astrology a science or myth

[Guest guest]

Dear Lalit Ji,

Namaskar,

Thanks for your mail of 16th , Though I decided not to answer your

mail because you are neither serious, nor inquisitive nor have

knowledge but you can only use filty language with blindfaith,

without any answer on my blog. But now you have come out with a

somewhat pointed argument on my subsequent mails. Hence I am

answering you. And I think that if I am able to lit inquisitive and

correct logig in your mind then you may be a gem.

 

>>>>>>>>1. If Jupitor has got planets in it's 12'th and 2nd from it's

placement , the person himself is certainly not the eldest among the

siblings, he is the one middle born. Mr. ramkrishna has also

identified the cases of exceptions to this corollary

2. The person has siblings.<<<<<<<

What are those exceptions. Let me know first. Otheriwise you will

say that it is exception.

 

>>>>>>>>3. If there is no planet in 12'th and 2nd to Jupitor, The

person is

only child. In ideal cases the compliance is 51+%, however, if,

retrogression, exaltation, mooltrikona, aspects, afflictions and

debilitation, friendly and enemic signs are also included, the

compliance is 93% of the sample horoscopes.<<<<<

Either you clarify as to how retrogression, exaltation, mooltrikona,

aspects, afflictions and

debilitation, friendly and enemic signs are to be included otherwise

there is no sense.

Because it is based on wrong sampling method. You cant say that all

patients can be cured by drinking water. Or they are cured by the so

and so position of planets then it is wrong sampling. Better you ask

some statician as to how sampling is done.

Let us take your first point which says

>>>>If Jupitor has got planets in it's 12'th and 2nd from it's

placement , the person himself is certainly not the eldest among the

siblings,<<<<

Do you know that from 23-8-2001 to 14-5-2005 (and I can give you

many dates) Saturn was 12th from Jupiter. So do you want to say that

during these 9 months there was no first delivery so that he may be

eldest. What a funny rule and logic on which you claim. Your other

rules are also like these. Now don't take back seat. And better

apply your own mind and logic before supporting any rule.

 

Though this time you have done some cut and paste labour hence I

will answer your these points too raised in another mail.

 

Birth of Male or Female children

>>>>>1. In a query relating to pregnancy, if the ascendant falls in a

fixed sign and is aspected by benefics it should be told that the

woman is surely pregnant - This is the opinion of Yavanacharya.<<<<<<<

 

Do you think she may not ask the question when it is not a fixed

ascendant, which are only four that means she/he may not ask the

question in remaining 16 hours (every ascendant has duration of

hours).

 

>>>>2. If Saturn occupies an odd sign, he causes the birth of a son.

If he occupies an even sign, he causes the birth of a girl - Thus it

has been told by Brihaspati, the great celestial astrologer.<<<<<<<

Again do you know that Saturn was transiting in Cancer sign (even

sign) since 26-5-2005 and it was in this sign till 31-10-2006. So

according to your socalled strong logic you want every body to

believe that there was no birth of a son and every birth is a girl.

 

>>>>>>3. If the ascendant falls in a number of male vargas (rasi,

drekkana,navamsa, dwadasamsa etc., are owned by a male planet) and be

strongly

aspected by male planets, surely a son will be born. If the query

concerns marriage the girl will surely get a good bridegroom<<<<<<

 

Fix the rule of (rasi, drekkana,navamsa, dwadasamsa etc.,) then I

will answer.

 

>>>>4. Yavanacharya has declared that if the ascendant falls on a

female sign, or female Navamsa or female Drekkana and is not aspected

by any male planet a girl child will be born.<<<<<

 

What will be the result if asc. Falls on female sign and male navansh

and so on. Thus first fix the rule.

 

>>>>>5. If the ascendant, Jupiter and the Moon be placed in odd signs

and in the signs and Navamsas owned by male planets and be endowed

with strength, a son will be born. If these are placed in an even

sign and the Navamsas owned by female planets, a girl will be

born<<<<<<

 

Jupiter remains in a sign (even or odd) for more then a year hence

after applying this rule do you think that there is only male birth

for a full year and then a female birth for a year.

 

>>>>>>>. If Jupiter and the Sun be in an odd sign, birth of a son is

to be predicted. <<<<<

 

Do you think that during 20-10-2006 to 16-11-2006 when Jup and Sun

were in odd sign Libra, there was no birth of daughter.

 

>>>>>>> 6. The number of nurses attending the lady during delivery

will be equal

to the number of planets placed between the ascendant and Moon.

<<<<<<<

Do you think there may be no lady if Moon is in ascendant Or there

may not be more then 8 lady (including Rahu/ketu) in any delivery.

 

>>>>>So many nurses will be outside the delivery room as there are

planets in the visible half of the zodiac and so many will be inside

as there are planets in the invisible half.<<<<

 

Again do you want dates when there is no planet in invisible half

hence there will be no lady .

 

I think it is enough and their is no substance in your principles

on which you have immense faith. That's why I was asking in my first

blog as to whether principles are right and to know this you have to

know as to how they were formulated.

 

Now it is up to you as to whether you are willing to apply your mind

or not.

 

Thanks

Yours,

 

Sanat

Sanatkumar_jain