Proof of Guruji's using the word affliction...

[Guest guest]

Dear Sirs,

Guruji is qouted verbatim in a reply to a query...:

Student's Query : I find that in (our) magazine) since the last few years,you are not suggesting that the Moon's Sign be taken,in certain cases...

Guruji's Answer : I had been following the above method of taking the unafflicted Ascendant or Moon sign,in case the lagna is afflicted and Moon Sign is not. But in my research,only in 1965 end(sic),I understood that when twins are born,the Moon does not move a single minute...whereas lagna alone moves,and when the research on the sub-lord came out successful to read diametrically opposite results among twins ...I gave up taking the idea of taking the Moon Sign...in case Lagna is afflicted...(as) it needed reconsideration.So,we must,whether Lagna is afflicted or not,take only the exact position of

the Lagna...If the Lagna is afflicted ,then the horoscope has a certain defect,and simply because of that we should not jump to the Moon sign(saying it is auspicious...)After I have found out this,I have stopped writing in the above manner(taking Moon Sign).

Therefore I request readers to take only and never the Moon Sign, whether the Lagna is afflicted or not...

It is now hoped that wringing the curtain down on the curtain his needless controversy is now final.

With kind regards,

Yogesh Lajmi.

GOOD LUCK !

[Guest guest]

Dear Friends,

1. This word " afflicted " was used in early stage of writing as per Traditional,

which was corrected to use any more as shown below:

/message/18211

/message/22790

2. There is no practiacal application of " afflicted " by Guruji KSK in the frame

work of KP principles.

Regards,

tw

 

 

, Yogesh Lajmi <yogeshlajmi wrote:

>

> Dear Sirs,

>                Guruji is qouted verbatim in a reply to a query...:

>               Student's  Query :   I find that in (our) magazine) since the

last few years,you are not suggesting that the Moon's Sign be taken,in certain

cases...

>                Guruji's  Answer :  I had been following the above method of

taking the unafflicted Ascendant or Moon sign,in case the lagna is afflicted and

Moon Sign is not. But in my research,only in 1965 end(sic),I understood that

when twins are born,the Moon does not move a single minute...whereas lagna alone

moves,and when the research on the sub-lord came out successful to read

diametrically opposite results among twins ...I gave up taking the idea of

taking the Moon Sign...in case Lagna is afflicted...(as) it needed

reconsideration.So,we must,whether Lagna is afflicted or not,take only the exact

position of

> the Lagna...If the Lagna is afflicted ,then the horoscope has a

certaindefect,and simply because of that we should not jump to the Moon

sign(saying it is auspicious...)After I have found out this,I have stopped

writing in the above manner(taking Moon Sign).

>                                                  Therefore I request readers

to take onlyand never the Moon Sign, whether the Lagna is afflicted or not...

>                                                  

>                                                   It is now hoped

that wringing the curtain down on the curtain his needless controversy is now

final.

>               

>                                                   With kind regards,

>                                                   Yogesh Lajmi.

>                                                                            

GOOD LUCK !

>