view 6000yrs

old) than certainly VEDAS could be 10,000 yrs old when Sapta Sindhu part was not

having rivers and it is also supported by VEDAS as VEDIC ppl learnt Farming

slowly slowly.

 

But it looks that Herodotus point is correct that first wave of AVESTA would

have emerged near about in 6000-8000BCE as in Ashur Banipal's ( Plz notice his

name, they use to write their name as Ashur something something so you may guess

who were they , they were the other section of VEDIC ppl who parted because of

some controversies near Himalaya ) library there have been talk of cardinal

points (and after analyzing the time when VE was there means in Taurus, it gives

date of 3100 BCE) but in tablets there is no talk of NKS, but according to texts

which are available in India in Sanskrit those shows that around 4500 BCE NKS

were already there so Herodotus point looks correct that Assyrians would have

parted in very ancient time(means 2 waves of AVESTA) means when Indians were

aware of only Cardinal points. Concept of 360 degree around one point in 2-D and

Sexagesimal system was penetrated in Egypt by Assyrians and they also gave

mathematics to construct Pyramid (Pythagorean Triplets) and I am sure when they

parted, that time circles theory were not discovered by VEDIC ppl.

 

I was having one wrong impression that 36 part of Zodiac( Enuma anu enlil ie

MUL-APIN tablets ) was given by Egyptian, it was my mistake as ppl had floated

wrong theory on internet (Approx all person on internet have floated this wrong

detail), one Historian of Europe corrected me and he said all those tablets

(MUL-APIN tablets) which we know of Egyptians and of Babylonians(Old

Babylonaians not Neo Bablylonains who were Zoroasterians) are of Assyrians, yes

later same theory was replicated there ie in EGYPT as ASSYRIANS dynasty was also

there after some time and near about 2000 BCE.

Interesting thing in those tablets there is talk of cardinal point and of Enuma

anu enlil but not of NKS, but when Zoroasterians took control of Chaldeans(Neo

Babylonian) area in the form of Achaemenian Dynasty than there were NKS.

 

 

New wave of AVESTA which ZOROASETR tried to revive was in the form of

Achaemenian Dynasty and Sassnid dynasty and it was near about 1200 BCE, I am

talking of revival and Migration from Himalayan region so it takes time to make

Dynasty as those ppl didn't attack on Persia and they migrated over there and in

Persia at the time of ZOROASTER there was already worship of ASHURA but

ZOROASTER concentrated only on AHURA-MAZDA so they were different ppl so new

wave took birth in the form of new religion ie Zoroasterian.

 

ANCIENT WAVE WAS ASSYRIAN (REAL NAME - ASHURA) AND NOW THOSE ASSYRIANS ARE IN

GERMANY, FRANCE, DUTCH and all have been converted to Christian religion.

 

GERMANS(in the form of Assyrians) ARE CLOSE PPL OF HIMALAYAN PPL as Swastika

have been found over there, and they have been arch enemy of JEWS as same JEWS

has thrown them out from their ancient land(SYRIA, IRAQ etc etc…), i think ADOLF

HITLER was aware of real ancient history (not propounded by Max-Muller) so he

was against JEWS.

 

Now all Assyrians have been converted to Christianity due to Muslims invasion in

their area. And they migrated to Europe through Turkey and near Shore of Black

and Caspian Sea. Assyrians also took with them Swastik and which were found with

them in GERMANY.

 

So through Assyrians one major chuck of Sanskrit speaking ppl reached over there

and so we find Sanskrit language over there.

 

Document which have been presented to Hittie in Sanskrit in 1600 BCE were by

Assyrians not by Indians.

 

I am sure that if archaeologist excavates Syrian and Iraqi places than

definitely they will get the inscriptions of Sanskrit in Cuneiform script over

there and also sign of Swastika like which have been found in GERMANY. Some

archaeologist already guessed in Assyrian region there would be big civilization

like of Harappa.

 

Indra are the same Assyrians who used to attack in ancient times due to

religious conflict in the region which were DEVA worship populated areas,So

imagine about ROMILAS thnking what she talks, I have shown ASHURA were already

ther in ASSYRIANS but she says they would be EURASIAN Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha…..

 

Sathiya gayi hai in the greed of Klugne award (Noble Prize)

 

Dasyu was very old dynasty which also came in existence from same VEDIC ppl

because they also wanted to worship Ashuras etc etc but they were defeated and

about them there is talk in VEDAS. But listen stories of ROMILA and Max Muller….

 

Darius the great of Achaemenian dynasty (Basically Dasyu, Dasyu means slave for

Deva worshippers, not for ASHURA worshipper), christened himself in the same

name from that old dynasty.

 

Regs,

Prashant Pandey

 

 

, Sunil Bhattacharjya

<sunil_bhattacharjya wrote:

>

> Dear friends,

>

> David Pingree's chronology is not correct as he followed the Max Mullerian

chronology. If you want to relate the ancient Indian chronology with the

chronology of the Zorastrianism you have to remember that the Zorastrian

tradition places Zarathustra around 300 years before Alexander's invasion of

Iran. Inscriptions of Archimenian kings also support that, The date of

Zarathustra is around 630 BCE.

>

> Regards,

>

> Sunil K. Bhattacharjya

>

>

>

>

>

>