RE: [SJC: Varahamihira] Varahamihira] Progeny Delineation

[Guest guest]

Om Gurave namah

Dear Dhira Krsna,

The points are the same that I had witten in COVA, problem is in reading

them. The movement of the count is altered by (1) nodes and (2)

marriage(s) and relationships outside marriage or more than one marriage.

Thus the navamsa is linked to the Saptamsa - this is what I meant when I

originally talked about Prakriti to Sureshbabu. 9 x7 = 63 and we are

going beyond the D-60 limit of Prakriti.

In this case the movement of count is altered by Rahu being the 5th

co-lord and conjoining the lord. This has been explicitly mentioned in

COVA.

Visti, you again got the count wrong with the nodes- these nodes are not

easy. Look at the direction carefully. Next should be Sagittarius and

then Libra and finally Leo with Cancer causing the end to further

children from first marriage.

Regards

Sanjay Rath

At 07:19 PM 15-03-03 +0100, you wrote:

Hare

Rama Krsna

 

 

Dear Dhira,

I don't think you read Sanjay's mail clearly.

Remember the gati of the count has changed. So 2nd child is seen from 6th

house, 3rd from 8th house, etc. Read the mail again.

Best wishes

Visti

---

Sri Jagannath Center:

http://.org

Bhagavad Purana:

http://www.srimadbhagavatam.org

iTRANS 99 Font:

http://www.omkarananda-ashram.org

 

-

Dhira Krsna

BCS

To:

varahamihira

Saturday, March 15, 2003 6:37 PM

[sJC: Varahamihira] Progeny Delineation

Dear Sanjay Rath,

Hare Rama Krsna!

Your explanation about this Saptamsa chart is very nice indeed, however

you have to clarify a few matters to me:

- first pregnancy being destroyed and 2nd one being a boy is clear

- then how can 3rd pregnancy be a girl when it's lord Mercury conjoins

exalted Sun (male) and in a male sign (Aries)?

-how can exalted Sun (male) conjoined Mercury (male eunuch) again give a

girl?

Doesn't that contradict your earlier teachings? However, using my ayanamsa

correction of 12 1/2 minutes less than Lahiri gives me Venus in Aries and

Sun in Taurus. Doesn't that look better to explain the 2 girls?

BTW, the confusion which 3rd pregnancy met with can be explained also by

Mercury (eunuch) being in male sign with Venus, and being the 7th house of

Saptamsa.

Correct me if I'm wrong, please.

Your sishya,

Dhira Krsna dasa

 

Hare Rama Krishna

[Guest guest]

Hare Rama Krishna

Dear Visti

and Sanjay,

 

Duuhhh…big

Ooops…L This is where I always

appear to get confused, (nodes are known for confusion)

and therefore I need to go back over this material and get these principles involving the nodes implemented

within more clearly, and then ingrain them in my brain... Thanks Visti!

 

BTW (for

anyone)…What does “Wahe” mean?

 

~Namaste~

Sandy Crowther

http://www.jupitersweb.com/

 

-----Original

Message-----

Visti Larsen

[vishnu]

Saturday, March 15, 2003

1:19 PM

varahamihira

[sJC: Varahamihira] Re:

Varahamihira] Progeny Delineation

 

Hare Rama Krsna

 

 

 

Dear Dhira,

I don't think you read Sanjay's mail clearly.

Remember the gati of the count has changed. So 2nd child is seen

from 6th house, 3rd from 8th house, etc. Read the mail again.

Best wishes

Visti

---

Sri Jagannath Center: http://.org

Bhagavad Purana: http://www.srimadbhagavatam.org

iTRANS 99 Font: http://www.omkarananda-ashram.org

 

-----

Original Message -----

 

Dhira

Krsna BCS

 

varahamihira

 

Saturday, March 15,

2003 6:37 PM

[sJC:

Varahamihira] Progeny Delineation

 

Dear Sanjay Rath,

 

Hare Rama Krsna!

 

Your explanation about this Saptamsa chart is very nice indeed, however

you have to clarify a few matters to me:

 

- first pregnancy being destroyed and 2nd one being a boy is clear

- then how can 3rd pregnancy be a girl when it's lord Mercury conjoins

exalted Sun (male) and in a male sign (Aries)?

-how can exalted Sun (male) conjoined Mercury (male eunuch) again give a

girl?

 

Doesn't that contradict your earlier teachings? However, using my ayanamsa

correction of 12 1/2 minutes less than Lahiri gives me Venus in Aries and

Sun in Taurus. Doesn't that look better to explain the 2 girls?

