Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

One riddle I could't solveMoon in 7th in plazce of

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Dear Adithji,

 

I request you kindly to see my mail to Shri VGR Pavanji this morning. I agree that RAHU, a node in the sign of Moon is agent of

Moon and not Moon is to follow Rahu's signification. Rahu's Rasi lord Moon is in 4th a negative house for marriage. So Rahu is to give the result of 4th only. Reg. Saturn, a self strength planet (no planet is in its stars), his occupation sign only isd to be considered in KP system aznd not lordship. He is the CSL of 10th cusp, a negative houxe for marriage. In KP system, node

has no aspect of his own. Aspect of other planets only on it is considered. As such your statement that Rahu aspects Saturn

from 7th is confusing me. Because of this, we cannot assume that Saturn gets the signification of 7th.

Saturn is in the star of Moon in 4th a negative houe. We cannot assume that Moon is in 7th in place of Rahu. On the contrary, Rahu will signify as agent 4th house where Moon occupies. I request you kindly to correct me, if I am wrong. For the reasons sta\ted in my mail to shri VGR Pavan, this chart is really puzzle to me so far as Saturn coming as

Bhukthi and Anthara lord on the date of marriage. I very much doubt whether it is a first marriage or second one,

as on the dat e of marriage the native has completed his 42 years of age. I have sought for clarification from him.

I request for your comment please.

 

Thanking you,

 

Astrologically yours,

 

K.S.V.Ramani

 

 

-

adith kasinath.g.k

Sunday, August 02, 2009 6:59 PM

Re: One riddle I could't solve

Dear Suprakash ji,First of all I like to convey that I am not an elder Kp lover! (39 yrs). Hope I am still young!!!My analysis is follows:Rahu is posited in Moon sign and in 7th house.Hence if any planet is in Moon star, Rahu representing Moon will play role also. ( as I ever say nodes are "Multi faced Weapons")Hence the planets in Rahu star and also Moon star is capable of favoring marriage. The planets who in the sub of planets who are in the star of Rahu or Moon also capable of giving marriage. (But the panets should not negate strongly .)As said Guru in the star of Rahu is a strong significator of Marriage.Saturn has the following significations:Saturn signifies 2 as lordship (though it is occupied by Jupiter, Saturn is in its own sign). But as no planet in its star, it also signifies secondarily the 2nd.Moreover it is in the star of Moon (represented by Rahu posited in its sign). It is in the sub of Mercury (feebly signifies 7 as lordship) posited in 5. But Mercury is in Sun star signfies 4,8 and also 5 through its star lord Venus. This 5 is also favorable for marriage.Saturn is also aspected by Rahu from 7 also.The other strong planet in Moon star is Venus who signifies 5, and also 2,7 though its sublord Jupiter.Mercury is in the sub of Venus who is in the star of Moon. Hence Mercury is also capable of favoring marraige provided they do not negate the event. Mercury is the lord of 7 posited in Sun star in4. But Sun is in Venus star in 5. Mercury is in Venus star in 5. Venus is in Moon star (in 4. but signfies 7 through Rahu). The DBAS as per my sw on 9/Feb/2005 is Jup-Sat-Sat-Venusthe day was Mercury day.Transit : Sign-star-subMoon -Sat -Mars (Mars in Mer star in 5)-Sat Jupiter-Mercury-Mars-RahuSat- Mercury-Jupiter-venusVenus-Sat-Moon-JupiterRegardsAdithwww.thebestastro.com

On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 11:30 PM, S.Ghosh <suprakash.ghosh (AT) cesc (DOT) co.in> wrote:

 

 

Dear allI seek comments from all members particularly elder KP lovers regarding a chart for which I could not find any clue regarding the marriage time.DOB 04-05-196210:58 PMHowrahMaleHis marriage was on 09-02-2005 during Jup-Sat-sat-KetJupiter is a strong significator for marriage, no doubt about it.But why Saturn? Saturn is so strong that it triggered the event in its own antara.RegardsSuprakash

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Dear Mr Ramani

 

This is a first marriage, however married life is not happy. They are now separated,waiting for divirce.The guy complains that his wife used to harass and physicall abuse him every day night.I don't know if its a problem of sexual in nature.

 

Regards

 

Suprakash

 

 

-

kadavasal ramani

Monday, August 03, 2009 9:26 AM

Re: One riddle I could't solveMoon in 7th in plazce of

 

Dear Adithji,

 

I request you kindly to see my mail to Shri VGR Pavanji this morning. I agree that RAHU, a node in the sign of Moon is agent of

Moon and not Moon is to follow Rahu's signification. Rahu's Rasi lord Moon is in 4th a negative house for marriage. So Rahu is to give the result of 4th only. Reg. Saturn, a self strength planet (no planet is in its stars), his occupation sign only isd to be considered in KP system aznd not lordship. He is the CSL of 10th cusp, a negative houxe for marriage. In KP system, node

has no aspect of his own. Aspect of other planets only on it is considered. As such your statement that Rahu aspects Saturn

from 7th is confusing me. Because of this, we cannot assume that Saturn gets the signification of 7th.

Saturn is in the star of Moon in 4th a negative houe. We cannot assume that Moon is in 7th in place of Rahu. On the contrary, Rahu will signify as agent 4th house where Moon occupies. I request you kindly to correct me, if I am wrong. For the reasons sta\ted in my mail to shri VGR Pavan, this chart is really puzzle to me so far as Saturn coming as

Bhukthi and Anthara lord on the date of marriage. I very much doubt whether it is a first marriage or second one,

as on the dat e of marriage the native has completed his 42 years of age. I have sought for clarification from him.

I request for your comment please.

 

Thanking you,

 

Astrologically yours,

 

K.S.V.Ramani

 

 

-

adith kasinath.g.k

Sunday, August 02, 2009 6:59 PM

Re: One riddle I could't solve

Dear Suprakash ji,First of all I like to convey that I am not an elder Kp lover! (39 yrs). Hope I am still young!!!My analysis is follows:Rahu is posited in Moon sign and in 7th house.Hence if any planet is in Moon star, Rahu representing Moon will play role also. ( as I ever say nodes are "Multi faced Weapons")Hence the planets in Rahu star and also Moon star is capable of favoring marriage. The planets who in the sub of planets who are in the star of Rahu or Moon also capable of giving marriage. (But the panets should not negate strongly .)As said Guru in the star of Rahu is a strong significator of Marriage.Saturn has the following significations:Saturn signifies 2 as lordship (though it is occupied by Jupiter, Saturn is in its own sign). But as no planet in its star, it also signifies secondarily the 2nd.Moreover it is in the star of Moon (represented by Rahu posited in its sign). It is in the sub of Mercury (feebly signifies 7 as lordship) posited in 5. But Mercury is in Sun star signfies 4,8 and also 5 through its star lord Venus. This 5 is also favorable for marriage.Saturn is also aspected by Rahu from 7 also.The other strong planet in Moon star is Venus who signifies 5, and also 2,7 though its sublord Jupiter.Mercury is in the sub of Venus who is in the star of Moon. Hence Mercury is also capable of favoring marraige provided they do not negate the event. Mercury is the lord of 7 posited in Sun star in4. But Sun is in Venus star in 5. Mercury is in Venus star in 5. Venus is in Moon star (in 4. but signfies 7 through Rahu). The DBAS as per my sw on 9/Feb/2005 is Jup-Sat-Sat-Venusthe day was Mercury day.Transit : Sign-star-subMoon -Sat -Mars (Mars in Mer star in 5)-Sat Jupiter-Mercury-Mars-RahuSat- Mercury-Jupiter-venusVenus-Sat-Moon-JupiterRegardsAdithwww.thebestastro.com

On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 11:30 PM, S.Ghosh <suprakash.ghosh (AT) cesc (DOT) co.in> wrote:

 

 

 

Dear allI seek comments from all members particularly elder KP lovers regarding a chart for which I could not find any clue regarding the marriage time.DOB 04-05-196210:58 PMHowrahMaleHis marriage was on 09-02-2005 during Jup-Sat-sat-KetJupiter is a strong significator for marriage, no doubt about it.But why Saturn? Saturn is so strong that it triggered the event in its own antara.RegardsSuprakash

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Dear Ramani ji,Pls note the node will act as its signlord. Hence the planet in its signlord will also reflect the signfication of Rahu. I know most of us will not agree this. But I have read analysis in few examples in KP books (not 6 readers). In that Mars in whose sign Rahu is posited, acts as Rahu also. In the other way, Rahu representing Mars, acts for Mars and so. I dont remember the book names. I shall tell you when I recollect or find it from my collections.

Also pls note Nodes will represent the planets who are in thier star also. But all are depending on the other points also that strengthen or weaken the signfications Reg: The marraige at the late age: of cource I did not look into that. We shall wait for the feed back.

With RegardsAdith   www.thebestastro.comOn Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 9:26 AM, kadavasal ramani <kadavasalramani wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Adithji,

 

I request you  kindly to see my mail to Shri VGR Pavanji this morning.  I agree that RAHU, a node in the sign of Moon is agent of

Moon and not Moon is to follow Rahu's signification.  Rahu's Rasi lord Moon is in 4th a negative house for marriage. So Rahu is to give the result of 4th only.  Reg. Saturn, a self strength planet (no planet is in its stars), his occupation sign only isd to be considered in KP system aznd not lordship.  He is the CSL of 10th cusp, a negative houxe for marriage.  In KP system, node

has no aspect of his own.  Aspect of other planets only on it is considered. As such your statement that Rahu aspects Saturn

from 7th is confusing me. Because of this, we cannot assume that Saturn gets the signification of 7th.

  Saturn is in the star of Moon in 4th a negative houe.  We cannot assume that Moon is in 7th in place of Rahu.  On the contrary, Rahu will signify as agent 4th house where Moon occupies.    I request you kindly to correct me, if I am wrong.  For the reasons sta\ted in my mail to shri VGR Pavan, this chart is really puzzle to me so far as Saturn coming as

Bhukthi and Anthara lord on the date of marriage.  I very much doubt whether it is a first marriage or second one,

as on the dat e of marriage the native has completed his 42 years of age.  I have sought for clarification from him.

I request for your comment please.

 

Thanking you,

 

Astrologically yours,

 

K.S.V.Ramani

 

 

-

 

adith kasinath.g.k

Sunday, August 02, 2009 6:59 PM

Re: One riddle I could't solve

 

Dear Suprakash ji,First of all I like to convey that I am not an elder Kp lover! (39 yrs). Hope I am still young!!!My analysis is follows:Rahu is posited in Moon sign and in 7th house.Hence if any planet is in Moon star, Rahu representing Moon will play role also. ( as I ever say nodes are " Multi faced Weapons " )Hence the planets in Rahu star and also Moon star is capable of favoring marriage. The planets who in the sub of planets who are in the star of Rahu or Moon also capable of giving marriage. (But the panets should not negate strongly .)As said Guru in the star of Rahu is a strong significator of Marriage.Saturn has the following significations:Saturn signifies 2 as lordship (though it is occupied by Jupiter, Saturn is in its own sign). But as no planet in its star, it also signifies secondarily the 2nd.Moreover it is in the star of Moon (represented by Rahu posited in its sign). It is in the sub of Mercury (feebly signifies 7 as lordship) posited in 5. But Mercury is in Sun star signfies 4,8 and also 5 through its star lord Venus. This 5 is also favorable for marriage.Saturn is also aspected by Rahu from 7 also.The other strong planet in Moon star is Venus who signifies 5, and also 2,7 though its sublord Jupiter.Mercury is in the sub of Venus who is in the star of Moon. Hence Mercury is also capable of favoring marraige provided they do not negate the event. Mercury is the lord of 7 posited in Sun star in4. But Sun is in Venus star in 5. Mercury is in Venus star in 5. Venus is in Moon star (in 4. but signfies 7 through Rahu). The DBAS as per my sw on 9/Feb/2005 is Jup-Sat-Sat-Venusthe day was Mercury day.Transit : Sign-star-subMoon -Sat -Mars (Mars in Mer star in 5)-Sat Jupiter-Mercury-Mars-RahuSat- Mercury-Jupiter-venusVenus-Sat-Moon-JupiterRegardsAdithwww.thebestastro.com

On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 11:30 PM, S.Ghosh <suprakash.ghosh wrote:

 

 

 

Dear allI seek comments from all members particularly elder KP lovers regarding a chart for which I could not find any clue regarding the marriage time.DOB 04-05-196210:58 PMHowrahMaleHis marriage was on 09-02-2005 during Jup-Sat-sat-KetJupiter is a strong significator for marriage, no doubt about it.But why Saturn? Saturn is so strong that it triggered the event in its own antara.RegardsSuprakash

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Adithji

You have said,

"Also pls note Nodes will represent the planets who are in thier star also." Does it mean if jup in star of rahu, rahu will give the result of Jup ? If so, Can you please give the reference?

 

Regards

 

Suprakash

 

 

 

 

 

-

adith kasinath.g.k

Monday, August 03, 2009 1:37 PM

Re: One riddle I could't solveMoon in 7th in plazce of

Dear Ramani ji,Pls note the node will act as its signlord. Hence the planet in its signlord will also reflect the signfication of Rahu. I know most of us will not agree this. But I have read analysis in few examples in KP books (not 6 readers). In that Mars in whose sign Rahu is posited, acts as Rahu also. In the other way, Rahu representing Mars, acts for Mars and so. I dont remember the book names. I shall tell you when I recollect or find it from my collections.Also pls note Nodes will represent the planets who are in thier star also. But all are depending on the other points also that strengthen or weaken the signfications Reg: The marraige at the late age: of cource I did not look into that. We shall wait for the feed back.With RegardsAdith www.thebestastro.com

On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 9:26 AM, kadavasal ramani <kadavasalramani > wrote:

 

 

 

Dear Adithji,

 

I request you kindly to see my mail to Shri VGR Pavanji this morning. I agree that RAHU, a node in the sign of Moon is agent of

Moon and not Moon is to follow Rahu's signification. Rahu's Rasi lord Moon is in 4th a negative house for marriage. So Rahu is to give the result of 4th only. Reg. Saturn, a self strength planet (no planet is in its stars), his occupation sign only isd to be considered in KP system aznd not lordship. He is the CSL of 10th cusp, a negative houxe for marriage. In KP system, node

has no aspect of his own. Aspect of other planets only on it is considered. As such your statement that Rahu aspects Saturn

from 7th is confusing me. Because of this, we cannot assume that Saturn gets the signification of 7th.

Saturn is in the star of Moon in 4th a negative houe. We cannot assume that Moon is in 7th in place of Rahu. On the contrary, Rahu will signify as agent 4th house where Moon occupies. I request you kindly to correct me, if I am wrong. For the reasons sta\ted in my mail to shri VGR Pavan, this chart is really puzzle to me so far as Saturn coming as

Bhukthi and Anthara lord on the date of marriage. I very much doubt whether it is a first marriage or second one,

as on the dat e of marriage the native has completed his 42 years of age. I have sought for clarification from him.

I request for your comment please.

 

Thanking you,

 

Astrologically yours,

 

K.S.V.Ramani

 

 

-

adith kasinath.g.k

Sunday, August 02, 2009 6:59 PM

Re: One riddle I could't solve

Dear Suprakash ji,First of all I like to convey that I am not an elder Kp lover! (39 yrs). Hope I am still young!!!My analysis is follows:Rahu is posited in Moon sign and in 7th house.Hence if any planet is in Moon star, Rahu representing Moon will play role also. ( as I ever say nodes are "Multi faced Weapons")Hence the planets in Rahu star and also Moon star is capable of favoring marriage. The planets who in the sub of planets who are in the star of Rahu or Moon also capable of giving marriage. (But the panets should not negate strongly .)As said Guru in the star of Rahu is a strong significator of Marriage.Saturn has the following significations:Saturn signifies 2 as lordship (though it is occupied by Jupiter, Saturn is in its own sign). But as no planet in its star, it also signifies secondarily the 2nd.Moreover it is in the star of Moon (represented by Rahu posited in its sign). It is in the sub of Mercury (feebly signifies 7 as lordship) posited in 5. But Mercury is in Sun star signfies 4,8 and also 5 through its star lord Venus. This 5 is also favorable for marriage.Saturn is also aspected by Rahu from 7 also.The other strong planet in Moon star is Venus who signifies 5, and also 2,7 though its sublord Jupiter.Mercury is in the sub of Venus who is in the star of Moon. Hence Mercury is also capable of favoring marraige provided they do not negate the event. Mercury is the lord of 7 posited in Sun star in4. But Sun is in Venus star in 5. Mercury is in Venus star in 5. Venus is in Moon star (in 4. but signfies 7 through Rahu). The DBAS as per my sw on 9/Feb/2005 is Jup-Sat-Sat-Venusthe day was Mercury day.Transit : Sign-star-subMoon -Sat -Mars (Mars in Mer star in 5)-Sat Jupiter-Mercury-Mars-RahuSat- Mercury-Jupiter-venusVenus-Sat-Moon-JupiterRegardsAdithwww.thebestastro.com

On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 11:30 PM, S.Ghosh <suprakash.ghosh (AT) cesc (DOT) co.in> wrote:

 

 

 

Dear allI seek comments from all members particularly elder KP lovers regarding a chart for which I could not find any clue regarding the marriage time.DOB 04-05-196210:58 PMHowrahMaleHis marriage was on 09-02-2005 during Jup-Sat-sat-KetJupiter is a strong significator for marriage, no doubt about it.But why Saturn? Saturn is so strong that it triggered the event in its own antara.RegardsSuprakash

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Dear Adithji,

I remember to have read that when a node is posited in any sign consider that the sign lord and Star lord are posited at that point. So theoritically all three are posited at that point of zodiac and all are significatrs of that house. But I do not remember to have ever read that if Rahu is in Mars sign Mars acts as Rahu. So I do not think that it is a rule but some one might have applied so. It needs to be examined and verified whether it is genuin. Let us wait to see opinion of others.

Dr. Rath.

 

 

 

adith kasinath.g.k <gkadithkasinath Sent: Monday, August 3, 2009 1:37:40 PMRe: One riddle I could't solveMoon in 7th in plazce of

Dear Ramani ji,Pls note the node will act as its signlord. Hence the planet in its signlord will also reflect the signfication of Rahu. I know most of us will not agree this. But I have read analysis in few examples in KP books (not 6 readers). In that Mars in whose sign Rahu is posited, acts as Rahu also. In the other way, Rahu representing Mars, acts for Mars and so. I dont remember the book names. I shall tell you when I recollect or find it from my collections.Also pls note Nodes will represent the planets who are in thier star also. But all are depending on the other points also that strengthen or weaken the signfications Reg: The marraige at the late age: of cource I did not look into that. We shall wait for the feed back.With RegardsAdith www.thebestastro. com

On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 9:26 AM, kadavasal ramani <kadavasalramani@ gmail.com> wrote:

 

 

 

 

Dear Adithji,

 

I request you kindly to see my mail to Shri VGR Pavanji this morning. I agree that RAHU, a node in the sign of Moon is agent of

Moon and not Moon is to follow Rahu's signification. Rahu's Rasi lord Moon is in 4th a negative house for marriage. So Rahu is to give the result of 4th only. Reg. Saturn, a self strength planet (no planet is in its stars), his occupation sign only isd to be considered in KP system aznd not lordship. He is the CSL of 10th cusp, a negative houxe for marriage. In KP system, node

has no aspect of his own. Aspect of other planets only on it is considered. As such your statement that Rahu aspects Saturn

from 7th is confusing me. Because of this, we cannot assume that Saturn gets the signification of 7th.

Saturn is in the star of Moon in 4th a negative houe. We cannot assume that Moon is in 7th in place of Rahu. On the contrary, Rahu will signify as agent 4th house where Moon occupies. I request you kindly to correct me, if I am wrong. For the reasons sta\ted in my mail to shri VGR Pavan, this chart is really puzzle to me so far as Saturn coming as

Bhukthi and Anthara lord on the date of marriage. I very much doubt whether it is a first marriage or second one,

as on the dat e of marriage the native has completed his 42 years of age. I have sought for clarification from him.

I request for your comment please.

 

Thanking you,

 

Astrologically yours,

 

K.S.V.Ramani

 

 

-

adith kasinath.g.k

@gro ups.com

Sunday, August 02, 2009 6:59 PM

Re: One riddle I could't solve

Dear Suprakash ji,First of all I like to convey that I am not an elder Kp lover! (39 yrs). Hope I am still young!!!My analysis is follows:Rahu is posited in Moon sign and in 7th house.Hence if any planet is in Moon star, Rahu representing Moon will play role also. ( as I ever say nodes are "Multi faced Weapons")Hence the planets in Rahu star and also Moon star is capable of favoring marriage. The planets who in the sub of planets who are in the star of Rahu or Moon also capable of giving marriage. (But the panets should not negate strongly .)As said Guru in the star of Rahu is a strong significator of Marriage.Saturn has the following significations:Saturn signifies 2 as lordship (though it is occupied by Jupiter, Saturn is in its own sign). But as no planet in its star, it also signifies secondarily the 2nd.Moreover it is in the star of Moon (represented by Rahu posited in its

sign). It is in the sub of Mercury (feebly signifies 7 as lordship) posited in 5. But Mercury is in Sun star signfies 4,8 and also 5 through its star lord Venus. This 5 is also favorable for marriage.Saturn is also aspected by Rahu from 7 also.The other strong planet in Moon star is Venus who signifies 5, and also 2,7 though its sublord Jupiter.Mercury is in the sub of Venus who is in the star of Moon. Hence Mercury is also capable of favoring marraige provided they do not negate the event. Mercury is the lord of 7 posited in Sun star in4. But Sun is in Venus star in 5. Mercury is in Venus star in 5. Venus is in Moon star (in 4. but signfies 7 through Rahu). The DBAS as per my sw on 9/Feb/2005 is Jup-Sat-Sat- Venusthe day was Mercury day.Transit : Sign-star-subMoon -Sat -Mars (Mars in Mer star in 5)-Sat Jupiter-Mercury- Mars-RahuSat- Mercury-Jupiter-

venusVenus-Sat-Moon- JupiterRegardsAdithwww.thebestastro. com

On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 11:30 PM, S.Ghosh <suprakash.ghosh@ cesc.co.in> wrote:

 

 

 

Dear allI seek comments from all members particularly elder KP lovers regarding a chart for which I could not find any clue regarding the marriage time.DOB 04-05-196210:58 PMHowrahMaleHis marriage was on 09-02-2005 during Jup-Sat-sat- KetJupiter is a strong significator for marriage, no doubt about it.But why Saturn? Saturn is so strong that it triggered the event in its own antara.RegardsSuprakash

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Dear all KP Astrologers

 

Namaskar

 

Regarding Rahu and Kethu (Shadow Planets) .The Rules of the Shadow

Planets as follows:

 

1) It will represent in which star it is placed,

11) Aspect of Rahu and Ketu of any Planet will represnt the significator of that

planets

 

111) The sign lord in which the nodes are placed are also the significator of

the nodes

 

Thanking you

 

Mohan kumar

 

KP Astrologer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

, Luther Rath <rathluther wrote:

>

> Dear Adithji,

> I remember to have read that when a node is posited in any sign consider that

the sign lord and Star lord are posited at that point. So theoritically all

three are posited at that point of zodiac and all are significatrs of that

house. But I do not remember to have ever read that if Rahu is in Mars sign Mars

acts as Rahu. So I do not think that it is a rule but some one might have

applied so. It needs to be examined and verified whether it is genuin. Let us

wait to see opinion of others.

> Dr. Rath.

>

>

>

>

> ________________________________

> adith kasinath.g.k <gkadithkasinath

>

> Monday, August 3, 2009 1:37:40 PM

> Re: One riddle I could't solveMoon in 7th in plazce of

>

>  

> Dear Ramani ji,

>

> Pls note the node will act as its signlord. Hence the planet in its signlord

will also reflect the signfication of Rahu. I know most of us will not agree

this. But I have read analysis in few examples in KP books (not 6 readers). In

that Mars in whose sign Rahu is posited, acts as Rahu also. In the other way,

Rahu representing Mars, acts for Mars and so. I dont remember the book names. I

shall tell you when I recollect or find it from my collections.

>

> Also pls note Nodes will represent the planets who are in thier star also.

> But all are depending on the other points also that strengthen or weaken the

signfications

>

> Reg: The marraige at the late age: of cource I did not look into that. We

shall wait for the feed back.

>

> With Regards

> Adith  

>

> www.thebestastro. com

>

>

> On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 9:26 AM, kadavasal ramani <kadavasalramani@ gmail.com>

wrote:

>

>  

> >Dear Adithji,

> > 

> >I request you  kindly to see my mail to Shri VGR Pavanji this morning.  I

agree that RAHU, a node in the sign of Moon is agent of

> >Moon and not Moon is to follow Rahu's signification.  Rahu's Rasi lord Moon

is in 4th a negative house for marriage. So Rahu is to give the result of 4th

only.  Reg. Saturn, a self strength planet (no planet is in its stars), his

occupation sign only isd to be considered in KP system aznd not lordship.  He is

the CSL of 10th cusp, a negative houxe for marriage.  In KP system, node

> >has no aspect of his own.  Aspect of other planets only on it is considered.

As such your statement that Rahu aspects Saturn

> >from 7th is confusing me. Because of this, we cannot assume that Saturn gets

the signification of 7th.

> >  Saturn is in the star of Moon in 4th a negative houe.  We cannot assume

that Moon is in 7th in place of Rahu.  On the contrary, Rahu will signify as

agent 4th house where Moon occupies.    I request you kindly to correct me, if I

am wrong.  For the reasons sta\ted in my mail to shri VGR Pavan, this chart is

really puzzle to me so far as Saturn coming as

> >Bhukthi and Anthara lord on the date of marriage.  I very much doubt whether

it is a first marriage or second one,

> >as on the dat e of marriage the native has completed his 42 years of age.  I

have sought for clarification from him.

> >I request for your comment please.

> >

> >Thanking you,

> > 

> >Astrologically yours,

> > 

> >K.S.V.Ramani

> >

> >>

> >>-

> >>adith kasinath.g.k

> >>@gro ups.com

> >>Sunday, August 02, 2009 6:59 PM

> >>Re: One riddle I could't solve

> >>

> >> 

> >>Dear Suprakash ji,

> >>

> >>First of all I like to convey that I am not an elder Kp lover! (39 yrs).

Hope I am still young!!!

> >>

> >>My analysis is follows:

> >>

> >>Rahu is posited in Moon sign and in 7th house.

> >>

> >>Hence if any planet is in Moon star, Rahu representing Moon will play role

also. ( as I ever say nodes are " Multi faced Weapons " )

> >>

> >>Hence the planets in Rahu star and also Moon star is capable of favoring

marriage. The planets who in the sub of planets who are in the star of Rahu or

Moon also capable of giving marriage. (But the panets should not negate strongly

..)

> >>

> >>As said Guru in the star of Rahu is a strong significator of Marriage.

> >>Saturn has the following significations:

> >>

> >>Saturn signifies 2 as lordship (though it is occupied by Jupiter, Saturn is

in its own sign). But as no planet in its star, it also signifies secondarily

the 2nd.

> >>

> >>Moreover it is in the star of Moon (represented by Rahu posited in its

sign). It is in the sub of Mercury (feebly signifies 7 as lordship) posited in

5. But Mercury is in Sun star signfies 4,8 and also 5 through its star lord

Venus. This 5 is also favorable for marriage.

> >>

> >>Saturn is also aspected by Rahu from 7 also.

> >>

> >>The other strong planet in Moon star is Venus who signifies 5, and also 2,7

though its sublord Jupiter.

> >>

> >>Mercury is in the sub of Venus who is in the star of Moon. Hence Mercury is

also capable of favoring marraige provided they do not negate the event. Mercury

is the lord of 7 posited in Sun star in4. But Sun is in Venus star in 5. Mercury

is in Venus star in 5. Venus is in Moon star (in 4. but signfies 7 through

Rahu).

> >>

> >>The DBAS as per my sw on 9/Feb/2005 is

> >>Jup-Sat-Sat- Venus

> >>

> >>the day was Mercury day.

> >>Transit : Sign-star-sub

> >>Moon -Sat -Mars (Mars in Mer star in 5)-Sat

> >>Jupiter-Mercury- Mars-Rahu

> >>Sat- Mercury-Jupiter- venus

> >>Venus-Sat-Moon- Jupiter

> >>

> >>

> >>Regards

> >>Adith

> >>www.thebestastro. com

> >>

> >>

> >>On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 11:30 PM, S.Ghosh <suprakash.ghosh@ cesc.co.in>

wrote:

> >>

> >> 

> >>>Dear all

> >>>

> >>>I seek comments from all members particularly elder KP lovers regarding a

chart for which I could not find any clue regarding the marriage time.

> >>>

> >>>DOB 04-05-1962

> >>>10:58 PM

> >>>Howrah

> >>>Male

> >>>

> >>>His marriage was on 09-02-2005 during Jup-Sat-sat- Ket

> >>>

> >>>Jupiter is a strong significator for marriage, no doubt about it.

> >>>But why Saturn? Saturn is so strong that it triggered the event in its own

antara.

> >>>

> >>>Regards

> >>>

> >>>Suprakash

> >>>

> >>>

> >>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Dear Dr.Rath,Yes. I agree with youBut this is not a rule! Many things are yet to be examined with practical experiences.I have seen it is applied in few cases in some KP books. I dont recall.I shall furnish once I get it.

My opnion is : Why should we take " Mars will play the role of Rahu? " . In stead, we take " Rahu the representative of Mars will act for Mars " .hope practical experiments need for further affirmation.

But Nodes are the strongest to give such unexpected results.RegardsAdithOn Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 4:38 PM, Luther Rath <rathluther wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Adithji,

I remember to have read that when a node is posited in any sign consider that the sign lord and Star lord are posited at that point. So theoritically all three are posited at that point of zodiac and all are significatrs of that house. But I do not remember to have ever read that if Rahu is in Mars sign Mars acts as Rahu. So I do not think that it is a rule but some one might have applied so. It needs to be examined and verified whether it is genuin. Let us wait to see opinion of others.

Dr. Rath.

 

 

 

adith kasinath.g.k <gkadithkasinath

Monday, August 3, 2009 1:37:40 PMRe: One riddle I could't solveMoon in 7th in plazce of

 

Dear Ramani ji,Pls note the node will act as its signlord. Hence the planet in its signlord will also reflect the signfication of Rahu. I know most of us will not agree this. But I have read analysis in few examples in KP books (not 6 readers). In that Mars in whose sign Rahu is posited, acts as Rahu also. In the other way, Rahu representing Mars, acts for Mars and so. I dont remember the book names. I shall tell you when I recollect or find it from my collections.

Also pls note Nodes will represent the planets who are in thier star also. But all are depending on the other points also that strengthen or weaken the signfications Reg: The marraige at the late age: of cource I did not look into that. We shall wait for the feed back.

With RegardsAdith   www.thebestastro. com

On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 9:26 AM, kadavasal ramani <kadavasalramani@ gmail.com> wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Adithji,

 

I request you  kindly to see my mail to Shri VGR Pavanji this morning.  I agree that RAHU, a node in the sign of Moon is agent of

Moon and not Moon is to follow Rahu's signification.  Rahu's Rasi lord Moon is in 4th a negative house for marriage. So Rahu is to give the result of 4th only.  Reg. Saturn, a self strength planet (no planet is in its stars), his occupation sign only isd to be considered in KP system aznd not lordship.  He is the CSL of 10th cusp, a negative houxe for marriage.  In KP system, node

has no aspect of his own.  Aspect of other planets only on it is considered. As such your statement that Rahu aspects Saturn

from 7th is confusing me. Because of this, we cannot assume that Saturn gets the signification of 7th.

  Saturn is in the star of Moon in 4th a negative houe.  We cannot assume that Moon is in 7th in place of Rahu.  On the contrary, Rahu will signify as agent 4th house where Moon occupies.    I request you kindly to correct me, if I am wrong.  For the reasons sta\ted in my mail to shri VGR Pavan, this chart is really puzzle to me so far as Saturn coming as

Bhukthi and Anthara lord on the date of marriage.  I very much doubt whether it is a first marriage or second one,

as on the dat e of marriage the native has completed his 42 years of age.  I have sought for clarification from him.

I request for your comment please.

 

Thanking you,

 

Astrologically yours,

 

K.S.V.Ramani

 

 

-

adith kasinath.g.k

@gro ups.com

Sunday, August 02, 2009 6:59 PM

Re: One riddle I could't solve

 

Dear Suprakash ji,First of all I like to convey that I am not an elder Kp lover! (39 yrs). Hope I am still young!!!My analysis is follows:Rahu is posited in Moon sign and in 7th house.Hence if any planet is in Moon star, Rahu representing Moon will play role also. ( as I ever say nodes are " Multi faced Weapons " )

Hence the planets in Rahu star and also Moon star is capable of favoring marriage. The planets who in the sub of planets who are in the star of Rahu or Moon also capable of giving marriage. (But the panets should not negate strongly .)

As said Guru in the star of Rahu is a strong significator of Marriage.Saturn has the following significations:Saturn signifies 2 as lordship (though it is occupied by Jupiter, Saturn is in its own sign). But as no planet in its star, it also signifies secondarily the 2nd.

Moreover it is in the star of Moon (represented by Rahu posited in its

sign). It is in the sub of Mercury (feebly signifies 7 as lordship) posited in 5. But Mercury is in Sun star signfies 4,8 and also 5 through its star lord Venus. This 5 is also favorable for marriage.Saturn is also aspected by Rahu from 7 also.

The other strong planet in Moon star is Venus who signifies 5, and also 2,7 though its sublord Jupiter.Mercury is in the sub of Venus who is in the star of Moon. Hence Mercury is also capable of favoring marraige provided they do not negate the event. Mercury is the lord of 7 posited in Sun star in4. But Sun is in Venus star in 5. Mercury is in Venus star in 5. Venus is in Moon star (in 4. but signfies 7 through Rahu).

The DBAS as per my sw on 9/Feb/2005 is Jup-Sat-Sat- Venusthe day was Mercury day.Transit : Sign-star-subMoon -Sat -Mars (Mars in Mer star in 5)-Sat Jupiter-Mercury- Mars-RahuSat- Mercury-Jupiter-

venusVenus-Sat-Moon- JupiterRegardsAdithwww.thebestastro. com

On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 11:30 PM, S.Ghosh <suprakash.ghosh@ cesc.co.in> wrote:

 

 

 

 

Dear allI seek comments from all members particularly elder KP lovers regarding a chart for which I could not find any clue regarding the marriage time.DOB 04-05-196210:58 PMHowrahMale

His marriage was on 09-02-2005 during Jup-Sat-sat- KetJupiter is a strong significator for marriage, no doubt about it.But why Saturn? Saturn is so strong that it triggered the event in its own antara.

RegardsSuprakash

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Dear Suprakash ji,I shall give the reference once I recollect it. Hope in this forum also I have read in an article about the Nodes..RegardsAdithwww.thebestastro.com

On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 4:25 PM, Suprakash Ghosh <suprakash.ghosh wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Adithji

You have said,

" Also pls note Nodes will represent the planets who are in thier star also. " Does it mean if jup in star of rahu, rahu will give the result of Jup ? If so, Can you please give the reference?

 

Regards

 

Suprakash

 

 

 

 

 

-

 

adith kasinath.g.k

Monday, August 03, 2009 1:37 PM

Re: One riddle I could't solveMoon in 7th in plazce of

 

Dear Ramani ji,Pls note the node will act as its signlord. Hence the planet in its signlord will also reflect the signfication of Rahu. I know most of us will not agree this. But I have read analysis in few examples in KP books (not 6 readers). In that Mars in whose sign Rahu is posited, acts as Rahu also. In the other way, Rahu representing Mars, acts for Mars and so. I dont remember the book names. I shall tell you when I recollect or find it from my collections.Also pls note Nodes will represent the planets who are in thier star also. But all are depending on the other points also that strengthen or weaken the signfications Reg: The marraige at the late age: of cource I did not look into that. We shall wait for the feed back.With RegardsAdith   www.thebestastro.com

On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 9:26 AM, kadavasal ramani <kadavasalramani wrote:

 

 

 

 

Dear Adithji,

 

I request you  kindly to see my mail to Shri VGR Pavanji this morning.  I agree that RAHU, a node in the sign of Moon is agent of

Moon and not Moon is to follow Rahu's signification.  Rahu's Rasi lord Moon is in 4th a negative house for marriage. So Rahu is to give the result of 4th only.  Reg. Saturn, a self strength planet (no planet is in its stars), his occupation sign only isd to be considered in KP system aznd not lordship.  He is the CSL of 10th cusp, a negative houxe for marriage.  In KP system, node

has no aspect of his own.  Aspect of other planets only on it is considered. As such your statement that Rahu aspects Saturn

from 7th is confusing me. Because of this, we cannot assume that Saturn gets the signification of 7th.

  Saturn is in the star of Moon in 4th a negative houe.  We cannot assume that Moon is in 7th in place of Rahu.  On the contrary, Rahu will signify as agent 4th house where Moon occupies.    I request you kindly to correct me, if I am wrong.  For the reasons sta\ted in my mail to shri VGR Pavan, this chart is really puzzle to me so far as Saturn coming as

Bhukthi and Anthara lord on the date of marriage.  I very much doubt whether it is a first marriage or second one,

as on the dat e of marriage the native has completed his 42 years of age.  I have sought for clarification from him.

I request for your comment please.

 

Thanking you,

 

Astrologically yours,

 

K.S.V.Ramani

 

 

-

adith kasinath.g.k

Sunday, August 02, 2009 6:59 PM

Re: One riddle I could't solve

 

Dear Suprakash ji,First of all I like to convey that I am not an elder Kp lover! (39 yrs). Hope I am still young!!!My analysis is follows:Rahu is posited in Moon sign and in 7th house.Hence if any planet is in Moon star, Rahu representing Moon will play role also. ( as I ever say nodes are " Multi faced Weapons " )Hence the planets in Rahu star and also Moon star is capable of favoring marriage. The planets who in the sub of planets who are in the star of Rahu or Moon also capable of giving marriage. (But the panets should not negate strongly .)As said Guru in the star of Rahu is a strong significator of Marriage.Saturn has the following significations:Saturn signifies 2 as lordship (though it is occupied by Jupiter, Saturn is in its own sign). But as no planet in its star, it also signifies secondarily the 2nd.Moreover it is in the star of Moon (represented by Rahu posited in its sign). It is in the sub of Mercury (feebly signifies 7 as lordship) posited in 5. But Mercury is in Sun star signfies 4,8 and also 5 through its star lord Venus. This 5 is also favorable for marriage.Saturn is also aspected by Rahu from 7 also.The other strong planet in Moon star is Venus who signifies 5, and also 2,7 though its sublord Jupiter.Mercury is in the sub of Venus who is in the star of Moon. Hence Mercury is also capable of favoring marraige provided they do not negate the event. Mercury is the lord of 7 posited in Sun star in4. But Sun is in Venus star in 5. Mercury is in Venus star in 5. Venus is in Moon star (in 4. but signfies 7 through Rahu). The DBAS as per my sw on 9/Feb/2005 is Jup-Sat-Sat-Venusthe day was Mercury day.Transit : Sign-star-subMoon -Sat -Mars (Mars in Mer star in 5)-Sat Jupiter-Mercury-Mars-RahuSat- Mercury-Jupiter-venusVenus-Sat-Moon-JupiterRegardsAdithwww.thebestastro.com

On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 11:30 PM, S.Ghosh <suprakash.ghosh wrote:

 

 

 

 

Dear allI seek comments from all members particularly elder KP lovers regarding a chart for which I could not find any clue regarding the marriage time.DOB 04-05-196210:58 PMHowrahMaleHis marriage was on 09-02-2005 during Jup-Sat-sat-KetJupiter is a strong significator for marriage, no doubt about it.But why Saturn? Saturn is so strong that it triggered the event in its own antara.RegardsSuprakash

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Dear Suprakashji,

 

Thanks for your informtion. The unhappy married life was predicted by Shri Adithji beforehand. The reason is to be probed.

 

Truly yours,

 

K.S.V.Ramani

 

 

 

-

Suprakash Ghosh

Monday, August 03, 2009 1:08 PM

Re: One riddle I could't solveMoon in 7th in plazce of

 

Dear Mr Ramani

 

This is a first marriage, however married life is not happy. They are now separated,waiting for divirce.The guy complains that his wife used to harass and physicall abuse him every day night.I don't know if its a problem of sexual in nature.

 

Regards

 

Suprakash

 

 

-

kadavasal ramani

Monday, August 03, 2009 9:26 AM

Re: One riddle I could't solveMoon in 7th in plazce of

 

Dear Adithji,

 

I request you kindly to see my mail to Shri VGR Pavanji this morning. I agree that RAHU, a node in the sign of Moon is agent of

Moon and not Moon is to follow Rahu's signification. Rahu's Rasi lord Moon is in 4th a negative house for marriage. So Rahu is to give the result of 4th only. Reg. Saturn, a self strength planet (no planet is in its stars), his occupation sign only isd to be considered in KP system aznd not lordship. He is the CSL of 10th cusp, a negative houxe for marriage. In KP system, node

has no aspect of his own. Aspect of other planets only on it is considered. As such your statement that Rahu aspects Saturn

from 7th is confusing me. Because of this, we cannot assume that Saturn gets the signification of 7th.

Saturn is in the star of Moon in 4th a negative houe. We cannot assume that Moon is in 7th in place of Rahu. On the contrary, Rahu will signify as agent 4th house where Moon occupies. I request you kindly to correct me, if I am wrong. For the reasons sta\ted in my mail to shri VGR Pavan, this chart is really puzzle to me so far as Saturn coming as

Bhukthi and Anthara lord on the date of marriage. I very much doubt whether it is a first marriage or second one,

as on the dat e of marriage the native has completed his 42 years of age. I have sought for clarification from him.

I request for your comment please.

 

Thanking you,

 

Astrologically yours,

 

K.S.V.Ramani

 

 

-

adith kasinath.g.k

Sunday, August 02, 2009 6:59 PM

Re: One riddle I could't solve

Dear Suprakash ji,First of all I like to convey that I am not an elder Kp lover! (39 yrs). Hope I am still young!!!My analysis is follows:Rahu is posited in Moon sign and in 7th house.Hence if any planet is in Moon star, Rahu representing Moon will play role also. ( as I ever say nodes are "Multi faced Weapons")Hence the planets in Rahu star and also Moon star is capable of favoring marriage. The planets who in the sub of planets who are in the star of Rahu or Moon also capable of giving marriage. (But the panets should not negate strongly .)As said Guru in the star of Rahu is a strong significator of Marriage.Saturn has the following significations:Saturn signifies 2 as lordship (though it is occupied by Jupiter, Saturn is in its own sign). But as no planet in its star, it also signifies secondarily the 2nd.Moreover it is in the star of Moon (represented by Rahu posited in its sign). It is in the sub of Mercury (feebly signifies 7 as lordship) posited in 5. But Mercury is in Sun star signfies 4,8 and also 5 through its star lord Venus. This 5 is also favorable for marriage.Saturn is also aspected by Rahu from 7 also.The other strong planet in Moon star is Venus who signifies 5, and also 2,7 though its sublord Jupiter.Mercury is in the sub of Venus who is in the star of Moon. Hence Mercury is also capable of favoring marraige provided they do not negate the event. Mercury is the lord of 7 posited in Sun star in4. But Sun is in Venus star in 5. Mercury is in Venus star in 5. Venus is in Moon star (in 4. but signfies 7 through Rahu). The DBAS as per my sw on 9/Feb/2005 is Jup-Sat-Sat-Venusthe day was Mercury day.Transit : Sign-star-subMoon -Sat -Mars (Mars in Mer star in 5)-Sat Jupiter-Mercury-Mars-RahuSat- Mercury-Jupiter-venusVenus-Sat-Moon-JupiterRegardsAdithwww.thebestastro.com

On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 11:30 PM, S.Ghosh <suprakash.ghosh (AT) cesc (DOT) co.in> wrote:

 

 

 

Dear allI seek comments from all members particularly elder KP lovers regarding a chart for which I could not find any clue regarding the marriage time.DOB 04-05-196210:58 PMHowrahMaleHis marriage was on 09-02-2005 during Jup-Sat-sat-KetJupiter is a strong significator for marriage, no doubt about it.But why Saturn? Saturn is so strong that it triggered the event in its own antara.RegardsSuprakash

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Dear Friends,

" Also pls note Nodes will represent the planets who are in thier star

also. " is not KP rule but by PM Shanmugam and N. Pandu or N.

Santhanalingam, as mentioned in point 2 of the message below.

/message/25891

Regards,

tw

 

 

, " adith kasinath.g.k " <gkadithkasinath

wrote:

>

> Dear Suprakash ji,

>

> I shall give the reference once I recollect it. Hope in this forum also I

> have read in an article about the Nodes..

>

> Regards

> Adith

>

> www.thebestastro.com

>

> On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 4:25 PM, Suprakash Ghosh

> <suprakash.ghoshwrote:

>

> >

> >

> > Adithji

> > You have said,

> > " Also pls note Nodes will represent the planets who are in thier star

> > also. "

> > Does it mean if jup in star of rahu, rahu will give the result of Jup ? If

> > so, Can you please give the reference?

> >

> > Regards

> >

> > Suprakash

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > -

> > ** adith kasinath.g.k <gkadithkasinath

> > *To:*

> > *Sent:* Monday, August 03, 2009 1:37 PM

> > *Subject:* Re: One riddle I could't solveMoon in 7th in

> > plazce of

> >

> >

> >

> > Dear Ramani ji,

> >

> > Pls note the node will act as its signlord. Hence the planet in its

> > signlord will also reflect the signfication of Rahu. I know most of us will

> > not agree this. But I have read analysis in few examples in KP books (not 6

> > readers). In that Mars in whose sign Rahu is posited, acts as Rahu also. In

> > the other way, Rahu representing Mars, acts for Mars and so. I dont remember

> > the book names. I shall tell you when I recollect or find it from my

> > collections.

> >

> > Also pls note Nodes will represent the planets who are in thier star also.

> > But all are depending on the other points also that strengthen or weaken

> > the signfications

> >

> > Reg: The marraige at the late age: of cource I did not look into that. We

> > shall wait for the feed back.

> >

> > With Regards

> > Adith

> >

> > www.thebestastro.com

> >

> > On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 9:26 AM, kadavasal ramani <

> > kadavasalramani wrote:

> >

> >>

> >>

> >> Dear Adithji,

> >>

> >> I request you kindly to see my mail to Shri VGR Pavanji this morning. I

> >> agree that RAHU, a node in the sign of Moon is agent of

> >> Moon and not Moon is to follow Rahu's signification. Rahu's Rasi lord

> >> Moon is in 4th a negative house for marriage. So Rahu is to give the result

> >> of 4th only. Reg. Saturn, a self strength planet (no planet is in its

> >> stars), his occupation sign only isd to be considered in KP system aznd not

> >> lordship. He is the CSL of 10th cusp, a negative houxe for marriage. In

KP

> >> system, node

> >> has no aspect of his own. Aspect of other planets only on it is

> >> considered. As such your statement that Rahu aspects Saturn

> >> from 7th is confusing me. Because of this, we cannot assume that Saturn

> >> gets the signification of 7th.

> >> Saturn is in the star of Moon in 4th a negative houe. We cannot assume

> >> that Moon is in 7th in place of Rahu. On the contrary, Rahu will signify

as

> >> agent 4th house where Moon occupies. I request you kindly to correct

> >> me, if I am wrong. For the reasons sta\ted in my mail to shri VGR Pavan,

> >> this chart is really puzzle to me so far as Saturn coming as

> >> Bhukthi and Anthara lord on the date of marriage. I very much doubt

> >> whether it is a first marriage or second one,

> >> as on the dat e of marriage the native has completed his 42 years of age.

> >> I have sought for clarification from him.

> >> I request for your comment please.

> >>

> >> Thanking you,

> >>

> >> Astrologically yours,

> >>

> >> K.S.V.Ramani

> >>

> >>

> >> -

> >> ** adith kasinath.g.k <gkadithkasinath

> >> *To:*

> >> *Sent:* Sunday, August 02, 2009 6:59 PM

> >> *Subject:* Re: One riddle I could't solve

> >>

> >>

> >>

> >> Dear Suprakash ji,

> >>

> >> First of all I like to convey that I am not an elder Kp lover! (39 yrs).

> >> Hope I am still young!!!

> >>

> >> My analysis is follows:

> >>

> >> Rahu is posited in Moon sign and in 7th house.

> >>

> >> Hence if any planet is in Moon star, Rahu representing Moon will play role

> >> also. ( as I ever say nodes are " Multi faced Weapons " )

> >>

> >> Hence the planets in Rahu star and also Moon star is capable of favoring

> >> marriage. The planets who in the sub of planets who are in the star of Rahu

> >> or Moon also capable of giving marriage. (But the panets should not negate

> >> strongly .)

> >>

> >> As said Guru in the star of Rahu is a strong significator of Marriage.

> >> *Saturn has the following significations:*

> >>

> >> Saturn signifies 2 as lordship (though it is occupied by Jupiter, Saturn

> >> is in its own sign). But as no planet in its star, it also signifies

> >> secondarily the 2nd.

> >>

> >> Moreover it is in the star of Moon (represented by Rahu posited in its

> >> sign). It is in the sub of Mercury (feebly signifies 7 as lordship) posited

> >> in 5. But Mercury is in Sun star signfies 4,8 and also 5 through its star

> >> lord Venus. This 5 is also favorable for marriage.

> >>

> >> Saturn is also aspected by Rahu from 7 also.

> >>

> >> The other strong planet in Moon star is *Venus* who signifies 5, and also

> >> 2,7 though its sublord Jupiter.

> >>

> >> *Mercury* is in the sub of Venus who is in the star of Moon. Hence

> >> Mercury is also capable of favoring marraige provided they do not negate

the

> >> event. Mercury is the lord of 7 posited in Sun star in4. But Sun is in

Venus

> >> star in 5. Mercury is in Venus star in 5. Venus is in Moon star (in 4. but

> >> signfies 7 through Rahu).

> >>

> >> The DBAS as per my sw on 9/Feb/2005 is

> >> *Jup-Sat-Sat-Venus*

> >>

> >> the day was Mercury day.

> >> Transit : Sign-star-sub

> >> Moon -Sat -Mars (Mars in Mer star in 5)-Sat

> >> Jupiter-Mercury-Mars-Rahu

> >> Sat- Mercury-Jupiter-venus

> >> Venus-Sat-Moon-Jupiter

> >>

> >>

> >> Regards

> >> Adith

> >> www.thebestastro.com

> >>

> >> On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 11:30 PM, S.Ghosh <suprakash.ghoshwrote:

> >>

> >>>

> >>>

> >>> Dear all

> >>>

> >>> I seek comments from all members particularly elder KP lovers regarding a

> >>> chart for which I could not find any clue regarding the marriage time.

> >>>

> >>> DOB 04-05-1962

> >>> 10:58 PM

> >>> Howrah

> >>> Male

> >>>

> >>> His marriage was on 09-02-2005 during Jup-Sat-sat-Ket

> >>>

> >>> Jupiter is a strong significator for marriage, no doubt about it.

> >>> But why Saturn? Saturn is so strong that it triggered the event in its

> >>> own antara.

> >>>

> >>> Regards

> >>>

> >>> Suprakash

> >>>

> >>>

> >>

> >

> >

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Yes, Adithji,

In the rules for Rahu and Kethu brought forth by Sri Lajmiji also I did not find that any planet offers the results of nodes. But in all rules the nodes offer results of other planets. Your statement needs further appliction to confirm it.

Dr. Rath

 

 

 

adith kasinath.g.k <gkadithkasinath Sent: Monday, August 3, 2009 7:19:17 PMRe: One riddle I could't solveMoon in 7th in plazce of

Dear Dr.Rath,Yes. I agree with youBut this is not a rule! Many things are yet to be examined with practical experiences.I have seen it is applied in few cases in some KP books. I dont recall.I shall furnish once I get it.My opnion is : Why should we take "Mars will play the role of Rahu?". In stead, we take "Rahu the representative of Mars will act for Mars".hope practical experiments need for further affirmation.But Nodes are the strongest to give such unexpected results.RegardsAdith

On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 4:38 PM, Luther Rath <rathluther > wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Adithji,

I remember to have read that when a node is posited in any sign consider that the sign lord and Star lord are posited at that point. So theoritically all three are posited at that point of zodiac and all are significatrs of that house. But I do not remember to have ever read that if Rahu is in Mars sign Mars acts as Rahu. So I do not think that it is a rule but some one might have applied so. It needs to be examined and verified whether it is genuin. Let us wait to see opinion of others.

Dr. Rath.

 

 

 

adith kasinath.g.k <gkadithkasinath@ gmail.com>

@gro ups.comMonday, August 3, 2009 1:37:40 PM

Re: One riddle I could't solveMoon in 7th in plazce of

Dear Ramani ji,

Pls note the node will act as its signlord. Hence the planet in its signlord will also reflect the signfication of Rahu. I know most of us will not agree this. But I have read analysis in few examples in KP books (not 6 readers). In that Mars in whose sign Rahu is posited, acts as Rahu also. In the other way, Rahu representing Mars, acts for Mars and so. I dont remember the book names. I shall tell you when I recollect or find it from my collections.Also pls note Nodes will represent the planets who are in thier star also. But all are depending on the other points also that strengthen or weaken the signfications Reg: The marraige at the late age: of cource I did not look into that. We shall wait for the feed back.With RegardsAdith www.thebestastro. com

 

On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 9:26 AM, kadavasal ramani <kadavasalramani@ gmail.com> wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Adithji,

 

I request you kindly to see my mail to Shri VGR Pavanji this morning. I agree that RAHU, a node in the sign of Moon is agent of

Moon and not Moon is to follow Rahu's signification. Rahu's Rasi lord Moon is in 4th a negative house for marriage. So Rahu is to give the result of 4th only. Reg. Saturn, a self strength planet (no planet is in its stars), his occupation sign only isd to be considered in KP system aznd not lordship. He is the CSL of 10th cusp, a negative houxe for marriage. In KP system, node

has no aspect of his own. Aspect of other planets only on it is considered. As such your statement that Rahu aspects Saturn

from 7th is confusing me. Because of this, we cannot assume that Saturn gets the signification of 7th.

Saturn is in the star of Moon in 4th a negative houe. We cannot assume that Moon is in 7th in place of Rahu. On the contrary, Rahu will signify as agent 4th house where Moon occupies. I request you kindly to correct me, if I am wrong. For the reasons sta\ted in my mail to shri VGR Pavan, this chart is really puzzle to me so far as Saturn coming as

Bhukthi and Anthara lord on the date of marriage. I very much doubt whether it is a first marriage or second one,

as on the dat e of marriage the native has completed his 42 years of age. I have sought for clarification from him.

I request for your comment please.

 

Thanking you,

 

Astrologically yours,

 

K.S.V.Ramani

 

 

 

-

adith kasinath.g.k

 

 

 

@gro ups.com

Sunday, August 02, 2009 6:59 PM

Re: One riddle I could't solve

Dear Suprakash ji,First of all I like to convey that I am not an elder Kp lover! (39 yrs). Hope I am still young!!!My analysis is follows:Rahu is posited in Moon sign and in 7th house.Hence if any planet is in Moon star, Rahu representing Moon will play role also. ( as I ever say nodes are "Multi faced Weapons")Hence the planets in Rahu star and also Moon star is capable of favoring marriage. The planets who in the sub of planets who are in the star of Rahu or Moon also capable of giving marriage. (But the panets should not negate strongly .)As said Guru in the star of Rahu is a strong significator of Marriage.Saturn has the following significations:Saturn signifies 2 as lordship (though it is occupied by Jupiter, Saturn is in its own sign). But as no planet in its star, it also signifies secondarily the 2nd.Moreover it is in the star of Moon (represented by Rahu posited in its

sign). It is in the sub of Mercury (feebly signifies 7 as lordship) posited in 5. But Mercury is in Sun star signfies 4,8 and also 5 through its star lord Venus. This 5 is also favorable for marriage.Saturn is also aspected by Rahu from 7 also.The other strong planet in Moon star is Venus who signifies 5, and also 2,7 though its sublord Jupiter.Mercury is in the sub of Venus who is in the star of Moon. Hence Mercury is also capable of favoring marraige provided they do not negate the event. Mercury is the lord of 7 posited in Sun star in4. But Sun is in Venus star in 5. Mercury is in Venus star in 5. Venus is in Moon star (in 4. but signfies 7 through Rahu). The DBAS as per my sw on 9/Feb/2005 is Jup-Sat-Sat- Venusthe day was Mercury day.Transit : Sign-star-subMoon -Sat -Mars (Mars in Mer star in 5)-Sat Jupiter-Mercury- Mars-RahuSat- Mercury-Jupiter-

venusVenus-Sat-Moon- JupiterRegardsAdithwww.thebestastro. com

On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 11:30 PM, S.Ghosh <suprakash.ghosh@ cesc.co.in> wrote:

 

 

 

Dear allI seek comments from all members particularly elder KP lovers regarding a chart for which I could not find any clue regarding the marriage time.DOB 04-05-196210:58 PMHowrahMaleHis marriage was on 09-02-2005 during Jup-Sat-sat- KetJupiter is a strong significator for marriage, no doubt about it.But why Saturn? Saturn is so strong that it triggered the event in its own antara.RegardsSuprakash

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Dear Twji,Thanks for your reference.RegardsAdithOn Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 8:05 AM, tw853 <tw853 wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Friends,

" Also pls note Nodes will represent the planets who are in thier star

also. " is not KP rule but by PM Shanmugam and N. Pandu or N.

Santhanalingam, as mentioned in point 2 of the message below.

/message/25891

Regards,

tw

 

, " adith kasinath.g.k " <gkadithkasinath wrote:

>

> Dear Suprakash ji,

>

> I shall give the reference once I recollect it. Hope in this forum also I

> have read in an article about the Nodes..

>

> Regards

> Adith

>

> www.thebestastro.com

>

> On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 4:25 PM, Suprakash Ghosh

> <suprakash.ghoshwrote:

>

> >

> >

> > Adithji

> > You have said,

> > " Also pls note Nodes will represent the planets who are in thier star

> > also. "

> > Does it mean if jup in star of rahu, rahu will give the result of Jup ? If

> > so, Can you please give the reference?

> >

> > Regards

> >

> > Suprakash

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > -

> > ** adith kasinath.g.k <gkadithkasinath

> > *To:*

> > *Sent:* Monday, August 03, 2009 1:37 PM

> > *Subject:* Re: One riddle I could't solveMoon in 7th in

> > plazce of

> >

> >

> >

> > Dear Ramani ji,

> >

> > Pls note the node will act as its signlord. Hence the planet in its

> > signlord will also reflect the signfication of Rahu. I know most of us will

> > not agree this. But I have read analysis in few examples in KP books (not 6

> > readers). In that Mars in whose sign Rahu is posited, acts as Rahu also. In

> > the other way, Rahu representing Mars, acts for Mars and so. I dont remember

> > the book names. I shall tell you when I recollect or find it from my

> > collections.

> >

> > Also pls note Nodes will represent the planets who are in thier star also.

> > But all are depending on the other points also that strengthen or weaken

> > the signfications

> >

> > Reg: The marraige at the late age: of cource I did not look into that. We

> > shall wait for the feed back.

> >

> > With Regards

> > Adith

> >

> > www.thebestastro.com

> >

> > On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 9:26 AM, kadavasal ramani <

> > kadavasalramani wrote:

> >

> >>

> >>

> >> Dear Adithji,

> >>

> >> I request you kindly to see my mail to Shri VGR Pavanji this morning. I

> >> agree that RAHU, a node in the sign of Moon is agent of

> >> Moon and not Moon is to follow Rahu's signification. Rahu's Rasi lord

> >> Moon is in 4th a negative house for marriage. So Rahu is to give the result

> >> of 4th only. Reg. Saturn, a self strength planet (no planet is in its

> >> stars), his occupation sign only isd to be considered in KP system aznd not

> >> lordship. He is the CSL of 10th cusp, a negative houxe for marriage. In KP

> >> system, node

> >> has no aspect of his own. Aspect of other planets only on it is

> >> considered. As such your statement that Rahu aspects Saturn

> >> from 7th is confusing me. Because of this, we cannot assume that Saturn

> >> gets the signification of 7th.

> >> Saturn is in the star of Moon in 4th a negative houe. We cannot assume

> >> that Moon is in 7th in place of Rahu. On the contrary, Rahu will signify as

> >> agent 4th house where Moon occupies. I request you kindly to correct

> >> me, if I am wrong. For the reasons sta\ted in my mail to shri VGR Pavan,

> >> this chart is really puzzle to me so far as Saturn coming as

> >> Bhukthi and Anthara lord on the date of marriage. I very much doubt

> >> whether it is a first marriage or second one,

> >> as on the dat e of marriage the native has completed his 42 years of age.

> >> I have sought for clarification from him.

> >> I request for your comment please.

> >>

> >> Thanking you,

> >>

> >> Astrologically yours,

> >>

> >> K.S.V.Ramani

> >>

> >>

> >> -

> >> ** adith kasinath.g.k <gkadithkasinath

> >> *To:*

> >> *Sent:* Sunday, August 02, 2009 6:59 PM

> >> *Subject:* Re: One riddle I could't solve

> >>

> >>

> >>

> >> Dear Suprakash ji,

> >>

> >> First of all I like to convey that I am not an elder Kp lover! (39 yrs).

> >> Hope I am still young!!!

> >>

> >> My analysis is follows:

> >>

> >> Rahu is posited in Moon sign and in 7th house.

> >>

> >> Hence if any planet is in Moon star, Rahu representing Moon will play role

> >> also. ( as I ever say nodes are " Multi faced Weapons " )

> >>

> >> Hence the planets in Rahu star and also Moon star is capable of favoring

> >> marriage. The planets who in the sub of planets who are in the star of Rahu

> >> or Moon also capable of giving marriage. (But the panets should not negate

> >> strongly .)

> >>

> >> As said Guru in the star of Rahu is a strong significator of Marriage.

> >> *Saturn has the following significations:*

> >>

> >> Saturn signifies 2 as lordship (though it is occupied by Jupiter, Saturn

> >> is in its own sign). But as no planet in its star, it also signifies

> >> secondarily the 2nd.

> >>

> >> Moreover it is in the star of Moon (represented by Rahu posited in its

> >> sign). It is in the sub of Mercury (feebly signifies 7 as lordship) posited

> >> in 5. But Mercury is in Sun star signfies 4,8 and also 5 through its star

> >> lord Venus. This 5 is also favorable for marriage.

> >>

> >> Saturn is also aspected by Rahu from 7 also.

> >>

> >> The other strong planet in Moon star is *Venus* who signifies 5, and also

> >> 2,7 though its sublord Jupiter.

> >>

> >> *Mercury* is in the sub of Venus who is in the star of Moon. Hence

> >> Mercury is also capable of favoring marraige provided they do not negate the

> >> event. Mercury is the lord of 7 posited in Sun star in4. But Sun is in Venus

> >> star in 5. Mercury is in Venus star in 5. Venus is in Moon star (in 4. but

> >> signfies 7 through Rahu).

> >>

> >> The DBAS as per my sw on 9/Feb/2005 is

> >> *Jup-Sat-Sat-Venus*

> >>

> >> the day was Mercury day.

> >> Transit : Sign-star-sub

> >> Moon -Sat -Mars (Mars in Mer star in 5)-Sat

> >> Jupiter-Mercury-Mars-Rahu

> >> Sat- Mercury-Jupiter-venus

> >> Venus-Sat-Moon-Jupiter

> >>

> >>

> >> Regards

> >> Adith

> >> www.thebestastro.com

> >>

> >> On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 11:30 PM, S.Ghosh <suprakash.ghoshwrote:

> >>

> >>>

> >>>

> >>> Dear all

> >>>

> >>> I seek comments from all members particularly elder KP lovers regarding a

> >>> chart for which I could not find any clue regarding the marriage time.

> >>>

> >>> DOB 04-05-1962

> >>> 10:58 PM

> >>> Howrah

> >>> Male

> >>>

> >>> His marriage was on 09-02-2005 during Jup-Sat-sat-Ket

> >>>

> >>> Jupiter is a strong significator for marriage, no doubt about it.

> >>> But why Saturn? Saturn is so strong that it triggered the event in its

> >>> own antara.

> >>>

> >>> Regards

> >>>

> >>> Suprakash

> >>>

> >>>

> >>

> >

> >

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Dear Dr.Rath,When nodes are capable of giving the result of the signlord and represents or replaces the signlord, why cant they influence on the planets who are in the star of the Signlord? Yes. A lot of findings to be anlalysed further,. And nothing can be confirmed as a rule. Because we have to look into other factors in that case also which supports or not..and many practical results needed.

RegardsAdith On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 8:13 AM, Luther Rath <rathluther wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

Yes, Adithji,

In the rules for Rahu and Kethu brought forth by Sri Lajmiji also I did not find that any planet offers the results of nodes. But in all rules the nodes offer results of other planets. Your statement needs further appliction to confirm it.

Dr. Rath

 

 

 

adith kasinath.g.k <gkadithkasinath

Monday, August 3, 2009 7:19:17 PMRe: One riddle I could't solveMoon in 7th in plazce of

 

Dear Dr.Rath,Yes. I agree with youBut this is not a rule! Many things are yet to be examined with practical experiences.I have seen it is applied in few cases in some KP books. I dont recall.

I shall furnish once I get it.My opnion is : Why should we take " Mars will play the role of Rahu? " . In stead, we take " Rahu the representative of Mars will act for Mars " .hope practical experiments need for further affirmation.

But Nodes are the strongest to give such unexpected results.RegardsAdith

On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 4:38 PM, Luther Rath <rathluther > wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Adithji,

I remember to have read that when a node is posited in any sign consider that the sign lord and Star lord are posited at that point. So theoritically all three are posited at that point of zodiac and all are significatrs of that house. But I do not remember to have ever read that if Rahu is in Mars sign Mars acts as Rahu. So I do not think that it is a rule but some one might have applied so. It needs to be examined and verified whether it is genuin. Let us wait to see opinion of others.

Dr. Rath.

 

 

 

adith kasinath.g.k <gkadithkasinath@ gmail.com>

@gro ups.comMonday, August 3, 2009 1:37:40 PM

Re: One riddle I could't solveMoon in 7th in plazce of 

Dear Ramani ji,

Pls note the node will act as its signlord. Hence the planet in its signlord will also reflect the signfication of Rahu. I know most of us will not agree this. But I have read analysis in few examples in KP books (not 6 readers). In that Mars in whose sign Rahu is posited, acts as Rahu also. In the other way, Rahu representing Mars, acts for Mars and so. I dont remember the book names. I shall tell you when I recollect or find it from my collections.

Also pls note Nodes will represent the planets who are in thier star also. But all are depending on the other points also that strengthen or weaken the signfications Reg: The marraige at the late age: of cource I did not look into that. We shall wait for the feed back.

With RegardsAdith   www.thebestastro. com

 

On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 9:26 AM, kadavasal ramani <kadavasalramani@ gmail.com> wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Adithji,

 

I request you  kindly to see my mail to Shri VGR Pavanji this morning.  I agree that RAHU, a node in the sign of Moon is agent of

Moon and not Moon is to follow Rahu's signification.  Rahu's Rasi lord Moon is in 4th a negative house for marriage. So Rahu is to give the result of 4th only.  Reg. Saturn, a self strength planet (no planet is in its stars), his occupation sign only isd to be considered in KP system aznd not lordship.  He is the CSL of 10th cusp, a negative houxe for marriage.  In KP system, node

has no aspect of his own.  Aspect of other planets only on it is considered. As such your statement that Rahu aspects Saturn

from 7th is confusing me. Because of this, we cannot assume that Saturn gets the signification of 7th.

  Saturn is in the star of Moon in 4th a negative houe.  We cannot assume that Moon is in 7th in place of Rahu.  On the contrary, Rahu will signify as agent 4th house where Moon occupies.    I request you kindly to correct me, if I am wrong.  For the reasons sta\ted in my mail to shri VGR Pavan, this chart is really puzzle to me so far as Saturn coming as

Bhukthi and Anthara lord on the date of marriage.  I very much doubt whether it is a first marriage or second one,

as on the dat e of marriage the native has completed his 42 years of age.  I have sought for clarification from him.

I request for your comment please.

 

Thanking you,

 

Astrologically yours,

 

K.S.V.Ramani

 

 

 

-

adith kasinath.g.k

 

 

 

 

@gro ups.com

Sunday, August 02, 2009 6:59 PM

Re: One riddle I could't solve

 

Dear Suprakash ji,First of all I like to convey that I am not an elder Kp lover! (39 yrs). Hope I am still young!!!My analysis is follows:Rahu is posited in Moon sign and in 7th house.Hence if any planet is in Moon star, Rahu representing Moon will play role also. ( as I ever say nodes are " Multi faced Weapons " )

Hence the planets in Rahu star and also Moon star is capable of favoring marriage. The planets who in the sub of planets who are in the star of Rahu or Moon also capable of giving marriage. (But the panets should not negate strongly .)

As said Guru in the star of Rahu is a strong significator of Marriage.Saturn has the following significations:Saturn signifies 2 as lordship (though it is occupied by Jupiter, Saturn is in its own sign). But as no planet in its star, it also signifies secondarily the 2nd.

Moreover it is in the star of Moon (represented by Rahu posited in its

sign). It is in the sub of Mercury (feebly signifies 7 as lordship) posited in 5. But Mercury is in Sun star signfies 4,8 and also 5 through its star lord Venus. This 5 is also favorable for marriage.Saturn is also aspected by Rahu from 7 also.

The other strong planet in Moon star is Venus who signifies 5, and also 2,7 though its sublord Jupiter.Mercury is in the sub of Venus who is in the star of Moon. Hence Mercury is also capable of favoring marraige provided they do not negate the event. Mercury is the lord of 7 posited in Sun star in4. But Sun is in Venus star in 5. Mercury is in Venus star in 5. Venus is in Moon star (in 4. but signfies 7 through Rahu).

The DBAS as per my sw on 9/Feb/2005 is Jup-Sat-Sat- Venusthe day was Mercury day.Transit : Sign-star-subMoon -Sat -Mars (Mars in Mer star in 5)-Sat Jupiter-Mercury- Mars-RahuSat- Mercury-Jupiter-

venusVenus-Sat-Moon- JupiterRegardsAdithwww.thebestastro. com

On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 11:30 PM, S.Ghosh <suprakash.ghosh@ cesc.co.in> wrote:

 

 

 

 

Dear allI seek comments from all members particularly elder KP lovers regarding a chart for which I could not find any clue regarding the marriage time.DOB 04-05-196210:58 PMHowrahMale

His marriage was on 09-02-2005 during Jup-Sat-sat- KetJupiter is a strong significator for marriage, no doubt about it.But why Saturn? Saturn is so strong that it triggered the event in its own antara.

RegardsSuprakash

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Dear Sri Adithji,

 

If a node is in a sign, the followingis the order for his signification: (1) Planetsw with which it is conjoined; (2) Planet that aspect it;

(3) star lord of the node ; (4) His Rasi lord. In nAugust 1990 monthly magazinw od K.P. & Astrology in and no planet in its stars. So Rahu, acquires SUB LORDS SPEAK (IV) late Sri K.M.Sibramanian, while analysing a chart and Rahu's role, he h as stated that " Look at the sub lord of Rahu, who is

in his own sub. As node, in its own star or sub, Rahu attains the full signification of its Rasi lord. Hre the Raai lord is Sun who is fu to signify, Rahu ll aignificator o 2,6, & 11 (sub is in the star of Jupiter in 2 owning11. Jupiter is in own star in 2 and no planetin 11th. Further Sun is in 6 and no planet inits stars. So Rahu acquires the strength of 2,6,11 through Rasi lord under its sub lord starus as explained above and is a fine service satus is being enjoyed by the native". It is true that node attains full signification of his Rasi lord, if the sign lord attains aselef strength (no Planet in its stars). I doubt very much that planets in the sign will also reflect the signification of the node.Node ca\nnot become Rasi lord himself. I request you kindly to give the ruling for your statein such case. Another point that the planets in the star of a node, node will function as the planet is not a KP Rule as stressed by

Mr.Tin Winji. Pl. don't take this as a challenge to your atatement.

 

Truly yours,

 

K.S.V.Ramani

 

 

 

 

-

adith kasinath.g.k

Monday, August 03, 2009 1:37 PM

Re: One riddle I could't solveMoon in 7th in plazce of

Dear Ramani ji,Pls note the node will act as its signlord. Hence the planet in its signlord will also reflect the signfication of Rahu. I know most of us will not agree this. But I have read analysis in few examples in KP books (not 6 readers). In that Mars in whose sign Rahu is posited, acts as Rahu also. In the other way, Rahu representing Mars, acts for Mars and so. I dont remember the book names. I shall tell you when I recollect or find it from my collections.Also pls note Nodes will represent the planets who are in thier star also. But all are depending on the other points also that strengthen or weaken the signfications Reg: The marraige at the late age: of cource I did not look into that. We shall wait for the feed back.With RegardsAdith www.thebestastro.com

On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 9:26 AM, kadavasal ramani <kadavasalramani > wrote:

 

 

 

Dear Adithji,

 

I request you kindly to see my mail to Shri VGR Pavanji this morning. I agree that RAHU, a node in the sign of Moon is agent of

Moon and not Moon is to follow Rahu's signification. Rahu's Rasi lord Moon is in 4th a negative house for marriage. So Rahu is to give the result of 4th only. Reg. Saturn, a self strength planet (no planet is in its stars), his occupation sign only isd to be considered in KP system aznd not lordship. He is the CSL of 10th cusp, a negative houxe for marriage. In KP system, node

has no aspect of his own. Aspect of other planets only on it is considered. As such your statement that Rahu aspects Saturn

from 7th is confusing me. Because of this, we cannot assume that Saturn gets the signification of 7th.

Saturn is in the star of Moon in 4th a negative houe. We cannot assume that Moon is in 7th in place of Rahu. On the contrary, Rahu will signify as agent 4th house where Moon occupies. I request you kindly to correct me, if I am wrong. For the reasons sta\ted in my mail to shri VGR Pavan, this chart is really puzzle to me so far as Saturn coming as

Bhukthi and Anthara lord on the date of marriage. I very much doubt whether it is a first marriage or second one,

as on the dat e of marriage the native has completed his 42 years of age. I have sought for clarification from him.

I request for your comment please.

 

Thanking you,

 

Astrologically yours,

 

K.S.V.Ramani

 

 

-

adith kasinath.g.k

Sunday, August 02, 2009 6:59 PM

Re: One riddle I could't solve

Dear Suprakash ji,First of all I like to convey that I am not an elder Kp lover! (39 yrs). Hope I am still young!!!My analysis is follows:Rahu is posited in Moon sign and in 7th house.Hence if any planet is in Moon star, Rahu representing Moon will play role also. ( as I ever say nodes are "Multi faced Weapons")Hence the planets in Rahu star and also Moon star is capable of favoring marriage. The planets who in the sub of planets who are in the star of Rahu or Moon also capable of giving marriage. (But the panets should not negate strongly .)As said Guru in the star of Rahu is a strong significator of Marriage.Saturn has the following significations:Saturn signifies 2 as lordship (though it is occupied by Jupiter, Saturn is in its own sign). But as no planet in its star, it also signifies secondarily the 2nd.Moreover it is in the star of Moon (represented by Rahu posited in its sign). It is in the sub of Mercury (feebly signifies 7 as lordship) posited in 5. But Mercury is in Sun star signfies 4,8 and also 5 through its star lord Venus. This 5 is also favorable for marriage.Saturn is also aspected by Rahu from 7 also.The other strong planet in Moon star is Venus who signifies 5, and also 2,7 though its sublord Jupiter.Mercury is in the sub of Venus who is in the star of Moon. Hence Mercury is also capable of favoring marraige provided they do not negate the event. Mercury is the lord of 7 posited in Sun star in4. But Sun is in Venus star in 5. Mercury is in Venus star in 5. Venus is in Moon star (in 4. but signfies 7 through Rahu). The DBAS as per my sw on 9/Feb/2005 is Jup-Sat-Sat-Venusthe day was Mercury day.Transit : Sign-star-subMoon -Sat -Mars (Mars in Mer star in 5)-Sat Jupiter-Mercury-Mars-RahuSat- Mercury-Jupiter-venusVenus-Sat-Moon-JupiterRegardsAdithwww.thebestastro.com

On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 11:30 PM, S.Ghosh <suprakash.ghosh (AT) cesc (DOT) co.in> wrote:

 

 

 

Dear allI seek comments from all members particularly elder KP lovers regarding a chart for which I could not find any clue regarding the marriage time.DOB 04-05-196210:58 PMHowrahMaleHis marriage was on 09-02-2005 during Jup-Sat-sat-KetJupiter is a strong significator for marriage, no doubt about it.But why Saturn? Saturn is so strong that it triggered the event in its own antara.RegardsSuprakash

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Dear Sri Adithji,

 

The node unless it is in August 1in its own star or sub, attains the full signification o its Rasi lord. Late Sri K.M.Subramanian has in his article "Sub Lord Speaks IV" in K.P.Astrology monthly magazine opf August 1990, has while analysing Dasa lord Rahu's effects on a chart has observed that "look at ther sub lord of Rahu. Rahu is in his own sub. As node,is in own star or sub. Rahattains the full significaton of its Rasi Lod. Here the Rasi Lord is Sun, who is full significaor of 2, 6 and 11.(Sun is in th star of Jupiter in 2 owning 11. Jupiter is in its own star in 2 and no planet in 11. Further Sun is in 6 and no planet in its stars).

 

Normally, the node's significations are in order of priority (1) planets conjoined with it; (2) Planets aspecting it; (3) the star lord in which the node is posited (4) Irs sign lord. Mr. Tin Winji has categorically stated that th Node will not signify the planets who are

in the star of Node and it is not a K.P.Rule.

 

Your statement that say Rahu will signify its Rasi lord and planets in the Rasi will signify Rahu is just unheard. The other planets

in the Rasi in which the node is present will signify only their star lord's signification and not the node. Suppose Rahu is in Cancer sign, he will signify Moon and the Bhavam in which Moon isa placed. Moon will not signify Rahu. Similarly if any other planet is

in the same sign viz. Cancer, then if it is in the star of Moon, it will signify Moon and the Bhavam in which it is placed and not Rahu and if the other planet is in the star other than Moon, then it will signify that star lord and Bhavam and not Rahu. The special Rule is only for Node. Kindly correct me if I am wrong along with Rule for your views. Kindly do not think that I am challenging you.

 

Truly Yours,

 

K.S.V.Ramani

 

l

 

 

 

 

-

adith kasinath.g.k

Monday, August 03, 2009 1:37 PM

Re: One riddle I could't solveMoon in 7th in plazce of

Dear Ramani ji,Pls note the node will act as its signlord. Hence the planet in its signlord will also reflect the signfication of Rahu. I know most of us will not agree this. But I have read analysis in few examples in KP books (not 6 readers). In that Mars in whose sign Rahu is posited, acts as Rahu also. In the other way, Rahu representing Mars, acts for Mars and so. I dont remember the book names. I shall tell you when I recollect or find it from my collections.Also pls note Nodes will represent the planets who are in thier star also. But all are depending on the other points also that strengthen or weaken the signfications Reg: The marraige at the late age: of cource I did not look into that. We shall wait for the feed back.With RegardsAdith www.thebestastro.com

On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 9:26 AM, kadavasal ramani <kadavasalramani > wrote:

 

 

 

Dear Adithji,

 

I request you kindly to see my mail to Shri VGR Pavanji this morning. I agree that RAHU, a node in the sign of Moon is agent of

Moon and not Moon is to follow Rahu's signification. Rahu's Rasi lord Moon is in 4th a negative house for marriage. So Rahu is to give the result of 4th only. Reg. Saturn, a self strength planet (no planet is in its stars), his occupation sign only isd to be considered in KP system aznd not lordship. He is the CSL of 10th cusp, a negative houxe for marriage. In KP system, node

has no aspect of his own. Aspect of other planets only on it is considered. As such your statement that Rahu aspects Saturn

from 7th is confusing me. Because of this, we cannot assume that Saturn gets the signification of 7th.

Saturn is in the star of Moon in 4th a negative houe. We cannot assume that Moon is in 7th in place of Rahu. On the contrary, Rahu will signify as agent 4th house where Moon occupies. I request you kindly to correct me, if I am wrong. For the reasons sta\ted in my mail to shri VGR Pavan, this chart is really puzzle to me so far as Saturn coming as

Bhukthi and Anthara lord on the date of marriage. I very much doubt whether it is a first marriage or second one,

as on the dat e of marriage the native has completed his 42 years of age. I have sought for clarification from him.

I request for your comment please.

 

Thanking you,

 

Astrologically yours,

 

K.S.V.Ramani

 

 

-

adith kasinath.g.k

Sunday, August 02, 2009 6:59 PM

Re: One riddle I could't solve

Dear Suprakash ji,First of all I like to convey that I am not an elder Kp lover! (39 yrs). Hope I am still young!!!My analysis is follows:Rahu is posited in Moon sign and in 7th house.Hence if any planet is in Moon star, Rahu representing Moon will play role also. ( as I ever say nodes are "Multi faced Weapons")Hence the planets in Rahu star and also Moon star is capable of favoring marriage. The planets who in the sub of planets who are in the star of Rahu or Moon also capable of giving marriage. (But the panets should not negate strongly .)As said Guru in the star of Rahu is a strong significator of Marriage.Saturn has the following significations:Saturn signifies 2 as lordship (though it is occupied by Jupiter, Saturn is in its own sign). But as no planet in its star, it also signifies secondarily the 2nd.Moreover it is in the star of Moon (represented by Rahu posited in its sign). It is in the sub of Mercury (feebly signifies 7 as lordship) posited in 5. But Mercury is in Sun star signfies 4,8 and also 5 through its star lord Venus. This 5 is also favorable for marriage.Saturn is also aspected by Rahu from 7 also.The other strong planet in Moon star is Venus who signifies 5, and also 2,7 though its sublord Jupiter.Mercury is in the sub of Venus who is in the star of Moon. Hence Mercury is also capable of favoring marraige provided they do not negate the event. Mercury is the lord of 7 posited in Sun star in4. But Sun is in Venus star in 5. Mercury is in Venus star in 5. Venus is in Moon star (in 4. but signfies 7 through Rahu). The DBAS as per my sw on 9/Feb/2005 is Jup-Sat-Sat-Venusthe day was Mercury day.Transit : Sign-star-subMoon -Sat -Mars (Mars in Mer star in 5)-Sat Jupiter-Mercury-Mars-RahuSat- Mercury-Jupiter-venusVenus-Sat-Moon-JupiterRegardsAdithwww.thebestastro.com

On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 11:30 PM, S.Ghosh <suprakash.ghosh (AT) cesc (DOT) co.in> wrote:

 

 

 

Dear allI seek comments from all members particularly elder KP lovers regarding a chart for which I could not find any clue regarding the marriage time.DOB 04-05-196210:58 PMHowrahMaleHis marriage was on 09-02-2005 during Jup-Sat-sat-KetJupiter is a strong significator for marriage, no doubt about it.But why Saturn? Saturn is so strong that it triggered the event in its own antara.RegardsSuprakash

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Dear KSV Ramani ji,reg: Node representing the planet in its star:Please note TinwinJi has said this is not KP rule. But it has been suggested by a stalwart in the magazine.After our Guruju, many astrologers are finding new inventions as per thier experience. (like the sublords in the RPs).

I have also seen the few cases of my clients the role of Rahu (Bukthi Lord) plays the role of a planet in its star. Because sometime Rahu will not signify the factors, while analysing, a planet in its star will be signfying the factor, hence I had thought that could be the reason ? Later when I studied the statement as Tw ji said in some books and also in the forum, I thought that could be the reason.

But it needs a lot of reseaches yet to find in what are all the situation this works out.Reg: The Sign Lord replced by Rahu:Further, I have said when Rahu represents a signlord (we replace the sign lord for Node on many occasions), a node may also represents the signlord in whose star a planet is traveling. It is my opinion also. This can also be a last grade signfications? Moreover, as I have said clearly we have look into the planet should not negate the matter by otehr factors.

  But I have read in a KP book for sure , this type of statement which I got confused and later I thought the above could be the reason . But I dont recall the book.But I shall state an another example from a book . It is not exactly the same, but related only.

Book: How KP pin point the events? Edition 1997Page 84: case: Return of Missin SonAuthour: Shri.K.HariharanMars is in Capricon in 6 from the Lagana of Son (5)Rahu is in 8( from 5) in Mars Sign- Aries. Rahu has no planet in its star.

Mars has ketu , MOOn and also Mars in its star.I shall reproduce the lines given: " Judge the houses 2,8 and 11. 2nd house is occupied by Ketu. Rahu,Ketu,Mercury and Sun are in Ketu star.8th House is occupied by Rahu and none in Rahu star.

11th house and no planet in Mercury star.Therefore Rahu, Mercury (Rahu Indicates Mars) conjoined period will bring hin back,i.e., Mars Dasa, Rahu bukthi, Mercury andra ie., between 3rd Nov a1968 annd 25/Dec/1968. "

If you see, as per the statement, Mars though no a signficator , but predcited that will give give result as Rahu (the signficator) will play role for Mars.But when I checked the chart Mars is in the sub of Rahu and that could be the reason for the signfications.

Hence I did not take it seriously. But the Authour has not mentined that. In stead he has said within bracket (Rahu presents Mars) and taken the Mars Dasa. Here we must conside one more point. Mars Dasa is the running Dasa. Hence we must for any chance for the event within the Mars Dasa before moving to the Rahu Dasa. So we have to look into all the possibilities.

I ever take everything as a challenge and I need not worry for that as I just wanted to share my learning. With RegardsAdith  www.thebestastro.com

On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 2:22 PM, kadavasal ramani <kadavasalramani wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Sri Adithji,

 

The node  unless it is  in August 1in its own star or sub, attains the full signification o its Rasi lord.  Late Sri K.M.Subramanian has in his article " Sub Lord Speaks IV " in K.P.Astrology monthly magazine opf August 1990, has while analysing Dasa  lord Rahu's effects on a chart has  observed that " look at ther sub lord of Rahu.  Rahu is in his own sub.  As node,is in own star or sub. Rahattains the full significaton of its Rasi Lod.   Here the Rasi Lord is Sun, who is full significaor of 2, 6 and 11.(Sun is in th star of Jupiter in 2 owning 11.  Jupiter is in its own star in 2 and no planet in 11.  Further Sun is in 6 and no planet in its stars).

 

Normally, the node's significations are in order of priority (1) planets conjoined with it; (2) Planets aspecting it; (3) the star lord in which the node is posited (4) Irs sign lord. Mr. Tin Winji has categorically stated that th Node will not signify the planets who are

in the star of Node and it is not a K.P.Rule.

 

Your statement that say Rahu will signify its Rasi lord and planets in the Rasi will signify Rahu is just unheard. The other planets

in the Rasi in which the node is present will signify only their star lord's signification and not the node.  Suppose Rahu is in Cancer sign,  he will signify Moon and the Bhavam in which Moon isa placed.  Moon will not signify Rahu.  Similarly if any other planet is

in the same sign viz. Cancer, then if it is in the star of Moon, it will signify Moon and the Bhavam in which it is placed and not Rahu and if the other planet is in the star other than Moon, then it will signify that star lord and Bhavam and not Rahu.  The special Rule is only for Node. Kindly correct me if I am wrong along with Rule for your views.  Kindly do not think that I am challenging you.

 

Truly Yours,

 

K.S.V.Ramani

 

l

 

 

 

 

-

 

adith kasinath.g.k

Monday, August 03, 2009 1:37 PM

Re: One riddle I could't solveMoon in 7th in plazce of

 

Dear Ramani ji,Pls note the node will act as its signlord. Hence the planet in its signlord will also reflect the signfication of Rahu. I know most of us will not agree this. But I have read analysis in few examples in KP books (not 6 readers). In that Mars in whose sign Rahu is posited, acts as Rahu also. In the other way, Rahu representing Mars, acts for Mars and so. I dont remember the book names. I shall tell you when I recollect or find it from my collections.Also pls note Nodes will represent the planets who are in thier star also. But all are depending on the other points also that strengthen or weaken the signfications Reg: The marraige at the late age: of cource I did not look into that. We shall wait for the feed back.With RegardsAdith   www.thebestastro.com

On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 9:26 AM, kadavasal ramani <kadavasalramani wrote:

 

 

 

 

Dear Adithji,

 

I request you  kindly to see my mail to Shri VGR Pavanji this morning.  I agree that RAHU, a node in the sign of Moon is agent of

Moon and not Moon is to follow Rahu's signification.  Rahu's Rasi lord Moon is in 4th a negative house for marriage. So Rahu is to give the result of 4th only.  Reg. Saturn, a self strength planet (no planet is in its stars), his occupation sign only isd to be considered in KP system aznd not lordship.  He is the CSL of 10th cusp, a negative houxe for marriage.  In KP system, node

has no aspect of his own.  Aspect of other planets only on it is considered. As such your statement that Rahu aspects Saturn

from 7th is confusing me. Because of this, we cannot assume that Saturn gets the signification of 7th.

  Saturn is in the star of Moon in 4th a negative houe.  We cannot assume that Moon is in 7th in place of Rahu.  On the contrary, Rahu will signify as agent 4th house where Moon occupies.    I request you kindly to correct me, if I am wrong.  For the reasons sta\ted in my mail to shri VGR Pavan, this chart is really puzzle to me so far as Saturn coming as

Bhukthi and Anthara lord on the date of marriage.  I very much doubt whether it is a first marriage or second one,

as on the dat e of marriage the native has completed his 42 years of age.  I have sought for clarification from him.

I request for your comment please.

