Guest guest Posted July 13, 2009 Report Share Posted July 13, 2009 Dear Friends, 1. This in p 165 of any reprinted edition of KP Reader VI of 1970 (also in p 153 of any reprinted edition of KP Reader II of 1971)as given under: /message/608 " Second marriage is indicated if the following two conditions are simultaneously satisfied: (i) The sub-lord of the 7th cusp is deposited in a dual sign or in the constellation of a planet in or owning a dual sign or if the sub-lord of the 7th cusp is Mercury; and (ii)The sub-lord of the 7th cusp is also a significator of either of the houses 2 or 11. If any of the above two conditions is not satisfied, then second marriage is denied. " 2. These two rules can be met by large number of persons including signgle-marriage natives. And so they are not sufficient and the third rule in p 146 of any reprinted edition of KP Reader II of 1971 as given below is also required to be satisfied for the 2nd marriage: " If the sublord of the 2nd cusp is connected with 7th house, 2nd marriage; if connected with 11th house, one will keep a keep, as 7th house significator shows legal bondage whereas the 11th indicates attachment and friendship " . 3. Some references a) MMRULES.TXT guide lines for predicting more than one marriage MMRULES.TXT b) KSK RULES FOR SECOND MARRIAGE.doc KSK%20RULES%20FOR%20SECOND%20MARR\ \IAGE.doc Regards, tw , Ajai Prakash <ajaiprakash7 wrote: > > Sri tw853, > marriage(second) is at Sl.38.Ref is at page-164 of horary astrology,6th > reader,eleventh edition;june-2007.there is a typing error in primecusp & > also in the explaination.At both places , it should be sublord of 7th cusp & > not of 2nd cusp.The slip may be corrected.error is regretted.thanks for > pointing out the error. > sincerly, > ajai prakash > > > On 7/12/09, tw853 <tw853 wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear Ajai Prakash, > > If it's said to be just verbatum reproduction from the book, could you > > kindly give the KP Reader reference for " sl. 35 Marriage (second) " as it's > > absolutely different from the KP second marriage rules. > > Thanks and regards, > > tw > > > > <%40>, Ajai > > Prakash <ajaiprakash7@> wrote: > > > > > > dear sri adith kasinath ji, > > > The querry posed before pujya guru ji was, " can i have a partner in > > > my business " .(page-192,reader-VI,eleventh edition-june 2007).I reproduced > > > the same as it is. > > > Other querries about businees & partners are at sl.4 & 5 of the table. > > > In reader VI,querries are given housewise,While I have compiled them > > > alphabetically,for the ease of searching.I have not added or Subtracted > > any > > > thing at my own.It is just verbetum reprodction from the book. > > > Thanking you, > > > ajaiprakash > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.