RK Das/ChandraShekhar Ji / Sridhar Ji - Sat/Venus Dasa in Uttar Kalamrita

[Guest guest]

Dear Sir(s),

 

I have seen same thing happening in Venus - Saturn period also, The

horoscope, i m posting is once discussed by Chandrashekhar Ji also.

 

The Correct birth data - 16 oct 1979, 7:35 am at Etawah (UP). (Venus -

Saturn Period)

 

He is no one else but our Saurabh. He had seen all round failure

right from 1998 july to 2000.

 

He got releief in yr 2001, Aug.

 

regards,

Lalit.

 

 

 

 

 

Vedic Astrologyandhealing , " litsol "

<litsol wrote:

>

> Sorry,

>

> I happen to post wrong horoscope.

>

> regards,

> Lalit.

>

> Vedic Astrologyandhealing , Chandrashekhar

> <sharma.chandrashekhar@> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Lalit,

> >

> > Are you certain of your data and the results? This chart

indicates

> > beginning of Venus dasha from 10.8.1996 and Saturn Bhukti

operates

> from

> > 4.4.2009. Since that is yet to arrive how did you reach the

> conclusion

> > that this chart and events related to it confirms what is said in

> Uttara

> > Kalamrita? More over Venus occupies enemy rasi, besides being

> afflicted

> > by Rahu in navamsha, and so does not fulfill the parameter of

both

> > Saturn and Venus having to be strong.

> >

> > Take care,

> >

> > Chandrashekhar.

> >

> >

> > litsol wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Mr. Das,

> > >

> > > As u know, i m in my learning phase only, so, whatever, i do

> find, i

> > > check against the horoscopes as i m afraid of interpolations in

> the

> > > texts.

> > >

> > > I will give u one horoscope, he is luckily my one of best

> friends -

> > > 1st April 1975, at 7:10 am in Bhopal.

> > >

> > > He is Neeraj Mukerjee, MBA and still not stable in his job. he

> lost

> > > his father in 1990, I dont remember exact month.

> > >

> > > Luckily, last month he got selected in one of the interviews and

> > > about letter of appointment last week either 13'th Nov or

143'th

> Nov.

> > >

> > > regards,

> > > Lalit.

> > >

> > > Vedic Astrologyandhealing

> > > <Vedic Astrologyandhealing%40>, " rk dash "

> > > <arkaydash@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Lalit,

> > > > This is speaking out of turn, as your doubt is addressed to

one

> > > member.

> > > >

> > > > Frankly, the reasoning, I have not come across from anyone in

> > > contemporary

> > > > India. It is easy to crank out any reasoning just as there

are

> for

> > > why a

> > > > retrograde palnet behaves funny. Learner-masters of this land

> today

> > > are very

> > > > resourceful. I am not detained by the proliferation of

perverse

> > > reasoning.

> > > > Well, my only gripe is one ends up devoting some time

browsing,

> > > only to gain

> > > > nothing.

> > > >

> > > > But why I responded to your query is this. My memory serving

me

> > > right -- I

> > > > read Kalidasa (U.K.) years ago -- to make pauper of a king,

the

> > > dasa of one

> > > > and the sub-dasa of the other is not sufficient condition.

The

> two

> > > have to

> > > > be ill-placed from each other and, I think, ill-palced

> themselves.

> > > >

> > > > The point I'd like to make here is, Has anyone done the

testing

> of

> > > this U.K.

> > > > ruling? If you can find someone who has, then let me know.

This

> is

> > > a famous

> > > > heterodoxical ruling, for which U.K. is known as maverick.

> > > >

> > > > RK

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > On 20/11/2007, litsol <litsol@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > > Dear Sir,

> > > > >

> > > > > In the Uttara Kalamrita by Kalidasa it's said that during

the

> sub-

> > > > > period of Venus in the main period of Saturn even a king

will

> > > become a

> > > > > beggar.

> > > > >

> > > > > I wanted to understand the reasoning behind this ruling,

> which i

> > > saw is

> > > > > more or less true. Why it happens.

> > > > >

> > > > > regards,

> > > > > Lalit.

