Guest guest Posted January 29, 2008 Report Share Posted January 29, 2008 Namaste, The said AXIOM could be applied for Simha Lagna but not for Makara Lagna ;for there is another AXIOM which says that " when a gragha represents two sthaanas viz.,kendra and kona,it becomes functional benefic " . " Mrs. Lanny TwoShoes " <cassiek49 wrote: Hi, So for instance if a person has Venus as the ruler of the 10th house and is running venus MD, does that mean that it ruins the career prospects? Thanks for your reply! Regards from Mrs Lanny KARUNAAKARAM RAAGHAVAM <munisevitham wrote: Namaste, AXIOM: Guru , Sukra , Budha when become owners of kendras except Lagna , they are deemed to become malefic to the following extant : Guru 100% , Sukra 75% , Budha 50% . When malefic become the owners of kendra they convey special subha palam and yoga palam during their Dasa bukti. P.S:-The above rule shall not apply to graha dirishti. Raghavendra Guru <rguru wrote: Respected Gurujis, I have a small fundamental doubt, can you clear that please .. Grahas like shani,mangal,surya are considered as natural malefics and grahas like shukra, guru natural benefics. I understand that if a natural malefic is in any house other than its own, it significantly destroys the qualities of that house ( simplistically speaking without considering yogas, temporary friendship etc ) In the same way, the natural benefics give a boost to the house in which they are present. What is confusing to me is the kendradhipathya dosha, ie when a natural benefic becomes the owner of a kendra, it becomes a malefic, and a malefic graha on becoming the owner of a kendra becomes benefic. Can anyone explain this in detail please ? Does it mean that if shukra is gets the kendradipathya dosha, * does it become a malefic ? * does it destroy the house in which it resides and aspects ? * the kaarakatwa gets spoiled ? OR does it become a benefic and malefic simlutaneously.. this point i;m not able to grasp, if anybody can throw light on this, with example, i would be much greatful. thanks very much Raghavendra ---------- This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message. Any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 29, 2008 Report Share Posted January 29, 2008 Dear KARUNAAKARAM RAAGHAVAM, Thank you very much for your quick reply! And yes, as in Yogakaraka. Best regards from Mrs. Lanny KARUNAAKARAM RAAGHAVAM <munisevitham wrote: Namaste, The said AXIOM could be applied for Simha Lagna but not for Makara Lagna ;for there is another AXIOM which says that " when a gragha represents two sthaanas viz.,kendra and kona,it becomes functional benefic " . " Mrs. Lanny TwoShoes " <cassiek49 wrote: Hi, So for instance if a person has Venus as the ruler of the 10th house and is running venus MD, does that mean that it ruins the career prospects? Thanks for your reply! Regards from Mrs Lanny KARUNAAKARAM RAAGHAVAM <munisevitham wrote: Namaste, AXIOM: Guru , Sukra , Budha when become owners of kendras except Lagna , they are deemed to become malefic to the following extant : Guru 100% , Sukra 75% , Budha 50% . When malefic become the owners of kendra they convey special subha palam and yoga palam during their Dasa bukti. P.S:-The above rule shall not apply to graha dirishti. Raghavendra Guru <rguru wrote: Respected Gurujis, I have a small fundamental doubt, can you clear that please .. Grahas like shani,mangal,surya are considered as natural malefics and grahas like shukra, guru natural benefics. I understand that if a natural malefic is in any house other than its own, it significantly destroys the qualities of that house ( simplistically speaking without considering yogas, temporary friendship etc ) In the same way, the natural benefics give a boost to the house in which they are present. What is confusing to me is the kendradhipathya dosha, ie when a natural benefic becomes the owner of a kendra, it becomes a malefic, and a malefic graha on becoming the owner of a kendra becomes benefic. Can anyone explain this in detail please ? Does it mean that if shukra is gets the kendradipathya dosha, * does it become a malefic ? * does it destroy the house in which it resides and aspects ? * the kaarakatwa gets spoiled ? OR does it become a benefic and malefic simlutaneously.. this point i;m not able to grasp, if anybody can throw light on this, with example, i would be much greatful. thanks very much Raghavendra ---------- This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message. Any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.