Guest guest Posted December 24, 2001 Report Share Posted December 24, 2001 are Rama Krsna. Sorry, by a mistake which I made earlier, the attachment didn't reach. Here it is. It should be alright now. The Narayan dasha is quite interesting as well. Your sishya, Dhira Krsna dasa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 26, 2001 Report Share Posted December 26, 2001 Om Sri Gurave Namah, Dear Dhira Krishna, This chart has Saturn and Rahu in AL which I believe would have not given such a lasting name for Jesus Christ. Regards S.Prabhakaran Hare Rama Krishna varahamihira, " Krsna Shakti (dd) TVS (Radhadesh - B) " <Krsna.Shakti.TVS@p...> wrote: > Hare Rama Krsna. > > Some time ago, before I went to India, there was a discussion going on > regarding Jesus' chart. I didn't participate because I strongly doubt the > accuracy of this date. First of all, we know that the date of 25 Dec. was > a date of a Heden festival which was chosen to fit the Christmas day, and > second I think the date must be too early. The fact that if the " new star " > was a Jup-Sat conjunction which had been seen by the Sages from the East, > and which made them travel to see the new King of the Jews, and made them > ask Herod where was this child, indicates clearly that when they arrived > at Herod's palace, they thought the child to be born 2 years before, yet > when they were led to the place where the little Jesus was born, he was > just a new-born baby. Prove of this is that Herod ordered all 2- year old > children and younger to be killed. Thus Jesus must have been born around > -4 (5BC) or 2 years after the Jup-Sat conjunction started. > Herod died in -3 (4BC). > > My wife was raised in Orthodox church, and recently told me how in > Orthodox church they celebrate Christmas not like we do, but they > celebrate the night of 6 to 7 Jan. and they hold that it was an amavasya > tithi, or complete dark night. So out of curiosity I checked if one of > those years had an amavasya tithi on 6 to 7 Jan. and found the year of -4 > (5BC if your software doesn't include the year 0) to be exactly fitting > (according to jhl4). > Have we found the real chart of Jesus Christ? Please have a look. > Mercury retrograde as atmakaraka 9th lord in the lagna Capricorn, ALL > planets aspecting on the 8th house, Mars-Ketu in Libra and Saturn and Ketu > aspecting on 3rd from AL. Chart is attached. > > Your sishya, > Dhira Krsna dasa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 2, 2002 Report Share Posted January 2, 2002 ***Jaya Jagannath***Dear Dhira Krishna PrabhuWhat you say may well be right, but then the primary consideration for the bright star is the conjunction of Saturn and Jupiter in Pisces. This was observed much later again after many centuries by Kepler or some other astrologers (I am forgetting the name). As regards the Year, Josephus records an eclipse of the moon just before Herod died. This occurred on March 12th or 13th in 4 B.C. Josephus also tells us that Herod expired just before Passover. This feast took place on April 11th, in the same year, 4 B.C. From other details supplied by Josephus, we can pinpoint Herod the Great's demise as occurring between March 29th and April 4th in 4 B.C. Agreed that Herod died in 4 BC and that this was close to the eclipse of that year. So, Jesus could have been born at least 2 years before that i.e. 6 BC i.e. (-5) or earlier. Since the various prophesy and revelations point out the fact that Jesus was born "within 2 years from the killing of the babes" ordered by Herod, it is likely that this could be between 7 B.C to 4 BC, but definitely not 3 BC. As regards Tithi, I have read detailed descriptions fitting the stars at Virgo and am inclined to believe that the Moon may have just risen at the time of his birth i.e. Moon will be in Lagna or 12th house but just below the lagna degree if in lagna. Thus, in any case it cannot be amavasya. Revelations:12:1-2 And there appeared a great wonder in heaven; a woman clothed with the sun, and the moon under her feet, and upon her head a crown of twelve stars: And she being with child cried, travailing in birth, and pained to be delivered. Some scholars have interpreted the term clothed with the Sun to mean that the Sun was in Virgo, but this can also indicate the rising sign due to the phrase "appeared in the sky" meaning that the sign Virgo was not visible before that moment of birth of Jesus Christ and becase visible i.e. ascended at the time of his birth. In any case we need to think more on this. Dr Raman and many other astrologers feel that Virgo is most correct with the Sun representing the Holy father being in the fifth house of worship. Both the worship of the Holy father (Sun is natural Pitrikaraka) and Virgo ascending fit into this. The Jupiter - Saturn conjunction began on 30 January 7 B.C (-6) and ended on 7 February 6 B.C (-5). The perfect conjunction started about May 7 BC (-6) in Revati Nakshatra and continued till december of that year. By Jan 7 next year (-5), they were already apart by 2 degrees. So, we need to study all these factors. As regards the question as to How did Jesus survive if Herod had had all children aged 2 or less killed, the following explains it well: Best WishesSanjay Rathhttp://sanjayrath.tripod.com***Om Tat Sat***- Krsna Shakti (dd) TVS (Radhadesh - B) Varahamihira ; vedic astrology Monday, December 24, 2001 11:38 PM[Hare Rama Krishna] [vedic astrology] Jesus' chart (please check this)Hare Rama Krsna.Sorry, by a mistake which I made earlier, the attachment didn't reach.Here it is. It should be alright now.The Narayan dasha is quite interesting as well.Your sishya,Dhira Krsna dasa Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.