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> > >

> >

>

[Guest guest]

Dear Lalit,

Did you also mark that at that time the yogakaraka was in the 6th bhava

for the chart? So it is only the combinations of the transit and dashas

that gave that result. Otherwise the period from 1997 onwards should

have been bad if the principle of UK was to be applied blindly. And

then here Saturn is weak being afflicted by Rahu so he should have had

a great dasha if we go by UK.

 

Take care,

Chandrashekhar.

 

litsol wrote:

 

 

Dear Sir(s),

 

I have seen same thing happening in Venus - Saturn period also, The

horoscope, i m posting is once discussed by Chandrashekhar Ji also.

 

The Correct birth data - 16 oct 1979, 7:35 am at Etawah (UP). (Venus -

Saturn Period)

 

He is no one else but our Saurabh. He had seen all round failure

right from 1998 july to 2000.

 

He got releief in yr 2001, Aug.

 

regards,

Lalit.

 

Vedic Astrologyandhealing ,

"litsol"

<litsol wrote:

>

> Sorry,

>

> I happen to post wrong horoscope.

>

> regards,

> Lalit.

>

> Vedic Astrologyandhealing ,

Chandrashekhar

> <sharma.chandrashekhar@> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Lalit,

> >

> > Are you certain of your data and the results? This chart

indicates

> > beginning of Venus dasha from 10.8.1996 and Saturn Bhukti

operates

> from

> > 4.4.2009. Since that is yet to arrive how did you reach the

> conclusion

> > that this chart and events related to it confirms what is

said in

> Uttara

> > Kalamrita? More over Venus occupies enemy rasi, besides being

 

> afflicted

> > by Rahu in navamsha, and so does not fulfill the parameter of

 

both

> > Saturn and Venus having to be strong.

> >

> > Take care,

> >

> > Chandrashekhar.

> >

> >

> > litsol wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Mr. Das,

> > >

> > > As u know, i m in my learning phase only, so, whatever,

i do

> find, i

> > > check against the horoscopes as i m afraid of

interpolations in

> the

> > > texts.

> > >

> > > I will give u one horoscope, he is luckily my one of

best

> friends -

> > > 1st April 1975, at 7:10 am in Bhopal.

> > >

> > > He is Neeraj Mukerjee, MBA and still not stable in his

job. he

> lost

> > > his father in 1990, I dont remember exact month.

> > >

> > > Luckily, last month he got selected in one of the

interviews and

> > > about letter of appointment last week either 13'th Nov

or

143'th

> Nov.

> > >

> > > regards,

> > > Lalit.

> > >

> > > Vedic Astrologyandhealing

 

> > > <Vedic Astrologyandhealing%40>,

"rk dash"

> > > <arkaydash@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Lalit,

> > > > This is speaking out of turn, as your doubt is

addressed to

one

> > > member.

> > > >

> > > > Frankly, the reasoning, I have not come across from

anyone in

> > > contemporary

> > > > India. It is easy to crank out any reasoning just

as there

are

> for

> > > why a

> > > > retrograde palnet behaves funny. Learner-masters of

this land

> today

> > > are very

> > > > resourceful. I am not detained by the proliferation

of

perverse

> > > reasoning.

> > > > Well, my only gripe is one ends up devoting some

time

browsing,

> > > only to gain

> > > > nothing.

> > > >

> > > > But why I responded to your query is this. My

memory serving

me

> > > right -- I

> > > > read Kalidasa (U.K.) years ago -- to make pauper of

a king,

the

> > > dasa of one

> > > > and the sub-dasa of the other is not sufficient

condition.

The

> two

> > > have to

> > > > be ill-placed from each other and, I think,

ill-palced

> themselves.

> > > >

> > > > The point I'd like to make here is, Has anyone done

the

testing

> of

> > > this U.K.

> > > > ruling? If you can find someone who has, then let

me know.

This

> is

> > > a famous

> > > > heterodoxical ruling, for which U.K. is known as

maverick.

> > > >

> > > > RK

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > On 20/11/2007, litsol <litsol@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > > Dear Sir,

> > > > >

> > > > > In the Uttara Kalamrita by Kalidasa it's said

that during

the

> sub-

> > > > > period of Venus in the main period of Saturn

even a king

will

> > > become a

> > > > > beggar.

