Aspects - Jup & Nodes

[Guest guest]

Om Gurave Namah----Dear Sanjay,Jyotish cannot just be a bunch of rules. There is a finer understanding of =these rules that makes the subject "an art as well as a science". The situ=ation where "Jupiter is aspecting the nodes" is very different from "Jupite=r conjoining the nodes". Take a situation where a Purohit of a temple is si=tting inside a temple and then he is approached by a murderer (Rahu) for so=me task. Here Jupiter (purohit) is in strength in sagittarius (work place) =and Rahu has entered sagittarius. The conjunction of the two makes Jupiter =weaker by a polluting conjunction and then the Purohit is normally coerced =to help the criminal.Take another situation where the Purohit was in his house (Pisces) and then= he gets information about some theif (Ketu) breaking into his temple (Ketu= in Sagittarius aspected by Jupiter from Pisces). The result is simple. He =takes preventive measures by calling the police (Mars) or others to prevent= the theft.. the theif is caught and Ketu's exaltation i.e. to steal the id=ols itself (untruth of the highest level) is broken.Conjunction cannot strengthen Jupiter. In fact, the sign occupied by the Lo=rd of Lagna is called the Paka Lagna and if this sign is conjoined Ketu, th=en invariably it creates some serious mental aberration or autism etc. The =Dhi-shakti is lost. In this manner try to understand the Guru-Sthana.With Best Wishes,Sanjay Rath -=20 SanjayPrabhakaran=20 varahamihira =20 Saturday, July 21, 2001 4:23 AM [Hare Rama Krishna] Guru aspect on Rahu Om Gurave Namah, Dear Gurudeva and members, For evaluating the lordship of Aq and Sc. Guru's rasi aspect or conjunction with the nodes are supposed to make them weaker and hence Saturn or Mars wins and becomes the respective owners of the houes.But in COVA on Page 63 in Pt. Jawaharlal Nehru's chart even though Ketu is conjunct Jupiter and Jupiter aspects Rahu, Rahu and Ketu are taken as lords of=20 Aq and Sc repectively. Such a consideration is even made in N.T Ramarao's chart in Page 97 of COVA. Have I misunderstood something?. Can you please clear this confusion. Your's Sincerely S.Prabhakaran OM TAT SAT