Guest guest Posted July 19, 2006 Report Share Posted July 19, 2006 || Hare Rama Krishna || Namaste, A native approached me about his issues in marriage. After looking at his chart, I suggested that he fast on Thursdays (since UL lord is exalted and retrograde Guru placed in the 12th house). After doing this remedy, the native gave the following feedback: I have been noticing that I get very angry on Thursday and I get very much frustrated also. As a result of this I start remembering all the things that I have done or have been done to me. * * * Native's data: 12/25/1966, 22:20 Hrs, 5:30 East of GMT, 77E12, 28N36 My question is - why should the native feel angry particularly on Thursdays? Is it just the exhaustion of fasting or something more? I notice that there is an unmada yoga on the UL axis. But that should mean that the spouse could have temper problems. It doesn't mean that the native cannot fast on the UL lord's day to try to save his marriage, correct? So are there any other indications, which I might have missed, that suggest native's frustration and anger on Thursdays since he began fasting? Any insight would be greatly appreciated. May Sri Vishnu bless us all, Reema. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 19, 2006 Report Share Posted July 19, 2006 || Hare Rama Krishna || Namaste Bojan-ji, Thank you so much. Your reply helped me in understanding the UL better, and it certainly will go a long way in helping the native. He seems to really want to save his marriage, and may God grant him the power to do so. Thank you once again, and best wishes. May Sri Vishnu bless us all, Reema. sohamsa , bojan vidakovic <janbovid wrote: > > > HARE RAMA KRISHNA > Dear Reema, as per my experience it is the karma that > should be cleansed thorugh that UL with fasting, and > ofcourse it is not so easy. What I have seen is that > when UL is in 8th or its lord is at the same time the > lord of the eight bhava than it is very hard to fast, > esspeceally at the beginning. It can bring headaches, > short temper, but after some time of regular fast it > will be normalized. Ofcourse he should fast on that > particular day, it will save his marriage and fix > problems with unmada yoga etc. Everything will be fine > after few weeks...best wishes, but the person must > keep fasting, Bojan Vidakovic > OM TAT SAT > --- reema_sriganesh <reema_sriganesh wrote: > > > || Hare Rama Krishna || > > > > Namaste, > > > > A native approached me about his issues in marriage. > > After looking at > > his chart, I suggested that he fast on Thursdays > > (since UL lord is > > exalted and retrograde Guru placed in the 12th > > house). > > > > After doing this remedy, the native gave the > > following feedback: > > > > I have been noticing that I get very angry on > > Thursday and I get very > > much frustrated also. As a result of this I start > > remembering all the > > things that I have done or have been done to me. > > > > * * * > > > > Native's data: 12/25/1966, 22:20 Hrs, 5:30 East of > > GMT, 77E12, 28N36 > > > > My question is - why should the native feel angry > > particularly on > > Thursdays? Is it just the exhaustion of fasting or > > something more? I > > notice that there is an unmada yoga on the UL axis. > > But that should > > mean that the spouse could have temper problems. It > > doesn't mean that > > the native cannot fast on the UL lord's day to try > > to save his > > marriage, correct? > > > > So are there any other indications, which I might > > have missed, that > > suggest native's frustration and anger on Thursdays > > since he began > > fasting? > > > > Any insight would be greatly appreciated. > > > > May Sri Vishnu bless us all, > > Reema. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 20, 2006 Report Share Posted July 20, 2006 || Hare Rama Krishna || Dear Reema-ji, Namaskar. Kindly notice two things. One, the native should take fasting in steps (as everyone should). Head, if deprived of glucose, suffers. Hence body should take time to fasting is steps to adjust. First ask him to have fast on cold milk/icecream etc and also fruits if he likes. Then after 2-3 months, only cold milk and water; and after 4 months, as he gradually reduces milk, only water. Then still further, he can even eliminate water (if he wants). Second, UL in the 8th shows rina is large. UL is typically misunderstood as only marriage. However, UL represents sumtotal of what we ought to give back to the world, large part of it typically is to wife because marriage is biggest area of compromise for a typical person. A paapa graha in the UL and 2nd from UL prevents giving thereby trying to perpetuate the rina or make it evolve into further debts. Hence, it is best to propitiate the deity associated with the 2nd from UL after fasting on UL day. Ask him to worship Chandi Mata after the fast in the evening before he takes food. Moreover, he should donate to poor brahmins (Shani in Meena in UL) or orphans or poor people in general and the donations should be done only on Thursdays !! And most importantly, he should wear a yellow sapphire to counteract Rahu in 9th in MKS/Badhak; and this also strengthens his Guru/UL and VRY. AK is in debility in Navamsa and this debility is removed by Shukra in kendra with Ishtakaraka Rahu. Clearly, worshipping Durga will strengthen atma-bala and remove the Badhaka effects (together with strong Guru). Best wishes, Sourav ================================================================== sohamsa , "reema_sriganesh" <reema_sriganesh wrote:>> || Hare Rama Krishna ||> > Namaste Bojan-ji,> > Thank you so much. Your reply helped me in understanding the UL> better, and it certainly will go a long way in helping the native. He> seems to really want to save his marriage, and may God grant him the> power to do so.> > Thank you once again, and best wishes.> > May Sri Vishnu bless us all,> Reema.> > sohamsa , bojan vidakovic janbovid@ wrote:> >> > > > HARE RAMA KRISHNA> > Dear Reema, as per my experience it is the karma that> > should be cleansed thorugh that UL with fasting, and> > ofcourse it is not so easy. What I have seen is that> > when UL is in 8th or its lord is at the same time the> > lord of the eight bhava than it is very hard to fast,> > esspeceally at the beginning. It can bring headaches,> > short temper, but after some time of regular fast it> > will be normalized. Ofcourse he should fast on that> > particular day, it will save his marriage and fix> > problems with unmada yoga etc. Everything will be fine> > after few weeks...best wishes, but the person must> > keep fasting, Bojan Vidakovic> > OM TAT SAT> > --- reema_sriganesh reema_sriganesh@ wrote:> > > > > || Hare Rama Krishna ||> > > > > > Namaste,> > > > > > A native approached me about his issues in marriage.> > > After looking at> > > his chart, I suggested that he fast on Thursdays> > > (since UL lord is> > > exalted and retrograde Guru placed in the 12th> > > house).> > > > > > After doing this remedy, the native gave the> > > following feedback:> > > > > > I have been noticing that I get very angry on> > > Thursday and I get very> > > much frustrated also. As a result of this I start> > > remembering all the> > > things that I have done or have been done to me.> > > > > > * * *> > > > > > Native's data: 12/25/1966, 22:20 Hrs, 5:30 East of> > > GMT, 77E12, 28N36> > > > > > My question is - why should the native feel angry> > > particularly on> > > Thursdays? Is it just the exhaustion of fasting or> > > something more? I> > > notice that there is an unmada yoga on the UL axis.> > > But that should> > > mean that the spouse could have temper problems. It> > > doesn't mean that> > > the native cannot fast on the UL lord's day to try> > > to save his> > > marriage, correct?> > > > > > So are there any other indications, which I might> > > have missed, that> > > suggest native's frustration and anger on Thursdays> > > since he began> > > fasting?> > > > > > Any insight would be greatly appreciated.> > > > > > May Sri Vishnu bless us all,> > > Reema.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 20, 2006 Report Share Posted July 20, 2006 Dear Freedom, I sincerely hope that you do not presume to have the spiritual authority to recommend divorce. This will be the downfall of jyotish in the West, and already seems to be a commonplace in many circles. Your technical abilities are not in question; what is worrisome to me is the karma borne by both jyotishi and native for destroying families and engineering self-fulfilling prophecies. I have not even looked at the chart in question (though I hope to do so soon and email Reema off-list). I think SJC sgould build into its charter a way of ensuring that jyotishis avoid precisely the tone your email exemplifies, which seems more in the spirit of a commandment or directive than a diplomatic and compassionate offering, infused with humility and bedside manner. Respectfully, J.I. Abbot sohamsa , " freeflowaum " <freeflowaum wrote: > > Hare Rama Krsna > > Reema, > Do not be attached to individual desires of native or your own personal > ideals about relationships, unattachment brings clear sightedness. The > Upapada is heavily afflicted and there should have been a kumbha vivaha > before the native was married, so the UL could have been broken, but too > late now. > Bojan, > The unmada is on the UL, which means the wife has lost it, irrational anger > and depression (Saturn in first and Mars in seventh-to UL). To check if this > is the correct wife we are speaking of, she would have a heavily afflicted > (or MKS) Mars and Saturn in HER natal chart, based on upon his UL. And UL > fasting will not remove her unmada, only promote marriage. > That same Mars-Saturn is a poverty yoga from the native's lagna (malefics in > 2nd and 8th). So after the vivaha (marriage), the native would become poor > and the wife would become 'mad'. This is a cursed UL (cursed marriage) and > in these cases it will be seen that the native's spouse will also have a > curse on their UL. Now if the curse is on your head, you cannot get out of > it, but when a curse is on your marriage, then it is possible to let the > curse go. > > Secondly, the sustaining factor in this marriage is maranakaraka sthana Rahu > (second from UL) and this is on his AL. The marriage had little chance of > lasting to begin with because a dying malefic is feeding it. The vivaha's > breaking has ruined the native's name and reputation, the longer the break > lasts the more damage there will be to the native's image (what people think > of him and how he is socially percieved). > > The breaking of the vivaha will benefit both the native and his wife! She > will regain some sanity and the native will be able to do remedy for his > financial problems. The two people will actually be able to get along much > better after divorce. In this chart, Bagala worship will break the marriage. > Fasting will only prolong the suffering of both natives. Therefore, first > have the native do mantra of Bagala Devi. > > Then after divorce, the native should perform kumbha vivaha (as next UL is > on Ketu-Rahu axis) and Rahu is MKS as already mentioned (another problemed > marriage). The third UL, his next marriage after divorce and kumba vivaha > will prove very beneficial as it contains an uccha Moon. With this marriage > he will prosper financially and his dharma will grow in many ways. Jupiter > is uccha banga being uplifted by this uccha Moon that will be activated by > the third marriage. With the worship of Krsna he will be able to attain his > beneficial UL in his upcoming Jupiter Moon Mula dasha (if he is completely > divorced and has performed kumbha vivaha) by that time. > > Namah Sivaya > > _____ > > sohamsa [sohamsa ] On Behalf Of > reema_sriganesh > Wednesday, July 19, 2006 2:32 PM > sohamsa > Re: Why should fasting on Thursday make the native angry? > > || Hare Rama Krishna || > > Namaste Bojan-ji, > > Thank you so much. Your reply helped me in understanding the UL > better, and it certainly will go a long way in helping the native. He > seems to really want to save his marriage, and may God grant him the > power to do so. > > Thank you once again, and best wishes. > > May Sri Vishnu bless us all, > Reema. > > sohamsa@ <sohamsa%40> .com, bojan > vidakovic <janbovid@> wrote: > > > > > > HARE RAMA KRISHNA > > Dear Reema, as per my experience it is the karma that > > should be cleansed thorugh that UL with fasting, and > > ofcourse it is not so easy. What I have seen is that > > when UL is in 8th or its lord is at the same time the > > lord of the eight bhava than it is very hard to fast, > > esspeceally at the beginning. It can bring headaches, > > short temper, but after some time of regular fast it > > will be normalized. Ofcourse he should fast on that > > particular day, it will save his marriage and fix > > problems with unmada yoga etc. Everything will be fine > > after few weeks...best wishes, but the person must > > keep fasting, Bojan Vidakovic > > OM TAT SAT > > --- reema_sriganesh <reema_sriganesh@> wrote: > > > > > || Hare Rama Krishna || > > > > > > Namaste, > > > > > > A native approached me about his issues in marriage. > > > After looking at > > > his chart, I suggested that he fast on Thursdays > > > (since UL lord is > > > exalted and retrograde Guru placed in the 12th > > > house). > > > > > > After doing this remedy, the native gave the > > > following feedback: > > > > > > I have been noticing that I get very angry on > > > Thursday and I get very > > > much frustrated also. As a result of this I start > > > remembering all the > > > things that I have done or have been done to me. > > > > > > * * * > > > > > > Native's data: 12/25/1966, 22:20 Hrs, 5:30 East of > > > GMT, 77E12, 28N36 > > > > > > My question is - why should the native feel angry > > > particularly on > > > Thursdays? Is it just the exhaustion of fasting or > > > something more? I > > > notice that there is an unmada yoga on the UL axis. > > > But that should > > > mean that the spouse could have temper problems. It > > > doesn't mean that > > > the native cannot fast on the UL lord's day to try > > > to save his > > > marriage, correct? > > > > > > So are there any other indications, which I might > > > have missed, that > > > suggest native's frustration and anger on Thursdays > > > since he began > > > fasting? > > > > > > Any insight would be greatly appreciated. > > > > > > May Sri Vishnu bless us all, > > > Reema. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://mail. <> > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 20, 2006 Report Share Posted July 20, 2006 I agree with your statements on ethics of jyotishi. regards / Prafulla Gang In order to live free and happily you must sacrifice boredom. It is not always an easy sacrifice. > > j.abbot > Thu, 20 Jul 2006 05:06:30 -0000 > sohamsa > Re: Why should fasting on Thursday make the native > angry? > > Dear Freedom, > > I sincerely hope that you do not presume to have the spiritual > authority to recommend divorce. This will be the downfall of jyotish > in the West, and already seems to be a commonplace in many circles. > Your technical abilities are not in question; what is worrisome to me > is the karma borne by both jyotishi and native for destroying families > and engineering self-fulfilling prophecies. I have not even looked at > the chart in question (though I hope to do so soon and email Reema > off-list). I think SJC sgould build into its charter a way of > ensuring that jyotishis avoid precisely the tone your email > exemplifies, which seems more in the spirit of a commandment or > directive than a diplomatic and compassionate offering, infused with > humility and bedside manner. > > Respectfully, > > J.I. Abbot > > sohamsa , " freeflowaum " <freeflowaum wrote: >> >> Hare Rama Krsna >> >> Reema, >> Do not be attached to individual desires of native or your own personal >> ideals about relationships, unattachment brings clear sightedness. The >> Upapada is heavily afflicted and there should have been a kumbha vivaha >> before the native was married, so the UL could have been broken, but too >> late now. >> Bojan, >> The unmada is on the UL, which means the wife has lost it, > irrational anger >> and depression (Saturn in first and Mars in seventh-to UL). To check > if this >> is the correct wife we are speaking of, she would have a heavily > afflicted >> (or MKS) Mars and Saturn in HER natal chart, based on upon his UL. > And UL >> fasting will not remove her unmada, only promote marriage. >> That same Mars-Saturn is a poverty yoga from the native's lagna > (malefics in >> 2nd and 8th). So after the vivaha (marriage), the native would > become poor >> and the wife would become 'mad'. This is a cursed UL (cursed > marriage) and >> in these cases it will be seen that the native's spouse will also have a >> curse on their UL. Now if the curse is on your head, you cannot get > out of >> it, but when a curse is on your marriage, then it is possible to let the >> curse go. >> >> Secondly, the sustaining factor in this marriage is maranakaraka > sthana Rahu >> (second from UL) and this is on his AL. The marriage had little > chance of >> lasting to begin with because a dying malefic is feeding it. The > vivaha's >> breaking has ruined the native's name and reputation, the longer the > break >> lasts the more damage there will be to the native's image (what > people think >> of him and how he is socially percieved). >> >> The breaking of the vivaha will benefit both the native and his > wife! She >> will regain some sanity and the native will be able to do remedy for his >> financial problems. The two people will actually be able to get > along much >> better after divorce. In this chart, Bagala worship will break the > marriage. >> Fasting will only prolong the suffering of both natives. Therefore, > first >> have the native do mantra of Bagala Devi. >> >> Then after divorce, the native should perform kumbha vivaha (as next > UL is >> on Ketu-Rahu axis) and Rahu is MKS as already mentioned (another > problemed >> marriage). The third UL, his next marriage after divorce and kumba > vivaha >> will prove very beneficial as it contains an uccha Moon. With this > marriage >> he will prosper financially and his dharma will grow in many ways. > Jupiter >> is uccha banga being uplifted by this uccha Moon that will be > activated by >> the third marriage. With the worship of Krsna he will be able to > attain his >> beneficial UL in his upcoming Jupiter Moon Mula dasha (if he is > completely >> divorced and has performed kumbha vivaha) by that time. >> >> Namah Sivaya >> >> _____ >> >> sohamsa [sohamsa ] On > Behalf Of >> reema_sriganesh >> Wednesday, July 19, 2006 2:32 PM >> sohamsa >> Re: Why should fasting on Thursday make the > native angry? >> >> || Hare Rama Krishna || >> >> Namaste Bojan-ji, >> >> Thank you so much. Your reply helped me in understanding the UL >> better, and it certainly will go a long way in helping the native. He >> seems to really want to save his marriage, and may God grant him the >> power to do so. >> >> Thank you once again, and best wishes. >> >> May Sri Vishnu bless us all, >> Reema. >> >> sohamsa@ <sohamsa%40> .com, > bojan >> vidakovic <janbovid@> wrote: >>> >>> >>> HARE RAMA KRISHNA >>> Dear Reema, as per my experience it is the karma that >>> should be cleansed thorugh that UL with fasting, and >>> ofcourse it is not so easy. What I have seen is that >>> when UL is in 8th or its lord is at the same time the >>> lord of the eight bhava than it is very hard to fast, >>> esspeceally at the beginning. It can bring headaches, >>> short temper, but after some time of regular fast it >>> will be normalized. Ofcourse he should fast on that >>> particular day, it will save his marriage and fix >>> problems with unmada yoga etc. Everything will be fine >>> after few weeks...best wishes, but the person must >>> keep fasting, Bojan Vidakovic >>> OM TAT SAT >>> --- reema_sriganesh <reema_sriganesh@> wrote: >>> >>>> || Hare Rama Krishna || >>>> >>>> Namaste, >>>> >>>> A native approached me about his issues in marriage. >>>> After looking at >>>> his chart, I suggested that he fast on Thursdays >>>> (since UL lord is >>>> exalted and retrograde Guru placed in the 12th >>>> house). >>>> >>>> After doing this remedy, the native gave the >>>> following feedback: >>>> >>>> I have been noticing that I get very angry on >>>> Thursday and I get very >>>> much frustrated also. As a result of this I start >>>> remembering all the >>>> things that I have done or have been done to me. >>>> >>>> * * * >>>> >>>> Native's data: 12/25/1966, 22:20 Hrs, 5:30 East of >>>> GMT, 77E12, 28N36 >>>> >>>> My question is - why should the native feel angry >>>> particularly on >>>> Thursdays? Is it just the exhaustion of fasting or >>>> something more? I >>>> notice that there is an unmada yoga on the UL axis. >>>> But that should >>>> mean that the spouse could have temper problems. It >>>> doesn't mean that >>>> the native cannot fast on the UL lord's day to try >>>> to save his >>>> marriage, correct? >>>> >>>> So are there any other indications, which I might >>>> have missed, that >>>> suggest native's frustration and anger on Thursdays >>>> since he began >>>> fasting? >>>> >>>> Any insight would be greatly appreciated. >>>> >>>> May Sri Vishnu bless us all, >>>> Reema. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> http://mail. <> >>> >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 20, 2006 Report Share Posted July 20, 2006 Hare Rama Krishna Dear Mr. Abbot, PLease post your analysis on the list of the chart in question.I'd like to see how you are able to make something nice out of something that can be causing both parties alot of pain and destruction. undoubtably the UL is severly afflicted. Of course many angles would need to be checked before the original opinion is confirmed. No one needs to have " spiritual authority " , but an astrologer needs common sense. I'd rather take the karma for supposedly " destoying a marraige " than taking the karma of seeing a badly afflicted chart and recommending something that in all probablity wont work as the relationship is not destined to survive, or worse yet, encourage some lady/man to stick around in a marraige while her husband/wife abuses them, and perhaps kills them -while I sit back and told tell them to " work it out " (while I attmept to play God encouraging them to stay together,,, it goes both ways!) Look how many people children will suffer if they kill each other or make each others life hellish. Some marriages are just a living hell.While others can work with some help. Yes, Ive seen and heard all sorts of things. Freedom was just relating what he thought about the astrological content, I dont think you can jump on him so easy for that.He wasnt replying directly to the person/client he was attempting to give is astrological assessment of the situation for some ohter astrologers.Everyone is free to do so. best wishes Lakshmi sohamsa , " j.abbot " <j.abbot wrote: > > Dear Freedom, > > I sincerely hope that you do not presume to have the spiritual > authority to recommend divorce. This will be the downfall of jyotish > in the West, and already seems to be a commonplace in many circles. > Your technical abilities are not in question; what is worrisome to me > is the karma borne by both jyotishi and native for destroying families > and engineering self-fulfilling prophecies. I have not even looked at > the chart in question (though I hope to do so soon and email Reema > off-list). I think SJC sgould build into its charter a way of > ensuring that jyotishis avoid precisely the tone your email > exemplifies, which seems more in the spirit of a commandment or > directive than a diplomatic and compassionate offering, infused with > humility and bedside manner. > > Respectfully, > > J.I. Abbot > > sohamsa , " freeflowaum " <freeflowaum@> wrote: > > > > Hare Rama Krsna > > > > Reema, > > Do not be attached to individual desires of native or your own personal > > ideals about relationships, unattachment brings clear sightedness. The > > Upapada is heavily afflicted and there should have been a kumbha vivaha > > before the native was married, so the UL could have been broken, but too > > late now. > > Bojan, > > The unmada is on the UL, which means the wife has lost it, > irrational anger > > and depression (Saturn in first and Mars in seventh-to UL). To check > if this > > is the correct wife we are speaking of, she would have a heavily > afflicted > > (or MKS) Mars and Saturn in HER natal chart, based on upon his UL. > And UL > > fasting will not remove her unmada, only promote marriage. > > That same Mars-Saturn is a poverty yoga from the native's lagna > (malefics in > > 2nd and 8th). So after the vivaha (marriage), the native would > become poor > > and the wife would become 'mad'. This is a cursed UL (cursed > marriage) and > > in these cases it will be seen that the native's spouse will also have a > > curse on their UL. Now if the curse is on your head, you cannot get > out of > > it, but when a curse is on your marriage, then it is possible to let the > > curse go. > > > > Secondly, the sustaining factor in this marriage is maranakaraka > sthana Rahu > > (second