> > > > >

> > > > > I wanted to understand the reasoning behind

this ruling,

> which i

> > > saw is

> > > > > more or less true. Why it happens.

> > > > >

> > > > > regards,

> > > > > Lalit.

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> > >

> >

>

[Guest guest]

Dear Sir,

 

Saturn and Rahu are alike, Rahu has a tendency to achieve the targets

out of the way, kind of a negative jupitor in chart, so, a combo like

Sat+Rahu or Venus + Rahu should not reduce the good results, rather

it should double the saturn's yogakarakatwa, I understand affliction

of jupitor,moon, sun, mars's afflictoin by rahu but why saturn and

venus too should get afflicted.

 

regards,

Lalit.

 

 

 

 

 

Vedic Astrologyandhealing , Chandrashekhar

<sharma.chandrashekhar wrote:

>

> Dear Lalit,

> Did you also mark that at that time the yogakaraka was in the 6th

bhava

> for the chart? So it is only the combinations of the transit and

dashas

> that gave that result. Otherwise the period from 1997 onwards

should

> have been bad if the principle of UK was to be applied blindly. And

then

> here Saturn is weak being afflicted by Rahu so he should have had a

> great dasha if we go by UK.

>

> Take care,

> Chandrashekhar.

>

> litsol wrote:

> >

> > Dear Sir(s),

> >

> > I have seen same thing happening in Venus - Saturn period also,

The

> > horoscope, i m posting is once discussed by Chandrashekhar Ji

also.

> >

> > The Correct birth data - 16 oct 1979, 7:35 am at Etawah (UP).

(Venus -

> > Saturn Period)

> >

> > He is no one else but our Saurabh. He had seen all round failure

> > right from 1998 july to 2000.

> >

> > He got releief in yr 2001, Aug.

> >

> > regards,

> > Lalit.

> >

> > Vedic Astrologyandhealing

> > <Vedic Astrologyandhealing%40>, " litsol "

> > <litsol@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Sorry,

> > >

> > > I happen to post wrong horoscope.

> > >

> > > regards,

> > > Lalit.

> > >

> > > Vedic Astrologyandhealing

> > <Vedic Astrologyandhealing%40>,

Chandrashekhar

> > > <sharma.chandrashekhar@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Dear Lalit,

> > > >

> > > > Are you certain of your data and the results? This chart

> > indicates

> > > > beginning of Venus dasha from 10.8.1996 and Saturn Bhukti

> > operates

> > > from

> > > > 4.4.2009. Since that is yet to arrive how did you reach the

> > > conclusion

> > > > that this chart and events related to it confirms what is

said in

> > > Uttara

> > > > Kalamrita? More over Venus occupies enemy rasi, besides being

> > > afflicted

> > > > by Rahu in navamsha, and so does not fulfill the parameter of

> > both

> > > > Saturn and Venus having to be strong.

> > > >

> > > > Take care,

> > > >

> > > > Chandrashekhar.

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > litsol wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Dear Mr. Das,

> > > > >

> > > > > As u know, i m in my learning phase only, so, whatever, i do

> > > find, i

> > > > > check against the horoscopes as i m afraid of

interpolations in

> > > the

> > > > > texts.

> > > > >

> > > > > I will give u one horoscope, he is luckily my one of best

> > > friends -

> > > > > 1st April 1975, at 7:10 am in Bhopal.

> > > > >

> > > > > He is Neeraj Mukerjee, MBA and still not stable in his job.

he

> > > lost

> > > > > his father in 1990, I dont remember exact month.

> > > > >

> > > > > Luckily, last month he got selected in one of the

interviews and

> > > > > about letter of appointment last week either 13'th Nov or

> > 143'th

> > > Nov.

> > > > >

> > > > > regards,

> > > > > Lalit.

