[Jaya Jagannath] Narayana dasa

[Guest guest]

Dear Narayan,

 

many, many thanks for your comments. They are very helpful. I did not know

about

the Ketu exception. The post I used for learning Narayana dasa rules

mentioned that there are exceptions but it did not list them.

 

You answered my main doubt (is Ketu stronger than Mars due to Jupiters

aspect?): Mars is stronger.Ketu is weakend by Jupiters aspect, not

strengthened. Good to know this rule.

 

And you are right about my sudasa calculations. They are wrong. I found my

stupid

error.

 

Again, many thanks

 

Anantarupa

 

 

Narayan Iyer schrieb:

 

> Dear Anantarupa,

>

> I believe your post was addressed to me. Please find my comments below:

>

> > Narayan dasa:

> >

> > Cn 71-74

> > Ge 74-84

> > Ta 84-93

> > Ar 93-2001

> > Pi 01-05

> > Aq 05-14

> > Cp 14-22

> > Sg 22-33

> > Sc 23-31

> > Li 31-35

> > Vi 35-40

> > Le 40-45

> >

> > Antardashas in Pisces Narayan dasha:

> >

> > Sc,Lib, Vi, Le, Cn, Ge, Ta, Ari, Pis, Aq,Cp, Sg

> >

>

> The calculation of years for the dasa's are all correct. But the

> sequence is incorrect!!!

>

> You are right in that Cn is stronger than Cp. So Cn initiates the

> sequence. But, notice the

> presence of Ke in the initaiting sign Cn!!! Thus Ke exception comes

> into act and by its very

> nature Ke will reverse the direction and hence the progression will be

> Zodiacally, like so:

> Cn, Le, Vi etc.

>

> One more thing, you have alloted 8yrs to Ke, as you must have

> considered Ke to be stronger than

> Ma. Gurudev in one of his posts mentioned that aspect of Ju on nodes

> reduces its powers.

> So in this case, Ma is stronger than Ke, and hence Sc will contribute

> only 1yr in the first

> cycle.

>

> I will just go ahead and list, for the benefit of all the members, the

> sequence and the number of years contributed by each, both in the

> first cycle and the second.

>

> CYCLE #1

> --------

>

> Cn : 71 - 74

> Le : 74 - 79

> Vi : 79 - 85

> Li : 84 - 88

> Sc : 88 - 89

> Sg : 89 - 2000

> Cp : 00 - 08

> Aq : 08 - 17

> Pi : 17 - 21

> Ar : 21 - 29

> Ta : 29 - 38

> Ge : 38 - 48

>

> CYCLE #2

> --------

>

> In the 2nd cycle the number of years contributed by signs will be

>

> --------------------------------

> ( 12 - ( number of yrs contributed by sign in the first cycle ) )

> --------------------------------

>

> Cn : 48 - 57

> Le : 57 - 64

> Vi : 64 - 71

> Li : 71 - 79

> Sc : 79 - 90

> Sg : 90 - 91

> Cp : 91 - 95

> Aq : 95 - 98

> Pi : 98 - 2106

> Ar : 06 - 10

> Ta : 10 - 13

> Ge : 12 - 15

>

> > Sudasa:

> >

> > Srilagna: 16 Vi 19

> >

> > Vi 29/3/1971-10/7/1973

> > Ge 10 years

> > Pi 4 years

> > Sg 11 years

> > Le 5 years

> > Ta 9 years

> > Aq 9 years

> > Sc 8 years

> > Ca 3 years

> > Ar 8 years

> > Cp 8 years

> > Li 4 years

> >

> > Sequence of Antardashas in Leo Dasha:

> >

> > Le,Ta,Aq,Sc,Cn,Ar,Cp,Li,Ge,Pi,Sg,Vi

> >

> > Regards and I hope I am not bothering you to much

>

> I think your calculations are incorrect. If you would

> have re-produced the steps, I could have pointed out the

> error. Here is how I calculate:

>

> La : 29Cn16

> Mo : 23Ar14

>

> Fraction : ( 09d 54m / 13d 20m ) * 360

> : ( 09d 54m ) * 27

> : 267d 18m

>

> La + Fraction : 119d 16m + 267d 18m

> : 386d 34m

> SL : 26Ar34

>

> Ar : ( 03d 26m / 30 ) * ( 8 yrs )

> : 0y 10m 30d

>

> Progression:

> ------------

>

> Ar( 03/29/71 - 02/29/72 )

> Cn( 2/72 - 5/ 72 )

> Li( 5/72 - 5/76 )

> Cp( 5/76 - 5/84 )

>

> Ta( 5/84 - 5/93 )

> Le( 5/93 - 5/98 )

> Sc( 5/98 - 5/99 )

> Aq( 5/99 - 5/08 )

>

> Ge( 5/08 - 5/18 )

> Vi( 5/18 - 5/23 )

> Sg( 5/23 - 5/34 )

> Pi( 5/34 - 5/38 )

>

> The second cycle will be calculated in the same way as

> demonstrated above in Narayana Dasa, with the sequence of Sudasa.

>

> Hope this helps,

> Regards

> -Narayan

>

> OM TAT SAT

> Archive: varahamihira

> Info: varahamihira/info.html

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

Dear Narayan,

 

while redoing my calculations, I came up with the same Srilagna as you but

should not

Cancer dasa be of 3 years both in Narayan dasa and Sudasa?

 

>

> > CYCLE #1

> > --------

> >

> > Cn : 71 - 74

> > Le : 74 - 79

> > Vi : 79 - 85

> > Li : 84 - 88

> > Sc : 88 - 89

> > Sg : 89 - 2000

> > Cp : 00 - 08

> > Aq : 08 - 17

> > Pi : 17 - 21

> > Ar : 21 - 29

> > Ta : 29 - 38

> > Ge : 38 - 48

>

> > I think your calculations are incorrect. If you would

> > have re-produced the steps, I could have pointed out the

> > error. Here is how I calculate:

> >

> > La : 29Cn16

> > Mo : 23Ar14

> >

> > Fraction : ( 09d 54m / 13d 20m ) * 360

> > : ( 09d 54m ) * 27

> > : 267d 18m

> >

> > La + Fraction : 119d 16m + 267d 18m

> > : 386d 34m

> > SL : 26Ar34

> >

> > Ar : ( 03d 26m / 30 ) * ( 8 yrs )

> > : 0y 10m 30d

> >

> > Progression:

> > ------------

> >

> > Ar( 03/29/71 - 02/29/72 )

> > Cn( 2/72 - 5/ 72 )

> > Li( 5/72 - 5/76 )

> > Cp( 5/76 - 5/84 )

> >

> > Ta( 5/84 - 5/93 )

> > Le( 5/93 - 5/98 )

> > Sc( 5/98 - 5/99 )

> > Aq( 5/99 - 5/08 )

> >

> > Ge( 5/08 - 5/18 )

> > Vi( 5/18 - 5/23 )

> > Sg( 5/23 - 5/34 )

> > Pi( 5/34 - 5/38 )

> >

> > The second cycle will be calculated in the same way as

> > demonstrated above in Narayana Dasa, with the sequence of Sudasa.

> >

> > Hope this helps,

> > Regards

> > -Narayan

> >