Jyotish study (Lalit)

[Guest guest]

Dear Lalit,

 

Where is the doubt in " Bhavat Bhavam " actually ? I want a specific

question about this rule.

 

I have gone through all the posts related but I have neither found

any specific question nor any explanation against it.

 

So please post a question related to it so that we can explain

something more to you about this rule.

 

regards

sushil dikshit

 

 

Vedic Astrologyandhealing , " litsol "

<litsol wrote:

>

> Sir,

>

> I did a thorough study of Bhavat Bhavam from various angles and at

> various level, after a point, we land in nowhere zone.

>

> Bhavat Bhavam can't be a tool to predict anything.

>

> It's like mnemonics that we used in childhod to memorise various,

> that's a tool for astrologer not for astrology.

>

> For the rest of things i have same opinion as u do have, however, i

> dont think one life is not enough to learn astrology, if we can

learn

> any other science, any other vedic vidya in this life, we can learn

> Jyotish also.

>

> I have great respect for all our sages, pls. dont take me wrong,

and

> my opinions are in their line of working only.

>

> regards,

> Lalit.

>

> Vedic Astrologyandhealing , " aavesh_s "

> <aavesh_s@> wrote:

> >

> >

> > Dear Lalit,

> >

> > I am surprised and pained at the statements that you are making

in

> the

> > past few days regarding some timetested principles of Jyotish

Vidya

> >

> > Have you tried to understand the principle of 'Bhavat Bhavam'

> sincerely

> > ??

> >

> > Let me be more specific:How many horoscopes have you tested this

> > principle on ??

> >

> > I have a healthy respect for your abilities and feel that you

have

> the

> > potential to be a really good Jyotishi,but your statements over

the

> past

> > few days are really immaturish to say the least !!

> >

> > PLEASE UNDERSTAND THAT TO LEARN JYOTISH VIDYA,THE FIRST

> QUALIFICATION IS

> > TO HAVE UTMOST RESPECT FOR THE VIDYA AND THE RISHIS OF YORE

> >

> > Another point:Jyotish is not mathematics where 2+2=4.

> >

> > It is an occult science where much depends on the Sadhana of the

> person

> >

> > A really good Jyotishi who has been practicing Jyotish through

> > generations can predict at least 50 things by just looking at a

> chart

> > wheras a beginner even with all his computers and Divisional

charts

> will

> > fail to get even 5 predictions correct !!

> >

> > Last but not the least,Jyotish is akin to 'Anant Paar Saagar'

> > (Varahamihira's words).

> >

> > We have not even touched the tip of the iceberg my friend []

> >

> > Regards,

> >

> > aavesh

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Vedic Astrologyandhealing , " litsol "

<litsol@>

> > wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Kamal,

> > >

> > > It's only an imagination, u can check any 2 horoscopes of any 2

> > married

> > > couples, spouses horoscope is no way mirror image each other's

> > > horoscope pivoting on 7'th house.

> > >

> > > Same is true for parent - kid relation also, however, one or

two

> case

> > > in 1,00,000 families or so can be there.

> > >

> > >

> > > regards,

> > > Lalit.

> > >

> > > Vedic Astrologyandhealing , " Vedic Learner "

> > > sightsolutions@ wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Dear All,

> > > >

> > > > It is said one can deduce the horoscope of relatives from

Native

> > e.g.

> > > mother from 4th brother from 3rd and spouse from 7th. I believe

it

> > > means taking that house as lagna. How do we time there

> fructification.

> > > If we are using dasa how it is calculated or we transit to see

> timing

> > > of events

> > > >

> > > > HARE RAMA KRSNA

> > > >

> > > > SINCERELY

> > > >

> > > > KAMAL

> > > >

> > >

> >

>