> > > > >

> > > > > Vedic Astrologyandhealing

> > <Vedic Astrologyandhealing%40>

> > > > > <Vedic Astrologyandhealing%40>, " rk

dash "

> > > > > <arkaydash@> wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Lalit,

> > > > > > This is speaking out of turn, as your doubt is addressed

to

> > one

> > > > > member.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Frankly, the reasoning, I have not come across from

anyone in

> > > > > contemporary

> > > > > > India. It is easy to crank out any reasoning just as there

> > are

> > > for

> > > > > why a

> > > > > > retrograde palnet behaves funny. Learner-masters of this

land

> > > today

> > > > > are very

> > > > > > resourceful. I am not detained by the proliferation of

> > perverse

> > > > > reasoning.

> > > > > > Well, my only gripe is one ends up devoting some time

> > browsing,

> > > > > only to gain

> > > > > > nothing.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > But why I responded to your query is this. My memory

serving

> > me

> > > > > right -- I

> > > > > > read Kalidasa (U.K.) years ago -- to make pauper of a

king,

> > the

> > > > > dasa of one

> > > > > > and the sub-dasa of the other is not sufficient condition.

> > The

> > > two

> > > > > have to

> > > > > > be ill-placed from each other and, I think, ill-palced

> > > themselves.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > The point I'd like to make here is, Has anyone done the

> > testing

> > > of

> > > > > this U.K.

> > > > > > ruling? If you can find someone who has, then let me know.

> > This

> > > is

> > > > > a famous

> > > > > > heterodoxical ruling, for which U.K. is known as maverick.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > RK

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > On 20/11/2007, litsol <litsol@> wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > > Dear Sir,

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > In the Uttara Kalamrita by Kalidasa it's said that

during

> > the

> > > sub-

> > > > > > > period of Venus in the main period of Saturn even a king

> > will

> > > > > become a

> > > > > > > beggar.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > I wanted to understand the reasoning behind this ruling,

> > > which i

> > > > > saw is

> > > > > > > more or less true. Why it happens.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > Lalit.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> >

> >

>

[Guest guest]

Dear Lalit,

In my reply I happened to bypass the real catch in this UK ruling. Even a king gets pauperized in S-V, V-S periods, unless they are ill-placed/ill-disposed. The catch is in " when not happily placed " . There are nuances to broad ruling. Kalidasa devotes two stanzas to this. The testing should be done. Before that we can ask experienced members if they have come across any substantial comments, as different from mere reference to, on S-V, V-S dasa peculiarity.

 

 

I repeat, mere S-V, V-S operating period will not lead to the dire reversal in fortune. The planetary staus decides this. Now you can proceed to see how Sat and Ven stand, in the horoscope. I'll supply the complete dictum in the next post.

 

 

Best,

RK

 

On 22/11/2007, litsol <litsol wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Sir(s),I have seen same thing happening in Venus - Saturn period also, The horoscope, i m posting is once discussed by Chandrashekhar Ji also.The Correct birth data - 16 oct 1979, 7:35 am at Etawah (UP). (Venus -

Saturn Period)He is no one else but our Saurabh. He had seen all round failure right from 1998 july to 2000.He got releief in yr 2001, Aug.regards,Lalit.

Vedic Astrologyandhealing , " litsol " <litsol wrote:>> Sorry,> > I happen to post wrong horoscope.> > regards,> Lalit.>

> Vedic Astrologyandhealing , Chandrashekhar > <sharma.chandrashekhar

@> wrote:> >> > Dear Lalit,> > > > Are you certain of your data and the results? This chart indicates > > beginning of Venus dasha from 10.8.1996 and Saturn Bhukti operates > from > > 4.4.2009. Since that is yet to arrive how did you reach the > conclusion > > that this chart and events related to it confirms what is said in > Uttara

> > Kalamrita? More over Venus occupies enemy rasi, besides being > afflicted > > by Rahu in navamsha, and so does not fulfill the parameter of both > > Saturn and Venus having to be strong.

> > > > Take care,> > > > Chandrashekhar.> > > > > > litsol wrote:> > >> > > Dear Mr. Das,> > >> > > As u know, i m in my learning phase only, so, whatever, i do > find, i> > > check against the horoscopes as i m afraid of interpolations in > the> > > texts.> > >> > > I will give u one horoscope, he is luckily my one of best > friends -> > > 1st April 1975, at 7:10 am in Bhopal.> > >> > > He is Neeraj Mukerjee, MBA and still not stable in his job. he > lost> > > his father in 1990, I dont remember exact month.

