RATIO OF EFFECTS - Exaltation to Debilitation

[Guest guest]

It's very Interesting Information for one and all - Lalit.

RATIO OF EFFECTS:A planet in exaltation gives fully good effects while in Moolatrikona it is bereft of its auspicious effects by one fourth. It is half beneficial in its own house. Its beneficence is in one fourth in a friendly sign. In an egual's sign one eighth of auspicious disposition is useful. The good effects are nil in debilitation or enemy's camp. Inauspicious effects are quite reverse with reference to what is stated.

[Guest guest]

Dear Lalit,

 

I donot agree with it. This is a very plain explanation it has not

depth. It is not epected from a new learner too.

 

with regards

sushil dikshit

Vedic Astrologyandhealing , " litsol "

<mishra.lalit wrote:

>

>

> It's very Interesting Information for one and all - Lalit.

>

> RATIO OF EFFECTS:

> A planet in exaltation gives fully good effects while in

Moolatrikona it

> is bereft of its auspicious effects by one fourth. It is half

beneficial

> in its own house. Its beneficence is in one fourth in a friendly

sign.

> In an egual's sign one eighth of auspicious disposition is useful.

The

> good effects are nil in debilitation or enemy's camp. Inauspicious

> effects are quite reverse with reference to what is stated.

>

[Guest guest]

Dear Sushil Ji,

 

It's a translation of one Schloka of Parashara, As today i remained

busy in reading books and also was doing pending deliverables so that

i can go on at least one week's leave.

 

I m fully tired, in the last 5 days, i had to work 75-76 hrs in

office.

 

regards,

Lalit.

 

Vedic Astrologyandhealing , " sushil.dikshit "

<sushil.dikshit wrote:

>

> Dear Lalit,

>

> I donot agree with it. This is a very plain explanation it has not

> depth. It is not epected from a new learner too.

>

> with regards

> sushil dikshit

> Vedic Astrologyandhealing , " litsol "

> <mishra.lalit@> wrote:

> >

> >

> > It's very Interesting Information for one and all - Lalit.

> >

> > RATIO OF EFFECTS:

> > A planet in exaltation gives fully good effects while in

> Moolatrikona it

> > is bereft of its auspicious effects by one fourth. It is half

> beneficial

> > in its own house. Its beneficence is in one fourth in a friendly

> sign.

> > In an egual's sign one eighth of auspicious disposition is

useful.

> The

> > good effects are nil in debilitation or enemy's camp.

Inauspicious

> > effects are quite reverse with reference to what is stated.

> >

>

[Guest guest]

Sushil Ji,

 

Why u r facing difficulty to accept this result or some other posts

is, because, u think, i m posting all dregs by just copy and paste

approach.

 

No, Like this result, most of the contents are only stated by

Parashara in BPHS, I opened soft copy of BPHS and went to exaltation

chapter, Pick the information therefrom.

 

I have noticed u accept things from ppl whom u think they are good or

established ,whereas i accept the things from the original text and

if any one with recognition or no recognition, if what he says has

worth, I w'd accept and then validate his statement, w'd try to know

why he is saying something.

 

I have got now some 22 books with me with almost all classics - BJS

by Varahmihira, BPHS, Garg Hora, Saravali , Jatak Parijata, Hora Sara

and books written by

Gopesh Kumar Ojha, Chandrashekhar Sharma Ji (our group), Bipin

Behari, PVR Narasinha Rao, Sanjay Rath, BVR's half a Dozen's books

etc.. and specific books on Aspects, Navamsha, Dasha and Transis.

 

I didn't get a quality book on transits. Next Month, i will purchase

Deva Keralam and Mansagri.

 

I m not like mediocre astrologers of VA group, who dont understand

basics of 8'th house and 7'th house and give partial results or

opinon.

 

Prem Chopra though is quick but he doesnt study and don't have deep

knowledge, Rafel is rather good but doesn't discuss why he is saying

something, advantage is, with this approach he leaves good impression.

 

people think him as authority, whereas he is wrong many placed like

once he said debilatated planets give Raj Yoga if placed in Kendra,

this statement has no worth coz it depends on lot many factors.

 

 

In Amit Sinha's accident he was fully wrong, when Amit confirmed the

accident, He gave a post mortem style explaination, He should study

more astrology for at least 2 yrs to become a Guru.

 

So, I have decided to follow mainstream parampara of vedic astrology

that begins from Shaunak, Lomus, Parashara goes to Kalyan Verman.

 

Yogas are another tool to confuse self and next person. If u study

the planets involved in a Yoga, u will arrive at same or better

results stated by some Yoga, Chandrashekar Ji's book is dedicated to

this sort of reasoning - " Vedic Astrology Demystified " .

 

Same is Dreskana and Navamsha - 22nd Dreshkana of a house means 8'th

house from that house and u already know that is a randhra house for

the house it's counted. So, People are using such divisional charts

to impress the reader, they dont reveal that most important thing is

Fundamental of Vedic Astrology.

 

I m focussed on this, at least for the time being.

 

Well, i w'd like to know from u abt the Quiz's Result, How far I was

right.

 

regards,

Lalit.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Vedic Astrologyandhealing , " litsol "

<mishra.lalit wrote:

>

> Dear Sushil Ji,

>

> It's a translation of one Schloka of Parashara, As today i remained

> busy in reading books and also was doing pending deliverables so

that

> i can go on at least one week's leave.

>

> I m fully tired, in the last 5 days, i had to work 75-76 hrs in

> office.

>

> regards,

> Lalit.

>

> Vedic Astrologyandhealing , " sushil.dikshit "

> <sushil.dikshit@> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Lalit,

> >

> > I donot agree with it. This is a very plain explanation it has

not

> > depth. It is not epected from a new learner too.

> >

> > with regards

> > sushil dikshit

> > Vedic Astrologyandhealing , " litsol "

> > <mishra.lalit@> wrote:

> > >

> > >

> > > It's very Interesting Information for one and all - Lalit.

> > >

> > > RATIO OF EFFECTS:

> > > A planet in exaltation gives fully good effects while in

> > Moolatrikona it

> > > is bereft of its auspicious effects by one fourth. It is half

> > beneficial

> > > in its own house. Its beneficence is in one fourth in a

friendly

> > sign.

> > > In an egual's sign one eighth of auspicious disposition is

> useful.

> > The

> > > good effects are nil in debilitation or enemy's camp.

> Inauspicious

> > > effects are quite reverse with reference to what is stated.

> > >

> >

>

[Guest guest]

Sir,

 

I just wanted this group should have some new approach about learning

vedic astrology. If we are here to do the same thing others are doing

why we need a separate group. If you are ready to accept healtgy

discussion I am sorry. I will not post further. Even whenever you

don't like me, you may drop me.

 

again sorry.

 

with regards

sushil dikshit

Vedic Astrologyandhealing , " litsol "

<mishra.lalit wrote:

>

> Sushil Ji,

>

> Why u r facing difficulty to accept this result or some other posts

> is, because, u think, i m posting all dregs by just copy and paste

> approach.

>

> No, Like this result, most of the contents are only stated by

> Parashara in BPHS, I opened soft copy of BPHS and went to

exaltation

> chapter, Pick the information therefrom.

>

> I have noticed u accept things from ppl whom u think they are good

or

> established ,whereas i accept the things from the original text and

> if any one with recognition or no recognition, if what he says has

> worth, I w'd accept and then validate his statement, w'd try to

know

> why he is saying something.

>

> I have got now some 22 books with me with almost all classics - BJS

> by Varahmihira, BPHS, Garg Hora, Saravali , Jatak Parijata, Hora

Sara

> and books written by

> Gopesh Kumar Ojha, Chandrashekhar Sharma Ji (our group), Bipin

> Behari, PVR Narasinha Rao, Sanjay Rath, BVR's half a Dozen's books

> etc.. and specific books on Aspects, Navamsha, Dasha and Transis.

>

> I didn't get a quality book on transits. Next Month, i will

purchase

> Deva Keralam and Mansagri.

>

> I m not like mediocre astrologers of VA group, who dont understand

> basics of 8'th house and 7'th house and give partial results or

> opinon.