from UL) and this is on his AL. The marriage had little > chance of > > lasting to begin with because a dying malefic is feeding it. The > vivaha's > > breaking has ruined the native's name and reputation, the longer the > break > > lasts the more damage there will be to the native's image (what > people think > > of him and how he is socially percieved). > > > > The breaking of the vivaha will benefit both the native and his > wife! She > > will regain some sanity and the native will be able to do remedy for his > > financial problems. The two people will actually be able to get > along much > > better after divorce. In this chart, Bagala worship will break the > marriage. > > Fasting will only prolong the suffering of both natives. Therefore, > first > > have the native do mantra of Bagala Devi. > > > > Then after divorce, the native should perform kumbha vivaha (as next > UL is > > on Ketu-Rahu axis) and Rahu is MKS as already mentioned (another > problemed > > marriage). The third UL, his next marriage after divorce and kumba > vivaha > > will prove very beneficial as it contains an uccha Moon. With this > marriage > > he will prosper financially and his dharma will grow in many ways. > Jupiter > > is uccha banga being uplifted by this uccha Moon that will be > activated by > > the third marriage. With the worship of Krsna he will be able to > attain his > > beneficial UL in his upcoming Jupiter Moon Mula dasha (if he is > completely > > divorced and has performed kumbha vivaha) by that time. > > > > Namah Sivaya > > > > _____ > > > > sohamsa [sohamsa ] On > Behalf Of > > reema_sriganesh > > Wednesday, July 19, 2006 2:32 PM > > sohamsa > > Re: Why should fasting on Thursday make the > native angry? > > > > || Hare Rama Krishna || > > > > Namaste Bojan-ji, > > > > Thank you so much. Your reply helped me in understanding the UL > > better, and it certainly will go a long way in helping the native. He > > seems to really want to save his marriage, and may God grant him the > > power to do so. > > > > Thank you once again, and best wishes. > > > > May Sri Vishnu bless us all, > > Reema. > > > > sohamsa@ <sohamsa% 40> .com, > bojan > > vidakovic <janbovid@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > HARE RAMA KRISHNA > > > Dear Reema, as per my experience it is the karma that > > > should be cleansed thorugh that UL with fasting, and > > > ofcourse it is not so easy. What I have seen is that > > > when UL is in 8th or its lord is at the same time the > > > lord of the eight bhava than it is very hard to fast, > > > esspeceally at the beginning. It can bring headaches, > > > short temper, but after some time of regular fast it > > > will be normalized. Ofcourse he should fast on that > > > particular day, it will save his marriage and fix > > > problems with unmada yoga etc. Everything will be fine > > > after few weeks...best wishes, but the person must > > > keep fasting, Bojan Vidakovic > > > OM TAT SAT > > > --- reema_sriganesh <reema_sriganesh@> wrote: > > > > > > > || Hare Rama Krishna || > > > > > > > > Namaste, > > > > > > > > A native approached me about his issues in marriage. > > > > After looking at > > > > his chart, I suggested that he fast on Thursdays > > > > (since UL lord is > > > > exalted and retrograde Guru placed in the 12th > > > > house). > > > > > > > > After doing this remedy, the native gave the > > > > following feedback: > > > > > > > > I have been noticing that I get very angry on > > > > Thursday and I get very > > > > much frustrated also. As a result of this I start > > > > remembering all the > > > > things that I have done or have been done to me. > > > > > > > > * * * > > > > > > > > Native's data: 12/25/1966, 22:20 Hrs, 5:30 East of > > > > GMT, 77E12, 28N36 > > > > > > > > My question is - why should the native feel angry > > > > particularly on > > > > Thursdays? Is it just the exhaustion of fasting or > > > > something more? I > > > > notice that there is an unmada yoga on the UL axis. > > > > But that should > > > > mean that the spouse could have temper problems. It > > > > doesn't mean that > > > > the native cannot fast on the UL lord's day to try > > > > to save his > > > > marriage, correct? > > > > > > > > So are there any other indications, which I might > > > > have missed, that > > > > suggest native's frustration and anger on Thursdays > > > > since he began > > > > fasting? > > > > > > > > Any insight would be greatly appreciated. > > > > > > > > May Sri Vishnu bless us all, > > > > Reema. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://mail. <> > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 20, 2006 Report Share Posted July 20, 2006 || Hare Rama Krishna || Dear Lakshmi-ji, Namaskar. Either way you are 'playing God' - by participating or by sitting back (in full knowledge that you can influence the situation). Hence it is not the argument. The thought behind is subtle and transcends western/eastern demarkation. Jyotisha should have full faith in God and realize that his own tendencies/inclinations are promptings of God only. He is only a nimitta. If your heart goes out to remedy a situation and bring immediate relief if it good within this idea that God is making you do so. If your heart says no let him suffer and via that burn his karma it is again God's will. It also means that the wife is going through a painful suffering part which cleanses her karma and gives direction to her atman so that she may not seek further fulfilment in next relationship (if that is good for her). How do we know ? The bottomline is that a Jyotishi should, in my opinion, show light/jyoti and let events take course. Too much talk generates heat instead of the divine and blissful light that jyoti is supposed to be. Now let us smile and not argue for we do not know our own follies much. Best wishes, Sourav ================================================================== sohamsa , "lakshmikary" <lakshmikary wrote:>> Hare Rama Krishna> Dear Mr. Abbot,> PLease post your analysis on the list of the chart in question.I'd > like to see how you are able to make something nice out of something > that can be causing both parties alot of pain and destruction.> > undoubtably the UL is severly afflicted. Of course many angles would > need to be checked before the original opinion is confirmed.> No one needs to have "spiritual authority", but an astrologer needs > common sense.> I'd rather take the karma for supposedly "destoying a marraige" than > taking the karma of seeing a badly afflicted chart and recommending > something that in all probablity wont work as the relationship is > not destined to survive, or worse yet, encourage some lady/man to > stick around in a marraige while her husband/wife abuses them, and > perhaps kills them -while I sit back and told tell them to "work it > out" (while I attmept to play God encouraging them to stay > together,,, it goes both ways!) Look how many people children will > suffer if they kill each other or make each others life hellish.> Some marriages are just a living hell.While others can work with > some help.> Yes, Ive seen and heard all sorts of things.> Freedom was just relating what he thought about the astrological > content, I dont think you can jump on him so easy for that.He wasnt > replying directly to the person/client he was attempting to give is > astrological assessment of the situation for some ohter > astrologers.Everyone is free to do so.> best wishes> Lakshmi> > > > > sohamsa , "j.abbot" j.abbot@ wrote:> >> > Dear Freedom,> > > > I sincerely hope that you do not presume to have the spiritual> > authority to recommend divorce. This will be the downfall of > jyotish> > in the West, and already seems to be a commonplace in many > circles. > > Your technical abilities are not in question; what is worrisome to > me> > is the karma borne by both jyotishi and native for destroying > families> > and engineering self-fulfilling prophecies. I have not even > looked at> > the chart in question (though I hope to do so soon and email Reema> > off-list). I think SJC sgould build into its charter a way of> > ensuring that jyotishis avoid precisely the tone your email> > exemplifies, which seems more in the spirit of a commandment or> > directive than a diplomatic and compassionate offering, infused > with> > humility and bedside manner.> > > > Respectfully,> > > > J.I. Abbot> > > > sohamsa , "freeflowaum" <freeflowaum@> wrote:> > >> > > Hare Rama Krsna> > > > > > Reema,> > > Do not be attached to individual desires of native or your own > personal> > > ideals about relationships, unattachment brings clear > sightedness. The> > > Upapada is heavily afflicted and there should have been a kumbha > vivaha> > > before the native was married, so the UL could have been broken, > but too> > > late now. > > > Bojan,> > > The unmada is on the UL, which means the wife has lost it,> > irrational anger> > > and depression (Saturn in first and Mars in seventh-to UL). To > check> > if this> > > is the correct wife we are speaking of, she would have a heavily> > afflicted> > > (or MKS) Mars and Saturn in HER natal chart, based on upon his > UL.> > And UL> > > fasting will not remove her unmada, only promote marriage.> > > That same Mars-Saturn is a poverty yoga from the native's lagna> > (malefics in> > > 2nd and 8th). So after the vivaha (marriage), the native would> > become poor> > > and the wife would become 'mad'. This is a cursed UL (cursed> > marriage) and> > > in these cases it will be seen that the native's spouse will > also have a> > > curse on their UL. Now if the curse is on your head, you cannot > get> > out of> > > it, but when a curse is on your marriage, then it is possible to > let the> > > curse go. > > > > > > Secondly, the sustaining factor in this marriage is maranakaraka> > sthana Rahu> > > (second from UL) and this is on his AL. The marriage had little> > chance of> > > lasting to begin with because a dying malefic is feeding it. The> > vivaha's> > > breaking has ruined the native's name and reputation, the longer > the> > break> > > lasts the more damage there will be to the native's image (what> > people think> > > of him and how he is socially percieved). > > > > > > The breaking of the vivaha will benefit both the native and his> > wife! She> > > will regain some sanity and the native will be able to do remedy > for his> > > financial problems. The two people will actually be able to get> > along much> > > better after divorce. In this chart, Bagala worship will break > the> > marriage.> > > Fasting will only prolong the suffering of both natives. > Therefore,> > first> > > have the native do mantra of Bagala Devi.> > > > > > Then after divorce, the native should perform kumbha vivaha (as > next> > UL is> > > on Ketu-Rahu axis) and Rahu is MKS as already mentioned (another> > problemed> > > marriage). The third UL, his next marriage after divorce and > kumba> > vivaha> > > will prove very beneficial as it contains an uccha Moon. With > this> > marriage> > > he will prosper financially and his dharma will grow in many > ways.> > Jupiter> > > is uccha banga being uplifted by this uccha Moon that will be> > activated by> > > the third marriage. With the worship of Krsna he will be able to> > attain his> > > beneficial UL in his upcoming Jupiter Moon Mula dasha (if he is> > completely> > > divorced and has performed kumbha vivaha) by that time. > > > > > > Namah Sivaya> > > > > > _____ > > > > > > sohamsa [sohamsa ] On> > Behalf Of> > > reema_sriganesh> > > Wednesday, July 19, 2006 2:32 PM> > > sohamsa > > > Re: Why should fasting on Thursday make the> > native angry?> > > > > > || Hare Rama Krishna ||> > > > > > Namaste Bojan-ji,> > > > > > Thank you so much. Your reply helped me in understanding the UL> > > better, and it certainly will go a long way in helping the > native. He> > > seems to really want to save his marriage, and may God grant him > the> > > power to do so.> > > > > > Thank you once again, and best wishes.> > > > > > May Sri Vishnu bless us all,> > > Reema.> > > > > > sohamsa@ <sohamsa%> 40> .com,> > bojan> > > vidakovic <janbovid@> wrote:> > > >> > > > > > > > HARE RAMA KRISHNA> > > > Dear Reema, as per my experience it is the karma that> > > > should be cleansed thorugh that UL with fasting, and> > > > ofcourse it is not so easy. What I have seen is that> > > > when UL is in 8th or its lord is at the same time the> > > > lord of the eight bhava than it is very hard to fast,> > > > esspeceally at the beginning. It can bring headaches,> > > > short temper, but after some time of regular fast it> > > > will be normalized. Ofcourse he should fast on that> > > > particular day, it will save his marriage and fix> > > > problems with unmada yoga etc. Everything will be fine> > > > after few weeks...best wishes, but the person must> > > > keep fasting, Bojan Vidakovic> > > > OM TAT SAT> > > > --- reema_sriganesh <reema_sriganesh@> wrote:> > > > > > > > > || Hare Rama Krishna ||> > > > > > > > > > Namaste,> > > > > > > > > > A native approached me about his issues in marriage.> > > > > After looking at> > > > > his chart, I suggested that he fast on Thursdays> > > > > (since UL lord is> > > > > exalted and retrograde Guru placed in the 12th> > > > > house).> > > > > > > > > > After doing this remedy, the native gave the> > > > > following feedback:> > > > > > > > > > I have been noticing that I get very angry on> > > > > Thursday and I get very> > > > > much frustrated also. As a result of this I start> > > > > remembering all the> > > > > things that I have done or have been done to me.> > > > > > > > > > * * *> > > > > > > > > > Native's data: 12/25/1966, 22:20 Hrs, 5:30 East of> > > > > GMT, 77E12, 28N36> > > > > > > > > > My question is - why should the native feel angry> > > > > particularly on> > > > > Thursdays? Is it just the exhaustion of fasting or> > > > > something more? I> > > > > notice that there is an unmada yoga on the UL axis.> > > > > But that should> > > > > mean that the spouse could have temper problems. It> > > > > doesn't mean that> > > > > the native cannot fast on the UL lord's day to try> > > > > to save his> > > > > marriage, correct?> > > > > > > > > > So are there any other indications, which I might> > > > > have missed, that> > > > > suggest native's frustration and anger on Thursdays> > > > > since he began> > > > > fasting?> > > > > > > > > > Any insight would be greatly appreciated.> > > > > > > > > > May Sri Vishnu bless us all,> > > > > Reema.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://mail. <> > > > >> > >> >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 20, 2006 Report Share Posted July 20, 2006 Dear Laxmi ji I will accept your opinion, if astrologer has track record of 100% accurate prediction. If he is fallible, then this is not recommended line of consultation. Yes, each one is free..even if it causes harm to someone!!!! regards / Prafulla Gang In order to live free and happily you must sacrifice boredom. It is not always an easy sacrifice. > > lakshmikary > Thu, 20 Jul 2006 06:57:21 -0000 > sohamsa > Re: Why should fasting on Thursday make the native > angry? > > Hare Rama Krishna > Dear Mr. Abbot, > PLease post your analysis on the list of the chart in question.I'd > like to see how you are able to make something nice out of something > that can be causing both parties alot of pain and destruction. > > undoubtably the UL is severly afflicted. Of course many angles would > need to be checked before the original opinion is confirmed. > No one needs to have " spiritual authority " , but an astrologer needs > common sense. > I'd rather take the karma for supposedly " destoying a marraige " than > taking the karma of seeing a badly afflicted chart and recommending > something that in all probablity wont work as the relationship is > not destined to survive, or worse yet, encourage some lady/man to > stick around in a marraige while her husband/wife abuses them, and > perhaps kills them -while I sit back and told tell them to " work it > out " (while I attmept to play God encouraging them to stay > together,,, it goes both ways!) Look how many people children will > suffer if they kill each other or make each others life hellish. > Some marriages are just a living hell.While others can work with > some help. > Yes, Ive seen and heard all sorts of things. > Freedom was just relating what he thought about the astrological > content, I dont think you can jump on him so easy for that.He wasnt > replying directly to the person/client he was attempting to give is > astrological assessment of the situation for some ohter > astrologers.Everyone is free to do so. > best wishes > Lakshmi > > > > > sohamsa , " j.abbot " <j.abbot wrote: >> >> Dear Freedom, >> >> I sincerely hope that you do not presume to have the spiritual >> authority to recommend divorce. This will be the downfall of > jyotish >> in the West, and already seems to be a commonplace in many > circles. >> Your technical abilities are not in question; what is worrisome to > me >> is the karma borne by both jyotishi and native for destroying > families >> and engineering self-fulfilling prophecies. I have not even > looked at >> the chart in question (though I hope to do so soon and email Reema >> off-list). I think SJC sgould build into its charter a way of >> ensuring that jyotishis avoid precisely the tone your email >> exemplifies, which seems more in the spirit of a commandment or >> directive than a diplomatic and compassionate offering, infused > with >> humility and bedside manner. >> >> Respectfully, >> >> J.I. Abbot >> >> sohamsa , " freeflowaum " <freeflowaum@> wrote: >>> >>> Hare Rama Krsna >>> >>> Reema, >>> Do not be attached to individual desires of native or your own > personal >>> ideals about relationships, unattachment brings clear > sightedness. The >>> Upapada is heavily afflicted and there should have been a kumbha > vivaha >>> before the native was married, so the UL could have been broken, > but too >>> late now. >>> Bojan, >>> The unmada is on the UL, which means the wife has lost it, >> irrational anger >>> and depression (Saturn in first and Mars in seventh-to UL). To > check >> if this >>> is the correct wife we are speaking of, she would have a heavily >> afflicted >>> (or MKS) Mars and Saturn in HER natal chart, based on upon his > UL. >> And UL >>> fasting will not remove her unmada, only promote marriage. >>> That same Mars-Saturn is a poverty yoga from the native's lagna >> (malefics in >>> 2nd and 8th). So after the vivaha (marriage), the native would >> become poor >>> and the wife would become 'mad'. This is a cursed UL (cursed >> marriage) and >>> in these cases it will be seen that the native's spouse will > also have a >>> curse on their UL. Now if the curse is on your head, you cannot > get >> out of >>> it, but when a curse is on your marriage, then it is possible to > let the >>> curse go. >>> >>> Secondly, the sustaining factor in this marriage is maranakaraka >> sthana Rahu >>> (second from UL) and this is on his AL. The marriage had little >> chance of >>> lasting to begin with because a dying malefic is feeding it. The >> vivaha's >>> breaking has ruined the native's name and reputation, the longer > the >> break >>> lasts the more damage there will be to the native's image (what >> people think >>> of him and how he is socially percieved). >>> >>> The breaking of the vivaha will benefit both the native and his >> wife! She >>> will regain some sanity and the native will be able to do remedy > for his >>> financial problems. The two people will actually be able to get >> along much >>> better after divorce. In this chart, Bagala worship will break > the >> marriage. >>> Fasting will only prolong the suffering of both natives. > Therefore, >> first >>> have the native do mantra of Bagala Devi. >>> >>> Then after divorce, the native should perform kumbha vivaha (as > next >> UL is >>> on Ketu-Rahu axis) and Rahu is MKS as already mentioned (another >> problemed >>> marriage). The third UL, his next marriage after divorce and > kumba >> vivaha >>> will prove very beneficial as it contains an uccha Moon. With > this >> marriage >>> he will prosper financially and his dharma will grow in many > ways. >> Jupiter >>> is uccha banga being uplifted by this uccha Moon that will be >> activated by >>> the third marriage. With the worship of Krsna he will be able to >> attain his >>> beneficial UL in his upcoming Jupiter Moon Mula dasha (if he is >> completely >>> divorced and has performed kumbha vivaha) by that time. >>> >>> Namah Sivaya >>> >>> _____ >>> >>> sohamsa [sohamsa ] On >> Behalf Of >>> reema_sriganesh >>> Wednesday, July 19, 2006 2:32 PM >>> sohamsa >>> Re: Why should fasting on Thursday make the >> native angry? >>> >>> || Hare Rama Krishna || >>> >>> Namaste Bojan-ji, >>> >>> Thank you so much. Your reply helped me in understanding the UL >>> better, and it certainly will go a long way in helping the > native. He >>> seems to really want to save his marriage, and may God grant him > the >>> power to do so. >>> >>> Thank you once again, and best wishes. >>> >>> May Sri Vishnu bless us all, >>> Reema. >>> >>> sohamsa@ <sohamsa% > 40> .com, >> bojan >>> vidakovic <janbovid@> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> HARE RAMA KRISHNA >>>> Dear Reema, as per my experience it is the karma that >>>> should be cleansed thorugh that UL with fasting, and >>>> ofcourse it is not so easy. What I have seen is that >>>> when UL is in 8th or its lord is at the same time the >>>> lord of the eight bhava than it is very hard to fast, >>>> esspeceally at the beginning. It can bring headaches, >>>> short temper, but after some time of regular fast it >>>> will be normalized. Ofcourse he should fast on that >>>> particular day, it will save his marriage and fix >>>> problems with unmada yoga etc. Everything will be fine >>>> after few weeks...best wishes, but the person must >>>> keep fasting, Bojan Vidakovic >>>> OM TAT SAT >>>> --- reema_sriganesh <reema_sriganesh@> wrote: >>>> >>>>> || Hare Rama Krishna || >>>>> >>>>> Namaste, >>>>> >>>>> A native approached me about his issues in marriage. >>>>> After looking at >>>>> his chart, I suggested that he fast on Thursdays >>>>> (since UL lord is >>>>> exalted and retrograde Guru placed in the 12th >>>>> house). >>>>> >>>>> After doing this remedy, the native gave the >>>>> following feedback: >>>>> >>>>> I have been noticing that I get very angry on >>>>> Thursday and I get very >>>>> much frustrated also. As a result of this I start >>>>> remembering all the >>>>> things that I have done or have been done to me. >>>>> >>>>> * * * >>>>> >>>>> Native's data: 12/25/1966, 22:20 Hrs, 5:30 East of >>>>> GMT, 77E12, 28N36 >>>>> >>>>> My question is - why should the native feel angry >>>>> particularly on >>>>> Thursdays? Is it just the exhaustion of fasting or >>>>> something more? I >>>>> notice that there is an unmada yoga on the UL axis. >>>>> But that should >>>>> mean that the spouse could have temper problems. It >>>>> doesn't mean that >>>>> the native cannot fast on the UL lord's day to try >>>>> to save his >>>>> marriage, correct? >>>>> >>>>> So are there any other indications, which I might >>>>> have missed, that >>>>> suggest native's frustration and anger on Thursdays >>>>> since he began >>>>> fasting? >>>>> >>>>> Any insight would be greatly appreciated. >>>>> >>>>> May Sri Vishnu bless us all, >>>>> Reema. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> http://mail. <> >>>> >>> >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 20, 2006 Report Share Posted July 20, 2006 Dear Lakshmi, Please call me Jesse; since we have spoken several times on the phone, there's no need to be so formal. I respectfully disagree with much of your assessment. To the degree that there is abuse, of course it is the role of the jyotishi to counsel an intervention. However, the facile way in which Freedom recommended divorce alarmed me. Obviously, the scenario is a bit different from direct advice to a client. Nonetheless, there is a certain tendency for jyotishis to presume what they can see or know, and/or to be prescriptive rather than descriptive. The universe is not so cut-and-dried, frankly. Here is an area where jyotish can actually borrow a page or two from Western astrologers, not with respect to methodology, but as to bedside manner. I never questioned Freedom's analysis (since I noted I had not looked at the chart, how could I?) I took issue with the tone. Please read his message again. If you do not see anything presumptuous, I fear there is not much more that I can say here. I concede that I'm biased in this instance because I have witnessed /audited firsthand very similar advice given by an SJC guru directly to a querent. Later that day, the same SJC guru addressed in a talk the terrible karma involved in destroying marriages and families! I do not anticipate engaging this thread further. To the degree that my own tone was less than kind, I do apologize to Freedom and the list. I think there is a broader issue here, though, which I will explore in an article, likely for _The Mountain Astrologer_, where I have published before. Obviously I would preserve anonymity in this particular instance. The previous event that I discussed above involving the advice to divorce left such an unpleasant taste in my mouth that I kept away from SJC lists for many months out of respect, knowing my own temper. Now I could not remain silent. There is lip service on the SJC lists (and their equivalent across the modern jyotish scene) regarding the difference between a shiksha guru and a diksha guru. I do see circumstances in which a jyotishi can be both, but I think actually that the lip service is paid so that a jyotishi can presume to act as both but then fall back on the caveat that he or she is not a diksha guru. That is fairly slippery if one considers it closely. I am *not* imputing this behavior to Freedom but rather speaking to a broader trend that should concern us. Thank you for your time considering these thoughts. As I noted, I shall not be getting into a " dueling jyotish " match via my own competitive analysis. My point clearly lay elsewhere than in the technical side of things. Sarva mangalam, Jesse sohamsa , " lakshmikary " <lakshmikary wrote: > > Hare Rama Krishna > Dear Mr. Abbot, > PLease post your analysis on the list of the chart in question.I'd > like to see how you are able to make something nice out of something > that can be causing both parties alot of pain and destruction. > > undoubtably the UL is severly afflicted. Of course many angles would > need to be checked before the original opinion is confirmed. > No one needs to have " spiritual authority " , but an astrologer needs > common sense. > I'd rather take the karma for supposedly " destoying a marraige " than > taking the karma of seeing a badly afflicted chart and recommending > something that in all probablity wont work as the relationship is > not destined to survive, or worse yet, encourage some lady/man to > stick around in a marraige while her husband/wife abuses them, and > perhaps kills them -while I sit back and told tell them to " work it > out " (while I attmept to play God encouraging them to stay > together,,, it goes both ways!) Look how many people children will > suffer if they kill each other or make each others life hellish. > Some marriages are just a living hell.While others can work with > some help. > Yes, Ive seen and heard all sorts of things. > Freedom was just relating what he thought about the astrological > content, I dont think you can jump on him so easy for that.He wasnt > replying directly to the person/client he was attempting to give is > astrological assessment of the situation for some ohter > astrologers.Everyone is free to do so. > best wishes > Lakshmi > > > > > sohamsa , " j.abbot " <j.abbot@> wrote: > > > > Dear Freedom, > > > > I sincerely hope that you do not presume to have the spiritual > > authority to recommend divorce. This will be the downfall of > jyotish > > in the West, and already seems to be a commonplace in many > circles. > > Your technical abilities are not in question; what is worrisome to > me > > is the karma borne by both jyotishi and native for destroying > families > > and engineering self-fulfilling prophecies. I have not even > looked at > > the chart in question (though I hope to do so soon and email Reema > > off-list). I think SJC sgould build into its charter a way of > > ensuring that jyotishis avoid precisely the tone your email > > exemplifies, which seems more in the spirit of a commandment or > > directive than a diplomatic and compassionate offering, infused > with > > humility and bedside manner. > > > > Respectfully, > > > > J.I. Abbot > > > > sohamsa , " freeflowaum " <freeflowaum@> wrote: > > > > > > Hare Rama Krsna > > > > > > Reema, > > > Do not be attached to individual desires of native or your own > personal > > > ideals about relationships, unattachment brings clear > sightedness. The > > > Upapada is heavily afflicted and there should have been a kumbha > vivaha > > > before the native was married, so the UL could have been broken, > but too > > > late now. > > > Bojan, > > > The unmada is on the UL, which means the wife has lost it, > > irrational anger > > > and depression (Saturn in first and Mars in seventh-to UL). To > check > > if this > > > is the correct wife we are speaking of, she would have a heavily > > afflicted > > > (or MKS) Mars and Saturn in HER natal chart, based on upon his > UL. > > And UL > > > fasting will not remove her unmada, only promote marriage. > > > That same Mars-Saturn is a poverty yoga from the native's lagna > > (malefics in > > > 2nd and 8th). So after the vivaha (marriage), the native would > > become poor > > > and the wife would become 'mad'. This is a cursed UL (cursed > > marriage) and > > > in these cases it will be seen that the native's spouse will > also have a > > > curse on their UL. Now if the curse is on your head, you cannot > get > > out of > > > it, but when a curse is on your marriage, then it is possible to > let the > > > curse go. > > > > > > Secondly, the sustaining factor in this marriage is maranakaraka > > sthana Rahu > > > (second from UL) and this is on his AL. The marriage had little > > chance of > > > lasting to begin with because a dying malefic is feeding it. The > > vivaha's > > > breaking has ruined the native's name and reputation, the longer > the > > break > > > lasts the more damage there will be to the native's image (what > > people think > > > of him and how he is socially percieved). > > > > > > The breaking of the vivaha will benefit both the native and his > > wife! She > > > will regain some sanity and the native will be able to do remedy > for his > > > financial problems. The two people will actually be able to get > > along much > > > better after divorce. In this chart, Bagala worship will break > the > > marriage. > > > Fasting will only prolong the suffering of both natives. > Therefore, > > first > > > have the native do mantra of Bagala Devi. > > > > > > Then after divorce, the native should perform kumbha vivaha (as > next > > UL is > > > on Ketu-Rahu axis) and Rahu is MKS as already mentioned (another > > problemed > > > marriage). The third UL, his next marriage after divorce and > kumba > > vivaha > > > will prove very beneficial as it contains an uccha Moon. With > this > > marriage > > > he will prosper financially and his dharma will grow in many > ways. > > Jupiter > > > is uccha banga being uplifted by this uccha Moon that will be > > activated by > > > the third marriage. With the worship of Krsna he will be able to > > attain his > > > beneficial UL in his upcoming Jupiter Moon Mula dasha (if he is > > completely > > > divorced and has performed kumbha vivaha) by that time. > > > > > > Namah Sivaya > > > > > > _____ > > > > > > sohamsa [sohamsa ] On > > Behalf Of > > > reema_sriganesh > > > Wednesday, July 19, 2006 2:32 PM > > > sohamsa > > > Re: Why should fasting on Thursday make the > > native angry? > > > > > > || Hare Rama Krishna || > > > > > > Namaste Bojan-ji, > > > > > > Thank you so much. Your reply helped me in understanding the UL > > > better, and it certainly will go a long way in helping the > native. He > > > seems to really want to save his marriage, and may God grant him > the > > > power to do so. > > > > > > Thank you once again, and best wishes. > > > > > > May Sri Vishnu bless us all, > > > Reema. > > > > > > sohamsa@ <sohamsa% > 40> .com, > > bojan > > > vidakovic <janbovid@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > HARE RAMA KRISHNA > > > > Dear Reema, as per my experience it is the karma that > > > > should be cleansed thorugh that UL with fasting, and > > > > ofcourse it is not so easy. What I have seen is that > > > > when UL is in 8th or its lord is at the same time the > > > > lord of the eight bhava than it is very hard to fast, > > > > esspeceally at the beginning. It can bring headaches, > > > > short temper, but after some time of regular fast it > > > > will be normalized. Ofcourse he should fast on that > > > > particular day, it will save his marriage and fix > > > > problems with unmada yoga etc. Everything will be fine > > > > after few weeks...best wishes, but the person must > > > > keep fasting, Bojan Vidakovic > > > > OM TAT SAT > > > > --- reema_sriganesh <reema_sriganesh@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > || Hare Rama Krishna || > > > > > > > > > > Namaste, > > > > > > > > > > A native approached me about his issues in marriage. > > > > > After looking at > > > > > his chart, I suggested that he fast on Thursdays > > > > > (since UL lord is > > > > > exalted and retrograde Guru placed in the 12th > > > > > house). > > > > > > > > > > After doing this remedy, the native gave the > > > > > following feedback: > > > > > > > > > > I have been noticing that I get very angry on > > > > > Thursday and I get very > > > > > much frustrated also. As a result of this I start > > > > > remembering all the > > > > > things that I have done or have been done to me. > > > > > > > > > > * * * > > > > > > > > > > Native's data: 12/25/1966, 22:20 Hrs, 5:30 East of > > > > > GMT, 77E12, 28N36 > > > > > > > > > > My question is - why should the native feel angry > > > > > particularly on > > > > > Thursdays? Is it just the exhaustion of fasting or > > > > > something more? I > > > > > notice that there is an unmada yoga on the UL axis. > > > > > But that should > > > > > mean that the spouse could have temper problems. It > > > > > doesn't mean that > > > > > the native cannot fast on the UL lord's day to try > > > > > to save his > > > > > marriage, correct? > > > > > > > > > > So are there any other indications, which I might > > > > > have missed, that > > > > > suggest native's frustration and anger on Thursdays > > > > > since he began > > > > > fasting? > > > > > > > > > > Any insight would be greatly appreciated. > > > > > > > > > > May Sri Vishnu bless us all, > > > > > Reema. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://mail. <> > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 20, 2006 Report Share Posted July 20, 2006 HARE RAMA KRISHNA Since the marriage is the highest darma I would advice to start fasting. Something will change, try and you'll see. My oppinion is that the native should choose the harder way and perform fast - and try to give the most from himself, and than when the UL becomes clean it will happen. The native will stay with partner or divorce, but has done everything from her/his side. All the karma which is excperinced is good for her/his development. Isn't it? After some time the situation will become better. As per my excperience I saw many ladies having a lot of marital problems that have been solved with fasting. Best wishes, Bojan OM TAT SAT --- " j.abbot " <j.abbot wrote: > Dear Lakshmi, > > Please call me Jesse; since we have spoken several > times on the phone, > there's no need to be so formal. I respectfully > disagree with much of > your assessment. To the degree that there is abuse, > of course it is > the role of the jyotishi to counsel an intervention. > However, the > facile way in which Freedom recommended divorce > alarmed me. > Obviously, the scenario is a bit different from > direct advice to a > client. Nonetheless, there is a certain tendency > for jyotishis to > presume what they can see or know, and/or to be > prescriptive rather > than descriptive. The universe is not so > cut-and-dried, frankly. Here > is an area where jyotish can actually borrow a page > or two from > Western astrologers, not with respect to > methodology, but as to > bedside manner. I never questioned Freedom's > analysis (since I noted > I had not looked at the chart, how could I?) I took > issue with the > tone. Please read his message again. If you do not > see anything > presumptuous, I fear there is not much more that I > can say here. > > I concede that I'm biased in this instance because I > have witnessed > /audited firsthand very similar advice given by an > SJC guru directly > to a querent. Later that day, the same SJC guru > addressed in a talk > the terrible karma involved in destroying marriages > and families! > > I do not anticipate engaging this thread further. > To the degree that > my own tone was less than kind, I do apologize to > Freedom and the > list. I think there is a broader issue here, > though, which I will > explore in an article, likely for _The Mountain > Astrologer_, where I > have published before. Obviously I would preserve > anonymity in this > particular instance. The previous event that I > discussed above > involving the advice to divorce left such an > unpleasant taste in my > mouth that I kept away from SJC lists for many > months out of respect, > knowing my own temper. Now I could not remain > silent. > > There is lip service on the SJC lists (and their > equivalent across the > modern jyotish scene) regarding the difference > between a shiksha guru > and a diksha guru. I do see circumstances in which > a jyotishi can be > both, but I think actually that the lip service is > paid so that a > jyotishi can presume to act as both but then fall > back on the caveat > that he or she is not a diksha guru. That is fairly > slippery if one > considers it closely. I am *not* imputing this > behavior to Freedom > but rather speaking to a broader trend that should > concern us. > > Thank you for your time considering these thoughts. > As I noted, I > shall not be getting into a " dueling jyotish " match > via my own > competitive analysis. My point clearly lay > elsewhere than in the > technical side of things. > > Sarva mangalam, > > Jesse > > sohamsa , " lakshmikary " > <lakshmikary wrote: > > > > Hare Rama Krishna > > Dear Mr. Abbot, > > PLease post your analysis on the list of the chart > in question.I'd > > like to see how you are able to make something > nice out of something > > that can be causing both parties alot of pain and > destruction. > > > > undoubtably the UL is severly afflicted. Of course > many angles would > > need to be checked before the original opinion is > confirmed. > > No one needs to have " spiritual authority " , but an > astrologer needs > > common sense. > > I'd rather take the karma for supposedly > " destoying a marraige " than > > taking the karma of seeing a badly afflicted chart > and recommending > > something that in all probablity wont work as the > relationship is > > not destined to survive, or worse yet, encourage > some lady/man to > > stick around in a marraige while her husband/wife > abuses them, and > > perhaps kills them -while I sit back and told tell > them to " work it > > out " (while I attmept to play God encouraging them > to stay > > together,,, it goes both ways!) Look how many > people children will > > suffer if they kill each other or make each others > life hellish. > > Some marriages are just a living hell.While others > can work with > > some help. > > Yes, Ive seen and heard all sorts of things. > > Freedom was just relating what he thought about > the astrological > > content, I dont think you can jump on him so easy > for that.He wasnt > > replying directly to the person/client he was > attempting to give is > > astrological assessment of the situation for some > ohter > > astrologers.Everyone is free to do so. > > best wishes > > Lakshmi > > > > > > > > > > sohamsa , " j.abbot " > <j.abbot@> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Freedom, > > > > > > I sincerely hope that you do not presume to have > the spiritual > > > authority to recommend divorce. This will be > the downfall of > > jyotish > > > in the West, and already seems to be a > commonplace in many > > circles. > > > Your technical abilities are not in question; > what is worrisome to > > me > > > is the karma borne by both jyotishi and native > for destroying > > families > > > and engineering self-fulfilling prophecies. I > have not even > > looked at > > > the chart in question (though I hope to do so > soon and email Reema > > > off-list). I think SJC sgould build into its > charter a way of > > > ensuring that jyotishis avoid precisely the tone > your email > > > exemplifies, which seems more in the spirit of a > commandment or > > > directive than a diplomatic and compassionate > offering, infused > > with > > > humility and bedside manner. > > > > > > Respectfully, > > > > > > J.I. Abbot > > > > > > sohamsa , " freeflowaum " > <freeflowaum@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hare Rama Krsna > > > > > > > > Reema, > > > > Do not be attached to individual desires of > native or your own > > personal > > > > ideals about relationships, unattachment > brings clear > > sightedness. The > > > > Upapada is heavily afflicted and there should > have been a kumbha > > vivaha > > > > before the native was married, so the UL could > have === message truncated === Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 21, 2006 Report Share Posted July 21, 2006 Hare Rama Krishna Dear Bojan, et all. In the chart we are looking at the afflcitions to 7 house, lord, UL,2nd from Ul, venus,etc etc. When malefics are aspecting conjoined these places and 2nd from UL especially, it requires the intervention of Jupiter the sustainer,upholder of dharma. to save the marriage. Look at some of these terrible marraiges and see if Jupiter was aspecting the 2nd from UL atthe time of marriage. Jupiter means wanting to stay together for dharma,religion, children, and finance. It also can mean that a Jyotishi(signified by a jupiter) can perhaps intervene and give mantra and remedial measure like a doctor. If we can see that Jupiter DOESNT influence 2nd from UL or someother key places. like all the kendras etc. then how CAN a person stay married?? What/who WIll keep it together? SAturn., Mars? Ketu,Rahu?? maybe venus Saturn only keeps a person in marriage by entrapment, kidnapping and repression,suppression. Mars can by aggression and physical and mental abuse, and Rahu and Ketu by threats and cheating. A Marriage might not beable to be saved(and sometimes shouldnt be saved) but the person should understand their karma. Chanting mantras Jupiter has, Om Vishnave Namah, Om Narayanaya namah, Om Namo Bhagavate Vasudevaya ALWAYS help.Other remedies for badhak, etc can help alot as well. If I see a jupiter trying to influence the outcome then I always encourage staying together, but with no Jupiter and no benefic influences....its a real toss up at times. what is best. of course if there is no jupiter etc, its unlikely the person will take your advice anyway, and will stay and suffer anyway.. BEst wishes Lakshmi Iwish someone can post some proven charts of some long happily married couples here on the list. sohamsa , bojan vidakovic <janbovid wrote: > > > HARE RAMA KRISHNA > Since the marriage is the highest darma I would > advice to start fasting. Something will change, try > and you'll see. My oppinion is that the native should > choose the harder way and perform fast - and try to > give the most from himself, and than when the UL > becomes clean it will happen. The native will stay > with partner or divorce, but has done everything from > her/his side. All the karma which is excperinced is > good for her/his development. Isn't it? After some > time the situation will become better. As per my > excperience I saw many ladies having a lot of marital > problems that have been solved with fasting. Best > wishes, Bojan > OM TAT SAT > --- " j.abbot " <j.abbot wrote: > > > Dear Lakshmi, > > > > Please call me Jesse; since we have spoken several > > times on the phone, > > there's no need to be so formal. I respectfully > > disagree with much of > > your assessment. To the degree that there is abuse, > > of course it is > > the role of the jyotishi to counsel an intervention. > > However, the > > facile way in which Freedom recommended divorce > > alarmed me. > > Obviously, the scenario is a bit different from > > direct advice to a > > client. Nonetheless, there is a certain tendency > > for jyotishis to > > presume what they can see or know, and/or to be > > prescriptive rather > > than descriptive. The universe is not so > > cut-and-dried, frankly. Here > > is an area where jyotish can actually borrow a page > > or two from > > Western astrologers, not with respect to > > methodology, but as to > > bedside manner. I never questioned Freedom's > > analysis (since I noted > > I had not looked at the chart, how could I?) I took > > issue with the > > tone. Please read his message again. If you do not > > see anything > > presumptuous, I fear there is not much more that I > > can say here. > > > > I concede that I'm biased in this instance because I > > have witnessed > > /audited firsthand very similar advice given by an > > SJC guru directly > > to a querent. Later that day, the same SJC guru > > addressed in a talk > > the terrible karma involved in destroying marriages > > and families! > > > > I do not anticipate engaging this thread further. > > To the degree that > > my own tone was less than kind, I do apologize to > > Freedom and the > > list. I think there is a broader issue here, > > though, which I will > > explore in an article, likely for _The Mountain > > Astrologer_, where I > > have published before. Obviously I would preserve > > anonymity in this > > particular instance. The previous event that I > > discussed above > > involving the advice to divorce left such an > > unpleasant taste in my > > mouth that I kept away from SJC lists for many > > months out of respect, > > knowing my own temper. Now I could not remain > > silent. > > > > There is lip service on the SJC lists (and their > > equivalent across the > > modern jyotish scene) regarding the difference > > between a shiksha guru > > and a diksha guru. I do see circumstances in which > > a jyotishi can be > > both, but I think actually that the lip service is > > paid so that a > > jyotishi can presume to act as both but then fall > > back on the caveat > > that he or she is not a diksha guru. That is fairly > > slippery if one > > considers it closely. I am *not* imputing this > > behavior to Freedom > > but rather speaking to a broader trend that should > > concern us. > > > > Thank you for your time considering these thoughts. > > As I noted, I > > shall not be getting into a " dueling jyotish " match > > via my own > > competitive analysis. My point clearly lay > > elsewhere than in the > > technical side of things. > > > > Sarva mangalam, > > > > Jesse > > > > sohamsa , " lakshmikary " > > <lakshmikary@> wrote: > > > > > > Hare Rama Krishna > > > Dear Mr. Abbot, > > > PLease post your analysis on the list of the chart > > in question.I'd > > > like to see how you are able to make something > > nice out of something > > > that can be causing both parties alot of pain and > > destruction. > > > > > > undoubtably the UL is severly afflicted. Of course > > many angles would > > > need to be checked before the original opinion is > > confirmed. > > > No one needs to have " spiritual authority " , but an > > astrologer needs > > > common sense. > > > I'd rather take the karma for supposedly > > " destoying a marraige " than > > > taking the karma of seeing a badly afflicted chart > > and recommending > > > something that in all probablity wont work as the > > relationship is > > > not destined to survive, or worse yet, encourage > > some lady/man to > > > stick around in a marraige while her husband/wife > > abuses them, and > > > perhaps kills them -while I sit back and told tell > > them to " work it > > > out " (while I attmept to play God encouraging them > > to stay > > > together,,, it goes both ways!) Look how many > > people children will > > > suffer if they kill each other or make each others > > life hellish. > > > Some marriages are just a living hell.While others > > can work with > > > some help. > > > Yes, Ive seen and heard all sorts of things. > > > Freedom was just relating what he thought about > > the astrological > > > content, I dont think you can jump on him so easy > > for that.He wasnt > > > replying directly to the person/client he was > > attempting to give is > > > astrological assessment of the situation for some > > ohter > > > astrologers.Everyone is free to do so. > > > best wishes > > > Lakshmi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sohamsa , " j.abbot " > > <j.abbot@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear Freedom, > > > > > > > > I sincerely hope that you do not presume to have > > the spiritual > > > > authority to recommend divorce. This will be > > the downfall of > > > jyotish > > > > in the West, and already seems to be a > > commonplace in many > > > circles. > > > > Your technical abilities are not in question; > > what is worrisome to > > > me > > > > is the karma borne by both jyotishi and native > > for destroying > > > families > > > > and engineering self-fulfilling prophecies. I > > have not even > > > looked at > > > > the chart in question (though I hope to do so > > soon and email Reema > > > > off-list). I think SJC sgould build into its > > charter a way of > > > > ensuring that jyotishis avoid precisely the tone > > your email > > > > exemplifies, which seems more in the spirit of a > > commandment or > > > > directive than a diplomatic and compassionate > > offering, infused > > > with > > > > humility and bedside manner. > > > > > > > > Respectfully, > > > > > > > > J.I. Abbot > > > > > > > > sohamsa , " freeflowaum " > > <freeflowaum@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hare Rama Krsna > > > > > > > > > > Reema, > > > > > Do not be attached to individual desires of > > native or your own > > > personal > > > > > ideals about relationships, unattachment > > brings clear > > > sightedness. The > > > > > Upapada is heavily afflicted and there should > > have been a kumbha > > > vivaha > > > > > before the native was married, so the UL could > > have > === message truncated === > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 21, 2006 Report Share Posted July 21, 2006 Hare Rama Krsna When Jupiter transits a curse he will help show the remedy, and give the ability to remedy the curse. This may mean the marriage staying together, it may mean it breaking. We must be unattached to either, and simply look at the situation. Namah Sivaya sohamsa [sohamsa ] On Behalf Of lakshmikary Thursday, July 20, 2006 5:51 PM sohamsa Re: Why should fasting on Thursday make the native angry? Hare Rama Krishna Dear Bojan, et all. In the chart we are looking at the afflcitions to 7 house, lord, UL,2nd from Ul, venus,etc etc. When malefics are aspecting conjoined these places and 2nd from UL especially, it requires the intervention of Jupiter the sustainer,upholder of dharma. to save the marriage. Look at some of these terrible marraiges and see if Jupiter was aspecting the 2nd from UL atthe time of marriage. Jupiter means wanting to stay together for dharma,religion, children, and finance. It also can mean that a Jyotishi(signified by a jupiter) can perhaps intervene and give mantra and remedial measure like a doctor. If we can see that Jupiter DOESNT influence 2nd from UL or someother key places. like all the kendras etc. then how CAN a person stay married?? What/who WIll keep it together? SAturn., Mars? Ketu,Rahu?? maybe venus Saturn only keeps a person in marriage by entrapment, kidnapping and repression,suppression. Mars can by aggression and physical and mental abuse, and Rahu and Ketu by threats and cheating. A Marriage might not beable to be saved(and sometimes shouldnt be saved) but the person should understand their karma. Chanting mantras Jupiter has, Om Vishnave Namah, Om Narayanaya namah, Om Namo Bhagavate Vasudevaya ALWAYS help.Other remedies for badhak, etc can help alot as well. If I see a jupiter trying to influence the outcome then I always encourage staying together, but with no Jupiter and no benefic influences....its a real toss up at times. what is best. of course if there is no jupiter etc, its unlikely the person will take your advice anyway, and will stay and suffer anyway.. BEst wishes Lakshmi Iwish someone can post some proven charts of some long happily married couples here on the list. sohamsa , bojan vidakovic <janbovid wrote: > > > HARE RAMA KRISHNA > Since the marriage is the highest darma I would > advice to start fasting. Something will change, try > and you'll see. My oppinion is that the native should > choose the harder way and perform fast - and try to > give the most from himself, and than when the UL > becomes clean it will happen. The native will stay > with partner or divorce, but has done everything from > her/his side. All the karma which is excperinced is > good for her/his development. Isn't it? After some > time the situation will become better. As per my > excperience I saw many ladies having a lot of marital > problems that have been solved with fasting. Best > wishes, Bojan > OM TAT SAT > --- " j.abbot " <j.abbot wrote: > > > Dear Lakshmi, > > > > Please call me Jesse; since we have spoken several > > times on the phone, > > there's no need to be so formal. I respectfully > > disagree with much of > > your assessment. To the degree that there is abuse, > > of course it is > > the role of the jyotishi to counsel an intervention. > > However, the > > facile way in which Freedom recommended divorce > > alarmed me. > > Obviously, the scenario is a bit different from > > direct advice to a > > client. Nonetheless, there is a certain tendency > > for jyotishis to > > presume what they can see or know, and/or to be > > prescriptive rather > > than descriptive. The universe is not so > > cut-and-dried, frankly. Here > > is an area where jyotish can actually borrow a page > > or two from > > Western astrologers, not with respect to > > methodology, but as to > > bedside manner. I never questioned Freedom's > > analysis (since I noted > > I had not looked at the chart, how could I?) I took > > issue with the > > tone. Please read his message again. If you do not > > see anything > > presumptuous, I fear there is not much more that I > > can say here. > > > > I concede that I'm biased in this instance because I > > have witnessed > > /audited firsthand very similar advice given by an > > SJC guru directly > > to a querent. Later that day, the same SJC guru > > addressed in a talk > > the terrible karma involved in destroying marriages > > and families! > > > > I do not anticipate engaging this thread further. > > To the degree that > > my own tone was less than kind, I do apologize to > > Freedom and the > > list. I think there is a broader issue here, > > though, which I will > > explore in an article, likely for _The Mountain > > Astrologer_, where I > > have published before. Obviously I would preserve > > anonymity in this > > particular instance. The previous event that I > > discussed above > > involving the advice to divorce left such an > > unpleasant taste in my > > mouth that I kept away from SJC lists for many > > months out of respect, > > knowing my own temper. Now I could not remain > > silent. > > > > There is lip service on the SJC lists (and their > > equivalent across the > > modern jyotish scene) regarding the difference > > between a shiksha guru > > and a diksha guru. I do see circumstances in which > > a jyotishi can be > > both, but I think actually that the lip service is > > paid so that a > > jyotishi can presume to act as both but then fall > > back on the caveat > > that he or she is not a diksha guru. That is fairly > > slippery if one > > considers it closely. I am *not* imputing this > > behavior to Freedom > > but rather speaking to a broader trend that should > > concern us. > > > > Thank you for your time considering these thoughts. > > As I noted, I > > shall not be getting into a " dueling jyotish " match > > via my own > > competitive analysis. My point clearly lay > > elsewhere than in the > > technical side of things. > > > > Sarva mangalam, > > > > Jesse > > > > sohamsa , " lakshmikary " > > <lakshmikary@> wrote: > > > > > > Hare Rama Krishna > > > Dear Mr. Abbot, > > > PLease post your analysis on the list of the chart > > in question.I'd > > > like to see how you are able to make something > > nice out of something > > > that can be causing both parties alot of pain and > > destruction. > > > > > > undoubtably the UL is severly afflicted. Of course > > many angles would > > > need to be checked before the original opinion is > > confirmed. > > > No one needs to have " spiritual authority " , but an > > astrologer needs > > > common sense. > > > I'd rather take the karma for supposedly > > " destoying a marraige " than > > > taking the karma of seeing a badly afflicted chart > > and recommending > > > something that in all probablity wont work as the > > relationship is > > > not destined to survive, or worse yet, encourage > > some lady/man to > > > stick around in a marraige while her husband/wife > > abuses them, and > > > perhaps kills them -while I sit back and told tell > > them to " work it > > > out " (while I attmept to play God encouraging them > > to stay > > > together,,, it goes both ways!) Look how many > > people children will > > > suffer if they kill each other or make each others > > life hellish. > > > Some marriages are just a living hell.While others > > can work with > > > some help. > > > Yes, Ive seen and heard all sorts of things. > > > Freedom was just relating what he thought about > > the astrological > > > content, I dont think you can jump on him so easy > > for that.He wasnt > > > replying directly to the person/client he was > > attempting to give is > > > astrological assessment of the situation for some > > ohter > > > astrologers.Everyone is free to do so. > > > best wishes > > > Lakshmi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sohamsa , " j.abbot " > > <j.abbot@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear Freedom, > > > > > > > > I sincerely hope that you do not presume to have > > the spiritual > > > > authority to recommend divorce. This will be > > the downfall of > > > jyotish > > > > in the West, and already seems to be a > > commonplace in many > > > circles. > > > > Your technical abilities are not in question; > > what is worrisome to > > > me > > > > is the karma borne by both jyotishi and native > > for destroying > > > families > > > > and engineering self-fulfilling prophecies. I > > have not even > > > looked at > > > > the chart in question (though I hope to do so > > soon and email Reema > > > > off-list). I think SJC sgould build into its > > charter a way of > > > > ensuring that jyotishis avoid precisely the tone > > your email > > > > exemplifies, which seems more in the spirit of a > > commandment or > > > > directive than a diplomatic and compassionate > > offering, infused > > > with > > > > humility and bedside manner. > > > > > > > > Respectfully, > > > > > > > > J.I. Abbot > > > > > > > > sohamsa , " freeflowaum " > > <freeflowaum@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hare Rama Krsna > > > > > > > > > > Reema, > > > > > Do not be attached to individual desires of > > native or your own > > > personal > > > > > ideals about relationships, unattachment > > brings clear > > > sightedness. The > > > > > Upapada is heavily afflicted and there should > > have been a kumbha > > > vivaha > > > > > before the native was married, so the UL could > > have > === message truncated === > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 21, 2006 Report Share Posted July 21, 2006 Hare Rama Krsna Dear Jesse, Marriage is a great thing, but it is your opinion that a jyotishi should try to hold a relationship together. A mantra to break it or hold it together will change karma, that is fact. Read the first lines of my reply, please. You are attached to making a marriage work, and because of this you will make mistakes in prediction that as Laksmi said may get someone killed or cause more harm than good. Read my message and study the chart until you can understand each line of what I have said. Do not start talking from opinion, this is untruth of the mind. A good jyotishi is unattached to personal and cultural ideals and reads the chart clearly, the chart doesn’t lie. The chart doesn’t lie. Malefics cause negative events, and benefics cause positive events. For example, is abortion good or not. That is an opinion. If you look at the D-7, there will be a house for every child, born or aborted in a mother’s life. That means an aborted child is the loss of an atma, this we see clearly from the chart, it doesn’t lie. I picked a loaded topic here, now, is abortion good or bad, it still remains an opinion, the fact is an atma is lost, but good or bad….. If the life of the atma or the mother is disturbed more than the removal, who can decide. But you can’t blindly have an opinion and tell every woman that asks about abortion not to have one. You can’t blindly try to make every marriage work. Otherwise throw away jyotish, and just be a preacher, don’t pretend to have insight-inner sight. People don’t come to an astrologer when the question is easy to answer, they need real vision. Now look better at what I wrote: -What are the results indicated by keeping the marriage and what are the results indicated by breaking the marriage. The chart will not lie. Who is being humane here? - Look at the predictions I have made about the persons life and spouse, see if they match before your start throwing opinions. It is said your opinions will chase and torture you when you die. There are Vedic examples of divorce, and rules for when it is allowable, the modern hindu no-divorce concept is modern fundamentalism that often leaves divorcees suffering. And why would the great Rishis teach us how to see divorce in a chart if there was no need for it? I believe fully in eka pati vratta- one marriage (as my mother stayed with my father till the day he died, as did my grandmother). But I am not a fundamentalist and work very hard to improve the lives of others for the highest good of all involved. Jaya Jagannatha sohamsa [sohamsa ] On Behalf Of j.abbot Thursday, July 20, 2006 10:01 AM sohamsa Re: Why should fasting on Thursday make the native angry? Dear Lakshmi, Thank you for your thoughtful and humane reply. I agree that there is a time to intervene. It is telling that you and I have both had experiences compelling us to speak here! And once again, I did not intend to be nasty to Freedom. Something meaningful was triggered here. I try to work continually with how to respond to these moments. Sincerely, Jesse sohamsa , " lakshmikary " <lakshmikary wrote: > > Hare Rama Krishna > Dear Jesse,and others on this thread.I'm not not arguing with > anyone, just discussing moral ethics and this and that.Im Sat AK- > I agree with you to.An astrologer is ruled by jupiter and is the 9th > house and should their duty is to uphold dharma. > Jupiter is also a benefactor and protector. The Sun is also karaka > for 9th house, and light.The Sun can give the knowledge > > In regards to previous post/disscusion- I just wanted to say they > is a difference between an internet learning forum, or even a > classroom speaking with a bunch of astrologers where astrologers can > sit and discuss charts and then actually sitting face to face with a > suffering client and do what you can to help them . > Perhaps because I've known Freedom I didnt take it the way you did. > Im assume he is careful when in person. > > But I agree we have to be very careful what and how we tlak to the > people approaching us. > > None of us can play God or even presume to fully know anything.Even > if we see something in a chart , the chart can be wrong and so many > things. > But basically when someone comes and they are suffering we have to > use our knowledge, common sense(wisdom) and compassion to help them > understand their karma . > On numerous occasion I have piped in when people were too quick to > make assertions about afffairs, infidelity,etc/ > Then we have the astrologers who ignore any bad indications and only > say positive and good things. Which is equally bad in my opinion. > Everyone has their personal style. > > Jesse , one time I didnt do something about a man I knew was > dangerous.I wanted to keep peace, not make waves, keep family going- > well that man killed 2 weeks later. I think of it almost every day, > and I feel the burden of that ladies life on me.I hate myself for > not doing something.Last year I knew a man was beating his son, i > was worried he might seriously harm him. I personally couldnt bear > the idea that the boy should be harmed further, so I took some > actions. Now by some intervention, whole family is happier because > father was forced by law to deal with his anger issues.Father is > happier, son is happy, no more with big bruises and swollen liver. > Even in USA any health care provider,teacher etc. is held by the law > to report such abuse. Why/how can an astrologer sit back and let > something go on letting the people burn away their " sins " . Well > there is some truth to that as well..I understand it. > Astrologers need to chant and always work towards disolving their > own stuff so they can be good vessels of " light " > We all have to work at being better persons and better astrologers > and hope to have some inner connection with the divine so we can > uplift people. > Best wishes. > Lakshmi > > > > sohamsa , " j.abbot " <j.abbot@> wrote: > > > > Dear Lakshmi, > > > > Please call me Jesse; since we have spoken several times on the > phone, > > there's no need to be so formal. I respectfully disagree with > much of > > your assessment. To the degree that there is abuse, of course it > is > > the role of the jyotishi to counsel an intervention. However, the > > facile way in which Freedom recommended divorce alarmed me. > > Obviously, the scenario is a bit different from direct advice to a > > client. Nonetheless, there is a certain tendency for jyotishis to > > presume what they can see or know, and/or to be prescriptive rather > > than descriptive. The universe is not so cut-and-dried, frankly. > Here > > is an area where jyotish can actually borrow a page or two from > > Western astrologers, not with respect to methodology, but as to > > bedside manner. I never questioned Freedom's analysis (since I > noted > > I had not looked at the chart, how could I?) I took issue with the > > tone. Please read his message again. If you do not see anything > > presumptuous, I fear there is not much more that I can say here. > > > > I concede that I'm biased in this instance because I have witnessed > > /audited firsthand very similar advice given by an SJC guru > directly > > to a querent. Later that day, the same SJC guru addressed in a > talk > > the terrible karma involved in destroying marriages and families! > > > > I do not anticipate engaging this thread further. To the degree > that > > my own tone was less than kind, I do apologize to Freedom and the > > list. I think there is a broader issue here, though, which I will > > explore in an article, likely for _The Mountain Astrologer_, where > I > > have published before. Obviously I would preserve anonymity in > this > > particular instance. The previous event that I discussed above > > involving the advice to divorce left such an unpleasant taste in my > > mouth that I kept away from SJC lists for many months out of > respect, > > knowing my own temper. Now I could not remain silent. > > > > There is lip service on the SJC lists (and their equivalent across > the > > modern jyotish scene) regarding the difference between a shiksha > guru > > and a diksha guru. I do see circumstances in which a jyotishi can > be > > both, but I think actually that the lip service is paid so that a > > jyotishi can presume to act as both but then fall back on the > caveat > > that he or she is not a diksha guru. That is fairly slippery if > one > > considers it closely. I am *not* imputing this behavior to Freedom > > but rather speaking to a broader trend that should concern us. > > > > Thank you for your time considering these thoughts. As I noted, I > > shall not be getting into a " dueling jyotish " match via my own > > competitive analysis. My point clearly lay elsewhere than in the > > technical side of things. > > > > Sarva mangalam, > > > > Jesse > > > > sohamsa , " lakshmikary " <lakshmikary@> wrote: > > > > > > Hare Rama Krishna > > > Dear Mr. Abbot, > > > PLease post your analysis on the list of the chart in > question.I'd > > > like to see how you are able to make something nice out of > something > > > that can be causing both parties alot of pain and destruction. > > > > > > undoubtably the UL is severly afflicted. Of course many angles > would > > > need to be checked before the original opinion is confirmed. > > > No one needs to have " spiritual authority " , but an astrologer > needs > > > common sense. > > > I'd rather take the karma for supposedly " destoying a marraige " > than > > > taking the karma of seeing a badly afflicted chart and > recommending > > > something that in all probablity wont work as the relationship > is > > > not destined to survive, or worse yet, encourage some lady/man > to > > > stick around in a marraige while her husband/wife abuses them, > and > > > perhaps kills them -while I sit back and told tell them to " work > it > > > out " (while I attmept to play God encouraging them to stay > > > together,,, it goes both ways!) Look how many people children > will > > > suffer if they kill each other or make each others life hellish. > > > Some marriages are just a living hell.While others can work with > > > some help. > > > Yes, Ive seen and heard all sorts of things. > > > Freedom was just relating what he thought about the astrological > > > content, I dont think you can jump on him so easy for that.He > wasnt > > > replying directly to the person/client he was attempting to give > is > > > astrological assessment of the situation for some ohter > > > astrologers.Everyone is free to do so. > > > best wishes > > > Lakshmi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sohamsa , " j.abbot " <j.abbot@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear Freedom, > > > > > > > > I sincerely hope that you do not presume to have the spiritual > > > > authority to recommend divorce. This will be the downfall of > > > jyotish > > > > in the West, and already seems to be a commonplace in many > > > circles. > > > > Your technical abilities are not in question; what is > worrisome to > > > me > > > > is the karma borne by both jyotishi and native for destroying > > > families > > > > and engineering self-fulfilling prophecies. I have not even > > > looked at > > > > the chart in question (though I hope to do so soon and email > Reema > > > > off-list). I think SJC sgould build into its charter a way of > > > > ensuring that jyotishis avoid precisely the tone your email > > > > exemplifies, which seems more in the spirit of a commandment or > > > > directive than a diplomatic and compassionate offering, > infused > > > with > > > > humility and bedside manner. > > > > > > > > Respectfully, > > > > > > > > J.I. Abbot > > > > > > > > sohamsa , " freeflowaum " <freeflowaum@> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hare Rama Krsna > > > > > > > > > > Reema, > > > > > Do not be attached to individual desires of native or your > own > > > personal > > > > > ideals about relationships, unattachment brings clear > > > sightedness. The > > > > > Upapada is heavily afflicted and there should have been a > kumbha > > > vivaha > > > > > before the native was married, so the UL could have been > broken, > > > but too > > > > > late now. > > > > > Bojan, > > > > > The unmada is on the UL, which means the wife has lost it, > > > > irrational anger > > > > > and depression (Saturn in first and Mars in seventh-to UL). > To > > > check > > > > if this > > > > > is the correct wife we are speaking of, she would have a > heavily > > > > afflicted > > > > > (or MKS) Mars and Saturn in HER natal chart, based on upon > his > > > UL. > > > > And UL > > > > > fasting will not remove her unmada, only promote marriage. > > > > > That same Mars-Saturn is a poverty yoga from the native's > lagna > > > > (malefics in > > > > > 2nd and 8th). So after the vivaha (marriage), the native > would > > > > become poor > > > > > and the wife would become 'mad'. This is a cursed UL (cursed > > > > marriage) and > > > > > in these cases it will be seen that the native's spouse will > > > also have a > > > > > curse on their UL. Now if the curse is on your head, you > cannot > > > get > > > > out of > > > > > it, but when a curse is on your marriage, then it is > possible to > > > let the > > > > > curse go. > > > > > > > > > > Secondly, the sustaining factor in this marriage is > maranakaraka > > > > sthana Rahu > > > > > (second from UL) and this is on his AL. The marriage had > little > > > > chance of > > > > > lasting to begin with because a dying malefic is feeding it. > The > > > > vivaha's > > > > > breaking has ruined the native's name and reputation, the > longer > > > the > > > > break > > > > > lasts the more damage there will be to the native's image > (what > > > > people think > > > > > of him and how he is socially percieved). > > > > > > > > > > The breaking of the vivaha will benefit both the native and > his > > > > wife! She > > > > > will regain some sanity and the native will be able to do > remedy > > > for his > > > > > financial problems. The two people will actually be able to > get > > > > along much > > > > > better after divorce. In this chart, Bagala worship will > break > > > the > > > > marriage. > > > > > Fasting will only prolong the suffering of both natives. > > > Therefore, > > > > first > > > > > have the native do mantra of Bagala Devi. > > > > > > > > > > Then after divorce, the native should perform kumbha vivaha > (as > > > next > > > > UL is > > > > > on Ketu-Rahu axis) and Rahu is MKS as already mentioned > (another > > > > problemed > > > > > marriage). The third UL, his next marriage after divorce and > > > kumba > > > > vivaha > > > > > will prove very beneficial as it contains an uccha Moon. > With > > > this > > > > marriage > > > > > he will prosper financially and his dharma will grow in many > > > ways. > > > > Jupiter > > > > > is uccha banga being uplifted by this uccha Moon that will be > > > > activated by > > > > > the third marriage. With the worship of Krsna he will be > able to > > > > attain his > > > > > beneficial UL in his upcoming Jupiter Moon Mula dasha (if he > is > > > > completely > > > > > divorced and has performed kumbha vivaha) by that time. > > > > > > > > > > Namah Sivaya > > > > > > > > > > _____ > > > > > > > > > > sohamsa > [sohamsa ] On > > > > Behalf Of > > > > > reema_sriganesh > > > > > Wednesday, July 19, 2006 2:32 PM > > > > > sohamsa > > > > > Re: Why should fasting on Thursday make > the > > > > native angry? > > > > > > > > > > || Hare Rama Krishna || > > > > > > > > > > Namaste Bojan-ji, > > > > > > > > > > Thank you so much. Your reply helped me in understanding the > UL > > > > > better, and it certainly will go a long way in helping the > > > native. He > > > > > seems to really want to save his marriage, and may God grant > him > > > the > > > > > power to do so. > > > > > > > > > > Thank you once again, and best wishes. > > > > > > > > > > May Sri Vishnu bless us all, > > > > > Reema. > > > > > > > > > > sohamsa@ <sohamsa% > > > 40> .com, > > > > bojan > > > > > vidakovic <janbovid@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HARE RAMA KRISHNA > > > > > > Dear Reema, as per my experience it is the karma that > > > > > > should be cleansed thorugh that UL with fasting, and > > > > > > ofcourse it is not so easy. What I have seen is that > > > > > > when UL is in 8th or its lord is at the same time the > > > > > > lord of the eight bhava than it is very hard to fast, > > > > > > esspeceally at the beginning. It can bring headaches, > > > > > > short temper, but after some time of regular fast it > > > > > > will be normalized. Ofcourse he should fast on that > > > > > > particular day, it will save his marriage and fix > > > > > > problems with unmada yoga etc. Everything will be fine > > > > > > after few weeks...best wishes, but the person must > > > > > > keep fasting, Bojan Vidakovic > > > > > > OM TAT SAT > > > > > > --- reema_sriganesh <reema_sriganesh@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > || Hare Rama Krishna || > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namaste, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > A native approached me about his issues in marriage. > > > > > > > After looking at > > > > > > > his chart, I suggested that he fast on Thursdays > > > > > > > (since UL lord is > > > > > > > exalted and retrograde Guru placed in the 12th > > > > > > > house). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > After doing this remedy, the native gave the > > > > > > > following feedback: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have been noticing that I get very angry on > > > > > > > Thursday and I get very > > > > > > > much frustrated also. As a result of this I start > > > > > > > remembering all the > > > > > > > things that I have done or have been done to me. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > * * * > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Native's data: 12/25/1966, 22:20 Hrs, 5:30 East of > > > > > > > GMT, 77E12, 28N36 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My question is - why should the native feel angry > > > > > > > particularly on > > > > > > > Thursdays? Is it just the exhaustion of fasting or > > > > > > > something more? I > > > > > > > notice that there is an unmada yoga on the UL axis. > > > > > > > But that should > > > > > > > mean that the spouse could have temper problems. It > > > > > > > doesn't mean that > > > > > > > the native cannot fast on the UL lord's day to try > > > > > > > to save his > > > > > > > marriage, correct? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So are there any other indications, which I might > > > > > > > have missed, that > > > > > > > suggest native's frustration and anger on Thursdays > > > > > > > since he began > > > > > > > fasting? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any insight would be greatly appreciated. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > May Sri Vishnu bless us all, > > > > > > > Reema. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tired of spam? Mail has the best spam protection > around > > > > > > http://mail. <> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 21, 2006 Report Share Posted July 21, 2006 Dear Freedom, Thank you for your patient reply. Your technical acumen has been evident to me for several years. However, if I may be so bold, technical genius does not a complete artist make. A conceptual contagion that permeates so many esoteric circles is something we could call " mystical fundamentalism. " This somehow promotes the attractive premise that fundamentalism can reach every arena, every cell or square inch in the world except for one's own spot! Please read Hari's excellent email. The idea that there is one final definitive reading that solely those with eyes can see is something owards which all of us may well be vigilant. I remember distinctly the standpoint you offerred me in 2003 that to follow my chosen Ishta was not taking spiritual practice far enough because She was ruled by Jupiter, whose element is akasha -- somehow not subtle enough from your position within the apparent aegis of the parampara! This is the same vantage poit that allows you to claim confidently that " the chart does not lie. " But I can only reply, " What is a lie, Freedom? " A lie is an an imperfection struggling with its place in the universe: and " universe " is nothing but a single poem (One Verse) a larger perfection beyond the conception of the " bad line " of spiritual doggerel, the misfire of inspiration. A hermeneutics that sees one valid reading of a horsoscope is consistent with the same monolithic brahminical elitism that weighed like an albatross on the neck of the Vedic tradition during difficult periods. This necessitated innovative new revelations (Buddhism, Jainism, Sikhism) to rejuvenate the still vital heart of wisdom. Ironically, there were always simulateneously Brahmanas doing things more resourcefully than their fundie cohorts, making these innovative heterodoxies not superfluous but unnececessarily alienated from the mainstream. At this moment when conservative positions are prominent in so many sectors of society given the anarchic, desperate mood of the world, it seems opportune to liberate mysticism from the clutches of any exclusive clique, and liberate ourselves in turn from stigmas of any brand. I suspect you and I are closer in position than strict evidence would dictate given your desire to transcend fundamentalism. But to the degree that we cannot glimpse even the hint that a secret bhanga can be discerned which will break even the worst dridha karma, we are missing something of the jurist's work - the defense counsel's calling - which can be the inspiration of the visionary jyotishi. Then maya is transposed to the key of lila; then bhakti and jnana fuse in a single conjugation of possibility. This would not presume that this is how events will turn out most of the time - not even remotely. But such is a possible predisposition we can have. If the client does not want to divorce, whose will is speaking to us during the session? Is it not possible we are subtly mistaken, and that the Ishta speaks directly through the client? If we insist there is one static chart and that the varied nimitta of the encounter do not with that chart make up a greater gestalt chakra, are we not entering the realm of fundamentalist jyotish? I myself do not insist on divorce or no divorce. I do not insist. I riff proactively in collaboration with the musicianship of the client. I try to listen for a melody I have forgotten amid the pomp and circumstance of my own credentials and own voice. And then I advance a case for that melody if it seems a worthy one. You may very well know something I do not about the machinery of this life. But it has been shown many times that the scientist inevitably influences the experiment. Subjectivity is not some Tempter but the contraption Divinity uses to bring us home. Objectivity is the fuel that keeps us honest getting there. SARVA MANGLAM (the mantra of the jyotishi- " defense counsel " !), Jesse sohamsa , " freeflowaum " <freeflowaum wrote: > > Hare Rama Krsna > > Dear Jesse, > Marriage is a great thing, but it is your opinion that a jyotishi should try > to hold a relationship together. A mantra to break it or hold it together > will change karma, that is fact. Read the first lines of my reply, please. > You are attached to making a marriage work, and because of this you will > make mistakes in prediction that as Laksmi said may get someone killed or > cause more harm than good. Read my message and study the chart until you can > understand each line of what I have said. Do not start talking from opinion, > this is untruth of the mind. A good jyotishi is unattached to personal and > cultural ideals and reads the chart clearly, the chart doesn't lie. The > chart doesn't lie. Malefics cause negative events, and benefics cause > positive events. > > For example, is abortion good or not. That is an opinion. If you look at the > D-7, there will be a house for every child, born or aborted in a mother's > life. That means an aborted child is the loss of an atma, this we see > clearly from the chart, it doesn't lie. I picked a loaded topic here, now, > is abortion good or bad, it still remains an opinion, the fact is an atma is > lost, but good or bad... If the life of the atma or the mother is disturbed > more than the removal, who can decide. But you can't blindly have an opinion > and tell every woman that asks about abortion not to have one. You can't > blindly try to make every marriage work. Otherwise throw away jyotish, and > just be a preacher, don't pretend to have insight-inner sight. People don't > come to an astrologer when the question is easy to answer, they need real > vision. > > Now look better at what I wrote: > -What are the results indicated by keeping the marriage and what are the > results indicated by breaking the marriage. The chart will not lie. Who is > being humane here? > - Look at the predictions I have made about the persons life and spouse, see > if they match before your start throwing opinions. It is said your opinions > will chase and torture you when you die. > > There are Vedic examples of divorce, and rules for when it is allowable, the > modern hindu no-divorce concept is modern fundamentalism that often leaves > divorcees suffering. And why would the great Rishis teach us how to see > divorce in a chart if there was no need for it? I believe fully in eka pati > vratta- one marriage (as my mother stayed with my father till the day he > died, as did my grandmother). But I am not a fundamentalist and work very > hard to improve the lives of others for the highest good of all involved. > > Jaya Jagannatha > > > > > > _____ > > sohamsa [sohamsa ] On Behalf Of > j.abbot > Thursday, July 20, 2006 10:01 AM > sohamsa > Re: Why should fasting on Thursday make the native angry? > > Dear Lakshmi, > > Thank you for your thoughtful and humane reply. I agree that there is > a time to intervene. It is telling that you and I have both had > experiences compelling us to speak here! And once again, I did not > intend to be nasty to Freedom. Something meaningful was triggered > here. I try to work continually with how to respond to these moments. > > Sincerely, > > Jesse > > sohamsa@ <sohamsa%40> .com, > " lakshmikary " lakshmikary@ wrote: > > > > Hare Rama Krishna > > Dear Jesse,and others on this thread.I'm not not arguing with > > anyone, just discussing moral ethics and this and that.Im Sat AK- > > I agree with you to.An astrologer is ruled by jupiter and is the 9th > > house and should their duty is to uphold dharma. > > Jupiter is also a benefactor and protector. The Sun is also karaka > > for 9th house, and light.The Sun can give the knowledge > > > > In regards to previous post/disscusion- I just wanted to say they > > is a difference between an internet learning forum, or even a > > classroom speaking with a bunch of astrologers where astrologers can > > sit and discuss charts and then actually sitting face to face with a > > suffering client and do what you can to help them . > > Perhaps because I've known Freedom I didnt take it the way you did. > > Im assume he is careful when in person. > > > > But I agree we have to be very careful what and how we tlak to the > > people approaching us. > > > > None of us can play God or even presume to fully know anything.Even > > if we see something in a chart , the chart can be wrong and so many > > things. > > But basically when someone comes and they are suffering we have to > > use our knowledge, common sense(wisdom) and compassion to help them > > understand their karma . > > On numerous occasion I have piped in when people were too quick to > > make assertions about afffairs, infidelity,etc/ > > Then we have the astrologers who ignore any bad indications and only > > say positive and good things. Which is equally bad in my opinion. > > Everyone has their personal style. > > > > Jesse , one time I didnt do something about a man I knew was > > dangerous.I wanted to keep peace, not make waves, keep family going- > > well that man killed 2 weeks later. I think of it almost every day, > > and I feel the burden of that ladies life on me.I hate myself for > > not doing something.Last year I knew a man was beating his son, i > > was worried he might seriously harm him. I personally couldnt bear > > the idea that the boy should be harmed further, so I took some > > actions. Now by some intervention, whole family is happier because > > father was forced by law to deal with his anger issues.Father is > > happier, son is happy, no more with big bruises and swollen liver. > > Even in USA any health care provider,teacher etc. is held by the law > > to report such abuse. Why/how can an astrologer sit back and let > > something go on letting the people burn away their " sins " . Well > > there is some truth to that as well..I understand it. > > Astrologers need to chant and always work towards disolving their > > own stuff so they can be good vessels of " light " > > We all have to work at being better persons and better astrologers > > and hope to have some inner connection with the divine so we can > > uplift people. > > Best wishes. > > Lakshmi > > > > > > > > sohamsa@ <sohamsa%40> .com, > " j.abbot " <j.abbot@> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Lakshmi, > > > > > > Please call me Jesse; since we have spoken several times on the > > phone, > > > there's no need to be so formal. I respectfully disagree with > > much of > > > your assessment. To the degree that there is abuse, of course it > > is > > > the role of the jyotishi to counsel an intervention. However, the > > > facile way in which Freedom recommended divorce alarmed me. > > > Obviously, the scenario is a bit different from direct advice to a > > > client. Nonetheless, there is a certain tendency for jyotishis to > > > presume what they can see or know, and/or to be prescriptive rather > > > than descriptive. The universe is not so cut-and-dried, frankly. > > Here > > > is an area where jyotish can actually borrow a page or two from > > > Western astrologers, not with respect to methodology, but as to > > > bedside manner. I never questioned Freedom's analysis (since I > > noted > > > I had not looked at the chart, how could I?) I took issue with the > > > tone. Please read his message again. If you do not see anything > > > presumptuous, I fear there is not much more that I can say here. > > > > > > I concede that I'm biased in this instance because I have witnessed > > > /audited firsthand very similar advice given by an SJC guru > > directly > > > to a querent. Later that day, the same SJC guru addressed in a > > talk > > > the terrible karma involved in destroying marriages and families! > > > > > > I do not anticipate engaging this thread further. To the degree > > that > > > my own tone was less than kind, I do apologize to Freedom and the > > > list. I think there is a broader issue here, though, which I will > > > explore in an article, likely for _The Mountain Astrologer_, where > > I > > > have published before. Obviously I would preserve anonymity in > > this > > > particular instance. The previous event that I discussed above > > > involving the advice to divorce left such an unpleasant taste in my > > > mouth that I kept away from SJC lists for many months out of > > respect, > > > knowing my own temper. Now I could not remain silent. > > > > > > There is lip service on the SJC lists (and their equivalent across > > the > > > modern jyotish scene) regarding the difference between a shiksha > > guru > > > and a diksha guru. I do see circumstances in which a jyotishi can > > be > > > both, but I think actually that the lip service is paid so that a > > > jyotishi can presume to act as both but then fall back on the > > caveat > > > that he or she is not a diksha guru. That is fairly slippery if > > one > > > considers it closely. I am *not* imputing this behavior to Freedom > > > but rather speaking to a broader trend that should concern us. > > > > > > Thank you for your time considering these thoughts. As I noted, I > > > shall not be getting into a " dueling jyotish " match via my own > > > competitive analysis. My point clearly lay elsewhere than in the > > > technical side of things. > > > > > > Sarva mangalam, > > > > > > Jesse > > > > > > sohamsa@ <sohamsa%40> ..com, > " lakshmikary " <lakshmikary@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hare Rama Krishna > > > > Dear Mr. Abbot, > > > > PLease post your analysis on the list of the chart in > > question.I'd > > > > like to see how you are able to make something nice out of > > something > > > > that can be causing both parties alot of pain and destruction. > > > > > > > > undoubtably the UL is severly afflicted. Of course many angles > > would > > > > need to be checked before the original opinion is confirmed. > > > > No one needs to have " spiritual authority " , but an astrologer > > needs > > > > common sense. > > > > I'd rather take the karma for supposedly " destoying a marraige " > > than > > > > taking the karma of seeing a badly afflicted chart and > > recommending > > > > something that in all probablity wont work as the relationship > > is > > > > not destined to survive, or worse yet, encourage some lady/man > > to > > > > stick around in a marraige while her husband/wife abuses them, > > and > > > > perhaps kills them -while I sit back and told tell them to " work > > it > > > > out " (while I attmept to play God encouraging them to stay > > > > together,,, it goes both ways!) Look how many people children > > will > > > > suffer if they kill each other or make each others life hellish. > > > > Some marriages are just a living hell.While others can work with > > > > some help. > > > > Yes, Ive seen and heard all sorts of things. > > > > Freedom was just relating what he thought about the astrological > > > > content, I dont think you can jump on him so easy for that.He > > wasnt > > > > replying directly to the person/client he was attempting to give > > is > > > > astrological assessment of the situation for some ohter > > > > astrologers.Everyone is free to do so. > > > > best wishes > > > > Lakshmi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sohamsa@ <sohamsa%40> ..com, > " j.abbot " <j.abbot@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Dear Freedom, > > > > > > > > > > I sincerely hope that you do not presume to have the spiritual > > > > > authority to recommend divorce. This will be the downfall of > > > > jyotish > > > > > in the West, and already seems to be a commonplace in many > > > > circles. > > > > > Your technical abilities are not in question; what is > > worrisome to > > > > me > > > > > is the karma borne by both jyotishi and native for destroying > > > > families > > > > > and engineering self-fulfilling prophecies. I have not even > > > > looked at > > > > > the chart in question (though I hope to do so soon and email > > Reema > > > > > off-list). I think SJC sgould build into its charter a way of > > > > > ensuring that jyotishis avoid precisely the tone your email > > > > > exemplifies, which seems more in the spirit of a commandment or > > > > > directive than a diplomatic and compassionate offering, > > infused > > > > with > > > > > humility and bedside manner. > > > > > > > > > > Respectfully, > > > > > > > > > > J.I. Abbot > > > > > > > > > > sohamsa@ <sohamsa%40> ..com, > " freeflowaum " <freeflowaum@> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Hare Rama Krsna > > > > > > > > > > > > Reema, > > > > > > Do not be attached to individual desires of native or your > > own > > > > personal > > > > > > ideals about relationships, unattachment brings clear > > > > sightedness. The > > > > > > Upapada is heavily afflicted and there should have been a > > kumbha > > > > vivaha > > > > > > before the native was married, so the UL could have been > > broken, > > > > but too > > > > > > late now. > > > > > > Bojan, > > > > > > The unmada is on the UL, which means the wife has lost it, > > > > > irrational anger > > > > > > and depression (Saturn in first and Mars in seventh-to UL). > > To > > > > check > > > > > if this > > > > > > is the correct wife we are speaking of, she would have a > > heavily > > > > > afflicted > > > > > > (or MKS) Mars and Saturn in HER natal chart, based on upon > > his > > > > UL. > > > > > And UL > > > > > > fasting will not remove her unmada, only promote marriage. > > > > > > That same Mars-Saturn is a poverty yoga from the native's > > lagna > > > > > (malefics in > > > > > > 2nd and 8th). So after the vivaha (marriage), the native > > would > > > > > become poor > > > > > > and the wife would become 'mad'. This is a cursed UL (cursed > > > > > marriage) and > > > > > > in these cases it will be seen that the native's spouse will > > > > also have a > > > > > > curse on their UL. Now if the curse is on your head, you > > cannot > > > > get > > > > > out of > > > > > > it, but when a curse is on your marriage, then it is > > possible to > > > > let the > > > > > > curse go. > > > > > > > > > > > > Secondly, the sustaining factor in this marriage is > > maranakaraka > > > > > sthana Rahu > > > > > > (second from UL) and this is on his AL. The marriage had > > little > > > > > chance of > > > > > > lasting to begin with because a dying malefic is feeding it. > > The > > > > > vivaha's > > > > > > breaking has ruined the native's name and reputation, the > > longer > > > > the > > > > > break > > > > > > lasts the more damage there will be to the native's image > > (what > > > > > people think > > > > > > of him and how he is socially percieved). > > > > > > > > > > > > The breaking of the vivaha will benefit both the native and > > his > > > > > wife! She > > > > > > will regain some sanity and the native will be able to do > > remedy > > > > for his > > > > > > financial problems. The two people will actually be able to > > get > > > > > along much > > > > > > better after divorce. In this chart, Bagala worship will > > break > > > > the > > > > > marriage. > > > > > > Fasting will only prolong the suffering of both natives. > > > > Therefore, > > > > > first > > > > > > have the native do mantra of Bagala Devi. > > > > > > > > > > > > Then after divorce, the native should perform kumbha vivaha > > (as > > > > next > > > > > UL is > > > > > > on Ketu-Rahu axis) and Rahu is MKS as already mentioned > > (another > > > > > problemed > > > > > > marriage). The third UL, his next marriage after divorce and > > > > kumba > > > > > vivaha > > > > > > will prove very beneficial as it contains an uccha Moon. > > With > > > > this > > > > > marriage > > > > > > he will prosper financially and his dharma will grow in many > > > > ways. > > > > > Jupiter > > > > > > is uccha banga being uplifted by this uccha Moon that will be > > > > > activated by > > > > > > the third marriage. With the worship of Krsna he will be > > able to > > > > > attain his > > > > > > beneficial UL in his upcoming Jupiter Moon Mula dasha (if he > > is > > > > > completely > > > > > > divorced and has performed kumbha vivaha) by that time. > > > > > > > > > > > > Namah Sivaya > > > > > > > > > > > > _____ > > > > > > > > > > > > sohamsa@ <sohamsa%40> ..com > > [sohamsa@ <sohamsa%40> .com] On > > > > > Behalf Of > > > > > > reema_sriganesh > > > > > > Wednesday, July 19, 2006 2:32 PM > > > > > > sohamsa@ <sohamsa%40> ..com > > > > > > Re: Why should fasting on Thursday make > > the > > > > > native angry? > > > > > > > > > > > > || Hare Rama Krishna || > > > > > > > > > > > > Namaste Bojan-ji, > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you so much. Your reply helped me in understanding the > > UL > > > > > > better, and it certainly will go a long way in helping the > > > > native. He > > > > > > seems to really want to save his marriage, and may God grant > > him > > > > the > > > > > > power to do so. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you once again, and best wishes. > > > > > > > > > > > > May Sri Vishnu bless us all, > > > > > > Reema. > > > > > > > > > > > > sohamsa@ <sohamsa% > > > > 40> .com, > > > > > bojan > > > > > > vidakovic <janbovid@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HARE RAMA KRISHNA > > > > > > > Dear Reema, as per my experience it is the karma that > > > > > > > should be cleansed thorugh that UL with fasting, and > > > > > > > ofcourse it is not so easy. What I have seen is that > > > > > > > when UL is in 8th or its lord is at the same time the > > > > > > > lord of the eight bhava than it is very hard to fast, > > > > > > > esspeceally at the beginning. It can bring headaches, > > > > > > > short temper, but after some time of regular fast it > > > > > > > will be normalized. Ofcourse he should fast on that > > > > > > > particular day, it will save his marriage and fix > > > > > > > problems with unmada yoga etc. Everything will be fine > > > > > > > after few weeks...best wishes, but the person must > > > > > > > keep fasting, Bojan Vidakovic > > > > > > > OM TAT SAT > > > > > > > --- reema_sriganesh <reema_sriganesh@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > || Hare Rama Krishna || > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namaste, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > A native approached me about his issues in marriage. > > > > > > > > After looking at > > > > > > > > his chart, I suggested that he fast on Thursdays > > > > > > > > (since UL lord is > > > > > > > > exalted and retrograde Guru placed in the 12th > > > > > > > > house). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > After doing this remedy, the native gave the > > > > > > > > following feedback: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have been noticing that I get very angry on > > > > > > > > Thursday and I get very > > > > > > > > much frustrated also. As a result of this I start > > > > > > > > remembering all the > > > > > > > > things that I have done or have been done to me. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > * * * > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Native's data: 12/25/1966, 22:20 Hrs, 5:30 East of > > > > > > > > GMT, 77E12, 28N36 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My question is - why should the native feel angry > > > > > > > > particularly on > > > > > > > > Thursdays? Is it just the exhaustion of fasting or > > > > > > > > something more? I > > > > > > > > notice that there is an unmada yoga on the UL axis. > > > > > > > > But that should > > > > > > > > mean that the spouse could have temper problems. It > > > > > > > > doesn't mean that > > > > > > > > the native cannot fast on the UL lord's day to try > > > > > > > > to save his > > > > > > > > marriage, correct? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So are there any other indications, which I might > > > > > > > > have missed, that > > > > > > > > suggest native's frustration and anger on Thursdays > > > > > > > > since he began > > > > > > > > fasting? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any insight would be greatly appreciated. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > May Sri Vishnu bless us all, > > > > > > > > Reema. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tired of spam? Mail has the best spam protection > > around > > > > > > > http://mail. <http://mail. <> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 21, 2006 Report Share Posted July 21, 2006 Dear all, In the current world today, it is frequent that the first UL does not apply to the eventual marriage. Frequently people eventually get married to even their 4th or 5th ULs. Which one should they fast on? Does the first UL still control anything? What if the the " n " th UL is completely different from the first? What does this mean? For example, in one case I know (cant disclose details) the first UL has a debilitated Saturn, and the UL itself is in the 10th house. Exalted Mars in the 7th (Mars is the ruler of the first UL). The relationship didnt last long (1-1.5 yrs), but there was a lot of love while it lasted. Relationship broke up because the person left the country suddenly to pursue very promising education (not incompatibility). Person is currently married to their 5th UL (Leo) which has a strong Ketu (39 bindu house), in trines to the debilitated Saturn, and has 8th aspect of exalted Mars, but second from UL is free from problematic aspect. Ishta candidates are Ketu, Sun and Saturn (all influencing this UL). In each of the previous ULs there was a tough aspect of either Mars or Saturn to 2nd from UL or its lord. Also the 7th house has exalted Mars. 8th house has Rahu. Can simply the fact that the second house from the 5th UL has no tough aspect, allay all the other tough features related to marriage (tough 7th, tough 8th, lord of second house from first UL has aspect of debilitated Saturn)? Thank you, Sundeep sohamsa , bojan vidakovic <janbovid wrote: > > > HARE RAMA KRISHNA > Since the marriage is the highest darma I would > advice to start fasting. Something will change, try > and you'll see. My oppinion is that the native should > choose the harder way and perform fast - and try to > give the most from himself, and than when the UL > becomes clean it will happen. The native will stay > with partner or divorce, but has done everything from > her/his side. All the karma which is excperinced is > good for her/his development. Isn't it? After some > time the situation will become better. As per my > excperience I saw many ladies having a lot of marital > problems that have been solved with fasting. Best > wishes, Bojan > OM TAT SAT Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 21, 2006 Report Share Posted July 21, 2006 Dear Sourav, Thank you for the detailed reply. I have additional questions. I understand that UL is a very serious relationship since 12th house involves giving, so it must be a manifestation of that. In the case I described each relationship was serious - the individual fully expected it to lead to marriage, but it didnt eventually due to unforeseen circumstances. But of course, there were no marriage rites, so does it still count as a UL? Secondly, I am still unclear about what you are saying: I dont understand your statement " Subsequent marriages come from the changes in the original UL pertaining to marriage " . The original UL is only one, and the placement of planets in it is known (unless you are including some transit influences too?). If you are implying that by looking at it, we can somehow understand how it will change over time, then I am confused. I assumed that the change over time was shown in the progression of ULs. So, if the progression in ULs shows the changes, then why isnt each new UL the defining one in every way? You also imply that the original UL defines the attitude, which never changes, consequently the other ULs must be " lesser " ULs in some sense, because they dont define the attitude? I probably just need some more concrete elaboration of your ideas..In the case that I described, I did see some sort of consistency in that the only one that materialized into marriage was the one which had no problems with 2nd from UL. However, I got confused in the understanding - in one case the UL has debilitated Saturn, in another case exalted Mars, in yet another case strong Ketu. Is it that the overall reaction to relationships (all relationships) remains the same (defined by the 7th house), while the personalities of the spouses is defined by the ULs, but the overall approach to giving is defined by the first UL? Thanks Sundeep sohamsa , " Sourav " <souravc108 wrote: > > > || Hare Rama Krishna || > > Dear Sundeep, > > Namaskar. Apparently you are confusing > between A7 and UL. UL comes into picture when you have a significant > amount of compromise/giving to another individual and that is wife and > marriage over 1 year period. If it is a love affair, the compromise part > may not be significant even if the love affair may run over several > years. Hence affairs simple do not count as UL. UL is arudha of the > 12-th house. Let us think much more of the 12-th house than 5th house > (rasa, love) and 7th house (sexuality) when it comes to UL. Having said > that I dont think a typical individual goes into 4 / 5 such UL's before > settling down on one. > > Moreover, the original UL is still the UL when it comes to deciding > donations or giving or contributing in general. If there is a malefic on > UL then the person may not be very giving in nature of may have > situations in life which will prevent him/her from donating things. > SanjayP-ji made this clear to me in the Washington conference where he > talked about marriage. Subsequent marriages come from the changes in the > original UL pertaining to marriage. Does the image of a person remain > same all his life ? AL is a continuum and not a static concept. Think of > it as a bowl. With each passing dasa you are putting a different colored > water into it and the overall content keeps changing. Amongst various > houses 8th from AL shows significant transitions. The new UL's show each > new cases of persons (wives) where one is contributing or compromising > or giving. But the overall giving happens in the original UL and shows > your internal attitude. Does your attitude on donation to an orphanage > change with each passing marriage ? Of course not. So for donation to an > orphanage, consider the present effect on the original UL. > > Best wishes, > > Sourav > > ====================================================================== ==\ > ==================================== sohamsa , " vedicastrostudent " > <vedicastrostudent@> wrote: > > > > Dear all, > > In the current world today, it is frequent that the first UL does > > not apply to the eventual marriage. Frequently people eventually get > > married to even their 4th or 5th ULs. Which one should they fast on? > > Does the first UL still control anything? What if the the " n " th UL > > is completely different from the first? What does this mean? For > > example, in one case I know (cant disclose details) the first UL has > > a debilitated Saturn, and the UL itself is in the 10th house. > > Exalted Mars in the 7th (Mars is the ruler of the first UL). The > > relationship didnt last long (1-1.5 yrs), but there was a lot of > > love while it lasted. Relationship broke up because the person left > > the country suddenly to pursue very promising education (not > > incompatibility). Person is currently married to their 5th UL (Leo) > > which has a strong Ketu (39 bindu house), in trines to the > > debilitated Saturn, and has 8th aspect of exalted Mars, but second > > from UL is free from problematic aspect. Ishta candidates are Ketu, > > Sun and Saturn (all influencing this UL). In each of the previous > > ULs there was a tough aspect of either Mars or Saturn to 2nd from UL > > or its lord. Also the 7th house has exalted Mars. 8th house has > > Rahu. Can simply the fact that the second house from the 5th UL has > > no tough aspect, allay all the other tough features related to > > marriage (tough 7th, tough 8th, lord of second house from first UL > > has aspect of debilitated Saturn)? > > > > Thank you, > > > > Sundeep > > > > > > sohamsa , bojan vidakovic janbovid@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > HARE RAMA KRISHNA > > > Since the marriage is the highest darma I would > > > advice to start fasting. Something will change, try > > > and you'll see. My oppinion is that the native should > > > choose the harder way and perform fast - and try to > > > give the most from himself, and than when the UL > > > becomes clean it will happen. The native will stay > > > with partner or divorce, but has done everything from > > > her/his side. All the karma which is excperinced is > > > good for her/his development. Isn't it? After some > > > time the situation will become better. As per my > > > excperience I saw many ladies having a lot of marital > > > problems that have been solved with fasting. Best > > > wishes, Bojan > > > OM TAT SAT > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 22, 2006 Report Share Posted July 22, 2006 Hare Rama Krsna My Brother Jesse, I have no problem with the final decision made by any jyotishi, I just do not stand for opinions not based on a proper understanding of the chart, as this makes jyotish look bad. This is a science (right eye) that ends in an art (left eye). First comes the technical understanding, then the art of interpretation, with these eyes balanced then the third eye is able to work. No fundamentalism just professionalism. I am not into lofty ideas, or conceptualizations, you still have not studied the chart fully, and are not looking at the situation at hand. My comments on your personally chosen deity in 2003, only relate to my concern for your mental health and nervous system functioning. Tantric Goddesses are powerful. Jaya Jagannatha sohamsa [sohamsa ] On Behalf Of j.abbot Friday, July 21, 2006 8:15 AM sohamsa Re: Why should fasting on Thursday make the native angry? Dear Freedom, Thank you for your patient reply. Your technical acumen has been evident to me for several years. However, if I may be so bold, technical genius does not a complete artist make. A conceptual contagion that permeates so many esoteric circles is something we could call " mystical fundamentalism. " This somehow promotes the attractive premise that fundamentalism can reach every arena, every cell or square inch in the world except for one's own spot! Please read Hari's excellent email. The idea that there is one final definitive reading that solely those with eyes can see is something owards which all of us may well be vigilant. I remember distinctly the standpoint you offerred me in 2003 that to follow my chosen Ishta was not taking spiritual practice far enough because She was ruled by Jupiter, whose element is akasha -- somehow not subtle enough from your position within the apparent aegis of the parampara! This is the same vantage poit that allows you to claim confidently that " the chart does not lie. " But I can only reply, " What is a lie, Freedom? " A lie is an an imperfection struggling with its place in the universe: and " universe " is nothing but a single poem (One Verse) a larger perfection beyond the conception of the " bad line " of spiritual doggerel, the misfire of inspiration. A hermeneutics that sees one valid reading of a horsoscope is consistent with the same monolithic brahminical elitism that weighed like an albatross on the neck of the Vedic tradition during difficult periods. This necessitated innovative new revelations (Buddhism, Jainism, Sikhism) to rejuvenate the still vital heart of wisdom. Ironically, there were always simulateneously Brahmanas doing things more resourcefully than their fundie cohorts, making these innovative heterodoxies not superfluous but unnececessarily alienated from the mainstream. At this moment when conservative positions are prominent in so many sectors of society given the anarchic, desperate mood of the world, it seems opportune to liberate mysticism from the clutches of any exclusive clique, and liberate ourselves in turn from stigmas of any brand. I suspect you and I are closer in position than strict evidence would dictate given your desire to transcend fundamentalism. But to the degree that we cannot glimpse even the hint that a secret bhanga can be discerned which will break even the worst dridha karma, we are missing something of the jurist's work - the defense counsel's calling - which can be the inspiration of the visionary jyotishi. Then maya is transposed to the key of lila; then bhakti and jnana fuse in a single conjugation of possibility. This would not presume that this is how events will turn out most of the time - not even remotely. But such is a possible predisposition we can have. If the client does not want to divorce, whose will is speaking to us during the session? Is it not possible we are subtly mistaken, and that the Ishta speaks directly through the client? If we insist there is one static chart and that the varied nimitta of the encounter do not with that chart make up a greater gestalt chakra, are we not entering the realm of fundamentalist jyotish? I myself do not insist on divorce or no divorce. I do not insist. I riff proactively in collaboration with the musicianship of the client. I try to listen for a melody I have forgotten amid the pomp and circumstance of my own credentials and own voice. And then I advance a case for that melody if it seems a worthy one. You may very well know something I do not about the machinery of this life. But it has been shown many times that the scientist inevitably influences the experiment. Subjectivity is not some Tempter but the contraption Divinity uses to bring us home. Objectivity is the fuel that keeps us honest getting there. SARVA MANGLAM (the mantra of the jyotishi- " defense counsel " !), Jesse sohamsa , " freeflowaum " <freeflowaum wrote: > > Hare Rama Krsna > > Dear Jesse, > Marriage is a great thing, but it is your opinion that a jyotishi should try > to hold a relationship together. A mantra to break it or hold it together > will change karma, that is fact. Read the first lines of my reply, please. > You are attached to making a marriage work, and because of this you will > make mistakes in prediction that as Laksmi said may get someone killed or > cause more harm than good. Read my message and study the chart until you can > understand each line of what I have said. Do not start talking from opinion, > this is untruth of the mind. A good jyotishi is unattached to personal and > cultural ideals and reads the chart clearly, the chart doesn't lie. The > chart doesn't lie. Malefics cause negative events, and benefics cause > positive events. > > For example, is abortion good or not. That is an opinion. If you look at the > D-7, there will be a house for every child, born or aborted in a mother's > life. That means an aborted child is the loss of an atma, this we see > clearly from the chart, it doesn't lie. I picked a loaded topic here, now, > is abortion good or bad, it still remains an opinion, the fact is an atma is > lost, but good or bad... If the life of the atma or the mother is disturbed > more than the removal, who can decide. But you can't blindly have an opinion > and tell every woman that asks about abortion not to have one. You can't > blindly try to make every marriage work. Otherwise throw away jyotish, and > just be a preacher, don't pretend to have insight-inner sight. People don't > come to an astrologer when the question is easy to answer, they need real > vision. > > Now look better at what I wrote: > -What are the results indicated by keeping the marriage and what are the > results indicated by breaking the marriage. The chart will not lie. Who is > being humane here? > - Look at the predictions I have made about the persons life and spouse, see > if they match before your start throwing opinions. It is said your opinions > will chase and torture you when you die. > > There are Vedic examples of divorce, and rules for when it is allowable, the > modern hindu no-divorce concept is modern fundamentalism that often leaves > divorcees suffering. And why would the great Rishis teach us how to see > divorce in a chart if there was no need for it? I believe fully in eka pati > vratta- one marriage (as my mother stayed with my father till the day he > died, as did my grandmother). But I am not a fundamentalist and work very > hard to improve the lives of others for the highest good of all involved. > > Jaya Jagannatha > > > > > > _____ > > sohamsa [sohamsa ] On Behalf Of > j.abbot > Thursday, July 20, 2006 10:01 AM > sohamsa > Re: Why should fasting on Thursday make the native angry? > > Dear Lakshmi, > > Thank you for your thoughtful and humane reply. I agree that there is > a time to intervene. It is telling that you and I have both had > experiences compelling us to speak here! And once again, I did not > intend to be nasty to Freedom. Something meaningful was triggered > here. I try to work continually with how to respond to these moments. > > Sincerely, > > Jesse > > sohamsa@ <sohamsa%40> ..com, > " lakshmikary " lakshmikary@ wrote: > > > > Hare Rama Krishna > > Dear Jesse,and others on this thread.I'm not not arguing with > > anyone, just discussing moral ethics and this and that.Im Sat AK- > > I agree with you to.An astrologer is ruled by jupiter and is the 9th > > house and should their duty is to uphold dharma. > > Jupiter is also a benefactor and protector. The Sun is also karaka > > for 9th house, and light.The Sun can give the knowledge > > > > In regards to previous post/disscusion- I just wanted to say they > > is a difference between an internet learning forum, or even a > > classroom speaking with a bunch of astrologers where astrologers can > > sit and discuss charts and then actually sitting face to face with a > > suffering client and do what you can to help them . > > Perhaps because I've known Freedom I didnt take it the way you did. > > Im assume he is careful when in person. > > > > But I agree we have to be very careful what and how we tlak to the > > people approaching us. > > > > None of us can play God or even presume to fully know anything.Even > > if we see something in a chart , the chart can be wrong and so many > > things. > > But basically when someone comes and they are suffering we have to > > use our knowledge, common sense(wisdom) and compassion to help them > > understand their karma . > > On numerous occasion I have piped in when people were too quick to > > make assertions about afffairs, infidelity,etc/ > > Then we have the astrologers who ignore any bad indications and only > > say positive and good things. Which is equally bad in my opinion. > > Everyone has their personal style. > > > > Jesse , one time I didnt do something about a man I knew was > > dangerous.I wanted to keep peace, not make waves, keep family going- > > well that man killed 2 weeks later. I think of it almost every day, > > and I feel the burden of that ladies life on me.I hate myself for > > not doing something.Last year I knew a man was beating his son, i > > was worried he might seriously harm him. I personally couldnt bear > > the idea that the boy should be harmed further, so I took some > > actions. Now by some intervention, whole family is happier because > > father was forced by law to deal with his anger issues.Father is > > happier, son is happy, no more with big bruises and swollen liver. > > Even in USA any health care provider,teacher etc. is held by the law > > to report such abuse. Why/how can an astrologer sit back and let > > something go on letting the people burn away their " sins " . Well > > there is some truth to that as well..I understand it. > > Astrologers need to chant and always work towards disolving their > > own stuff so they can be good vessels of " light " > > We all have to work at being better persons and better astrologers > > and hope to have some inner connection with the divine so we can > > uplift people. > > Best wishes. > > Lakshmi > > > > > > > > sohamsa@ <sohamsa%40> ..com, > " j.abbot " <j.abbot@> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Lakshmi, > > > > > > Please call me Jesse; since we have spoken several times on the > > phone, > > > there's no need to be so formal. I respectfully disagree with > > much of > > > your assessment. To the degree that there is abuse, of course it > > is > > > the role of the jyotishi to counsel an intervention. However, the > > > facile way in which Freedom recommended divorce alarmed me. > > > Obviously, the scenario is a bit different from direct advice to a > > > client. Nonetheless, there is a certain tendency for jyotishis to > > > presume what they can see or know, and/or to be prescriptive rather > > > than descriptive. The universe is not so cut-and-dried, frankly. > > Here > > > is an area where jyotish can actually borrow a page or two from > > > Western astrologers, not with respect to methodology, but as to > > > bedside manner. I never questioned Freedom's analysis (since I > > noted > > > I had not looked at the chart, how could I?) I took issue with the > > > tone. Please read his message again. If you do not see anything > > > presumptuous, I fear there is not much more that I can say here. > > > > > > I concede that I'm biased in this instance because I have witnessed > > > /audited firsthand very similar advice given by an SJC guru > > directly > > > to a querent. Later that day, the same SJC guru addressed in a > > talk > > > the terrible karma involved in destroying marriages and families! > > > > > > I do not anticipate engaging this thread further. To the degree > > that > > > my own tone was less than kind, I do apologize to Freedom and the > > > list. I think there is a broader issue here, though, which I will > > > explore in an article, likely for _The Mountain Astrologer_, where > > I > > > have published before. Obviously I would preserve anonymity in > > this > > > particular instance. The previous event that I discussed above > > > involving the advice to divorce left such an unpleasant taste in my > > > mouth that I kept away from SJC lists for many months out of > > respect, > > > knowing my own temper. Now I could not remain silent. > > > > > > There is lip service on the SJC lists (and their equivalent across > > the > > > modern jyotish scene) regarding the difference between a shiksha > > guru > > > and a diksha guru. I do see circumstances