> > >> > > Luckily, last month he got selected in one of the interviews and> > > about letter of appointment last week either 13'th Nov or 143'th > Nov.> > >

> > > regards,> > > Lalit.> > >> > >

Vedic Astrologyandhealing > > > <Vedic Astrologyandhealing%40

>, " rk dash " > > > <arkaydash@> wrote:> > > >> > > > Lalit,> > > > This is speaking out of turn, as your doubt is addressed to one

> > > member.> > > >> > > > Frankly, the reasoning, I have not come across from anyone in> > > contemporary> > > > India. It is easy to crank out any reasoning just as there are > for> > > why a> > > > retrograde palnet behaves funny. Learner-masters of this land > today> > > are very> > > > resourceful. I am not detained by the proliferation of perverse> > > reasoning.> > > > Well, my only gripe is one ends up devoting some time browsing,> > > only to gain> > > > nothing.> > > >

> > > > But why I responded to your query is this. My memory serving me> > > right -- I> > > > read Kalidasa (U.K.) years ago -- to make pauper of a king, the> > > dasa of one

> > > > and the sub-dasa of the other is not sufficient condition. The > two> > > have to> > > > be ill-placed from each other and, I think, ill-palced > themselves.

> > > >> > > > The point I'd like to make here is, Has anyone done the testing > of> > > this U.K.> > > > ruling? If you can find someone who has, then let me know. This > is> > > a famous> > > > heterodoxical ruling, for which U.K. is known as maverick.> > > >> > > > RK> > > >> > > >

> > > >> > > > On 20/11/2007, litsol <litsol@> wrote:> > > >> > > > > Dear Sir,> > > > >> > > > > In the Uttara Kalamrita by Kalidasa it's said that during the > sub-> > > > > period of Venus in the main period of Saturn even a king will> > > become a> > > > > beggar.> > > > >> > > > > I wanted to understand the reasoning behind this ruling, > which i> > > saw is> > > > > more or less true. Why it happens.> > > > >> > > > > regards,> > > > > Lalit.> > > > >

> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > >> >>

[Guest guest]

Dear Lalit,

The nodes express themselves by taking away the luminosity of other

planets and rendering them weak. It is an established principle that

the nodes will give the results of the planet that they conjoin or the

lord of the bhava that they occupy in their own dasha whereas the

planet concerned will not give own results fully. Neither Saturn nor

Venus are exception to this.

Chandrashekhar.

 

litsol wrote:

 

 

Dear Sir,

 

Saturn and Rahu are alike, Rahu has a tendency to achieve the targets

out of the way, kind of a negative jupitor in chart, so, a combo like

Sat+Rahu or Venus + Rahu should not reduce the good results, rather

it should double the saturn's yogakarakatwa, I understand affliction

of jupitor,moon, sun, mars's afflictoin by rahu but why saturn and

venus too should get afflicted.

 

regards,

Lalit.

 

Vedic Astrologyandhealing ,

Chandrashekhar

<sharma.chandrashekhar wrote:

>

> Dear Lalit,

> Did you also mark that at that time the yogakaraka was in the 6th

bhava

> for the chart? So it is only the combinations of the transit and

dashas

> that gave that result. Otherwise the period from 1997 onwards

should

> have been bad if the principle of UK was to be applied blindly.

And

then

> here Saturn is weak being afflicted by Rahu so he should have had

a

> great dasha if we go by UK.

>

> Take care,

> Chandrashekhar.

>

> litsol wrote:

> >

> > Dear Sir(s),

> >

> > I have seen same thing happening in Venus - Saturn period

also,

The

> > horoscope, i m posting is once discussed by Chandrashekhar Ji

 

also.

> >

> > The Correct birth data - 16 oct 1979, 7:35 am at Etawah (UP).

 

(Venus -

> > Saturn Period)

> >

> > He is no one else but our Saurabh. He had seen all round

failure

> > right from 1998 july to 2000.

> >

> > He got releief in yr 2001, Aug.

> >

> > regards,

> > Lalit.