>

> Prem Chopra though is quick but he doesnt study and don't have deep

> knowledge, Rafel is rather good but doesn't discuss why he is

saying

> something, advantage is, with this approach he leaves good

impression.

>

> people think him as authority, whereas he is wrong many placed like

> once he said debilatated planets give Raj Yoga if placed in Kendra,

> this statement has no worth coz it depends on lot many factors.

>

>

> In Amit Sinha's accident he was fully wrong, when Amit confirmed

the

> accident, He gave a post mortem style explaination, He should study

> more astrology for at least 2 yrs to become a Guru.

>

> So, I have decided to follow mainstream parampara of vedic

astrology

> that begins from Shaunak, Lomus, Parashara goes to Kalyan Verman.

>

> Yogas are another tool to confuse self and next person. If u study

> the planets involved in a Yoga, u will arrive at same or better

> results stated by some Yoga, Chandrashekar Ji's book is dedicated

to

> this sort of reasoning - " Vedic Astrology Demystified " .

>

> Same is Dreskana and Navamsha - 22nd Dreshkana of a house means

8'th

> house from that house and u already know that is a randhra house

for

> the house it's counted. So, People are using such divisional

charts

> to impress the reader, they dont reveal that most important thing

is

> Fundamental of Vedic Astrology.

>

> I m focussed on this, at least for the time being.

>

> Well, i w'd like to know from u abt the Quiz's Result, How far I

was

> right.

>

> regards,

> Lalit.

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

Vedic Astrologyandhealing , " litsol "

> <mishra.lalit@> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Sushil Ji,

> >

> > It's a translation of one Schloka of Parashara, As today i

remained

> > busy in reading books and also was doing pending deliverables so

> that

> > i can go on at least one week's leave.

> >

> > I m fully tired, in the last 5 days, i had to work 75-76 hrs in

> > office.

> >

> > regards,

> > Lalit.

> >

> > Vedic Astrologyandhealing , " sushil.dikshit "

> > <sushil.dikshit@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Lalit,

> > >

> > > I donot agree with it. This is a very plain explanation it has

> not

> > > depth. It is not epected from a new learner too.

> > >

> > > with regards

> > > sushil dikshit

> > > Vedic Astrologyandhealing , " litsol "

> > > <mishra.lalit@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > It's very Interesting Information for one and all - Lalit.

> > > >

> > > > RATIO OF EFFECTS:

> > > > A planet in exaltation gives fully good effects while in

> > > Moolatrikona it

> > > > is bereft of its auspicious effects by one fourth. It is half

> > > beneficial

> > > > in its own house. Its beneficence is in one fourth in a

> friendly

> > > sign.

> > > > In an egual's sign one eighth of auspicious disposition is

> > useful.

> > > The

> > > > good effects are nil in debilitation or enemy's camp.

> > Inauspicious

> > > > effects are quite reverse with reference to what is stated.

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

[Guest guest]

Sushil Ji,

 

Pls. begin any topic u wish to discuss, we are ready.

 

regards,

Lalit.

 

 

 

 

Vedic Astrologyandhealing , " sushil.dikshit "

<sushil.dikshit wrote:

>

> Sir,

>

> I just wanted this group should have some new approach about

learning

> vedic astrology. If we are here to do the same thing others are

doing

> why we need a separate group. If you are ready to accept healtgy

> discussion I am sorry. I will not post further. Even whenever you

> don't like me, you may drop me.

>

> again sorry.

>

> with regards

> sushil dikshit

> Vedic Astrologyandhealing , " litsol "

> <mishra.lalit@> wrote:

> >

> > Sushil Ji,

> >

> > Why u r facing difficulty to accept this result or some other

posts

> > is, because, u think, i m posting all dregs by just copy and

paste

> > approach.

> >

> > No, Like this result, most of the contents are only stated by

> > Parashara in BPHS, I opened soft copy of BPHS and went to

> exaltation

> > chapter, Pick the information therefrom.

