Guest guest Posted January 13, 2007 Report Share Posted January 13, 2007 Hare Rama Krishna, Dear Visti Namaskar, I have recently listened to your audio on the Nakshatras. In calulating Shri Lagna (and therefore Sudasha),you have-after ascertaining the 1/12th portion of the Nakshatra in which the Moon is posited- started counting from Aries to arrive at the " seat " of Shri Lagna. I believe that Jaimini counts this from Lagna. Obviously Shri Lagna will be different if you start counting from Aries or from Lagna (or from the Moon for that matter). Was this an oversight on your part or some further revelation of the " parampara " ? Secondly, I would like to know-in your opinion- what is the difference between the the 3 " wealth " lagnas: Shri Lagna, Hora Lagna and Indu Lagna. What I have observed is this: Shri Lagna-general prosperity;Hora Lagna- Values; Indu Lagna- cash.(very briefly) Much obliged to know your exerience. With deep respect: Arpadh Joo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 14, 2007 Report Share Posted January 14, 2007 Jaya Jagannatha Dear Arpad Joo, Namaste It might have been a misprint in Jaimini so do consider it from Aries. Love, Swee On 1/13/07 8:05 PM, " Arpad Joo " <panchasila wrote: Hare Rama Krishna, Dear Visti Namaskar, I have recently listened to your audio on the Nakshatras. In calulating Shri Lagna (and therefore Sudasha),you have-after ascertaining the 1/12th portion of the Nakshatra in which the Moon is posited- started counting from Aries to arrive at the " seat " of Shri Lagna. I believe that Jaimini counts this from Lagna. Obviously Shri Lagna will be different if you start counting from Aries or from Lagna (or from the Moon for that matter). Was this an oversight on your part or some further revelation of the " parampara " ? Secondly, I would like to know-in your opinion- what is the difference between the the 3 " wealth " lagnas: Shri Lagna, Hora Lagna and Indu Lagna. What I have observed is this: Shri Lagna-general prosperity;Hora Lagna- Values; Indu Lagna- cash.(very briefly) Much obliged to know your exerience. With deep respect: Arpadh Joo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 14, 2007 Report Share Posted January 14, 2007 Untitled Document हरे राम कृष्ण॥ Dear Swee and Arpad Joo, Namaskar Arpad isn't wrong. The difference is that without the addition of the Lagna-longitude , we are just seeing where the Shree exists in the world/rasis, whilst adding to the Lagna degree shows how we individually experience Shree, and is the basis of the Su-dasa. Good question and thank you for correcting my mistake. Yours sincerely, -- Visti Larsen email: visti For consultations and articles visit: http://srigaruda.com Swee Chan wrote: Jaya Jagannatha Dear Arpad Joo, Namaste It might have been a misprint in Jaimini so do consider it from Aries. Love, Swee On 1/13/07 8:05 PM, "Arpad Joo" <panchasila > wrote: Hare Rama Krishna, Dear Visti Namaskar, I have recently listened to your audio on the Nakshatras. In calulating Shri Lagna (and therefore Sudasha),you have-after ascertaining the 1/12th portion of the Nakshatra in which the Moon is posited- started counting from Aries to arrive at the "seat " of Shri Lagna. I believe that Jaimini counts this from Lagna. Obviously Shri Lagna will be different if you start counting from Aries or from Lagna (or from the Moon for that matter). Was this an oversight on your part or some further revelation of the "parampara"? Secondly, I would like to know-in your opinion- what is the difference between the the 3 "wealth" lagnas: Shri Lagna, Hora Lagna and Indu Lagna. What I have observed is this: Shri Lagna-general prosperity;Hora Lagna- Values; Indu Lagna- cash.(very briefly) Much obliged to know your exerience. With deep respect: Arpadh Joo Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 14, 2007 Report Share Posted January 14, 2007 Jaya Jagannatha Dear Visti, Namaste Yours is not really a mistake. By taking assumptions beginning from Aries, one can “physically” experience Shree – I guess this is best with graha samaya. Love, Swee On 1/14/07 12:59 PM, " Visti Larsen " <visti wrote: Untitled Document हरे राम कृषà¥à¤£à¥¥ Dear Swee and Arpad Joo, Namaskar Arpad isn't wrong. The difference is that without the addition of the Lagna-longitude , we are just seeing where the Shree exists in the world/rasis, whilst adding to the Lagna degree shows how we individually experience Shree, and is the basis of the Su-dasa. Good question and thank you for correcting my mistake. Yours sincerely, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 15, 2007 Report Share Posted January 15, 2007 Hare Rama Krishna, Dear Swee Namaskar, what is YOUR starting point in zodiacal terms,of Sudasha?If you are counting from Aries, then JHora's calculations are wrong. But I don't think so.Also, I do not believe that there is a misprint in Jaimini. Wih deep respect: Arpadh Joo sohamsa , Swee Chan <sweechan wrote:>> > Jaya Jagannatha> > Dear Visti,> Namaste> > Yours is not really a mistake. By taking assumptions beginning from Aries,> one can “physically†experience Shree â€" I guess this is best with graha> samaya.> > Love,> > Swee> > > On 1/14/07 12:59 PM, "Visti Larsen" visti wrote:> > > > > > > > > > > > > Untitled Document हरे राम कृषà¥à¤£à¥¥> > > > Dear Swee and Arpad Joo, Namaskar> > Arpad isn't wrong. The difference is that without the addition of the> > Lagna-longitude , we are just seeing where the Shree exists in the> > world/rasis, whilst adding to the Lagna degree shows how we individually> > experience Shree, and is the basis of the Su-dasa.> > > > Good question and thank you for correcting my mistake.> > > > Yours sincerely,> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.