Guest guest Posted January 11, 2007 Report Share Posted January 11, 2007 Dear Vistiji, Thank you very much for the illuminating write up. To echo what Sharat says, the only doubt that remains is the following case (of which Sharat's case is one example, my case is another and I'm sure many other people have very similar cases, so your one reply would probably help several people): 1) If a graha 1 in House A is in parivartana with graha 2 in House B, and simultaneously in House A there are graha 3 and graha 4, then which of the following is true: Possibility 1 (Apply all rules only ONCE per graha in ORDER): Due to being the most important rule, parivartana causes graha 1 and graha 2 to exchange results. Graha 3 and graha 4 exchange results. Possibility 2: (Apply all rules REPEATEDLY and in ORDER) Parivartana causes graha 1 and graha 2 to exchange results. However graha 1 may also end up exchanging results with graha 3 due to secondary yuti principle. So, graha 2 gives the results of graha 1. Graha 3 gives the results of graha 2 (because it is taking up graha 1's after-parivartana role). Graha 1 gives the results of graha 3 (because it is taking up graha 3's role). Graha 4 gives its own results. There are more possibilities, but the above 2 feel like the most realistic ones. The question is, which one if any is correct? Thank you very much, Sundeep Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.