> >

> > Vedic Astrologyandhealing

 

> > <Vedic Astrologyandhealing%40>,

"litsol"

> > <litsol@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Sorry,

> > >

> > > I happen to post wrong horoscope.

> > >

> > > regards,

> > > Lalit.

> > >

> > > Vedic Astrologyandhealing

 

> > <Vedic Astrologyandhealing%40>,

 

Chandrashekhar

> > > <sharma.chandrashekhar@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Dear Lalit,

> > > >

> > > > Are you certain of your data and the results? This

chart

> > indicates

> > > > beginning of Venus dasha from 10.8.1996 and Saturn

Bhukti

> > operates

> > > from

> > > > 4.4.2009. Since that is yet to arrive how did you

reach the

> > > conclusion

> > > > that this chart and events related to it confirms

what is

said in

> > > Uttara

> > > > Kalamrita? More over Venus occupies enemy rasi,

besides being

> > > afflicted

> > > > by Rahu in navamsha, and so does not fulfill the

parameter of

> > both

> > > > Saturn and Venus having to be strong.

> > > >

> > > > Take care,

> > > >

> > > > Chandrashekhar.

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > litsol wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Dear Mr. Das,

> > > > >

> > > > > As u know, i m in my learning phase only, so,

whatever, i do

> > > find, i

> > > > > check against the horoscopes as i m afraid of

interpolations in

> > > the

> > > > > texts.

> > > > >

> > > > > I will give u one horoscope, he is luckily my

one of best

> > > friends -

> > > > > 1st April 1975, at 7:10 am in Bhopal.

> > > > >

> > > > > He is Neeraj Mukerjee, MBA and still not

stable in his job.

he

> > > lost

> > > > > his father in 1990, I dont remember exact

month.

> > > > >

> > > > > Luckily, last month he got selected in one of

the

interviews and

> > > > > about letter of appointment last week either

13'th Nov or

> > 143'th

> > > Nov.

> > > > >

> > > > > regards,

> > > > > Lalit.

> > > > >

> > > > > Vedic Astrologyandhealing

 

> > <Vedic Astrologyandhealing%40>

> > > > > <Vedic Astrologyandhealing%40>,

"rk

dash"

> > > > > <arkaydash@> wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Lalit,

> > > > > > This is speaking out of turn, as your

doubt is addressed

to

> > one

> > > > > member.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Frankly, the reasoning, I have not come

across from

anyone in

> > > > > contemporary

> > > > > > India. It is easy to crank out any

reasoning just as there

> > are

> > > for

> > > > > why a

> > > > > > retrograde palnet behaves funny.

Learner-masters of this

land

> > > today

> > > > > are very

> > > > > > resourceful. I am not detained by the

proliferation of

> > perverse

> > > > > reasoning.

> > > > > > Well, my only gripe is one ends up

devoting some time

> > browsing,

> > > > > only to gain

> > > > > > nothing.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > But why I responded to your query is

this. My memory

serving

> > me

> > > > > right -- I

> > > > > > read Kalidasa (U.K.) years ago -- to make

pauper of a

king,

> > the

> > > > > dasa of one

> > > > > > and the sub-dasa of the other is not

sufficient condition.

> > The

> > > two

> > > > > have to

> > > > > > be ill-placed from each other and, I

think, ill-palced

> > > themselves.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > The point I'd like to make here is, Has

anyone done the

> > testing

> > > of

> > > > > this U.K.

> > > > > > ruling? If you can find someone who has,

then let me know.

> > This

> > > is

> > > > > a famous

> > > > > > heterodoxical ruling, for which U.K. is

known as maverick.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > RK

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > On 20/11/2007, litsol <litsol@>

wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > > Dear Sir,

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > In the Uttara Kalamrita by Kalidasa

it's said that

during

> > the

> > > sub-

> > > > > > > period of Venus in the main period

of Saturn even a king

> > will

> > > > > become a

> > > > > > > beggar.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > I wanted to understand the reasoning

behind this ruling,

> > > which i

> > > > > saw is

> > > > > > > more or less true. Why it happens.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > > regards,

> > > > > > > Lalit.

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> >

> >

>