List of Topics Pls. Aavesh Ji -- !!

[Guest guest]

Aavesh Ji,

 

Namaskaar, the said list is awaited.

 

regards,

Lalit.

 

Vedic Astrologyandhealing , aavesh t

<aavesh_s wrote:

>

> Namaskar Lalit,

>

> Shri Rk Dash has made a very good suggestion.I am in full

agreement with his views

>

> I can supply a list of topics which can be discussed (if required)

>

> I will be contributing to the discussions to the best of my

ability

>

> Keep up the good work !!

>

> Regards,

>

> aavesh

>

>

>

>

> litsol <litsol wrote:

>

> Dear Mr Das,

>

> Yes, my concern is addressed by you, expecting others views /

support on

> this.

>

> regards,

> Lalit.

>

>

> Vedic Astrologyandhealing , " rk dash "

> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Lalit,

> > Since this is a forum (let it remain one, not become an e-

classroom)

> let the

> > goal be clearing confusions and taking care of the discrepancies

> (sometimes

> > contradictions) in classics, as you have spelled out in the

proposal.

> If you

> > ask me to suggest, I will right away point to Prabodh Vekhande's

post.

> That

> > is a sample of the stuff that would serve the purpose you have in

> mind.

> >

> > I can suggest some topics needing attention. Members can take

them up,

> do

> > their bit of research or have done their bit of silent research

but

> have not

> > been able to break through. They can outline the area, and a

> discussion can

> > build up. One requirement. Those who want to contribute should

first

> 'gauge'

> > themselves where their existing insights/exposure stands with

regard

> to the

> > moot topic. If they feel they have something 'higher' to say, they

> should

> > jump in. This is the only way to do something serious.

> >

> > Once somebody points out something, the writer or 'topic pilot'

should

> duly

> > respond. It is thus that I would like to take the forum back to

> Prabodh

> > Vekhande's excellent schema of Benefic/Malefic planet. My

critique of

> the

> > third tier (Least Neutral, Medium Neutral, Most Neutral) has not

been

> > attended to. But then, be it as it may. I can do the rounding off

in a

> > future post. My compliment to Prabodh Saab for the write-up. The

> > little-understood 3rd lord maleficence finds full treatment in his

> schema.

> > Hope your concerns have been addressed,

> > RK

> > On 28/11/2007, litsol litsol@ wrote:

> > >

> > > Pls. suggest how to begin, what to take up first and what

should be

> > > the sequence.

> > >

> > > regards,

> > > Lalit.

> > >

> > > --- In

> Vedic Astrologyandhealing,

> > > " rk dash "

> > > arkaydash@ wrote:

> > > >

> > > > V. v. good. That is one of the good ways to go about it.

> > > > With you,

> > > > RK

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > On 28/11/2007, litsol litsol@ wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Dear Elders and Members,

> > > > >

> > > > > It's my good luck that we are togather here, let's work

togather

> > > to

> > > > > contribute our best to astrology, what i m planning is, I

or any

> > > of you

> > > > > w'd write on a topic and other learned people will give

their

> > > expert

> > > > > opinions and observations with case studies.

> > > > >

> > > > > This way we w'd remove confusions on various issues of

> astrology,

> > > there

> > > > > are contradictory explainations given in the classiscs,

let's

> work

> > > > > togather to make consensus and come up with tastified

confirmed

> > > > > conclusions.

> > > > >

> > > > > regards,

> > > > > Lalit.

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> >