List of Topics Pls. Aavesh Ji -- !!

November 30, 2007

Namaskar, I am a learner in this group. Can i request Chandrashekhar ji to give me his prediction please? Dr.Sanjay Chincholikaraavesh t <aavesh_s wrote: Namaskar Lalit, Before I give the list of topics,could you give me an idea of the profile of the members of this group I mean to ask: (i)How many members are advanced Jyotishis in this group (Somebody of the caliber of Chandrashekarji) (ii)How many are at the intermediate level ?? (iii)How many learners ?? I am asking this question as I will post only such topics which can be discussed and understood by the majority of members Regards, aavesh litsol <litsol > wrote: Aavesh Ji,Namaskaar, the said list is awaited.regards,Lalit.Vedic Astrologyandhealing , aavesh t wrote:>> Namaskar Lalit,> > Shri Rk Dash has made a very good suggestion.I am in full agreement with his views> > I can supply a list of topics which can be discussed (if required)> > I will be contributing to the discussions to the best of my ability > > Keep up the good work !!> > Regards,> > aavesh> > > > > litsol

wrote:> > Dear Mr Das,> > Yes, my concern is addressed by you, expecting others views / support on> this.> > regards,> Lalit.> > > Vedic Astrologyandhealing , "rk dash"> wrote:> >> > Dear Lalit,> > Since this is a forum (let it remain one, not become an e-classroom)> let the> > goal be clearing confusions and taking care of the discrepancies> (sometimes> > contradictions) in classics, as you have spelled out in the proposal.> If you> > ask me to suggest, I will right away point to Prabodh Vekhande's post.> That> > is a sample of the stuff that would serve the purpose you have in> mind.> >> > I can suggest some topics needing attention. Members can take them up,> do> > their bit of research or

have done their bit of silent research but> have not> > been able to break through. They can outline the area, and a> discussion can> > build up. One requirement. Those who want to contribute should first> 'gauge'> > themselves where their existing insights/exposure stands with regard> to the> > moot topic. If they feel they have something 'higher' to say, they> should> > jump in. This is the only way to do something serious.> >> > Once somebody points out something, the writer or 'topic pilot' should> duly> > respond. It is thus that I would like to take the forum back to> Prabodh> > Vekhande's excellent schema of Benefic/Malefic planet. My critique of> the> > third tier (Least Neutral, Medium Neutral, Most Neutral) has not been> > attended to. But then, be it as it may. I can do the

rounding off in a> > future post. My compliment to Prabodh Saab for the write-up. The> > little-understood 3rd lord maleficence finds full treatment in his> schema.> > Hope your concerns have been addressed,> > RK> > On 28/11/2007, litsol litsol@ wrote:> > >> > > Pls. suggest how to begin, what to take up first and what should be> > > the sequence.> > >> > > regards,> > > Lalit.> > >> > > --- In> Vedic Astrologyandhealing,> > > "rk dash"> > > arkaydash@ wrote:> > > >> > > > V. v. good. That is one of the good ways to go about it.> > > > With you,> > > > RK> > > >> > > >> > > > On 28/11/2007, litsol litsol@ wrote:> > > > >> >

> > >> > > > > Dear Elders and Members,> > > > >> > > > > It's my good luck that we are togather here, let's work togather> > > to> > > > > contribute our best to astrology, what i m planning is, I or any> > > of you> > > > > w'd write on a topic and other learned people will give their> > > expert> > > > > opinions and observations with case studies.> > > > >> > > > > This way we w'd remove confusions on various issues of> astrology,> > > there> > > > > are contradictory explainations given in the classiscs, let's> work> > > > > togather to make consensus and come up with tastified confirmed> > > > > conclusions.> > > > >> > > > >

regards,> > > > > Lalit.> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> >> > > > > > >

November 30, 2007

Dear Sanjay,

I see that you must have been under some stress for the past year or

so, including some health issues and also worry about progeny. If you

could tell me the area of life about which you would like me to

predict, that will be nice. I think you will be undergoing a

transformation in your attitude to life and work pattern in the coming

2 and 1/2 years of time.

Take care,

Chandrashekhar.

Sanjay Chincholikar wrote:

Namaskar, I am a learner in this group. Can i request Chandrashekhar ji to give me his prediction please?

Dr.Sanjay Chincholikar

aavesh t <aavesh_s wrote:

Namaskar Lalit,

Before I give the list of topics,could you give me an idea of the profile of the members of this group

I mean to ask:

(i)How many members are advanced Jyotishis in this group (Somebody of the caliber of Chandrashekarji)

(ii)How many are at the intermediate level ??

(iii)How many learners ??

I am asking this question as I will post only such topics which can be discussed and understood by the majority of members

Regards,

aavesh

litsol <litsol wrote:

Aavesh Ji,

Namaskaar, the said list is awaited.

regards,

Lalit.

Vedic Astrologyandhealing , aavesh t wrote:

Namaskar Lalit,

Shri Rk Dash has made a very good suggestion.I am in full

agreement with his views

I can supply a list of topics which can be discussed (if required)

I will be contributing to the discussions to the best of my

ability

Keep up the good work !!

Regards,

aavesh

litsol

wrote:

Dear Mr Das,

Yes, my concern is addressed by you, expecting others views /

support on

this.

regards,

Lalit.

Vedic Astrologyandhealing , "rk dash"

wrote:

Dear Lalit,

Since this is a forum (let it remain one, not become an e-

classroom)

let the

goal be clearing confusions and taking care of the discrepancies

(sometimes

contradictions) in classics, as you have spelled out in the

proposal.

If you

ask me to suggest, I will right away point to Prabodh Vekhande's

post.