 

BTW, the confusion which 3rd pregnancy met with can be explained also by

Mercury (eunuch) being in male sign with Venus, and being the 7th house of

Saptamsa.

 

Correct me if I'm wrong, please.

 

Your sishya,

Dhira Krsna dasa

 

 

Hare Rama

Krishna

Archive:varahamihira

Files:varahamihira

varahamihira/database

 

 

Your use of

is subject to the

Terms of Service.

 

 

 

 

Hare Rama Krishna

Archive:varahamihira

Files:varahamihira

varahamihira/database

 

 

Your use of

is subject to the

Terms of Service.

[Guest guest]

Dear Sandy,

 

I refer the last bit of your mail. From what I gather, "Wahe" means "Praise the". Jagmeet will know better. Sikhs often use "Wahe guru" when matters start veering out of control )

 

Warm regards,

 

Ramapriya

hubli

 

 

-

Sandy Crowther

varahamihira

Sunday, March 16, 2003 12:28 AM

RE: [sJC: Varahamihira] Re: Varahamihira] Progeny Delineation

 

 

Hare Rama Krishna

Dear Visti and Sanjay,

 

Duuhhh…big Ooops…L This is where I always appear to get confused, (nodes are known for confusion) and therefore I need to go back over this material and get these principles involving the nodes implemented within more clearly, and then ingrain them in my brain... Thanks Visti!

 

BTW (for anyone)…What does “Wahe” mean?

 

~Namaste~

Sandy Crowther

http://www.jupitersweb.com/

[Guest guest]

Vyam Vyaasadevaaya Namah

 

 

 

Dear Gurudeva, Namaste.

Some simple questions to get these principles straight.

1) When do the nodes cause a reverse counting as you have mentioned?

2) When do we crawl instead of jump?

 

Best wishesVisti---Sri Jagannath Center: http://.orgBhagavad Purana: http://www.srimadbhagavatam.orgiTRANS 99 Font: http://www.omkarananda-ashram.org

 

-

Sanjay Rath

varahamihira

Wednesday, March 16, 1994 6:57 AM

Re: [sJC: Varahamihira] Re: Varahamihira] Progeny Delineation

Om Gurave namahDear Dhira Krsna,The points are the same that I had witten in COVA, problem is in reading them. The movement of the count is altered by (1) nodes and (2) marriage(s) and relationships outside marriage or more than one marriage. Thus the navamsa is linked to the Saptamsa - this is what I meant when I originally talked about Prakriti to Sureshbabu. 9 x7 = 63 and we are going beyond the D-60 limit of Prakriti.In this case the movement of count is altered by Rahu being the 5th co-lord and conjoining the lord. This has been explicitly mentioned in COVA. Visti, you again got the count wrong with the nodes- these nodes are not easy. Look at the direction carefully. Next should be Sagittarius and then Libra and finally Leo with Cancer causing the end to further children from first marriage.RegardsSanjay RathAt 07:19 PM 15-03-03 +0100, you wrote:

 

Hare Rama Krsna

 

Dear Dhira,I don't think you read Sanjay's mail clearly.Remember the gati of the count has changed. So 2nd child is seen from 6th house, 3rd from 8th house, etc. Read the mail again.Best wishesVisti---Sri Jagannath Center: http://.orgBhagavad Purana: http://www.srimadbhagavatam.orgiTRANS 99 Font: http://www.omkarananda-ashram.org

 

-

Dhira Krsna BCS

varahamihira

Saturday, March 15, 2003 6:37 PM

[sJC: Varahamihira] Progeny Delineation

Dear Sanjay Rath,

Hare Rama Krsna!

Your explanation about this Saptamsa chart is very nice indeed, however

you have to clarify a few matters to me:

- first pregnancy being destroyed and 2nd one being a boy is clear

- then how can 3rd pregnancy be a girl when it's lord Mercury conjoins

exalted Sun (male) and in a male sign (Aries)?

-how can exalted Sun (male) conjoined Mercury (male eunuch) again give a

girl?

Doesn't that contradict your earlier teachings? However, using my ayanamsa

correction of 12 1/2 minutes less than Lahiri gives me Venus in Aries and

Sun in Taurus. Doesn't that look better to explain the 2 girls?

BTW, the confusion which 3rd pregnancy met with can be explained also by

Mercury (eunuch) being in male sign with Venus, and being the 7th house of

Saptamsa.

Correct me if I'm wrong, please.

Your sishya,

Dhira Krsna dasa

Hare Rama Krishna Hare Rama KrishnaArchive:varahamihiraFiles:varahamihiravarahamihira/database