[Jaya Jagannath] Functional v/s Natural Benefics

[Guest guest]

Namaste.

 

Try to figure out what it means to lord a house. I've found that the answer should lie here.

Best wishes, Visti.

 

-

swamyvk

varahamihira

Thursday, May 31, 2001 12:46 AM

[Jaya Jagannath] Functional v/s Natural Benefics

Hello all,I have a very basic question about the planets. Sun, Waxing Moon, Venus, Jupiter and well associated Mercury are considered natural benefics, while waning Moon, Mars, badly associated Mercury, Saturn, Rahu and Ketu are considered malefics.However, for each lagna, some planets are functional benefics and malefics.The questions are=================1. What are the effects of natural malefics who are functional benefics in a chart? Do they destroy the house they occupy/aspect? (assuming that they are not in their own house).Similarly, how do natural benefics who are functional malefics in a chart give their results?2. Does exaltation remove the malefic effect of any planet?OM TAT SATArchive: varahamihiraInfo: varahamihira/info.html

[Guest guest]

Om Gurave Namah

Dear Venkatesh,

Have you done the Lesson 16?

Sanjay Rath

-

<swamyvk

<varahamihira >

Thursday, May 31, 2001 4:16 AM

[Jaya Jagannath] Functional v/s Natural Benefics

 

 

> Hello all,

>

> I have a very basic question about the planets. Sun, Waxing Moon,

> Venus, Jupiter and well associated Mercury are considered natural

> benefics, while waning Moon, Mars, badly associated Mercury, Saturn,

> Rahu and Ketu are considered malefics.

>

> However, for each lagna, some planets are functional benefics and

> malefics.

>

> The questions are

> =================

> 1. What are the effects of natural malefics who are functional

> benefics in a chart? Do they destroy the house they occupy/aspect?

> (assuming that they are not in their own house).

>

> Similarly, how do natural benefics who are functional malefics in a

> chart give their results?

>

> 2. Does exaltation remove the malefic effect of any planet?

>

>

>

>

>