That

is a sample of the stuff that would serve the purpose you have in

mind.

I can suggest some topics needing attention. Members can take

them up,

do

their bit of research or have done their bit of silent research

but

have not

been able to break through. They can outline the area, and a

discussion can

build up. One requirement. Those who want to contribute should

first

'gauge'

themselves where their existing insights/exposure stands with

regard

to the

moot topic. If they feel they have something 'higher' to say, they

should

jump in. This is the only way to do something serious.

Once somebody points out something, the writer or 'topic pilot'

should

duly

respond. It is thus that I would like to take the forum back to

Prabodh

Vekhande's excellent schema of Benefic/Malefic planet. My

critique of

the

third tier (Least Neutral, Medium Neutral, Most Neutral) has not

been

attended to. But then, be it as it may. I can do the rounding off

in a

future post. My compliment to Prabodh Saab for the write-up. The

little-understood 3rd lord maleficence finds full treatment in his

schema.

Hope your concerns have been addressed,

RK

On 28/11/2007, litsol litsol@ wrote:

Pls. suggest how to begin, what to take up first and what

should be

the sequence.

regards,

Lalit.

--- In

Vedic Astrologyandhealing,

"rk dash"

arkaydash@ wrote:

V. v. good. That is one of the good ways to go about it.

With you,

RK

On 28/11/2007, litsol litsol@ wrote:

Dear Elders and Members,

It's my good luck that we are togather here, let's work

togather

to

contribute our best to astrology, what i m planning is, I

or any

of you

w'd write on a topic and other learned people will give

their

expert

opinions and observations with case studies.

This way we w'd remove confusions on various issues of

astrology,

there

are contradictory explainations given in the classiscs,

let's

work

togather to make consensus and come up with tastified

confirmed

conclusions.

regards,

Lalit.

December 4, 2007

Dear Chandrashekhar, Sorry for the delay n replying to your e-mail. I have been under stress, mainly work related, financial and related to love and marriage. I would like you to tell me about my marriage and finance. Also i would like you to tell me abt a person with whom iwas emotionally connected for over one year. Her date of birth is 21-08-1965, 4.30 pm or 4.45 pm at vizag on a friday. Regards Dr.SanjayChandrashekhar <sharma.chandrashekhar wrote: Dear Sanjay,I see that you must have been under some stress for the past year or so, including some health issues and also worry about progeny. If you could tell me the area of life about which you would like me to predict, that will be nice. I think you will be undergoing a transformation in your attitude to life and work pattern in the coming 2 and 1/2 years of time.Take care,Chandrashekhar.Sanjay Chincholikar wrote: Namaskar, I am a learner in this group. Can i request Chandrashekhar ji to give me his prediction please? Dr.Sanjay Chincholikar aavesh t <aavesh_s (AT) (DOT) co.in> wrote: Namaskar Lalit, Before I give the list of topics,could you give me an idea of the profile of the

members of this group I mean to ask: (i)How many members are advanced Jyotishis in this group (Somebody of the caliber of Chandrashekarji) (ii)How many are at the intermediate level ?? (iii)How many learners ?? I am asking this question as I will post only such topics which can be discussed and understood by the majority of members Regards, aavesh litsol <litsol > wrote: Aavesh Ji, Namaskaar, the said list is awaited. regards, Lalit. Vedic Astrologyandhealing , aavesh t wrote: Namaskar Lalit, Shri Rk Dash has made a very good suggestion.I am in full agreement with his views I can supply a list of topics which can be discussed (if required) I will be contributing to the discussions to the best of my ability Keep up the good work !! Regards, aavesh litsol wrote: Dear Mr Das, Yes, my concern is addressed by you, expecting others views / support on this. regards, Lalit. Vedic Astrologyandhealing , "rk dash" wrote: Dear Lalit, Since this is a forum (let it remain one, not become an e- classroom) let the goal be clearing confusions and taking care of the discrepancies (sometimes contradictions) in classics, as you have spelled out in the proposal. If you ask me to suggest, I will right away point to Prabodh Vekhande's post. That is a sample of the stuff that would serve the purpose you have in mind. I can suggest some topics needing attention. Members can take them up, do their bit of research or have done their bit of silent research but have not been able to break through. They can outline the area, and a discussion can build up. One requirement. Those who want to contribute should first 'gauge' themselves where their existing insights/exposure stands with regard to the moot topic. If they feel they have something 'higher' to

say, they should jump in. This is the only way to do something serious. Once somebody points out something, the writer or 'topic pilot' should duly respond. It is thus that I would like to take the forum back to Prabodh Vekhande's excellent schema of Benefic/Malefic planet. My critique of the third tier (Least Neutral, Medium Neutral, Most Neutral) has not been attended to. But then, be it

as it may. I can do the rounding off in a future post. My compliment to Prabodh Saab for the write-up. The little-understood 3rd lord maleficence finds full treatment in his schema. Hope your concerns have been addressed, RK On 28/11/2007, litsol litsol@ wrote: Pls. suggest how to begin, what to take up first and what should be the sequence. regards, Lalit. Vedic Astrologyandhealing, "rk dash" arkaydash@ wrote: V. v. good. That is one of the good ways to go about it. With you, RK On 28/11/2007, litsol litsol@ wrote: Dear Elders and Members, It's my good luck that we are togather here, let's work togather to contribute our best to astrology, what i m planning is, I or any of you w'd write on a topic and other

learned people will give their expert opinions and observations with case studies. This way we w'd remove confusions on various issues of astrology, there are contradictory explainations given in the classiscs, let's work togather to make consensus and come up with tastified confirmed conclusions. regards, Lalit.