Sade-sati effects from Navamsa Moon - Nodal aspects - corrrection

October 8, 2002

|| Om Gurave Namah ||

Namaste Sanjay Guruji,

In this case, does it mean that my sade-sati continues for another 2.5 years (moon in AR in D1 and in TA in D9).

This is a new - and a little troubling thought.

Looking out for your response.

Shailesh

Shailesh Chandra Chadhascchadha

-

Sanjay Rath

gjlist

Monday, October 07, 2002 9:31 AM

RE: [GJ] Re: Nodal aspects - corrrection

Sri Ganeshaya NamahDear Maddelena,Simply brilliant point..very brilliant indeed as this is the basic root ofbrighu's transit. I would love to hear more on this. Jaimini also talks ofSun transiting Ketvamsa in fructifying some events related to pregnancy.

Besides natal positions, the navamsa transitory positions are very valid.For example people invariably miss out the transits related to natal Moon innavamsa. I have found sade-sati effects to be more profound from navamsamoon.Best regards & greetings,Om Tat SatSanjay Rathweb: http://srath.com & http://.org> > Maddalena Cecchinato [mcecc88]> Sunday, October 06, 2002 11:47 PM> gjlist > Re: [GJ] Re: Nodal aspects - corrrection>>> Dear List,> whenever a transiting planet is at 120 degrees from a natal one,> this means> that it is transiting the same navamsha of the natal one. So> whether Ketu's> trinal aspects in Rasi should be considered or not, the effect would be> there in any case I think.> As has been observed by someone recently (sorry, with all these mails I> can't remember who it was :-) ), the conflicts going on in the> last days saw> Tr> Mars and Jupiter conjoined in Navamsha. Tr true Ketu was there as well on> 2nd/3rd Oct.> Looking forward to comments.>> regards> Maddalena>Om Namo Bhagavate Vasudevaya; Hare Krishna; Om Tat Sat: gjlist-http://www.goravani.com

October 13, 2002

|| Om Gurave Namah ||

Namaste Gurudev,

Thank you for your clarification and my apologise for this delayed acknowledgement.

With this clarification, and a second look at my Rasi & D-charts, a vague explanation for the current state of affairs seems to be forming in my mind.

As i mentioned earlier, MO is AR in my D-1 but in D-9 and also in D-10, it is in GE.

GE is 9H in D-1, 7H in D-9 and 6H in D-10.

Also, in D-1 GE have only 2 AV points for SA.

Isn't it reason enough for the present status?

Kindly confirm, or correct, my understanding.

Looking out for your response.

Shailesh

Shailesh Chandra Chadhascchadha

-

Sanjay Rath

Shailesh ; varahamihira

Wednesday, October 09, 2002 5:54 PM

RE: Sade-sati effects from Navamsa Moon - [GJ] Re: Nodal aspects - corrrection

Om Gurave Namah

Dear Sailesh

Divisional transits have other implications. Here we are considering the navamsa and navamsa related matters you will have sade-sati. Rasi sade-sati is over while look at dasamsa for other things. The point is the Moon sign is vital. Narasimha is delivering an important lecture on this with various examples.

Best regards,

Sanjay Rath

-------------------------------

Address: 71, Vasant Apartments, Mayur Vihar Ph-1, New Delhi, India 110091

Web pages: http://srath.com ; http://.org