 

Thanking you,

 

Astrologically yours,

 

K.S.V.Ramani

 

 

-

adith kasinath.g.k

Sunday, August 02, 2009 6:59 PM

Re: One riddle I could't solve

 

Dear Suprakash ji,First of all I like to convey that I am not an elder Kp lover! (39 yrs). Hope I am still young!!!My analysis is follows:Rahu is posited in Moon sign and in 7th house.Hence if any planet is in Moon star, Rahu representing Moon will play role also. ( as I ever say nodes are " Multi faced Weapons " )Hence the planets in Rahu star and also Moon star is capable of favoring marriage. The planets who in the sub of planets who are in the star of Rahu or Moon also capable of giving marriage. (But the panets should not negate strongly .)As said Guru in the star of Rahu is a strong significator of Marriage.Saturn has the following significations:Saturn signifies 2 as lordship (though it is occupied by Jupiter, Saturn is in its own sign). But as no planet in its star, it also signifies secondarily the 2nd.Moreover it is in the star of Moon (represented by Rahu posited in its sign). It is in the sub of Mercury (feebly signifies 7 as lordship) posited in 5. But Mercury is in Sun star signfies 4,8 and also 5 through its star lord Venus. This 5 is also favorable for marriage.Saturn is also aspected by Rahu from 7 also.The other strong planet in Moon star is Venus who signifies 5, and also 2,7 though its sublord Jupiter.Mercury is in the sub of Venus who is in the star of Moon. Hence Mercury is also capable of favoring marraige provided they do not negate the event. Mercury is the lord of 7 posited in Sun star in4. But Sun is in Venus star in 5. Mercury is in Venus star in 5. Venus is in Moon star (in 4. but signfies 7 through Rahu). The DBAS as per my sw on 9/Feb/2005 is Jup-Sat-Sat-Venusthe day was Mercury day.Transit : Sign-star-subMoon -Sat -Mars (Mars in Mer star in 5)-Sat Jupiter-Mercury-Mars-RahuSat- Mercury-Jupiter-venusVenus-Sat-Moon-JupiterRegardsAdithwww.thebestastro.com

On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 11:30 PM, S.Ghosh <suprakash.ghosh wrote:

 

 

 

 

Dear allI seek comments from all members particularly elder KP lovers regarding a chart for which I could not find any clue regarding the marriage time.DOB 04-05-196210:58 PMHowrahMaleHis marriage was on 09-02-2005 during Jup-Sat-sat-KetJupiter is a strong significator for marriage, no doubt about it.But why Saturn? Saturn is so strong that it triggered the event in its own antara.RegardsSuprakash

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Dear Adithji,

 

I am also inclined to agree with the concept of "node will give the result pof the planet that is in its star", as learned and much

experienced person like Sri M.P.Shanmug'in his book Astro Secrets' Vol.I, and two others.M/s N.Pandu and N Santhanalingam in K.P. & Astrology Magazine as confirmed by Mr.Tin Winji are strong voters for the above concept.I will try to search for the address

of 2 later persons and ascertain the basis or Rule for it, as Mr.Sh\anmugam is no more now.

 

Thanking you,

 

Truly, yours,

 

K.S.V.Ramani

magazine

Original Message -----

 

adith kasinath.g.k

Wednesday, August 05, 2009 10:41 PM

Re: One riddle I could't solveMoon in 7th in plazc e of

Dear KSV Ramani ji,reg: Node representing the planet in its star:Please note TinwinJi has said this is not KP rule. But it has been suggested by a stalwart in the magazine.After our Guruju, many astrologers are finding new inventions as per thier experience. (like the sublords in the RPs).I have also seen the few cases of my clients the role of Rahu (Bukthi Lord) plays the role of a planet in its star. Because sometime Rahu will not signify the factors, while analysing, a planet in its star will be signfying the factor, hence I had thought that could be the reason ? Later when I studied the statement as Tw ji said in some books and also in the forum, I thought that could be the reason.But it needs a lot of reseaches yet to find in what are all the situation this works out.Reg: The Sign Lord replced by Rahu:Further, I have said when Rahu represents a signlord (we replace the sign lord for Node on many occasions), a node may also represents the signlord in whose star a planet is traveling. It is my opinion also. This can also be a last grade signfications? Moreover, as I have said clearly we have look into the planet should not negate the matter by otehr factors. But I have read in a KP book for sure , this type of statement which I got confused and later I thought the above could be the reason . But I dont recall the book.But I shall state an another example from a book . It is not exactly the same, but related only.Book: How KP pin point the events? Edition 1997Page 84: case: Return of Missin SonAuthour: Shri.K.HariharanMars is in Capricon in 6 from the Lagana of Son (5)Rahu is in 8( from 5) in Mars Sign- Aries. Rahu has no planet in its star.Mars has ketu , MOOn and also Mars in its star.I shall reproduce the lines given:" Judge the houses 2,8 and 11. 2nd house is occupied by Ketu. Rahu,Ketu,Mercury and Sun are in Ketu star.8th House is occupied by Rahu and none in Rahu star.11th house and no planet in Mercury star.Therefore Rahu, Mercury (Rahu Indicates Mars) conjoined period will bring hin back,i.e., Mars Dasa, Rahu bukthi, Mercury andra ie., between 3rd Nov a1968 annd 25/Dec/1968."If you see, as per the statement, Mars though no a signficator , but predcited that will give give result as Rahu (the signficator) will play role for Mars.But when I checked the chart Mars is in the sub of Rahu and that could be the reason for the signfications.Hence I did not take it seriously. But the Authour has not mentined that. In stead he has said within bracket (Rahu presents Mars) and taken the Mars Dasa. Here we must conside one more point. Mars Dasa is the running Dasa. Hence we must for any chance for the event within the Mars Dasa before moving to the Rahu Dasa. So we have to look into all the possibilities.I ever take everything as a challenge and I need not worry for that as I just wanted to share my learning. With RegardsAdith www.thebestastro.com

On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 2:22 PM, kadavasal ramani <kadavasalramani > wrote:

 

 

 

Dear Sri Adithji,

 

The node unless it is in August 1in its own star or sub, attains the full signification o its Rasi lord. Late Sri K.M.Subramanian has in his article "Sub Lord Speaks IV" in K.P.Astrology monthly magazine opf August 1990, has while analysing Dasa lord Rahu's effects on a chart has observed that "look at ther sub lord of Rahu. Rahu is in his own sub. As node,is in own star or sub. Rahattains the full significaton of its Rasi Lod. Here the Rasi Lord is Sun, who is full significaor of 2, 6 and 11.(Sun is in th star of Jupiter in 2 owning 11. Jupiter is in its own star in 2 and no planet in 11. Further Sun is in 6 and no planet in its stars).

 

Normally, the node's significations are in order of priority (1) planets conjoined with it; (2) Planets aspecting it; (3) the star lord in which the node is posited (4) Irs sign lord. Mr. Tin Winji has categorically stated that th Node will not signify the planets who are

in the star of Node and it is not a K.P.Rule.

 

Your statement that say Rahu will signify its Rasi lord and planets in the Rasi will signify Rahu is just unheard. The other planets

in the Rasi in which the node is present will signify only their star lord's signification and not the node. Suppose Rahu is in Cancer sign, he will signify Moon and the Bhavam in which Moon isa placed. Moon will not signify Rahu. Similarly if any other planet is

in the same sign viz. Cancer, then if it is in the star of Moon, it will signify Moon and the Bhavam in which it is placed and not Rahu and if the other planet is in the star other than Moon, then it will signify that star lord and Bhavam and not Rahu. The special Rule is only for Node. Kindly correct me if I am wrong along with Rule for your views. Kindly do not think that I am challenging you.

 

Truly Yours,

 

K.S.V.Ramani

 

l

 

 

 

 

 

-

adith kasinath.g.k

 

Monday, August 03, 2009 1:37 PM

Re: One riddle I could't solveMoon in 7th in plazce of

 

 

 

 

Dear Ramani ji,Pls note the node will act as its signlord. Hence the planet in its signlord will also reflect the signfication of Rahu. I know most of us will not agree this. But I have read analysis in few examples in KP books (not 6 readers). In that Mars in whose sign Rahu is posited, acts as Rahu also. In the other way, Rahu representing Mars, acts for Mars and so. I dont remember the book names. I shall tell you when I recollect or find it from my collections.Also pls note Nodes will represent the planets who are in thier star also. But all are depending on the other points also that strengthen or weaken the signfications Reg: The marraige at the late age: of cource I did not look into that. We shall wait for the feed back.With RegardsAdith www.thebestastro.com

On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 9:26 AM, kadavasal ramani <kadavasalramani > wrote:

 

 

 

 

Dear Adithji,

 

I request you kindly to see my mail to Shri VGR Pavanji this morning. I agree that RAHU, a node in the sign of Moon is agent of

Moon and not Moon is to follow Rahu's signification. Rahu's Rasi lord Moon is in 4th a negative house for marriage. So Rahu is to give the result of 4th only. Reg. Saturn, a self strength planet (no planet is in its stars), his occupation sign only isd to be considered in KP system aznd not lordship. He is the CSL of 10th cusp, a negative houxe for marriage. In KP system, node

has no aspect of his own. Aspect of other planets only on it is considered. As such your statement that Rahu aspects Saturn

from 7th is confusing me. Because of this, we cannot assume that Saturn gets the signification of 7th.

Saturn is in the star of Moon in 4th a negative houe. We cannot assume that Moon is in 7th in place of Rahu. On the contrary, Rahu will signify as agent 4th house where Moon occupies. I request you kindly to correct me, if I am wrong. For the reasons sta\ted in my mail to shri VGR Pavan, this chart is really puzzle to me so far as Saturn coming as

Bhukthi and Anthara lord on the date of marriage. I very much doubt whether it is a first marriage or second one,

as on the dat e of marriage the native has completed his 42 years of age. I have sought for clarification from him.

I request for your comment please.

 

Thanking you,

 

Astrologically yours,

 

K.S.V.Ramani

 

 

-

adith kasinath.g.k

Sunday, August 02, 2009 6:59 PM

Re: One riddle I could't solve

Dear Suprakash ji,First of all I like to convey that I am not an elder Kp lover! (39 yrs). Hope I am still young!!!My analysis is follows:Rahu is posited in Moon sign and in 7th house.Hence if any planet is in Moon star, Rahu representing Moon will play role also. ( as I ever say nodes are "Multi faced Weapons")Hence the planets in Rahu star and also Moon star is capable of favoring marriage. The planets who in the sub of planets who are in the star of Rahu or Moon also capable of giving marriage. (But the panets should not negate strongly .)As said Guru in the star of Rahu is a strong significator of Marriage.Saturn has the following significations:Saturn signifies 2 as lordship (though it is occupied by Jupiter, Saturn is in its own sign). But as no planet in its star, it also signifies secondarily the 2nd.Moreover it is in the star of Moon (represented by Rahu posited in its sign). It is in the sub of Mercury (feebly signifies 7 as lordship) posited in 5. But Mercury is in Sun star signfies 4,8 and also 5 through its star lord Venus. This 5 is also favorable for marriage.Saturn is also aspected by Rahu from 7 also.The other strong planet in Moon star is Venus who signifies 5, and also 2,7 though its sublord Jupiter.Mercury is in the sub of Venus who is in the star of Moon. Hence Mercury is also capable of favoring marraige provided they do not negate the event. Mercury is the lord of 7 posited in Sun star in4. But Sun is in Venus star in 5. Mercury is in Venus star in 5. Venus is in Moon star (in 4. but signfies 7 through Rahu). The DBAS as per my sw on 9/Feb/2005 is Jup-Sat-Sat-Venusthe day was Mercury day.Transit : Sign-star-subMoon -Sat -Mars (Mars in Mer star in 5)-Sat Jupiter-Mercury-Mars-RahuSat- Mercury-Jupiter-venusVenus-Sat-Moon-JupiterRegardsAdithwww.thebestastro.com

On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 11:30 PM, S.Ghosh <suprakash.ghosh (AT) cesc (DOT) co.in> wrote:

 

 

 

Dear allI seek comments from all members particularly elder KP lovers regarding a chart for which I could not find any clue regarding the marriage time.DOB 04-05-196210:58 PMHowrahMaleHis marriage was on 09-02-2005 during Jup-Sat-sat-KetJupiter is a strong significator for marriage, no doubt about it.But why Saturn? Saturn is so strong that it triggered the event in its own antara.RegardsSuprakash

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Dear Adit,

The second part is not in KP. If it is proven it shall be acceptable, no doubt.

Dr. Rath

 

 

 

adith kasinath.g.k <gkadithkasinath Sent: Tuesday, August 4, 2009 10:39:38 AMRe: One riddle I could't solveMoon in 7th in plazce of

Dear Dr.Rath,When nodes are capable of giving the result of the signlord and represents or replaces the signlord, why cant they influence on the planets who are in the star of the Signlord? Yes. A lot of findings to be anlalysed further,. And nothing can be confirmed as a rule. Because we have to look into other factors in that case also which supports or not..and many practical results needed.RegardsAdith

On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 8:13 AM, Luther Rath <rathluther > wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

Yes, Adithji,

In the rules for Rahu and Kethu brought forth by Sri Lajmiji also I did not find that any planet offers the results of nodes. But in all rules the nodes offer results of other planets. Your statement needs further appliction to confirm it.

Dr. Rath

 

 

 

 

adith kasinath.g.k <gkadithkasinath@ gmail.com>@gro ups.comMonday, August 3, 2009 7:19:17 PM

Re: One riddle I could't solveMoon in 7th in plazce of

Dear Dr.Rath,

Yes. I agree with youBut this is not a rule! Many things are yet to be examined with practical experiences.I have seen it is applied in few cases in some KP books. I dont recall.I shall furnish once I get it.My opnion is : Why should we take "Mars will play the role of Rahu?". In stead, we take "Rahu the representative of Mars will act for Mars".hope practical experiments need for further affirmation.But Nodes are the strongest to give such unexpected results.RegardsAdith

 

On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 4:38 PM, Luther Rath <rathluther > wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Adithji,

I remember to have read that when a node is posited in any sign consider that the sign lord and Star lord are posited at that point. So theoritically all three are posited at that point of zodiac and all are significatrs of that house. But I do not remember to have ever read that if Rahu is in Mars sign Mars acts as Rahu. So I do not think that it is a rule but some one might have applied so. It needs to be examined and verified whether it is genuin. Let us wait to see opinion of others.

Dr. Rath.

 

 

 

 

adith kasinath.g.k <gkadithkasinath@ gmail.com>

@gro ups.com

 

 

Monday, August 3, 2009 1:37:40 PM Re: One riddle I could't solveMoon in 7th in plazce of

 

 

Dear Ramani ji,

Pls note the node will act as its signlord. Hence the planet in its signlord will also reflect the signfication of Rahu. I know most of us will not agree this. But I have read analysis in few examples in KP books (not 6 readers). In that Mars in whose sign Rahu is posited, acts as Rahu also. In the other way, Rahu representing Mars, acts for Mars and so. I dont remember the book names. I shall tell you when I recollect or find it from my collections.Also pls note Nodes will represent the planets who are in thier star also. But all are depending on the other points also that strengthen or weaken the signfications Reg: The marraige at the late age: of cource I did not look into that. We shall wait for the feed back.With RegardsAdith www.thebestastro. com

 

On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 9:26 AM, kadavasal ramani <kadavasalramani@ gmail.com> wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Adithji,

 

I request you kindly to see my mail to Shri VGR Pavanji this morning. I agree that RAHU, a node in the sign of Moon is agent of

Moon and not Moon is to follow Rahu's signification. Rahu's Rasi lord Moon is in 4th a negative house for marriage. So Rahu is to give the result of 4th only. Reg. Saturn, a self strength planet (no planet is in its stars), his occupation sign only isd to be considered in KP system aznd not lordship. He is the CSL of 10th cusp, a negative houxe for marriage. In KP system, node

has no aspect of his own. Aspect of other planets only on it is considered. As such your statement that Rahu aspects Saturn

from 7th is confusing me. Because of this, we cannot assume that Saturn gets the signification of 7th.

Saturn is in the star of Moon in 4th a negative houe. We cannot assume that Moon is in 7th in place of Rahu. On the contrary, Rahu will signify as agent 4th house where Moon occupies. I request you kindly to correct me, if I am wrong. For the reasons sta\ted in my mail to shri VGR Pavan, this chart is really puzzle to me so far as Saturn coming as

Bhukthi and Anthara lord on the date of marriage. I very much doubt whether it is a first marriage or second one,

as on the dat e of marriage the native has completed his 42 years of age. I have sought for clarification from him.

I request for your comment please.

 

Thanking you,

 

Astrologically yours,

 

K.S.V.Ramani

 

 

 

-

adith kasinath.g.k

 

 

 

@gro ups.com

Sunday, August 02, 2009 6:59 PM

Re: One riddle I could't solve

Dear Suprakash ji,First of all I like to convey that I am not an elder Kp lover! (39 yrs). Hope I am still young!!!My analysis is follows:Rahu is posited in Moon sign and in 7th house.Hence if any planet is in Moon star, Rahu representing Moon will play role also. ( as I ever say nodes are "Multi faced Weapons")Hence the planets in Rahu star and also Moon star is capable of favoring marriage. The planets who in the sub of planets who are in the star of Rahu or Moon also capable of giving marriage. (But the panets should not negate strongly .)As said Guru in the star of Rahu is a strong significator of Marriage.Saturn has the following significations:Saturn signifies 2 as lordship (though it is occupied by Jupiter, Saturn is in its own sign). But as no planet in its star, it also signifies secondarily the 2nd.Moreover it is in the star of Moon (represented by Rahu posited in its

sign). It is in the sub of Mercury (feebly signifies 7 as lordship) posited in 5. But Mercury is in Sun star signfies 4,8 and also 5 through its star lord Venus. This 5 is also favorable for marriage.Saturn is also aspected by Rahu from 7 also.The other strong planet in Moon star is Venus who signifies 5, and also 2,7 though its sublord Jupiter.Mercury is in the sub of Venus who is in the star of Moon. Hence Mercury is also capable of favoring marraige provided they do not negate the event. Mercury is the lord of 7 posited in Sun star in4. But Sun is in Venus star in 5. Mercury is in Venus star in 5. Venus is in Moon star (in 4. but signfies 7 through Rahu). The DBAS as per my sw on 9/Feb/2005 is Jup-Sat-Sat- Venusthe day was Mercury day.Transit : Sign-star-subMoon -Sat -Mars (Mars in Mer star in 5)-Sat Jupiter-Mercury- Mars-RahuSat- Mercury-Jupiter-

venusVenus-Sat-Moon- JupiterRegardsAdithwww.thebestastro. com

On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 11:30 PM, S.Ghosh <suprakash.ghosh@ cesc.co.in> wrote:

 

 

 

Dear allI seek comments from all members particularly elder KP lovers regarding a chart for which I could not find any clue regarding the marriage time.DOB 04-05-196210:58 PMHowrahMaleHis marriage was on 09-02-2005 during Jup-Sat-sat- KetJupiter is a strong significator for marriage, no doubt about it.But why Saturn? Saturn is so strong that it triggered the event in its own antara.RegardsSuprakash

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Dear KSV Ramani ji,Thanks !AdithOn Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 4:35 PM, kadavasal ramani <kadavasalramani wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Adithji,

 

I am also inclined to agree with the concept of " node will give the result pof the planet that is in its star " , as learned and much

experienced person like Sri M.P.Shanmug'in his book Astro Secrets' Vol.I, and two others.M/s N.Pandu and N  Santhanalingam in K.P. & Astrology Magazine as confirmed by Mr.Tin Winji are strong voters for the above concept.I will try to search for the address

of 2 later persons and ascertain the basis or Rule for it, as Mr.Sh\anmugam is no more now.

