Guest guest Posted April 9, 2008 Report Share Posted April 9, 2008 Dear Srimati, after some research I've found the source of Raman's disapproval with respect to VPY. It is found in a comment to Phaala Deepika by Dr. G.S. Kapoor with regard to Harsha, Sarala and Vimala Yoga. Quoting him (sorry, citation is a bit long, but interesting): " Parashara in his Brihat Parashara Hora Shastra has accorded no recognition to this yoga. " " Dr. B.V. Raman also has not been kindly to the Harsha, Sarala and Vimala yogas laid down by Shri Mantreswara. In his book Three Hundred Important Combinations while commenting on these three yogas he says boldly, " These three yogas furnish us with a clue as to how lords of Dusthanas by occupying another Dusthana can overcome the evil due to such malefic ownership. Even though the author of the above yogas has ascended very pleasant results to these three combinations yet in actual practice, quite contrary have been the results. Parashara and Lomasa do not seem to favour the conception that the sting arising from an evil lordship can disappear entirely as a result of the lord occupying another Dusthana. On the other hand, the intensity will be somewhat modified. This is evident from the fact that according to Parashara, when the 6th lord is in the 6th, the native's relatives become enemies while he would be friend of the outsiders;and when the 6th lord is in 8th or 12th, the person becomes sick, hates learned men,, goes after others' women and takes pleasure in causing violence. Therefore, in interpreting the three yogas given above, one should have an eye on the intrinsic evil nature of the ownership " Kindly Regards Pascal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.