List of Topics Pls. Aavesh Ji -- !!

[Guest guest]

Namaskar Lalit, Before I give the list of topics,could you give me an idea of the profile of the members of this group I mean to ask: (i)How many members are advanced Jyotishis in this group (Somebody of the caliber of Chandrashekarji) (ii)How many are at the intermediate level ?? (iii)How many learners ?? I am asking this question as I will post only such topics which can be discussed and understood by the majority of members Regards, aavesh litsol <litsol wrote: Aavesh Ji,Namaskaar, the said list is awaited.regards,Lalit.Vedic Astrologyandhealing , aavesh t wrote:>> Namaskar Lalit,> > Shri Rk Dash has made a very good suggestion.I am in full

agreement with his views> > I can supply a list of topics which can be discussed (if required)> > I will be contributing to the discussions to the best of my ability > > Keep up the good work !!> > Regards,> > aavesh> > > > > litsol wrote:> > Dear Mr Das,> > Yes, my concern is addressed by you, expecting others views / support on> this.> > regards,> Lalit.> > > Vedic Astrologyandhealing , "rk dash"> wrote:> >> > Dear Lalit,> > Since this is a forum (let it remain one, not become an e-classroom)> let the> > goal be clearing confusions and taking care of the discrepancies> (sometimes> > contradictions) in classics, as you have spelled out in the proposal.> If

you> > ask me to suggest, I will right away point to Prabodh Vekhande's post.> That> > is a sample of the stuff that would serve the purpose you have in> mind.> >> > I can suggest some topics needing attention. Members can take them up,> do> > their bit of research or have done their bit of silent research but> have not> > been able to break through. They can outline the area, and a> discussion can> > build up. One requirement. Those who want to contribute should first> 'gauge'> > themselves where their existing insights/exposure stands with regard> to the> > moot topic. If they feel they have something 'higher' to say, they> should> > jump in. This is the only way to do something serious.> >> > Once somebody points out something, the writer or 'topic pilot' should>

duly> > respond. It is thus that I would like to take the forum back to> Prabodh> > Vekhande's excellent schema of Benefic/Malefic planet. My critique of> the> > third tier (Least Neutral, Medium Neutral, Most Neutral) has not been> > attended to. But then, be it as it may. I can do the rounding off in a> > future post. My compliment to Prabodh Saab for the write-up. The> > little-understood 3rd lord maleficence finds full treatment in his> schema.> > Hope your concerns have been addressed,> > RK> > On 28/11/2007, litsol litsol@ wrote:> > >> > > Pls. suggest how to begin, what to take up first and what should be> > > the sequence.> > >> > > regards,> > > Lalit.> > >> > > --- In> Vedic Astrologyandhealing,> > > "rk

dash"> > > arkaydash@ wrote:> > > >> > > > V. v. good. That is one of the good ways to go about it.> > > > With you,> > > > RK> > > >> > > >> > > > On 28/11/2007, litsol litsol@ wrote:> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > Dear Elders and Members,> > > > >> > > > > It's my good luck that we are togather here, let's work togather> > > to> > > > > contribute our best to astrology, what i m planning is, I or any> > > of you> > > > > w'd write on a topic and other learned people will give their> > > expert> > > > > opinions and observations with case studies.> > > > >> > > > > This way we w'd remove confusions on various issues

of> astrology,> > > there> > > > > are contradictory explainations given in the classiscs, let's> work> > > > > togather to make consensus and come up with tastified confirmed> > > > > conclusions.> > > > >> > > > > regards,> > > > > Lalit.> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> >> > > > > > >