 

Thanking you,

 

Truly, yours,

 

K.S.V.Ramani

magazine

Original Message -----

 

 

adith kasinath.g.k

Wednesday, August 05, 2009 10:41 PM

Re: One riddle I could't solveMoon in 7th in plazc e of

 

Dear KSV Ramani ji,reg: Node representing the planet in its star:Please note TinwinJi has said this is not KP rule. But it has been suggested by a stalwart in the magazine.After our Guruju, many astrologers are finding new inventions as per thier experience. (like the sublords in the RPs).I have also seen the few cases of my clients the role of Rahu (Bukthi Lord) plays the role of a planet in its star. Because sometime Rahu will not signify the factors, while analysing, a planet in its star will be signfying the factor, hence I had thought that could be the reason ? Later when I studied the statement as Tw ji said in some books and also in the forum, I thought that could be the reason.But it needs a lot of reseaches yet to find in what are all the situation this works out.Reg: The Sign Lord replced by Rahu:Further, I have said when Rahu represents a signlord (we replace the sign lord for Node on many occasions), a node may also represents the signlord in whose star a planet is traveling. It is my opinion also. This can also be a last grade signfications? Moreover, as I have said clearly we have look into the planet should not negate the matter by otehr factors.  But I have read in a KP book for sure , this type of statement which I got confused and later I thought the above could be the reason . But I dont recall the book.But I shall state an another example from a book . It is not exactly the same, but related only.Book: How KP pin point the events? Edition 1997Page 84: case: Return of Missin SonAuthour: Shri.K.HariharanMars is in Capricon in 6 from the Lagana of Son (5)Rahu is in 8( from 5) in Mars Sign- Aries. Rahu has no planet in its star.Mars has ketu , MOOn and also Mars in its star.I shall reproduce the lines given: " Judge the houses 2,8 and 11. 2nd house is occupied by Ketu. Rahu,Ketu,Mercury and Sun are in Ketu star.8th House is occupied by Rahu and none in Rahu star.11th house and no planet in Mercury star.Therefore Rahu, Mercury (Rahu Indicates Mars) conjoined period will bring hin back,i.e., Mars Dasa, Rahu bukthi, Mercury andra ie., between 3rd Nov a1968 annd 25/Dec/1968. " If you see, as per the statement, Mars though no a signficator , but predcited that will give give result as Rahu (the signficator) will play role for Mars.But when I checked the chart Mars is in the sub of Rahu and that could be the reason for the signfications.Hence I did not take it seriously. But the Authour has not mentined that. In stead he has said within bracket (Rahu presents Mars) and taken the Mars Dasa. Here we must conside one more point. Mars Dasa is the running Dasa. Hence we must for any chance for the event within the Mars Dasa before moving to the Rahu Dasa. So we have to look into all the possibilities.I ever take everything as a challenge and I need not worry for that as I just wanted to share my learning. With RegardsAdith  www.thebestastro.com

On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 2:22 PM, kadavasal ramani <kadavasalramani wrote:

 

 

 

 

Dear Sri Adithji,

 

The node  unless it is  in August 1in its own star or sub, attains the full signification o its Rasi lord.  Late Sri K.M.Subramanian has in his article " Sub Lord Speaks IV " in K.P.Astrology monthly magazine opf August 1990, has while analysing Dasa  lord Rahu's effects on a chart has  observed that " look at ther sub lord of Rahu.  Rahu is in his own sub.  As node,is in own star or sub. Rahattains the full significaton of its Rasi Lod.   Here the Rasi Lord is Sun, who is full significaor of 2, 6 and 11.(Sun is in th star of Jupiter in 2 owning 11.  Jupiter is in its own star in 2 and no planet in 11.  Further Sun is in 6 and no planet in its stars).

 

Normally, the node's significations are in order of priority (1) planets conjoined with it; (2) Planets aspecting it; (3) the star lord in which the node is posited (4) Irs sign lord. Mr. Tin Winji has categorically stated that th Node will not signify the planets who are

in the star of Node and it is not a K.P.Rule.

 

Your statement that say Rahu will signify its Rasi lord and planets in the Rasi will signify Rahu is just unheard. The other planets

in the Rasi in which the node is present will signify only their star lord's signification and not the node.  Suppose Rahu is in Cancer sign,  he will signify Moon and the Bhavam in which Moon isa placed.  Moon will not signify Rahu.  Similarly if any other planet is

in the same sign viz. Cancer, then if it is in the star of Moon, it will signify Moon and the Bhavam in which it is placed and not Rahu and if the other planet is in the star other than Moon, then it will signify that star lord and Bhavam and not Rahu.  The special Rule is only for Node. Kindly correct me if I am wrong along with Rule for your views.  Kindly do not think that I am challenging you.

 

Truly Yours,

 

K.S.V.Ramani

 

l

 

 

 

 

 

-

adith kasinath.g.k

 

Monday, August 03, 2009 1:37 PM

Re: One riddle I could't solveMoon in 7th in plazce of

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Ramani ji,Pls note the node will act as its signlord. Hence the planet in its signlord will also reflect the signfication of Rahu. I know most of us will not agree this. But I have read analysis in few examples in KP books (not 6 readers). In that Mars in whose sign Rahu is posited, acts as Rahu also. In the other way, Rahu representing Mars, acts for Mars and so. I dont remember the book names. I shall tell you when I recollect or find it from my collections.Also pls note Nodes will represent the planets who are in thier star also. But all are depending on the other points also that strengthen or weaken the signfications Reg: The marraige at the late age: of cource I did not look into that. We shall wait for the feed back.With RegardsAdith   www.thebestastro.com

On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 9:26 AM, kadavasal ramani <kadavasalramani wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Adithji,

 

I request you  kindly to see my mail to Shri VGR Pavanji this morning.  I agree that RAHU, a node in the sign of Moon is agent of

Moon and not Moon is to follow Rahu's signification.  Rahu's Rasi lord Moon is in 4th a negative house for marriage. So Rahu is to give the result of 4th only.  Reg. Saturn, a self strength planet (no planet is in its stars), his occupation sign only isd to be considered in KP system aznd not lordship.  He is the CSL of 10th cusp, a negative houxe for marriage.  In KP system, node

has no aspect of his own.  Aspect of other planets only on it is considered. As such your statement that Rahu aspects Saturn

from 7th is confusing me. Because of this, we cannot assume that Saturn gets the signification of 7th.

  Saturn is in the star of Moon in 4th a negative houe.  We cannot assume that Moon is in 7th in place of Rahu.  On the contrary, Rahu will signify as agent 4th house where Moon occupies.    I request you kindly to correct me, if I am wrong.  For the reasons sta\ted in my mail to shri VGR Pavan, this chart is really puzzle to me so far as Saturn coming as

Bhukthi and Anthara lord on the date of marriage.  I very much doubt whether it is a first marriage or second one,

as on the dat e of marriage the native has completed his 42 years of age.  I have sought for clarification from him.

I request for your comment please.

 

Thanking you,

 

Astrologically yours,

 

K.S.V.Ramani

 

 

-

adith kasinath.g.k

Sunday, August 02, 2009 6:59 PM

Re: One riddle I could't solve

 

Dear Suprakash ji,First of all I like to convey that I am not an elder Kp lover! (39 yrs). Hope I am still young!!!My analysis is follows:Rahu is posited in Moon sign and in 7th house.Hence if any planet is in Moon star, Rahu representing Moon will play role also. ( as I ever say nodes are " Multi faced Weapons " )Hence the planets in Rahu star and also Moon star is capable of favoring marriage. The planets who in the sub of planets who are in the star of Rahu or Moon also capable of giving marriage. (But the panets should not negate strongly .)As said Guru in the star of Rahu is a strong significator of Marriage.Saturn has the following significations:Saturn signifies 2 as lordship (though it is occupied by Jupiter, Saturn is in its own sign). But as no planet in its star, it also signifies secondarily the 2nd.Moreover it is in the star of Moon (represented by Rahu posited in its sign). It is in the sub of Mercury (feebly signifies 7 as lordship) posited in 5. But Mercury is in Sun star signfies 4,8 and also 5 through its star lord Venus. This 5 is also favorable for marriage.Saturn is also aspected by Rahu from 7 also.The other strong planet in Moon star is Venus who signifies 5, and also 2,7 though its sublord Jupiter.Mercury is in the sub of Venus who is in the star of Moon. Hence Mercury is also capable of favoring marraige provided they do not negate the event. Mercury is the lord of 7 posited in Sun star in4. But Sun is in Venus star in 5. Mercury is in Venus star in 5. Venus is in Moon star (in 4. but signfies 7 through Rahu). The DBAS as per my sw on 9/Feb/2005 is Jup-Sat-Sat-Venusthe day was Mercury day.Transit : Sign-star-subMoon -Sat -Mars (Mars in Mer star in 5)-Sat Jupiter-Mercury-Mars-RahuSat- Mercury-Jupiter-venusVenus-Sat-Moon-JupiterRegardsAdithwww.thebestastro.com

On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 11:30 PM, S.Ghosh <suprakash.ghosh wrote:

 

 

 

 

Dear allI seek comments from all members particularly elder KP lovers regarding a chart for which I could not find any clue regarding the marriage time.DOB 04-05-196210:58 PMHowrahMaleHis marriage was on 09-02-2005 during Jup-Sat-sat-KetJupiter is a strong significator for marriage, no doubt about it.But why Saturn? Saturn is so strong that it triggered the event in its own antara.RegardsSuprakash

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Hello Adit,

 

This is a proven rule that nodes behave in 3 ways:

1. Nodes as Nodes

2. Nodes as the Lord of Sign in which they are posited, and

3. Nodes as the Lord of Nakshtra which they occupied

 

Let us clear this with an example. Rahu is placed in Mercury sign and Sun Nakshtra. Then Rahu represents Mercury as well as Sun also. Now if, 4th cusp sub Lord is Rahu, then Mercury and Sun will also be treated as the sub Lord of 4th cusp.

Now, suppose Mercury is the 5th cusp sub Lord or Sun is the 11th cusp sub lord then, it can never be said that 5th/11th cusp sub Lord is Rahu also.

 

Hope this clears doubt.

 

Thanks,D K BMob.: 91-9910048040

 

 

"Only GOOD is not Enough, When you Dream of being GREAT."--- On Thu, 6/8/09, Luther Rath <rathluther wrote:

Luther Rath <rathlutherRe: One riddle I could't solveMoon in 7th in plazce of Date: Thursday, 6 August, 2009, 9:29 PM

 

 

Dear Adit,

The second part is not in KP. If it is proven it shall be acceptable, no doubt.

Dr. Rath

 

 

 

adith kasinath.g.k <gkadithkasinath@ gmail.com>@gro ups.comTuesday, August 4, 2009 10:39:38 AMRe: One riddle I could't solveMoon in 7th in plazce of

Dear Dr.Rath,When nodes are capable of giving the result of the signlord and represents or replaces the signlord, why cant they influence on the planets who are in the star of the Signlord? Yes. A lot of findings to be anlalysed further,. And nothing can be confirmed as a rule. Because we have to look into other factors in that case also which supports or not..and many practical results needed.RegardsAdith

On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 8:13 AM, Luther Rath <rathluther > wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

Yes, Adithji,

In the rules for Rahu and Kethu brought forth by Sri Lajmiji also I did not find that any planet offers the results of nodes. But in all rules the nodes offer results of other planets. Your statement needs further appliction to confirm it.

Dr. Rath

 

 

 

 

adith kasinath.g.k <gkadithkasinath@ gmail.com>@gro ups.comMonday, August 3, 2009 7:19:17 PM Re: One riddle I could't solveMoon in 7th in plazce of

Dear Dr.Rath,

Yes. I agree with youBut this is not a rule! Many things are yet to be examined with practical experiences.I have seen it is applied in few cases in some KP books. I dont recall.I shall furnish once I get it.My opnion is : Why should we take "Mars will play the role of Rahu?". In stead, we take "Rahu the representative of Mars will act for Mars".hope practical experiments need for further affirmation.But Nodes are the strongest to give such unexpected results.RegardsAdith

 

On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 4:38 PM, Luther Rath <rathluther > wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Adithji,

I remember to have read that when a node is posited in any sign consider that the sign lord and Star lord are posited at that point. So theoritically all three are posited at that point of zodiac and all are significatrs of that house. But I do not remember to have ever read that if Rahu is in Mars sign Mars acts as Rahu. So I do not think that it is a rule but some one might have applied so. It needs to be examined and verified whether it is genuin. Let us wait to see opinion of others.

Dr. Rath.

 

 

 

 

adith kasinath.g.k <gkadithkasinath@ gmail.com>

@gro ups.com

 

 

Monday, August 3, 2009 1:37:40 PM Re: One riddle I could't solveMoon in 7th in plazce of

 

 

Dear Ramani ji,

Pls note the node will act as its signlord. Hence the planet in its signlord will also reflect the signfication of Rahu. I know most of us will not agree this. But I have read analysis in few examples in KP books (not 6 readers). In that Mars in whose sign Rahu is posited, acts as Rahu also. In the other way, Rahu representing Mars, acts for Mars and so. I dont remember the book names. I shall tell you when I recollect or find it from my collections.Also pls note Nodes will represent the planets who are in thier star also. But all are depending on the other points also that strengthen or weaken the signfications Reg: The marraige at the late age: of cource I did not look into that. We shall wait for the feed back.With RegardsAdith www.thebestastro. com

 

On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 9:26 AM, kadavasal ramani <kadavasalramani@ gmail.com> wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Adithji,

 

I request you kindly to see my mail to Shri VGR Pavanji this morning. I agree that RAHU, a node in the sign of Moon is agent of

Moon and not Moon is to follow Rahu's signification. Rahu's Rasi lord Moon is in 4th a negative house for marriage. So Rahu is to give the result of 4th only. Reg. Saturn, a self strength planet (no planet is in its stars), his occupation sign only isd to be considered in KP system aznd not lordship. He is the CSL of 10th cusp, a negative houxe for marriage. In KP system, node

has no aspect of his own. Aspect of other planets only on it is considered. As such your statement that Rahu aspects Saturn

from 7th is confusing me. Because of this, we cannot assume that Saturn gets the signification of 7th.

Saturn is in the star of Moon in 4th a negative houe. We cannot assume that Moon is in 7th in place of Rahu. On the contrary, Rahu will signify as agent 4th house where Moon occupies. I request you kindly to correct me, if I am wrong. For the reasons sta\ted in my mail to shri VGR Pavan, this chart is really puzzle to me so far as Saturn coming as

Bhukthi and Anthara lord on the date of marriage. I very much doubt whether it is a first marriage or second one,

as on the dat e of marriage the native has completed his 42 years of age. I have sought for clarification from him.

I request for your comment please.

 

Thanking you,

 

Astrologically yours,

 

K.S.V.Ramani

 

 

 

-

adith kasinath.g.k

 

 

 

@gro ups.com

Sunday, August 02, 2009 6:59 PM

Re: One riddle I could't solve

Dear Suprakash ji,First of all I like to convey that I am not an elder Kp lover! (39 yrs). Hope I am still young!!!My analysis is follows:Rahu is posited in Moon sign and in 7th house.Hence if any planet is in Moon star, Rahu representing Moon will play role also. ( as I ever say nodes are "Multi faced Weapons")Hence the planets in Rahu star and also Moon star is capable of favoring marriage. The planets who in the sub of planets who are in the star of Rahu or Moon also capable of giving marriage. (But the panets should not negate strongly .)As said Guru in the star of Rahu is a strong significator of Marriage.Saturn has the following significations:Saturn signifies 2 as lordship (though it is occupied by Jupiter, Saturn is in its own sign). But as no planet in its star, it also signifies secondarily the 2nd.Moreover it is in the star of Moon (represented by Rahu posited in

its sign). It is in the sub of Mercury (feebly signifies 7 as lordship) posited in 5. But Mercury is in Sun star signfies 4,8 and also 5 through its star lord Venus. This 5 is also favorable for marriage.Saturn is also aspected by Rahu from 7 also.The other strong planet in Moon star is Venus who signifies 5, and also 2,7 though its sublord Jupiter.Mercury is in the sub of Venus who is in the star of Moon. Hence Mercury is also capable of favoring marraige provided they do not negate the event. Mercury is the lord of 7 posited in Sun star in4. But Sun is in Venus star in 5. Mercury is in Venus star in 5. Venus is in Moon star (in 4. but signfies 7 through Rahu). The DBAS as per my sw on 9/Feb/2005 is Jup-Sat-Sat- Venusthe day was Mercury day.Transit : Sign-star-subMoon -Sat -Mars (Mars in Mer star in 5)-Sat Jupiter-Mercury- Mars-RahuSat- Mercury-Jupiter-

venusVenus-Sat-Moon- JupiterRegardsAdithwww.thebestastro. com

On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 11:30 PM, S.Ghosh <suprakash.ghosh@ cesc.co.in> wrote:

 

 

 

Dear allI seek comments from all members particularly elder KP lovers regarding a chart for which I could not find any clue regarding the marriage time.DOB 04-05-196210:58 PMHowrahMaleHis marriage was on 09-02-2005 during Jup-Sat-sat- KetJupiter is a strong significator for marriage, no doubt about it.But why Saturn? Saturn is so strong that it triggered the event in its own antara.RegardsSuprakash

 

 

 

 

 

recommends that you upgrade to the new and safer Internet Explorer 8.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Dear Friends,

1. One can use whatever system or mltisystem as he prefers by mentioning

Traditional, KB, KCIL, 4 Step, anyone's own way rule etc without mixing up with

KP, not to make confusion for the KP beginners.

2. KP= Krishnamurti Padhdhati= mainly Guruji KSK's writing in the 6 KP readers

3. Non KP= contradicting or not in line with KP or giving different result from

KP

4. " Node will give the result of the planet that is in its star " is not KP

because it is opposite to KP which is invented on the basis principle that the

planet gives mainly the result of its starlord and whether the result is

desirable or undesirable is decided by its sublord.

5. One or two learned article contributors to the KPE-zine are found using this

opposite rule which is not accepted there.

6. N. Pandu and N. Santhanalingam are only one person; the only one time article

contributor said at the end of article " Thanking you, N Pandu (K.P. Astrologer " )

and after that his address is given N. Santhanalingam M.A.B.T., Vadakkalur

P.O., Annur, (Via) Coimbatore, Pin- 641653.

7. " > Book: How KP pin point the events? Edition 1997

> Page 84: case: Return of Missin Son

> Authour: Shri.K.Hariharan "

is just reprint from KP Reader VI pp 309-311 under Return of Missin Son. In that

example chart Rahu is placed in Aries and so(Rahu Indicates Mars) which is

signlord of Aries, nothing else.

