astrololgy a science or myth

December 13, 2007

Dear Lalit Ji,

Namaskar,

Thanks for your mail of 10th under different heading.

You have stated

>>>>>>>I will be happy, u if u begin a debate with me, I wonder why u

have

not replied to my mail in which i asked u one question - do u think,

unavailability of library means the subject itself is not a

scientific.<<<<<<<<

I have always replied your mail after 29-11 I am receiving your

mail (ofcourse addressed to me) of 10-12, which I am replying. Mail

of 29-11 was replied in detail on 2-12. So how you can say that I

am not replying your mail. Your above question was also replied under

following querry which I am reproducing.

((((((((((((>>>>> if there is no good library of

physics in a university, doesnt mean physics is not a science.<<<<<

But I can read the physics from any other library. But if

any book has those principles which have no support in any library of

the world and whatever is being claimed is only based on faith

towards sages and that too may also be wrong (though it took

thousands of years) then how it can be termed as science. Sages were

of the view that Earth is stationary and Sun is nearer then Moon. All

constellations are below the Mercury…and so on….. How this concept

may now be treated as correct and over the modern science.))))))))

I will like to add as to when astrologers do not have any support in

their stand they why are they pushing some primitive concept without

analyzing as to what may be correct. Thus they simply exploiting the

faith of Indian citizen over the sages. Does any astrologer has

courage to say that he has not studied the astrology (because it is

not available according to your stand) and still predicting and

charging the amount. Do they say so in the same way in which they are

publicizing astrology and their prediction as true.

>>>>>>> People have fed up with ur selective replies and selective

arguments.<<<<<<<

Every body is free for not raising some queries, which have same

answers. In my first blog I raised so many points but none have

even read the blog and they start to defend as if they are well aware

with the factual position. They simply have faith and nothing else.

Only Sh. Prabodh has gone through the blog and tried to replied but

not on my specific questions. Does not matter what he can do if there

is no reply except faith.

>>>>>>>> Let's entertain the members, I m just waiting for u.<<<<<<<

I am not here for entertaining you………and if you think so then there

is no sense in even acknowledging your mail. As I have to spare my

valuable time for answering any mail.

>>>>>I m just waiting and challanging to u, i will find my points

from the points that u w'd raise.<<<<<<<

I have already posted my first blog and supplemented with my answers

on your offshoot queries. You can go through my first blog and try to

answer with some logic.

Thanks,

Sanat

Sanatkumar_jain

0751-2626868

13-12-2007

Re: Mr. Sanat - Do a debate with me !!

Posted by: " litsol " litsol litsol

Mon Dec 10, 2007 9:36 am (PST)

Dear Mr. Sanat,

I will be happy, u if u begin a debate with me, I wonder why u have

not replied to my mail in which i asked u one question - do u think,

unavailability of library means the subject itself is not a

scientific.

People have fed up with ur selective replies and selective arguments.

Let's entertain the members, I m just waiting for u.

I m just waiting and challanging to u, i will find my points from the

points that u w'd raise.

regards,

Lalit.

December 14, 2007

Dear Mr. Sanat ...

Pls. answer -

1. Suppose, I lost my physics library and i dont goto any other library, does it mean, physics is not a subject of science ?

2. Not going to a different library only indicates somebody is not sincere in his chosen subject..

Right, tell me what ur wisdom says to you ?

Warning : Always give reference while making statemients like this -

"Sages were of the view that Earth is stationary and Sun is nearer then Moon".

Also tell, whom you consider among the sages and who is the sage said that and where it is said.., I have read in the rigveda, earth is not stationary.., I will give u the shloka from the Rigveda to update ur knowledge.

~Lalit.

Vedic Astrologyandhealing , "sanat2221" <sanatkumar_jain wrote:>> > Dear Lalit Ji,> Namaskar,> Thanks for your mail of 10th under different heading.> You have stated> >>>>>>>I will be happy, u if u begin a debate with me, I wonder why u > have > not replied to my mail in which i asked u one question - do u think, > unavailability of library means the subject itself is not a > scientific.<<<<<<<<> I have always replied your mail after 29-11 I am receiving your > mail (ofcourse addressed to me) of 10-12, which I am replying. Mail > of 29-11 was replied in detail on 2-12. So how you can say that I > am not replying your mail. Your above question was also replied under > following querry which I am reproducing.> ((((((((((((>>>>> if there is no good library of > physics in a university, doesnt mean physics is not a science.<<<<<> But I can read the physics from any other library. But if > any book has those principles which have no support in any library of > the world and whatever is being claimed is only based on faith > towards sages and that too may also be wrong (though it took > thousands of years) then how it can be termed as science. Sages were > of the view that Earth is stationary and Sun is nearer then Moon. All > constellations are below the Mercury…and so on….. How this concept > may now be treated as correct and over the modern science.))))))))> I will like to add as to when astrologers do not have any support in > their stand they why are they pushing some primitive concept without > analyzing as to what may be correct. Thus they simply exploiting the > faith of Indian citizen over the sages. Does any astrologer has > courage to say that he has not studied the astrology (because it is > not available according to your stand) and still predicting and > charging the amount. Do they say so in the same way in which they are > publicizing astrology and their prediction as true.> >>>>>>> People have fed up with ur selective replies and selective > arguments.<<<<<<<> Every body is free for not raising some queries, which have same > answers. In my first blog I raised so many points but none have > even read the blog and they start to defend as if they are well aware > with the factual position. They simply have faith and nothing else. > Only Sh. Prabodh has gone through the blog and tried to replied but > not on my specific questions. Does not matter what he can do if there > is no reply except faith. > >>>>>>>> Let's entertain the members, I m just waiting for u.<<<<<<<> I am not here for entertaining you………and if you think so then there > is no sense in even acknowledging your mail. As I have to spare my > valuable time for answering any mail. > >>>>>I m just waiting and challanging to u, i will find my points > from the points that u w'd raise.<<<<<<<> > I have already posted my first blog and supplemented with my answers > on your offshoot queries. You can go through my first blog and try to > answer with some logic.> Thanks,> Sanat> Sanatkumar_jain 0751-2626868> 13-12-2007> > > > > > Re: Mr. Sanat - Do a debate with me !! > Posted by: "litsol" litsol litsol > Mon Dec 10, 2007 9:36 am (PST) > Dear Mr. Sanat,> > I will be happy, u if u begin a debate with me, I wonder why u have > not replied to my mail in which i asked u one question - do u think, > unavailability of library means the subject itself is not a > scientific.> > People have fed up with ur selective replies and selective arguments.> > Let's entertain the members, I m just waiting for u.> > I m just waiting and challanging to u, i will find my points from the > points that u w'd raise.> > regards,> Lalit.>