> >

> > I have noticed u accept things from ppl whom u think they are

good

> or

> > established ,whereas i accept the things from the original text

and

> > if any one with recognition or no recognition, if what he says

has

> > worth, I w'd accept and then validate his statement, w'd try to

> know

> > why he is saying something.

> >

> > I have got now some 22 books with me with almost all classics -

BJS

> > by Varahmihira, BPHS, Garg Hora, Saravali , Jatak Parijata, Hora

> Sara

> > and books written by

> > Gopesh Kumar Ojha, Chandrashekhar Sharma Ji (our group), Bipin

> > Behari, PVR Narasinha Rao, Sanjay Rath, BVR's half a Dozen's

books

> > etc.. and specific books on Aspects, Navamsha, Dasha and Transis.

> >

> > I didn't get a quality book on transits. Next Month, i will

> purchase

> > Deva Keralam and Mansagri.

> >

> > I m not like mediocre astrologers of VA group, who dont

understand

> > basics of 8'th house and 7'th house and give partial results or

> > opinon.

> >

> > Prem Chopra though is quick but he doesnt study and don't have

deep

> > knowledge, Rafel is rather good but doesn't discuss why he is

> saying

> > something, advantage is, with this approach he leaves good

> impression.

> >

> > people think him as authority, whereas he is wrong many placed

like

> > once he said debilatated planets give Raj Yoga if placed in

Kendra,

> > this statement has no worth coz it depends on lot many factors.

> >

> >

> > In Amit Sinha's accident he was fully wrong, when Amit confirmed

> the

> > accident, He gave a post mortem style explaination, He should

study

> > more astrology for at least 2 yrs to become a Guru.

> >

> > So, I have decided to follow mainstream parampara of vedic

> astrology

> > that begins from Shaunak, Lomus, Parashara goes to Kalyan Verman.

> >

> > Yogas are another tool to confuse self and next person. If u

study

> > the planets involved in a Yoga, u will arrive at same or better

> > results stated by some Yoga, Chandrashekar Ji's book is dedicated

> to

> > this sort of reasoning - " Vedic Astrology Demystified " .

> >

> > Same is Dreskana and Navamsha - 22nd Dreshkana of a house means

> 8'th

> > house from that house and u already know that is a randhra house

> for

> > the house it's counted. So, People are using such divisional

> charts

> > to impress the reader, they dont reveal that most important thing

> is

> > Fundamental of Vedic Astrology.

> >

> > I m focussed on this, at least for the time being.

> >

> > Well, i w'd like to know from u abt the Quiz's Result, How far I

> was

> > right.

> >

> > regards,

> > Lalit.

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Vedic Astrologyandhealing , " litsol "

> > <mishra.lalit@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Sushil Ji,

> > >

> > > It's a translation of one Schloka of Parashara, As today i

> remained

> > > busy in reading books and also was doing pending deliverables

so

> > that

> > > i can go on at least one week's leave.

> > >

> > > I m fully tired, in the last 5 days, i had to work 75-76 hrs in

> > > office.

> > >

> > > regards,

> > > Lalit.

> > >

> > > --- In

Vedic Astrologyandhealing , " sushil.dikshit "

> > > <sushil.dikshit@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Dear Lalit,

> > > >

> > > > I donot agree with it. This is a very plain explanation it

has

> > not

> > > > depth. It is not epected from a new learner too.

> > > >

> > > > with regards

> > > > sushil dikshit

> > > > Vedic Astrologyandhealing , " litsol "

> > > > <mishra.lalit@> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > It's very Interesting Information for one and all - Lalit.

> > > > >

> > > > > RATIO OF EFFECTS:

> > > > > A planet in exaltation gives fully good effects while in

> > > > Moolatrikona it

> > > > > is bereft of its auspicious effects by one fourth. It is

half

> > > > beneficial

> > > > > in its own house. Its beneficence is in one fourth in a

> > friendly

> > > > sign.

> > > > > In an egual's sign one eighth of auspicious disposition is

> > > useful.

> > > > The

> > > > > good effects are nil in debilitation or enemy's camp.

> > > Inauspicious

> > > > > effects are quite reverse with reference to what is stated.

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> >

>