Guest guest Posted August 29, 2007 Report Share Posted August 29, 2007 I never undserstand why transits are taken in consideration primarily from Moon sign, this posting gives an insight into this, I hope our masters will tell more - regards, Lalit. THE TRANSITS Transits should be looked at within the framework of the planetary periods. Transits have a 'personal' significance when one is experiencing the periods of relevant planets. These planets are not limited to the ones whose dasha period one is undergoing, but also their friends, enemies and those planets connected to them 1. one must know the fact that vimshottari dasha is a form of lunar progression, the natal Moon progressing through the asterism at an unequal pace (compared to the western counterpart, vimshottari dasha is still a progression that involves progressing the Moon through 120 degrees in 120 years, but not at a rate of a degree-a year!). 2. Regardless of the dasha, or the horoscope-specific role and rulership of the Moon, lunar transits must be paid particular attention when studying vimshottari dasha. 3. The lunar transits often help a lot in pin-pointing the timing during a dasha or bhukti and can work as the 'second' hand in a watch! The Moon's transit through relevant signs, stars and its associations in transit with relevant planets must be paid heed to. regards,Lalit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 31, 2007 Report Share Posted August 31, 2007 I think i had explained to u only sometime ago(may be in the old group)that many astrologers including western astrologers see transits from lagna also.I had also told you that even Foresight does that even though it is headed by a team of astrologers from South India who are generally conservative.I also remember telling you that seeing at Gochara from moon seems to have been the way with Parashara since his dasha system is based on the longitude of the moon.Lastly i remember telling you that most good astrologers nowadays see transits from both Moon and Lagna. RKVedic Astrologyandhealing , " litsol " <mishra.lalit wrote: > > > I never undserstand why transits are taken in consideration primarily > from Moon sign, this posting gives an insight into this, I hope our > masters will tell more - regards, Lalit. > > THE TRANSITS > > Transits should be looked at within the framework of the planetary > periods. Transits have a 'personal' significance when one is > experiencing the periods of relevant planets. These planets are not > limited to the ones whose dasha period one is undergoing, but also their > friends, enemies and those planets connected to them > > 1. one must know the fact that vimshottari dasha is a form of lunar > progression, the natal Moon progressing through the asterism at an > unequal pace (compared to the western counterpart, vimshottari dasha is > still a progression that involves progressing the Moon through 120 > degrees in 120 years, but not at a rate of a degree-a year!). > > 2. Regardless of the dasha, or the horoscope-specific role and rulership > of the Moon, lunar transits must be paid particular attention when > studying vimshottari dasha. > > 3. The lunar transits often help a lot in pin-pointing the timing during > a dasha or bhukti and can work as the 'second' hand in a watch! The > Moon's transit through relevant signs, stars and its associations in > transit with relevant planets must be paid heed to. > > regards, > Lalit. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.