Guest guest Posted December 1, 2007 Report Share Posted December 1, 2007 Dear Mr. Das, Namskaar, I understand what u r conveying, but we need people to express themseleves, let them open up. What Mr. Cherian has said, is becoz, he is not aware how he made his opinion, sages were never having regional feelings. We have seen, both Ram and Ravana born in north india, Great Aadi Shankara and Baba Mahaavtaar born in remote villages of south india but worked best in north india whereas Sage Agastya worked in mostly in tamilnadu. Sometimes, i think, why Nadi Classics got extinct from tamilnadu and kerla, it's because inability of those who were given to preserve and hand over to next generation. Still, there is so much noice. Let's people come togather to write a new chapter of astrology. regards, Lalit. Vedic Astrologyandhealing , " rk dash " <arkaydash wrote: > > Lalit, > Mr Gopu is veering towards the goal you are drive at while Cherian from CA > is yanking the topic away from frame of inquiry. We have to sort that out. > This is a sample of the kind of kerfuffle that ensues. While I -- as much > you and many other members -- would crave the sharing of the Kerala > excellence in astrology, what we would have from enthusiasts like him is no > better than or no further than this: > > > " > > Why > > Navamsha is associated to marriage is not as important as how it is > to > > be interpreted. In this regard I must tell you that Kerala's > > astrologer are better that north indian. There they have some > special > > classics > > > . " > > > > The forum wahts particiaption that's substantive, not mere attitudes. > Attitudes are fine. But they without contribution should be discouraged, not > thankQed. > > That's why I wrote this: > > One requirement. Those who want to contribute should first 'gauge' > themselves where their existing insights/exposure stands with regard to the > moot topic. If they feel they have something 'higher' to say, they should > jump in. This is the only way to do something serious. > > Everyone should pay heed, can I add? > > RK > > > > On 30/11/2007, litsol litsol wrote: > > > > Dear Mr. Das, > > > > I got it, thanx pls, keep it going on. > > > > even if i m not there, let us encourage every body to make queries > > and answer those queries. > > > > regards, > > Lalit. > > > > --- In Vedic Astrologyandhealing <Vedic Astrologyandhealing%40yaho\ ogroups.com>, > > " rk dash " > > arkaydash@ wrote: > > > > > > And how Spatamsha chart, to progeny, not marriage? > > > The seven in saptamamsha has nothing to do with house 7. > > > > > > Lalit, there are three views here. One, Navamsha chart is a sieve. > > Two, > > > Navamsha chart has something to do with the 9th house. Three, > > Navamsha chart > > > is the fruit, Rasi chart being the tree. View two fails to hold. > > Because if > > > the 'seven' in Saptamasha has nothing to do with house 7, why > > should the > > > 'nine' in navamsa have anything to do with bhagya (9th house)? > > However, in > > > female horoscopy 9th house is synonymous with marriage. > > > > > > And how? > > > > > > RK > > > > > > > > > On 28/11/2007, litsol litsol@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Q1 : How Navamsha Chart is connected to Marriage ? > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > Lalit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.