[SJC: Varahamihira] Fw: Updates - few doubts to sanjayji

[Guest guest]

Dear sanjay ji,

Referring to your last mail, you have said in your

mail:

" ...This should tell that the methods I have taught so

far are for understanding and predicting on the basis

of Prakriti. Purusha is a separate issue and the

determinant. "

 

How is this possible??

 

" Prakriti " is mother nature with its 3 gunas and by

virtue of which, and along with " Purusha " , it operates

to create this world of Maya/relative existence.

" Purusha " is Supreme soul, penetrating all and

referred to as " absolute existence " (which is a self

contradictory phrase considering that term " existence "

has only " relatively " defined connotations).

" Purusha " or knower exists, only relatively, through

association of what is known, through " Kala " or

" Prakriti " (referred as " KalaPurusha " in texts).

Similarly, " Prakriti " exists only because of

" Purusha " , if there is noone to know, there is nothing

to be known and the whole thing dissolves into void.

Bhagvada Gita, Ch.13, verse 26 states:

" Wherever a being is born, whether unmoving or

moving (i.e. plants and animals), know thou Arjuna,

that it is from the union between the field (Prakriti)

and the knower of the field (Purusha). "

 

Therefore, I don't understand how can the two

(Prakriti and Purusha) be separated and talked

about/taught unless one gets freed from the grip of

gunas or otherwise your statement has an entirely

different context or in some other manner yet unknown

to me.

Thus, no astrological principle can be laid down in

such a way as to clearly demarcate the " Purusha " from

" Prakriti " , which theory is the pillar of vedas!!!

Otherwise, I have not understood the concepts or the

context of your last mail properly and I would request

you to give me a few examples of astrological

concepts, which can be used to predict on the basis of

" Purusha " alone and those which can be used to predict

on the basis of " Prakriti " alone?

Further, a change of " shastyamsa " of the kind you

have mentioned in birth of twins, has made " some "

difference in both " Purusha " and " Prakriti " of the

twin brother who died and was the cause for his death.

Could those principles be brought to light?

Please clear up these doubts.

regards,

nitish

 

--- Sanjay Rath <vyasa wrote:

>

> Om Gurave Namah

> Dear

> At the feet of Guru Pandita Kasinatha,

> I remain,

> Sanjay Rath

> Mail: 71 Vasant Apartments, Mayur Vihar Phase-1, New

> Delhi 110091, India

> Tel: +91-11-2713201; SJC Web pages:

> http://.org; Personal Web:

> http://srath.com

> -

> Sanjay Rath

> Varahamihira (AT) (DOT) ; Sureshbabu Chandra

> Wednesday, March 12, 2003 5:52 PM

> Re: Updates

>

>

>

> Om Gurave Namah

> Dear Suresh,

> Let me tell you a few facts:

> There is a Jyotish named Chandra devi in the GJ List

> who had two sons, twins. Being a jytoish she had

> insisted on keeping the exact time and took great

> pains to have the exact time recorded. Now, all the

> divisional charts were the same except the

> " shastyamsa " . We used to discuss and debate those

> charts way back in 1996-97. Later I learnt that one

> of the sons had died. The other is healthy, touch

> wood, and is doing well. The point is what

> prediction will you make about Saptamsa from both

> charts? Why such diverse results. Alright forget

> saptamsa, the trmsamsa is the same, yet the

> longevity is so different! This should tell that the

> methods I have taught so far are for understanding

> and predicting on the basis of Prakriti. Purusha is

> a separate issue and the determinant.

>

> Look at it like this. Till I taught about the

> divisions etc, people were making predictions only

> using Rasi and Navamsa chakra. How did they make

> correct predictions! There is a lot to learn and

> there are many tools to master. Other points are

> given below.

>

> Looking forward to your inut for the workshops

> At the feet of Guru Pandita Kasinatha,

> I remain,

> Sanjay Rath

> Mail: 71 Vasant Apartments, Mayur Vihar Phase-1, New

> Delhi 110091, India

> Tel: +91-11-2713201; SJC Web pages:

> http://.org; Personal Web:

> http://srath.com

> -

> Sureshbabu Chandra

> Sanjay Rath

> Monday, March 10, 2003 10:08 PM

> Re: Updates

>

>

> Namasshivaaya!

>

> Dear Gurudeva,

>

> Namaste. Here is my request for you to throw some

> light on...

>

> 1) " Ketu Vipareetham " -- reckoning houses in

> reverse when Ketu is

> present in lagna.

>

> On the list, you have mentioned, we should not

> reverse reckoning.

> But in COVA you explicitly mentioned reckoning

> houses in reverse when

> Ketu is placed in Lagna. Is there a condition, when

> that should be

> applied and when it should not?

>

> Rath: Maharihsi Jaimini is very criptic..he says

> Vipareetam and my understanding so far has been that

> the Vipareetam applies only to matters associated

> with spirituality. To appreciate this you muct study

> the Sun-Moon-Rahu Chakra.

>

> 2) Finding sex of child and sibling from D-7 and

> D-3 respectively.

> The rules we have so far, seem inadequate at times.

> Are we missing

> something?. Please write on this, when you find

> time.

>

> Rath: Done. slated after Yoga Vipareetam

>

>

>

>

 

 

 

 

Web Hosting - establish your business online

http://webhosting.