Mr. Sanat --- Do it First (Sunilji)

[Guest guest]

Dear Sunilji, Thanks for your mail.It is nice to know that we are on the same wavelength as regards the qualifications of Mr Sanat Kumar Jain to debate on Jyotish This chap is a loser who is using the platform of Jyotish to gain some cheap publicity !! I admire the work that you and Lalit are doing in bringing the historical facts of Jyotish origins to light Keep up your Good work Regards, aavesh sunil nair <astro_tellerkerala wrote: hare ramakrishna , dear avesh ji . yes u said correct .his arguements r not related to astrology .its all dry arguements only . even his question to prove male or female by looking at a chart is height of bafoonery as no body came to u to know r u male or female . when i was telling abt diffenrt systems obselt he was telling ,its because astro is not perfect and we r frauds as we dont know half of total knowledge .again another dry arguement .Its as if u r telling a doctor if unaware of 38 different systems he is

farud . I hav solid proof with historical eveidence that we r the originater of this sytem and i am proud of it .Here many r in prison of judo chrsitian prison of biblical genoelogy of bc 4440 or some year adam born .so naything comes above it they cut it to suit their argement .Even carbon dating test i heard a variation of 2500 years can show ,so its easy to cut any thing into ur size. Today lalit ji called me and we r discussing various aspects of astro history and astrology .MY problem is i am not cut and past type so i need to type all things .So its getting delayed . I will come out with indian contribution beyond doubt .But i dont want any bodys certificate as u know whom i mean . thanks and regrds sunil nair om shreem mahalaxmai namah . Vedic Astrologyandhealing , aavesh t <aavesh_s wrote:>> Dear Lalit,> > Leave this joker alone.He is no match for you !!> > You have 'anubhava' of Sadhana.This chap is just quoting from different sources.> > I posted a mail to him when he first came on this group.> > He has not come up with any answer (he cannot as has not read a single chart in his lifetime otherwise he would not have posted his stupid arguments)> > Take care> > aavesh> > > > > > litsol litsol wrote:> > Mr. Sanat,> > You put in ur blog that u r debating with me and until the debate is> over, u will not claim/post anywhere that astrology is not a

science> rather a myth, hold ur blog.> > Let's this debate decide what's what ...., answer those 2 points stated> by me in my previous mail.> > regards,> Lalit.> > > > > > > > > >

[Guest guest]

hare ramakrishna ,

dear avesh ji .

 

Thanks for the mail and encouraging words .yes all that was the out come of a looser who said into 35 years ( i doubt it realy ) into astrology .

here i remeber my guru who says its not every bodys cup of tea .He used to refer a a famous ayurveda physician in our area who cures ppl with very cheap remedies and other people cannot do it how ever they try to copy him ,the secret was he was knowing muhurtha chikilsa ( treatment at a purticular time with a purticular herb ,i think he uses the moon phaces for it as in puranas it says moon is having amrit kala ) .

so without knowing the real secrets some one is jumping around .

 

thanks and regrds

sunil nair

om shreem mahalaxmai namah.

 

Vedic Astrologyandhealing , aavesh t <aavesh_s wrote:>> Dear Sunilji,> > Thanks for your mail.It is nice to know that we are on the same wavelength as regards the qualifications of Mr Sanat Kumar Jain to debate on Jyotish> > This chap is a loser who is using the platform of Jyotish to gain some cheap publicity !!> > I admire the work that you and Lalit are doing in bringing the historical facts of Jyotish origins to light> > Keep up your Good work> > Regards,> > aavesh> > > > > sunil nair astro_tellerkerala wrote:> > hare ramakrishna ,> dear avesh ji .> > yes u said correct .his arguements r not related to astrology .its all dry arguements only .> even his question to prove male or female by looking at a chart is height of bafoonery as no body came to u to know r u male or female .> when i was telling abt diffenrt systems obselt he was telling ,its because astro is not perfect and we r frauds as we dont know half of total knowledge .again another dry arguement .Its as if u r telling a doctor if unaware of 38 different systems he is farud .> I hav solid proof with historical eveidence that we r the originater of this sytem and i am proud of it .Here many r in prison of judo chrsitian prison of biblical genoelogy of bc 4440 or some year adam born .so naything comes above it they cut it to suit their argement .Even carbon dating test i heard a variation of 2500 years can show ,so its easy to cut any thing into ur size.> Today lalit ji called me and we r discussing various aspects of astro history and astrology .MY problem is i am not cut and past type so i need to type all things .So its getting delayed .> I will come out with indian contribution beyond doubt .But i dont want any bodys certificate as u know whom i mean .> thanks and regrds > > sunil nair > om shreem mahalaxmai namah .> > > > Vedic Astrologyandhealing , aavesh t aavesh_s@ wrote:> >> > Dear Lalit,> > > > Leave this joker alone.He is no match for you !!> > > > You have 'anubhava' of Sadhana.This chap is just quoting from different sources.> > > > I posted a mail to him when he first came on this group.> > > > He has not come up with any answer (he cannot as has not read a single chart in his lifetime otherwise he would not have posted his stupid arguments)> > > > Take care> > > > aavesh> > > > > > > > > > > > litsol litsol@ wrote:> > > > Mr. Sanat,> > > > You put in ur blog that u r debating with me and until the debate is> > over, u will not claim/post anywhere that astrology is not a science> > rather a myth, hold ur blog.> > > > Let's this debate decide what's what ...., answer those 2 points stated> > by me in my previous mail.> > > > regards,> > Lalit.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >