Guest guest Posted March 15, 2003 Report Share Posted March 15, 2003 Hare Rama Krsna Dear Dhira, I don't think you read Sanjay's mail clearly. Remember the gati of the count has changed. So 2nd child is seen from 6th house, 3rd from 8th house, etc. Read the mail again. Best wishesVisti---Sri Jagannath Center: http://.orgBhagavad Purana: http://www.srimadbhagavatam.orgiTRANS 99 Font: http://www.omkarananda-ashram.org - Dhira Krsna BCS varahamihira Saturday, March 15, 2003 6:37 PM [sJC: Varahamihira] Progeny Delineation Dear Sanjay Rath,Hare Rama Krsna!Your explanation about this Saptamsa chart is very nice indeed, howeveryou have to clarify a few matters to me:- first pregnancy being destroyed and 2nd one being a boy is clear- then how can 3rd pregnancy be a girl when it's lord Mercury conjoinsexalted Sun (male) and in a male sign (Aries)?-how can exalted Sun (male) conjoined Mercury (male eunuch) again give agirl?Doesn't that contradict your earlier teachings? However, using my ayanamsacorrection of 12 1/2 minutes less than Lahiri gives me Venus in Aries andSun in Taurus. Doesn't that look better to explain the 2 girls?BTW, the confusion which 3rd pregnancy met with can be explained also byMercury (eunuch) being in male sign with Venus, and being the 7th house ofSaptamsa.Correct me if I'm wrong, please.Your sishya,Dhira Krsna dasaHare Rama KrishnaArchive:varahamihiraFiles:varahamihiravarahamihira/database Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.