in which a jyotishi can > > be > > > both, but I think actually that the lip service is paid so that a > > > jyotishi can presume to act as both but then fall back on the > > caveat > > > that he or she is not a diksha guru. That is fairly slippery if > > one > > > considers it closely. I am *not* imputing this behavior to Freedom > > > but rather speaking to a broader trend that should concern us. > > > > > > Thank you for your time considering these thoughts. As I noted, I > > > shall not be getting into a " dueling jyotish " match via my own > > > competitive analysis. My point clearly lay elsewhere than in the > > > technical side of things. > > > > > > Sarva mangalam, > > > > > > Jesse > > > > > > sohamsa@ <sohamsa%40> ..com, > " lakshmikary " <lakshmikary@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hare Rama Krishna > > > > Dear Mr. Abbot, > > > > PLease post your analysis on the list of the chart in > > question.I'd > > > > like to see how you are able to make something nice out of > > something > > > > that can be causing both parties alot of pain and destruction. > > > > > > > > undoubtably the UL is severly afflicted. Of course many angles > > would > > > > need to be checked before the original opinion is confirmed. > > > > No one needs to have " spiritual authority " , but an astrologer > > needs > > > > common sense. > > > > I'd rather take the karma for supposedly " destoying a marraige " > > than > > > > taking the karma of seeing a badly afflicted chart and > > recommending > > > > something that in all probablity wont work as the relationship > > is > > > > not destined to survive, or worse yet, encourage some lady/man > > to > > > > stick around in a marraige while her husband/wife abuses them, > > and > > > > perhaps kills them -while I sit back and told tell them to " work > > it > > > > out " (while I attmept to play God encouraging them to stay > > > > together,,, it goes both ways!) Look how many people children > > will > > > > suffer if they kill each other or make each others life hellish. > > > > Some marriages are just a living hell.While others can work with > > > > some help. > > > > Yes, Ive seen and heard all sorts of things. > > > > Freedom was just relating what he thought about the astrological > > > > content, I dont think you can jump on him so easy for that.He > > wasnt > > > > replying directly to the person/client he was attempting to give > > is > > > > astrological assessment of the situation for some ohter > > > > astrologers.Everyone is free to do so. > > > > best wishes > > > > Lakshmi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sohamsa@ <sohamsa%40> ..com, > " j.abbot " <j.abbot@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Dear Freedom, > > > > > > > > > > I sincerely hope that you do not presume to have the spiritual > > > > > authority to recommend divorce. This will be the downfall of > > > > jyotish > > > > > in the West, and already seems to be a commonplace in many > > > > circles. > > > > > Your technical abilities are not in question; what is > > worrisome to > > > > me > > > > > is the karma borne by both jyotishi and native for destroying > > > > families > > > > > and engineering self-fulfilling prophecies. I have not even > > > > looked at > > > > > the chart in question (though I hope to do so soon and email > > Reema > > > > > off-list). I think SJC sgould build into its charter a way of > > > > > ensuring that jyotishis avoid precisely the tone your email > > > > > exemplifies, which seems more in the spirit of a commandment or > > > > > directive than a diplomatic and compassionate offering, > > infused > > > > with > > > > > humility and bedside manner. > > > > > > > > > > Respectfully, > > > > > > > > > > J.I. Abbot > > > > > > > > > > sohamsa@ <sohamsa%40> ..com, > " freeflowaum " <freeflowaum@> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Hare Rama Krsna > > > > > > > > > > > > Reema, > > > > > > Do not be attached to individual desires of native or your > > own > > > > personal > > > > > > ideals about relationships, unattachment brings clear > > > > sightedness. The > > > > > > Upapada is heavily afflicted and there should have been a > > kumbha > > > > vivaha > > > > > > before the native was married, so the UL could have been > > broken, > > > > but too > > > > > > late now. > > > > > > Bojan, > > > > > > The unmada is on the UL, which means the wife has lost it, > > > > > irrational anger > > > > > > and depression (Saturn in first and Mars in seventh-to UL). > > To > > > > check > > > > > if this > > > > > > is the correct wife we are speaking of, she would have a > > heavily > > > > > afflicted > > > > > > (or MKS) Mars and Saturn in HER natal chart, based on upon > > his > > > > UL. > > > > > And UL > > > > > > fasting will not remove her unmada, only promote marriage. > > > > > > That same Mars-Saturn is a poverty yoga from the native's > > lagna > > > > > (malefics in > > > > > > 2nd and 8th). So after the vivaha (marriage), the native > > would > > > > > become poor > > > > > > and the wife would become 'mad'. This is a cursed UL (cursed > > > > > marriage) and > > > > > > in these cases it will be seen that the native's spouse will > > > > also have a > > > > > > curse on their UL. Now if the curse is on your head, you > > cannot > > > > get > > > > > out of > > > > > > it, but when a curse is on your marriage, then it is > > possible to > > > > let the > > > > > > curse go. > > > > > > > > > > > > Secondly, the sustaining factor in this marriage is > > maranakaraka > > > > > sthana Rahu > > > > > > (second from UL) and this is on his AL. The marriage had > > little > > > > > chance of > > > > > > lasting to begin with because a dying malefic is feeding it. > > The > > > > > vivaha's > > > > > > breaking has ruined the native's name and reputation, the > > longer > > > > the > > > > > break > > > > > > lasts the more damage there will be to the native's image > > (what > > > > > people think > > > > > > of him and how he is socially percieved). > > > > > > > > > > > > The breaking of the vivaha will benefit both the native and > > his > > > > > wife! She > > > > > > will regain some sanity and the native will be able to do > > remedy > > > > for his > > > > > > financial problems. The two people will actually be able to > > get > > > > > along much > > > > > > better after divorce. In this chart, Bagala worship will > > break > > > > the > > > > > marriage. > > > > > > Fasting will only prolong the suffering of both natives. > > > > Therefore, > > > > > first > > > > > > have the native do mantra of Bagala Devi. > > > > > > > > > > > > Then after divorce, the native should perform kumbha vivaha > > (as > > > > next > > > > > UL is > > > > > > on Ketu-Rahu axis) and Rahu is MKS as already mentioned > > (another > > > > > problemed > > > > > > marriage). The third UL, his next marriage after divorce and > > > > kumba > > > > > vivaha > > > > > > will prove very beneficial as it contains an uccha Moon. > > With > > > > this > > > > > marriage > > > > > > he will prosper financially and his dharma will grow in many > > > > ways. > > > > > Jupiter > > > > > > is uccha banga being uplifted by this uccha Moon that will be > > > > > activated by > > > > > > the third marriage. With the worship of Krsna he will be > > able to > > > > > attain his > > > > > > beneficial UL in his upcoming Jupiter Moon Mula dasha (if he > > is > > > > > completely > > > > > > divorced and has performed kumbha vivaha) by that time. > > > > > > > > > > > > Namah Sivaya > > > > > > > > > > > > _____ > > > > > > > > > > > > sohamsa@ <sohamsa%40> ..com > > [sohamsa@ <sohamsa%40> ..com] On > > > > > Behalf Of > > > > > > reema_sriganesh > > > > > > Wednesday, July 19, 2006 2:32 PM > > > > > > sohamsa@ <sohamsa%40> ..com > > > > > > Re: Why should fasting on Thursday make > > the > > > > > native angry? > > > > > > > > > > > > || Hare Rama Krishna || > > > > > > > > > > > > Namaste Bojan-ji, > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you so much. Your reply helped me in understanding the > > UL > > > > > > better, and it certainly will go a long way in helping the > > > > native. He > > > > > > seems to really want to save his marriage, and may God grant > > him > > > > the > > > > > > power to do so. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you once again, and best wishes. > > > > > > > > > > > > May Sri Vishnu bless us all, > > > > > > Reema. > > > > > > > > > > > > sohamsa@ <sohamsa% > > > > 40> .com, > > > > > bojan > > > > > > vidakovic <janbovid@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HARE RAMA KRISHNA > > > > > > > Dear Reema, as per my experience it is the karma that > > > > > > > should be cleansed thorugh that UL with fasting, and > > > > > > > ofcourse it is not so easy. What I have seen is that > > > > > > > when UL is in 8th or its lord is at the same time the > > > > > > > lord of the eight bhava than it is very hard to fast, > > > > > > > esspeceally at the beginning. It can bring headaches, > > > > > > > short temper, but after some time of regular fast it > > > > > > > will be normalized. Ofcourse he should fast on that > > > > > > > particular day, it will save his marriage and fix > > > > > > > problems with unmada yoga etc. Everything will be fine > > > > > > > after few weeks...best wishes, but the person must > > > > > > > keep fasting, Bojan Vidakovic > > > > > > > OM TAT SAT > > > > > > > --- reema_sriganesh <reema_sriganesh@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > || Hare Rama Krishna || > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namaste, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > A native approached me about his issues in marriage. > > > > > > > > After looking at > > > > > > > > his chart, I suggested that he fast on Thursdays > > > > > > > > (since UL lord is > > > > > > > > exalted and retrograde Guru placed in the 12th > > > > > > > > house). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > After doing this remedy, the native gave the > > > > > > > > following feedback: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have been noticing that I get very angry on > > > > > > > > Thursday and I get very > > > > > > > > much frustrated also. As a result of this I start > > > > > > > > remembering all the > > > > > > > > things that I have done or have been done to me. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > * * * > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Native's data: 12/25/1966, 22:20 Hrs, 5:30 East of > > > > > > > > GMT, 77E12, 28N36 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My question is - why should the native feel angry > > > > > > > > particularly on > > > > > > > > Thursdays? Is it just the exhaustion of fasting or > > > > > > > > something more? I > > > > > > > > notice that there is an unmada yoga on the UL axis. > > > > > > > > But that should > > > > > > > > mean that the spouse could have temper problems. It > > > > > > > > doesn't mean that > > > > > > > > the native cannot fast on the UL lord's day to try > > > > > > > > to save his > > > > > > > > marriage, correct? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So are there any other indications, which I might > > > > > > > > have missed, that > > > > > > > > suggest native's frustration and anger on Thursdays > > > > > > > > since he began > > > > > > > > fasting? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any insight would be greatly appreciated. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > May Sri Vishnu bless us all, > > > > > > > > Reema. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tired of spam? Mail has the best spam protection > > around > > > > > > > http://mail. <http://mail. <> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 22, 2006 Report Share Posted July 22, 2006 Freedom, You parry where you have no room to engage. I took issue with your fixed worldview ( " The chart does not lie " ) and did not express an interest in talking shop. Am I up to the task? Probably not on your terms. Mystical fundamentalism is everywhere on the jyotish lists, and I am afraid we are going to have to agree to disagree regarding which are the lofty generalizations. On a more amusing note, I'm in your debt for your concern for my nervous system! Surely you must be aware that the first response of the Buddhist Taaraa is to devotees' fears and worries of any kind. Therefore, I'll take my chances. The power of both Aaryaa Taaraa and the nakshatras (Taaraa) lies in shuunyataa (openness). That is the antidote to lofty generalizations, actually. Blessed be, Jesse Abbot sohamsa , " freeflowaum " <freeflowaum wrote: > > Hare Rama Krsna > > My Brother Jesse, > > I have no problem with the final decision made by any jyotishi, I just do > not stand for opinions not based on a proper understanding of the chart, as > this makes jyotish look bad. This is a science (right eye) that ends in an > art (left eye). First comes the technical understanding, then the art of > interpretation, with these eyes balanced then the third eye is able to work. > No fundamentalism just professionalism. I am not into lofty ideas, or > conceptualizations, you still have not studied the chart fully, and are not > looking at the situation at hand. > > My comments on your personally chosen deity in 2003, only relate to my > concern for your mental health and nervous system functioning. Tantric > Goddesses are powerful. > > Jaya Jagannatha > > _____ > > sohamsa [sohamsa ] On Behalf Of > j.abbot > Friday, July 21, 2006 8:15 AM > sohamsa > Re: Why should fasting on Thursday make the native angry? > > Dear Freedom, > > Thank you for your patient reply. Your technical acumen has been evident > to me for several years. However, if I may be so bold, technical genius > does not a complete artist make. > > A conceptual contagion that permeates so many esoteric circles is > something we could call " mystical fundamentalism. " This somehow > promotes the attractive premise that fundamentalism can reach every > arena, every cell or square inch in the world except for one's own > spot! Please read Hari's excellent email. The idea that there is one > final definitive reading that solely those with eyes can see is > something owards which all of us may well be vigilant. > > I remember distinctly the standpoint you offerred me in 2003 that to > follow my chosen Ishta was not taking spiritual practice far enough > because She was ruled by Jupiter, whose element is akasha -- somehow > not subtle enough from your position within the apparent aegis of the > parampara! This is the same vantage poit that allows you to claim > confidently that " the chart does not lie. " But I can only reply, " What > is a lie, Freedom? " A lie is an an imperfection struggling with its > place in the universe: and " universe " is nothing but a single poem (One > Verse) a larger perfection beyond the conception of the " bad line " of > spiritual doggerel, the misfire of inspiration. > > A hermeneutics that sees one valid reading of a horsoscope is consistent > with the same monolithic brahminical elitism that weighed like an > albatross on the neck of the Vedic tradition during difficult periods. > This necessitated innovative new revelations (Buddhism, Jainism, > Sikhism) to rejuvenate the still vital heart of wisdom. Ironically, > there were always simulateneously Brahmanas doing things more > resourcefully than their fundie cohorts, making these innovative > heterodoxies not superfluous but unnececessarily alienated from the > mainstream. At this moment when conservative positions are prominent in > so many sectors of society given the anarchic, desperate mood of the > world, it seems opportune to liberate mysticism from the clutches of any > exclusive clique, and liberate ourselves in turn from stigmas of any > brand. > > I suspect you and I are closer in position than strict evidence would > dictate given your desire to transcend fundamentalism. But to the > degree that we cannot glimpse even the hint that a secret bhanga can be > discerned which will break even the worst dridha karma, we are missing > something of the jurist's work - the defense counsel's calling - which > can be the inspiration of the visionary jyotishi. Then maya is > transposed to the key of lila; then bhakti and jnana fuse in a single > conjugation of possibility. This would not presume that this is how > events will turn out most of the time - not even remotely. But such is > a possible predisposition we can have. If the client does not want to > divorce, whose will is speaking to us during the session? Is it not > possible we are subtly mistaken, and that the Ishta speaks directly > through the client? If we insist there is one static chart and that the > varied nimitta of the encounter do not with that chart make up a > greater gestalt chakra, are we not entering the realm of fundamentalist > jyotish? > > I myself do not insist on divorce or no divorce. I do not insist. I > riff proactively in collaboration with the musicianship of the client. > I try to listen for a melody I have forgotten amid the pomp and > circumstance of my own credentials and own voice. And then I advance a > case for that melody if it seems a worthy one. > > You may very well know something I do not about the machinery of this > life. But it has been shown many times that the scientist inevitably > influences the experiment. Subjectivity is not some Tempter but the > contraption Divinity uses to bring us home. Objectivity is the fuel > that keeps us honest getting there. > > SARVA MANGLAM (the mantra of the jyotishi- " defense counsel " !), > > Jesse > > sohamsa@ <sohamsa%40> .com, > " freeflowaum " <freeflowaum@> wrote: > > > > Hare Rama Krsna > > > > Dear Jesse, > > Marriage is a great thing, but it is your opinion that a jyotishi > should try > > to hold a relationship together. A mantra to break it or hold it > together > > will change karma, that is fact. Read the first lines of my reply, > please. > > You are attached to making a marriage work, and because of this you > will > > make mistakes in prediction that as Laksmi said may get someone killed > or > > cause more harm than good. Read my message and study the chart until > you can > > understand each line of what I have said. Do not start talking from > opinion, > > this is untruth of the mind. A good jyotishi is unattached to personal > and > > cultural ideals and reads the chart clearly, the chart doesn't lie. > The > > chart doesn't lie. Malefics cause negative events, and benefics cause > > positive events. > > > > For example, is abortion good or not. That is an opinion. If you look > at the > > D-7, there will be a house for every child, born or aborted in a > mother's > > life. That means an aborted child is the loss of an atma, this we see > > clearly from the chart, it doesn't lie. I picked a loaded topic here, > now, > > is abortion good or bad, it still remains an opinion, the fact is an > atma is > > lost, but good or bad... If the life of the atma or the mother is > disturbed > > more than the removal, who can decide. But you can't blindly have an > opinion > > and tell every woman that asks about abortion not to have one. You > can't > > blindly try to make every marriage work. Otherwise throw away jyotish, > and > > just be a preacher, don't pretend to have insight-inner sight. People > don't > > come to an astrologer when the question is easy to answer, they need > real > > vision. > > > > Now look better at what I wrote: > > -What are the results indicated by keeping the marriage and what are > the > > results indicated by breaking the marriage. The chart will not lie. > Who is > > being humane here? > > - Look at the predictions I have made about the persons life and > spouse, see > > if they match before your start throwing opinions. It is said your > opinions > > will chase and torture you when you die. > > > > There are Vedic examples of divorce, and rules for when it is > allowable, the > > modern hindu no-divorce concept is modern fundamentalism that often > leaves > > divorcees suffering. And why would the great Rishis teach us how to > see > > divorce in a chart if there was no need for it? I believe fully in eka > pati > > vratta- one marriage (as my mother stayed with my father till the day > he > > died, as did my grandmother). But I am not a fundamentalist and work > very > > hard to improve the lives of others for the highest good of all > involved. > > > > Jaya Jagannatha > > > > > > > > > > > > _____ > > > > sohamsa@ <sohamsa%40> .com > [sohamsa@ <sohamsa% 40> .com] On > Behalf Of > > j.abbot > > Thursday, July 20, 2006 10:01 AM > > sohamsa@ <sohamsa%40> .com > > Re: Why should fasting on Thursday make the native > angry? > > > > Dear Lakshmi, > > > > Thank you for your thoughtful and humane reply. I agree that there is > > a time to intervene. It is telling that you and I have both had > > experiences compelling us to speak here! And once again, I did not > > intend to be nasty to Freedom. Something meaningful was triggered > > here. I try to work continually with how to respond to these moments. > > > > Sincerely, > > > > Jesse > > > > sohamsa@ <sohamsa% 40> .com, > > " lakshmikary " lakshmikary@ wrote: > > > > > > Hare Rama Krishna > > > Dear Jesse,and others on this thread.I'm not not arguing with > > > anyone, just discussing moral ethics and this and that.Im Sat AK- > > > I agree with you to.An astrologer is ruled by jupiter and is the 9th > > > house and should their duty is to uphold dharma. > > > Jupiter is also a benefactor and protector. The Sun is also karaka > > > for 9th house, and light.The Sun can give the knowledge > > > > > > In regards to previous post/disscusion- I just wanted to say they > > > is a difference between an internet learning forum, or even a > > > classroom speaking with a bunch of astrologers where astrologers can > > > sit and discuss charts and then actually sitting face to face with a > > > suffering client and do what you can to help them . > > > Perhaps because I've known Freedom I didnt take it the way you did. > > > Im assume he is careful when in person. > > > > > > But I agree we have to be very careful what and how we tlak to the > > > people approaching us. > > > > > > None of us can play God or even presume to fully know anything.Even > > > if we see something in a chart , the chart can be wrong and so many > > > things. > > > But basically when someone comes and they are suffering we have to > > > use our knowledge, common sense(wisdom) and compassion to help them > > > understand their karma . > > > On numerous occasion I have piped in when people were too quick to > > > make assertions about afffairs, infidelity,etc/ > > > Then we have the astrologers who ignore any bad indications and only > > > say positive and good things. Which is equally bad in my opinion. > > > Everyone has their personal style. > > > > > > Jesse , one time I didnt do something about a man I knew was > > > dangerous.I wanted to keep peace, not make waves, keep family going- > > > well that man killed 2 weeks later. I think of it almost every day, > > > and I feel the burden of that ladies life on me.I hate myself for > > > not doing something.Last year I knew a man was beating his son, i > > > was worried he might seriously harm him. I personally couldnt bear > > > the idea that the boy should be harmed further, so I took some > > > actions. Now by some intervention, whole family is happier because > > > father was forced by law to deal with his anger issues.Father is > > > happier, son is happy, no more with big bruises and swollen liver. > > > Even in USA any health care provider,teacher etc. is held by the law > > > to report such abuse. Why/how can an astrologer sit back and let > > > something go on letting the people burn away their " sins " . Well > > > there is some truth to that as well..I understand it. > > > Astrologers need to chant and always work towards disolving their > > > own stuff so they can be good vessels of " light " > > > We all have to work at being better persons and better astrologers > > > and hope to have some inner connection with the divine so we can > > > uplift people. > > > Best wishes. > > > Lakshmi > > > > > > > > > > > > sohamsa@ <sohamsa% 40> .com, > > " j.abbot " <j.abbot@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear Lakshmi, > > > > > > > > Please call me Jesse; since we have spoken several times on the > > > phone, > > > > there's no need to be so formal. I respectfully disagree with > > > much of > > > > your assessment. To the degree that there is abuse, of course it > > > is > > > > the role of the jyotishi to counsel an intervention. However, the > > > > facile way in which Freedom recommended divorce alarmed me. > > > > Obviously, the scenario is a bit different from direct advice to a > > > > client. Nonetheless, there is a certain tendency for jyotishis to > > > > presume what they can see or know, and/or to be prescriptive > rather > > > > than descriptive. The universe is not so cut-and-dried, frankly. > > > Here > > > > is an area where jyotish can actually borrow a page or two from > > > > Western astrologers, not with respect to methodology, but as to > > > > bedside manner. I never questioned Freedom's analysis (since I > > > noted > > > > I had not looked at the chart, how could I?) I took issue with the > > > > tone. Please read his message again. If you do not see anything > > > > presumptuous, I fear there is not much more that I can say here. > > > > > > > > I concede that I'm biased in this instance because I have > witnessed > > > > /audited firsthand very similar advice given by an SJC guru > > > directly > > > > to a querent. Later that day, the same SJC guru addressed in a > > > talk > > > > the terrible karma involved in destroying marriages and families! > > > > > > > > I do not anticipate engaging this thread further. To the degree > > > that > > > > my own tone was less than kind, I do apologize to Freedom and the > > > > list. I think there is a broader issue here, though, which I will > > > > explore in an article, likely for _The Mountain Astrologer_, where > > > I > > > > have published before. Obviously I would preserve anonymity in > > > this > > > > particular instance. The previous event that I discussed above > > > > involving the advice to divorce left such an unpleasant taste in > my > > > > mouth that I kept away from SJC lists for many months out of > > > respect, > > > > knowing my own temper. Now I could not remain silent. > > > > > > > > There is lip service on the SJC lists (and their equivalent across > > > the > > > > modern jyotish scene) regarding the difference between a shiksha > > > guru > > > > and a diksha guru. I do see circumstances in which a jyotishi can > > > be > > > > both, but I think actually that the lip service is paid so that a > > > > jyotishi can presume to act as both but then fall back on the > > > caveat > > > > that he or she is not a diksha guru. That is fairly slippery if > > > one > > > > considers it closely. I am *not* imputing this behavior to Freedom > > > > but rather speaking to a broader trend that should concern us. > > > > > > > > Thank you for your time considering these thoughts. As I noted, I > > > > shall not be getting into a " dueling jyotish " match via my own > > > > competitive analysis. My point clearly lay elsewhere than in the > > > > technical side of things. > > > > > > > > Sarva mangalam, > > > > > > > > Jesse > > > > > > > > sohamsa@ <sohamsa%40> > .com, > > " lakshmikary " <lakshmikary@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hare Rama Krishna > > > > > Dear Mr. Abbot, > > > > > PLease post your analysis on the list of the chart in > > > question.I'd > > > > > like to see how you are able to make something nice out of > > > something > > > > > that can be causing both parties alot of pain and destruction. > > > > > > > > > > undoubtably the UL is severly afflicted. Of course many angles > > > would > > > > > need to be checked before the original opinion is confirmed. > > > > > No one needs to have " spiritual authority " , but an astrologer > > > needs > > > > > common sense. > > > > > I'd rather take the karma for supposedly " destoying a marraige " > > > than > > > > > taking the karma of seeing a badly afflicted chart and > > > recommending > > > > > something that in all probablity wont work as the relationship > > > is > > > > > not destined to survive, or worse yet, encourage some lady/man > > > to > > > > > stick around in a marraige while her husband/wife abuses them, > > > and > > > > > perhaps kills them -while I sit back and told tell them to " work > > > it > > > > > out " (while I attmept to play God encouraging them to stay > > > > > together,,, it goes both ways!) Look how many people children > > > will > > > > > suffer if they kill each other or make each others life hellish. > > > > > Some marriages are just a living hell.While others can work with > > > > > some help. > > > > > Yes, Ive seen and heard all sorts of things. > > > > > Freedom was just relating what he thought about the astrological > > > > > content, I dont think you can jump on him so easy for that.He > > > wasnt > > > > > replying directly to the person/client he was attempting to give > > > is > > > > > astrological assessment of the situation for some ohter > > > > > astrologers.Everyone is free to do so. > > > > > best wishes > > > > > Lakshmi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sohamsa@ <sohamsa% 40> > .com, > > " j.abbot " <j.abbot@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Freedom, > > > > > > > > > > > > I sincerely hope that you do not presume to have the spiritual > > > > > > authority to recommend divorce. This will be the downfall of > > > > > jyotish > > > > > > in the West, and already seems to be a commonplace in many > > > > > circles. > > > > > > Your technical abilities are not in question; what is > > > worrisome to > > > > > me > > > > > > is the karma borne by both jyotishi and native for destroying > > > > > families > > > > > > and engineering self-fulfilling prophecies. I have not even > > > > > looked at > > > > > > the chart in question (though I hope to do so soon and email > > > Reema > > > > > > off-list). I think SJC sgould build into its charter a way of > > > > > > ensuring that jyotishis avoid precisely the tone your email > > > > > > exemplifies, which seems more in the spirit of a commandment > or > > > > > > directive than a diplomatic and compassionate offering, > > > infused > > > > > with > > > > > > humility and bedside manner. > > > > > > > > > > > > Respectfully, > > > > > > > > > > > > J.I. Abbot > > > > > > > > > > > > sohamsa@ <sohamsa% 40> > .com, > > " freeflowaum " <freeflowaum@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hare Rama Krsna > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Reema, > > > > > > > Do not be attached to individual desires of native or your > > > own > > > > > personal > > > > > > > ideals about relationships, unattachment brings clear > > > > > sightedness. The > > > > > > > Upapada is heavily afflicted and there should have been a > > > kumbha > > > > > vivaha > > > > > > > before the native was married, so the UL could have been > > > broken, > > > > > but too > > > > > > > late now. > > > > > > > Bojan, > > > > > > > The unmada is on the UL, which means the wife has lost it, > > > > > > irrational anger > > > > > > > and depression (Saturn in first and Mars in seventh-to UL). > > > To > > > > > check > > > > > > if this > > > > > > > is the correct wife we are speaking of, she would have a > > > heavily > > > > > > afflicted > > > > > > > (or MKS) Mars and Saturn in HER natal chart, based on upon > > > his > > > > > UL. > > > > > > And UL > > > > > > > fasting will not remove her unmada, only promote marriage. > > > > > > > That same Mars-Saturn is a poverty yoga from the native's > > > lagna > > > > > > (malefics in > > > > > > > 2nd and 8th). So after the vivaha (marriage), the native > > > would > > > > > > become poor > > > > > > > and the wife would become 'mad'. This is a cursed UL (cursed > > > > > > marriage) and > > > > > > > in these cases it will be seen that the native's spouse will > > > > > also have a > > > > > > > curse on their UL. Now if the curse is on your head, you > > > cannot > > > > > get > > > > > > out of > > > > > > > it, but when a curse is on your marriage, then it is > > > possible to > > > > > let the > > > > > > > curse go. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Secondly, the sustaining factor in this marriage is > > > maranakaraka > > > > > > sthana Rahu > > > > > > > (second from UL) and this is on his AL. The marriage had > > > little > > > > > > chance of > > > > > > > lasting to begin with because a dying malefic is feeding it. > > > The > > > > > > vivaha's > > > > > > > breaking has ruined the native's name and reputation, the > > > longer > > > > > the > > > > > > break > > > > > > > lasts the more damage there will be to the native's image > > > (what > > > > > > people think > > > > > > > of him and how he is socially percieved). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The breaking of the vivaha will benefit both the native and > > > his > > > > > > wife! She > > > > > > > will regain some sanity and the native will be able to do > > > remedy > > > > > for his > > > > > > > financial problems. The two people will actually be able to > > > get > > > > > > along much > > > > > > > better after divorce. In this chart, Bagala worship will > > > break > > > > > the > > > > > > marriage. > > > > > > > Fasting will only prolong the suffering of both natives. > > > > > Therefore, > > > > > > first > > > > > > > have the native do mantra of Bagala Devi. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Then after divorce, the native should perform kumbha vivaha > > > (as > > > > > next > > > > > > UL is > > > > > > > on Ketu-Rahu axis) and Rahu is MKS as already mentioned > > > (another > > > > > > problemed > > > > > > > marriage). The third UL, his next marriage after divorce and > > > > > kumba > > > > > > vivaha > > > > > > > will prove very beneficial as it contains an uccha Moon. > > > With > > > > > this > > > > > > marriage > > > > > > > he will prosper financially and his dharma will grow in many > > > > > ways. > > > > > > Jupiter > > > > > > > is uccha banga being uplifted by this uccha Moon that will > be > > > > > > activated by > > > > > > > the third marriage. With the worship of Krsna he will be > > > able to > > > > > > attain his > > > > > > > beneficial UL in his upcoming Jupiter Moon Mula dasha (if he > > > is > > > > > > completely > > > > > > > divorced and has performed kumbha vivaha) by that time. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namah Sivaya > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _____ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sohamsa@ <sohamsa% 40> > .com > > > [sohamsa@ <sohamsa% 40> .com] > On > > > > > > Behalf Of > > > > > > > reema_sriganesh > > > > > > > Wednesday, July 19, 2006 2:32 PM > > > > > > > sohamsa@ <sohamsa% 40> > .com > > > > > > > Re: Why should fasting on Thursday make > > > the > > > > > > native angry? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > || Hare Rama Krishna || > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namaste Bojan-ji, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you so much. Your reply helped me in understanding the > > > UL > > > > > > > better, and it certainly will go a long way in helping the > > > > > native. He > > > > > > > seems to really want to save his marriage, and may God grant > > > him > > > > > the > > > > > > > power to do so. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you once again, and best wishes. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > May Sri Vishnu bless us all, > > > > > > > Reema. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sohamsa@ <sohamsa% > > > > > 40> .com, > > > > > > bojan > > > > > > > vidakovic <janbovid@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HARE RAMA KRISHNA > > > > > > > > Dear Reema, as per my experience it is the karma that > > > > > > > > should be cleansed thorugh that UL with fasting, and > > > > > > > > ofcourse it is not so easy. What I have seen is that > > > > > > > > when UL is in 8th or its lord is at the same time the > > > > > > > > lord of the eight bhava than it is very hard to fast, > > > > > > > > esspeceally at the beginning. It can bring headaches, > > > > > > > > short temper, but after some time of regular fast it > > > > > > > > will be normalized. Ofcourse he should fast on that > > > > > > > > particular day, it will save his marriage and fix > > > > > > > > problems with unmada yoga etc. Everything will be fine > > > > > > > > after few weeks...best wishes, but the person must > > > > > > > > keep fasting, Bojan Vidakovic > > > > > > > > OM TAT SAT > > > > > > > > --- reema_sriganesh <reema_sriganesh@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > || Hare Rama Krishna || > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namaste, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > A native approached me about his issues in marriage. > > > > > > > > > After looking at > > > > > > > > > his chart, I suggested that he fast on Thursdays > > > > > > > > > (since UL lord is > > > > > > > > > exalted and retrograde Guru placed in the 12th > > > > > > > > > house). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > After doing this remedy, the native gave the > > > > > > > > > following feedback: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have been noticing that I get very angry on > > > > > > > > > Thursday and I get very > > > > > > > > > much frustrated also. As a result of this I start > > > > > > > > > remembering all the > > > > > > > > > things that I have done or have been done to me. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > * * * > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Native's data: 12/25/1966, 22:20 Hrs, 5:30 East of > > > > > > > > > GMT, 77E12, 28N36 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My question is - why should the native feel angry > > > > > > > > > particularly on > > > > > > > > > Thursdays? Is it just the exhaustion of fasting or > > > > > > > > > something more? I > > > > > > > > > notice that there is an unmada yoga on the UL axis. > > > > > > > > > But that should > > > > > > > > > mean that the spouse could have temper problems. It > > > > > > > > > doesn't mean that > > > > > > > > > the native cannot fast on the UL lord's day to try > > > > > > > > > to save his > > > > > > > > > marriage, correct? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So are there any other indications, which I might > > > > > > > > > have missed, that > > > > > > > > > suggest native's frustration and anger on Thursdays > > > > > > > > > since he began > > > > > > > > > fasting? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Any insight would be greatly appreciated. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > May Sri Vishnu bless us all, > > > > > > > > > Reema. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tired of spam? Mail has the best spam protection > > > around > > > > > > > > http://mail. <http://mail. <http://mail. > <> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 24, 2006 Report Share Posted July 24, 2006 || Hare Rama Krishna || Namaste Sourav, Thank you for giving me further details of the remedial measures suggested earlier. I wanted to answer your one specific question: > [sourav]: Can you tell us if there is a benefic in the UL of strong > benefic influence on UL ? In this specific chart, there is no benefic in the UL. The UL lord, Saturn is in conjunction with Mars and Rahu in lagna in Gemini. The UL lord is retrograde, and Saturn and Mars are conjoined within 1 degree! The 2nd bhava from UL has retrograde Jupiter's aspect from the fifth, and Rahu's aspect from the lagna. So this is also an example of a not so beneficial UL, as you can see. May Sri Vishnu bless us all, Reema. sohamsa , " Sourav " <souravc108 wrote: > > > || Hare Rama Krishna || > > Dear Reema-ji, > > Namaskar. Please find comments below. > > Best wishes, > > Sourav > > ============================================================ > sohamsa , " reema_sriganesh " <reema_sriganesh@> > wrote: > > > > || Hare Rama Krishna || > > > > Namaste Sourav, > > > > I and this native are blessed to get suggestions from learned men such > > as yourself on remedies. I am an inept astrologer (in fact, I wonder > > if I should even call myself one), but since this native approached > > me, I had no choice but to seek divine blessings so as to be able to > > help him. I know that I am not the best Jyotisha he could have had, > > and yet, one sincere prayer to the Ishta and see how all the guidance > > on this chart is pouring! Sorry to keep rambling about this, but I > > can't seem to help it... > > [sourav]: Please treat me as a fellow student only. Not a drop of this > knowledge is mine. I am blessed to be able to discuss jyotish for this > native. > > > > > > Please see my responses inline, and kindly answer my questions > therein. > > > > Thank you. > > > > With the blessings of Sri Vishnu, > > Reema. > > > > sohamsa , " Sourav " souravc108@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > || Hare Rama Krishna || > > > > > > Dear Reema-ji, > > > > > > Namaskar. Kindly notice two things. > > > One, the native should take fasting in steps (as everyone should). > > > Head, if deprived of glucose, suffers. Hence body should take time > > > to fasting is steps to adjust. First ask him to have fast on cold > > > milk/icecream etc and also fruits if he likes. Then after 2-3 > > > months, only cold milk and water; and after 4 months, as he > > > gradually reduces milk, only water. Then still further, he can even > > > eliminate water (if he wants). > > > > Yes. I will make it a point to tell him not to over exert himself > > right from the beginning. > > [sourav]: Yes, this process if told by Sanjay-ji. > > > > > > > Second, UL in the 8th shows rina is large. UL is typically > > > misunderstood as only marriage. However, UL represents sumtotal of > > > what we ought to give back to the world, large part of it typically > > > is to wife because marriage is biggest area of compromise for a > > > typical person. A paapa graha in the UL and 2nd from UL prevents > > > giving thereby trying to perpetuate the rina or make it evolve into > > > further debts. Hence, it is best to propitiate the deity associated > > > with the 2nd from UL after fasting on UL day. > > > > Beautiful explanation you have given here about UL in the 8th house! > > Interestingly, I found this in the chart of a woman whom I am very > > close with. She has continuously given way more than what she got back > > from her husband. And, the story repeats with her children, relatives, > > etc. What is uncanny is that she even says that she must have been > > heavily indebted to all of these souls... Very spiritual is what she > > is. I opened her chart, and UL is right there in the 8th house. > > [sourav]: Can you tell us if there is a benefic in the UL of strong > benefic influence on UL ? > > > > > > > Ask him to worship Chandi Mata after the fast in the evening before > > > he takes food. > > > > Yes, I will. Now, how should he worship Chandi Mata? Can you please > > provide some guidance here in terms of mantra or puja that needs to be > > performed? > > [sourav]: Mother is Shakti and doing everything in this world and at the > same time watching all her children through the corner of her eyes. > Hence, I don't think anything elaborate is necessary to draw her > attention. I prefer something simple like wearng fresh clothes, lighting > a oil deepam and incense in front of a picture of Mother and offering to > Her the tapasya performed and praying for better marital life. The > native may take food only after Puja is completed. The native may start > doing Chandi patham if he can learn it from a learned person. > > > > > > > Moreover, he should donate to poor brahmins (Shani in Meena in UL) > > > or orphans or poor people in general and the donations should be > > > done only on Thursdays !! > > > > Yes, I will suggest this to the native. The reason for you to suggest > > this remedy is so that the native inculcates a habit of giving, which > > in turn will make him give more towards his marriage too as this is > > the demand of Shani in the UL (and Rahu in the 2nd from it). Is my > > understanding correct? > > [sourav]: Shani is preventing and not demanding. Giving is what UL is > and UL is beyond marriage. The unselfish giving should be done on > Thursdays becuase UL is in Guru's house. > > > > > > > And most importantly, he should wear a yellow sapphire to counteract > > > Rahu in 9th in MKS/Badhak; and this also strengthens his Guru/UL and > > > VRY. > > > > I have no knowledge about gemology. Can you provide some guidance on > > how big a stone he should wear and how to set the stone? > > [sourav]: Yellow Sapphire or Yellow topaz (lesser cost upa-ratna but > same effect) is advised to be set in Gold and worn on ring finger (2nd > from little finger) on Thursday morning after bath and worship. I am not > sure about the rattis of the stone but Sanjay-ji's VRA mentions 7 or 13 > rattis and *not* 6, 11 or 15 rattis in weight. However, I have seen > people wear different weights and would like Gurujanas to advise. It > would be great if Swee-ji can advise on this. Please tell native no take > off during Guru dasa/bhukti (as Guru is 8th lord). Panchopochara pooja > towards Ishta is best at all times. > > > > > > > AK is in debility in Navamsa and this debility is removed by > > > Shukra in kendra with Ishtakaraka Rahu. Clearly, worshipping Durga > > > will strengthen atma-bala and remove the Badhaka effects (together > > > with strong Guru). > > > > When I read about the financial woes of the native, I suggested him > > blindly to worship Sri Maha Lakshmi with the mantra > > > > || Om MahaLakshmiyae Namah || > > > > Now Sukra is in kendra from the Ishtakaraka Rahu. However, since the > > native is not seeking a remedy to enhance his standing spiritually, > > but rather materially, do you think strengthening Rahu with Durga > > worship will help or strengthening Venus further with Mahalakshmi > > worship? This Mahalakshmi worship should also help him bring his AK > > out of debility, but also soothe his financial problems. Kindly > > explain which deity would be more helpful. > > [sourav]: AK in debility in Navamsa indicates that the person will > always feel unsatisfied with life in general and prefer to live like a > sadhu or fakir. He prefers to give up rather struggle. > > As a jyotisha, recommend Ishtadevata worship always ! Infact it would be > great punya on your part if, after any consultation, you can point out > Ishtadevata and urge him to worship this devata. No one can get a better > suggestion or direction in life. > > > > > > > > Best wishes, > > > > > > Sourav > > > > > > ================================================================== > > > > > > > > > sohamsa , " reema_sriganesh " <reema_sriganesh@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > || Hare Rama Krishna || > > > > > > > > Namaste Bojan-ji, > > > > > > > > Thank you so much. Your reply helped me in understanding the UL > > > > better, and it certainly will go a long way in helping the native. > He > > > > seems to really want to save his marriage, and may God grant him > the > > > > power to do so. > > > > > > > > Thank you once again, and best wishes. > > > > > > > > May Sri Vishnu bless us all, > > > > Reema. > > > > > > > > sohamsa , bojan vidakovic janbovid@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HARE RAMA KRISHNA > > > > > Dear Reema, as per my experience it is the karma that > > > > > should be cleansed thorugh that UL with fasting, and > > > > > ofcourse it is not so easy. What I have seen is that > > > > > when UL is in 8th or its lord is at the same time the > > > > > lord of the eight bhava than it is very hard to fast, > > > > > esspeceally at the beginning. It can bring headaches, > > > > > short temper, but after some time of regular fast it > > > > > will be normalized. Ofcourse he should fast on that > > > > > particular day, it will save his marriage and fix > > > > > problems with unmada yoga etc. Everything will be fine > > > > > after few weeks...best wishes, but the person must > > > > > keep fasting, Bojan Vidakovic > > > > > OM TAT SAT > > > > > --- reema_sriganesh reema_sriganesh@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > || Hare Rama Krishna || > > > > > > > > > > > > Namaste, > > > > > > > > > > > > A native approached me about his issues in marriage. > > > > > > After looking at > > > > > > his chart, I suggested that he fast on Thursdays > > > > > > (since UL lord is > > > > > > exalted and retrograde Guru placed in the 12th > > > > > > house). > > > > > > > > > > > > After doing this remedy, the native gave the > > > > > > following feedback: > > > > > > > > > > > > I have been noticing that I get very angry on > > > > > > Thursday and I get very > > > > > > much frustrated also. As a result of this I start > > > > > > remembering all the > > > > > > things that I have done or have been done to me. > > > > > > > > > > > > * * * > > > > > > > > > > > > Native's data: 12/25/1966, 22:20 Hrs, 5:30 East of > > > > > > GMT, 77E12, 28N36 > > > > > > > > > > > > My question is - why should the native feel angry > > > > > > particularly on > > > > > > Thursdays? Is it just the exhaustion of fasting or > > > > > > something more? I > > > > > > notice that there is an unmada yoga on the UL axis. > > > > > > But that should > > > > > > mean that the spouse could have temper problems. It > > > > > > doesn't mean that > > > > > > the native cannot fast on the UL lord's day to try > > > > > > to save his > > > > > > marriage, correct? > > > > > > > > > > > > So are there any other indications, which I might > > > > > > have missed, that > > > > > > suggest native's frustration and anger on Thursdays > > > > > > since he began > > > > > > fasting? > > > > > > > > > > > > Any insight would be greatly appreciated. > > > > > > > > > > > > May Sri Vishnu bless us all, > > > > > > Reema. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.