Regards,

tw

 

 

, " kadavasal ramani " <kadavasalramani

wrote:

>

> Dear Adithji,

>

> I am also inclined to agree with the concept of " node will give the result pof

the planet that is in its star " , as learned and much

> experienced person like Sri M.P.Shanmug'in his book Astro Secrets' Vol.I, and

two others.M/s N.Pandu and N Santhanalingam in K.P. & Astrology Magazine as

confirmed by Mr.Tin Winji are strong voters for the above concept.I will try to

search for the address

> of 2 later persons and ascertain the basis or Rule for it, as Mr.Sh\anmugam is

no more now.

>

> Thanking you,

>

> Truly, yours,

>

> K.S.V.Ramani

> magazine

> Original Message -----

> adith kasinath.g.k

>

> Wednesday, August 05, 2009 10:41 PM

> Re: One riddle I could't solveMoon in 7th in plazc e

of

>

>

> Dear KSV Ramani ji,

>

> reg: Node representing the planet in its star:

> Please note TinwinJi has said this is not KP rule. But it has been suggested

by a stalwart in the magazine.

> After our Guruju, many astrologers are finding new inventions as per thier

experience. (like the sublords in the RPs).

>

> I have also seen the few cases of my clients the role of Rahu (Bukthi Lord)

plays the role of a planet in its star. Because sometime Rahu will not signify

the factors, while analysing, a planet in its star will be signfying the factor,

hence I had thought that could be the reason ? Later when I studied the

statement as Tw ji said in some books and also in the forum, I thought that

could be the reason.

> But it needs a lot of reseaches yet to find in what are all the situation

this works out.

>

>

> Reg: The Sign Lord replced by Rahu:

> Further, I have said when Rahu represents a signlord (we replace the sign

lord for Node on many occasions), a node may also represents the signlord in

whose star a planet is traveling. It is my opinion also. This can also be a last

grade signfications? Moreover, as I have said clearly we have look into the

planet should not negate the matter by otehr factors.

>

> But I have read in a KP book for sure , this type of statement which I got

confused and later I thought the above could be the reason . But I dont recall

the book.

>

> But I shall state an another example from a book . It is not exactly the

same, but related only.

>

> Book: How KP pin point the events? Edition 1997

> Page 84: case: Return of Missin Son

> Authour: Shri.K.Hariharan

>

> Mars is in Capricon in 6 from the Lagana of Son (5)

> Rahu is in 8( from 5) in Mars Sign- Aries. Rahu has no planet in its star.

> Mars has ketu , MOOn and also Mars in its star.

>

> I shall reproduce the lines given:

>

> " Judge the houses 2,8 and 11. 2nd house is occupied by Ketu.

Rahu,Ketu,Mercury and Sun are in Ketu star.

> 8th House is occupied by Rahu and none in Rahu star.

> 11th house and no planet in Mercury star.

> Therefore Rahu, Mercury (Rahu Indicates Mars) conjoined period will bring

hin back,

> i.e., Mars Dasa, Rahu bukthi, Mercury andra ie., between 3rd Nov a1968 annd

25/Dec/1968. "

>

> If you see, as per the statement, Mars though no a signficator , but

predcited that will give give result as Rahu (the signficator) will play role

for Mars.

>

> But when I checked the chart Mars is in the sub of Rahu and that could be

the reason for the signfications.

> Hence I did not take it seriously. But the Authour has not mentined that. In

stead he has said within bracket (Rahu presents Mars) and taken the Mars Dasa.

> Here we must conside one more point. Mars Dasa is the running Dasa. Hence we

must for any chance for the event within the Mars Dasa before moving to the Rahu

Dasa. So we have to look into all the possibilities.

>

> I ever take everything as a challenge and I need not worry for that as I

just wanted to share my learning.

>

> With Regards

>

> Adith

>

> www.thebestastro.com

>

>

>

> On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 2:22 PM, kadavasal ramani <kadavasalramani

wrote:

>

>

>

> Dear Sri Adithji,

>

> The node unless it is in August 1in its own star or sub, attains the

full signification o its Rasi lord. Late Sri K.M.Subramanian has in his article

" Sub Lord Speaks IV " in K.P.Astrology monthly magazine opf August 1990, has

while analysing Dasa lord Rahu's effects on a chart has observed that " look at

ther sub lord of Rahu. Rahu is in his own sub. As node,is in own star or sub.

Rahattains the full significaton of its Rasi Lod. Here the Rasi Lord is Sun,

who is full significaor of 2, 6 and 11.(Sun is in th star of Jupiter in 2 owning

11. Jupiter is in its own star in 2 and no planet in 11. Further Sun is in 6

and no planet in its stars).

>

> Normally, the node's significations are in order of priority (1) planets

conjoined with it; (2) Planets aspecting it; (3) the star lord in which the node

is posited (4) Irs sign lord. Mr. Tin Winji has categorically stated that th

Node will not signify the planets who are

> in the star of Node and it is not a K.P.Rule.

>

> Your statement that say Rahu will signify its Rasi lord and planets in the

Rasi will signify Rahu is just unheard. The other planets

> in the Rasi in which the node is present will signify only their star

lord's signification and not the node. Suppose Rahu is in Cancer sign, he will

signify Moon and the Bhavam in which Moon isa placed. Moon will not signify

Rahu. Similarly if any other planet is

> in the same sign viz. Cancer, then if it is in the star of Moon, it will

signify Moon and the Bhavam in which it is placed and not Rahu and if the other

planet is in the star other than Moon, then it will signify that star lord and

Bhavam and not Rahu. The special Rule is only for Node. Kindly correct me if I

am wrong along with Rule for your views. Kindly do not think that I am

challenging you.

>

> Truly Yours,

>

> K.S.V.Ramani

>

> l

>

>

>

> -

> adith kasinath.g.k

>

> Monday, August 03, 2009 1:37 PM

> Re: One riddle I could't solveMoon in 7th in

plazce of

>

>

>

> Dear Ramani ji,

>

> Pls note the node will act as its signlord. Hence the planet in its

signlord will also reflect the signfication of Rahu. I know most of us will not

agree this. But I have read analysis in few examples in KP books (not 6

readers). In that Mars in whose sign Rahu is posited, acts as Rahu also. In the

other way, Rahu representing Mars, acts for Mars and so. I dont remember the

book names. I shall tell you when I recollect or find it from my collections.

>

> Also pls note Nodes will represent the planets who are in thier star

also.

> But all are depending on the other points also that strengthen or weaken

the signfications

>

> Reg: The marraige at the late age: of cource I did not look into that.

We shall wait for the feed back.

>

> With Regards

> Adith

>

> www.thebestastro.com

>

>

>

> On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 9:26 AM, kadavasal ramani <kadavasalramani

wrote:

>

>

>

> Dear Adithji,

>

> I request you kindly to see my mail to Shri VGR Pavanji this morning.

I agree that RAHU, a node in the sign of Moon is agent of

> Moon and not Moon is to follow Rahu's signification. Rahu's Rasi lord

Moon is in 4th a negative house for marriage. So Rahu is to give the result of

4th only. Reg. Saturn, a self strength planet (no planet is in its stars), his

occupation sign only isd to be considered in KP system aznd not lordship. He is

the CSL of 10th cusp, a negative houxe for marriage. In KP system, node

> has no aspect of his own. Aspect of other planets only on it is

considered. As such your statement that Rahu aspects Saturn

> from 7th is confusing me. Because of this, we cannot assume that

Saturn gets the signification of 7th.

> Saturn is in the star of Moon in 4th a negative houe. We cannot

assume that Moon is in 7th in place of Rahu. On the contrary, Rahu will signify

as agent 4th house where Moon occupies. I request you kindly to correct me,

if I am wrong. For the reasons sta\ted in my mail to shri VGR Pavan, this chart

is really puzzle to me so far as Saturn coming as

> Bhukthi and Anthara lord on the date of marriage. I very much doubt

whether it is a first marriage or second one,

> as on the dat e of marriage the native has completed his 42 years of

age. I have sought for clarification from him.

> I request for your comment please.

>

> Thanking you,

>

> Astrologically yours,

>

> K.S.V.Ramani

>

> -

> adith kasinath.g.k

>

> Sunday, August 02, 2009 6:59 PM

> Re: One riddle I could't solve

>

>

>

> Dear Suprakash ji,

>

> First of all I like to convey that I am not an elder Kp lover! (39

yrs). Hope I am still young!!!

>

> My analysis is follows:

>

> Rahu is posited in Moon sign and in 7th house.

>

> Hence if any planet is in Moon star, Rahu representing Moon will

play role also. ( as I ever say nodes are " Multi faced Weapons " )

>

> Hence the planets in Rahu star and also Moon star is capable of

favoring marriage. The planets who in the sub of planets who are in the star of

Rahu or Moon also capable of giving marriage. (But the panets should not negate

strongly .)

>

> As said Guru in the star of Rahu is a strong significator of

Marriage.

> Saturn has the following significations:

>

> Saturn signifies 2 as lordship (though it is occupied by Jupiter,

Saturn is in its own sign). But as no planet in its star, it also signifies

secondarily the 2nd.

>

> Moreover it is in the star of Moon (represented by Rahu posited in

its sign). It is in the sub of Mercury (feebly signifies 7 as lordship) posited

in 5. But Mercury is in Sun star signfies 4,8 and also 5 through its star lord

Venus. This 5 is also favorable for marriage.

>

> Saturn is also aspected by Rahu from 7 also.

>

> The other strong planet in Moon star is Venus who signifies 5, and

also 2,7 though its sublord Jupiter.

>

> Mercury is in the sub of Venus who is in the star of Moon. Hence

Mercury is also capable of favoring marraige provided they do not negate the

event. Mercury is the lord of 7 posited in Sun star in4. But Sun is in Venus

star in 5. Mercury is in Venus star in 5. Venus is in Moon star (in 4. but

signfies 7 through Rahu).

>

> The DBAS as per my sw on 9/Feb/2005 is

> Jup-Sat-Sat-Venus

>

> the day was Mercury day.

> Transit : Sign-star-sub

> Moon -Sat -Mars (Mars in Mer star in 5)-Sat

> Jupiter-Mercury-Mars-Rahu

> Sat- Mercury-Jupiter-venus

> Venus-Sat-Moon-Jupiter

>

>

> Regards

> Adith

> www.thebestastro.com

>

>

>

> On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 11:30 PM, S.Ghosh <suprakash.ghosh

wrote:

>

>

> Dear all

>

> I seek comments from all members particularly elder KP lovers

regarding a chart for which I could not find any clue regarding the marriage

time.

>

> DOB 04-05-1962

> 10:58 PM

> Howrah

> Male

>

> His marriage was on 09-02-2005 during Jup-Sat-sat-Ket

>

> Jupiter is a strong significator for marriage, no doubt about it.

> But why Saturn? Saturn is so strong that it triggered the event in

its own antara.

>

> Regards

>

> Suprakash

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Dear Adithji,

Thanks a lot.

Now I understand your point. In the example given, the event took place in running Mars Dasa. When a dasa of a planet is already running a strict 'Kashauti' of the planet has to be done. It might not signify the concerned houses. We have to see whether it negates the event. If it does not signify and it does not negate too, then it is neutral on the mater. In such an instance the Bhukti, Antra and Sookshma lord will give the result during the running dasa. If the paricular example simulates my statement then we have to consider that since Mars in sub of Rahu as said, Mars allows all maters signifies by Rahu. Since Rahu is a strong significator for the event the event took place during the running Mars dasa.

Please do not mi-understand me but tell e if you do not agree for any reason.

Dr. Rath

 

 

 

adith kasinath.g.k <gkadithkasinath Sent: Thursday, August 6, 2009 10:09:24 PMRe: One riddle I could't solveMoon in 7th in plazce of

Dear Dr. rath,Thanks.Did you go through my reference I have given in the reply to KSV Ramani ji? The example is not exactly stating the point which I raised but related to that only. You can give your comments also. For your review I just past it here://But I have read in a KP book for sure , this type of statement which I got confused and later I thought the above could be the reason . But I dont recall the book.But I shall state an another example from a book . It is not exactly the same, but related only.Book: How KP pin point the events? Edition 1997Page 84: case: Return of Missin SonAuthour: Shri.K.HariharanMars is in Capricon in 6 from the Lagana of Son (5)Rahu is in 8( from 5) in Mars Sign- Aries. Rahu has no planet in its star.Mars has ketu , MOOn and also Mars in its star.I shall reproduce the lines given:" Judge the houses 2,8

and 11. 2nd house is occupied by Ketu. Rahu,Ketu,Mercury and Sun are in Ketu star.8th House is occupied by Rahu and none in Rahu star.11th house and no planet in Mercury star.Therefore Rahu, Mercury (Rahu Indicates Mars) conjoined period will bring hin back,i.e., Mars Dasa, Rahu bukthi, Mercury andra ie., between 3rd Nov a1968 annd 25/Dec/1968."If you see, as per the statement, Mars though no a signficator , but predcited that will give give result as Rahu (the signficator) will play role for Mars.But when I checked the chart Mars is in the sub of Rahu and that could be the reason for the signfications.Hence I did not take it seriously. But the Authour has not mentined that. In stead he has said within bracket (Rahu presents Mars) and taken the Mars Dasa. Here we must conside one more point. Mars Dasa is the running Dasa. Hence we must for any chance for the event within the Mars

Dasa before moving to the Rahu Dasa. So we have to look into all the possibilities. //

On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 9:29 PM, Luther Rath <rathluther > wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Adit,

The second part is not in KP. If it is proven it shall be acceptable, no doubt.

Dr. Rath

 

 

 

 

adith kasinath.g.k <gkadithkasinath@ gmail.com>@gro ups.comTuesday, August 4, 2009 10:39:38 AM

Re: One riddle I could't solveMoon in 7th in plazce of

Dear Dr.Rath,

When nodes are capable of giving the result of the signlord and represents or replaces the signlord, why cant they influence on the planets who are in the star of the Signlord? Yes. A lot of findings to be anlalysed further,. And nothing can be confirmed as a rule. Because we have to look into other factors in that case also which supports or not..and many practical results needed.RegardsAdith

 

On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 8:13 AM, Luther Rath <rathluther > wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yes, Adithji,

In the rules for Rahu and Kethu brought forth by Sri Lajmiji also I did not find that any planet offers the results of nodes. But in all rules the nodes offer results of other planets. Your statement needs further appliction to confirm it.

Dr. Rath

 

 

 

 

 

adith kasinath.g.k <gkadithkasinath@ gmail.com>

 

 

@gro ups.com

 

 

Monday, August 3, 2009 7:19:17 PM Re: One riddle I could't solveMoon in 7th in plazce of

 

 

Dear Dr.Rath,

Yes. I agree with youBut this is not a rule! Many things are yet to be examined with practical experiences.I have seen it is applied in few cases in some KP books. I dont recall.I shall furnish once I get it.My opnion is : Why should we take "Mars will play the role of Rahu?". In stead, we take "Rahu the representative of Mars will act for Mars".hope practical experiments need for further affirmation.But Nodes are the strongest to give such unexpected results.RegardsAdith

 

On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 4:38 PM, Luther Rath <rathluther > wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Adithji,

I remember to have read that when a node is posited in any sign consider that the sign lord and Star lord are posited at that point. So theoritically all three are posited at that point of zodiac and all are significatrs of that house. But I do not remember to have ever read that if Rahu is in Mars sign Mars acts as Rahu. So I do not think that it is a rule but some one might have applied so. It needs to be examined and verified whether it is genuin. Let us wait to see opinion of others.

Dr. Rath.

 

 

 

 

adith kasinath.g.k <gkadithkasinath@ gmail.com>

@gro ups.com

 

 

Monday, August 3, 2009 1:37:40 PM Re: One riddle I could't solveMoon in 7th in plazce of

 

 

Dear Ramani ji,

Pls note the node will act as its signlord. Hence the planet in its signlord will also reflect the signfication of Rahu. I know most of us will not agree this. But I have read analysis in few examples in KP books (not 6 readers). In that Mars in whose sign Rahu is posited, acts as Rahu also. In the other way, Rahu representing Mars, acts for Mars and so. I dont remember the book names. I shall tell you when I recollect or find it from my collections.Also pls note Nodes will represent the planets who are in thier star also. But all are depending on the other points also that strengthen or weaken the signfications Reg: The marraige at the late age: of cource I did not look into that. We shall wait for the feed back.With RegardsAdith www.thebestastro. com

 

On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 9:26 AM, kadavasal ramani <kadavasalramani@ gmail.com> wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Adithji,

 

I request you kindly to see my mail to Shri VGR Pavanji this morning. I agree that RAHU, a node in the sign of Moon is agent of

Moon and not Moon is to follow Rahu's signification. Rahu's Rasi lord Moon is in 4th a negative house for marriage. So Rahu is to give the result of 4th only. Reg. Saturn, a self strength planet (no planet is in its stars), his occupation sign only isd to be considered in KP system aznd not lordship. He is the CSL of 10th cusp, a negative houxe for marriage. In KP system, node

has no aspect of his own. Aspect of other planets only on it is considered. As such your statement that Rahu aspects Saturn

from 7th is confusing me. Because of this, we cannot assume that Saturn gets the signification of 7th.

Saturn is in the star of Moon in 4th a negative houe. We cannot assume that Moon is in 7th in place of Rahu. On the contrary, Rahu will signify as agent 4th house where Moon occupies. I request you kindly to correct me, if I am wrong. For the reasons sta\ted in my mail to shri VGR Pavan, this chart is really puzzle to me so far as Saturn coming as

Bhukthi and Anthara lord on the date of marriage. I very much doubt whether it is a first marriage or second one,

as on the dat e of marriage the native has completed his 42 years of age. I have sought for clarification from him.

I request for your comment please.

 

Thanking you,

 

Astrologically yours,

 

K.S.V.Ramani

 

 

 

-

adith kasinath.g.k

 

 

 

@gro ups.com

Sunday, August 02, 2009 6:59 PM

Re: One riddle I could't solve

Dear Suprakash ji,First of all I like to convey that I am not an elder Kp lover! (39 yrs). Hope I am still young!!!My analysis is follows:Rahu is posited in Moon sign and in 7th house.Hence if any planet is in Moon star, Rahu representing Moon will play role also. ( as I ever say nodes are "Multi faced Weapons")Hence the planets in Rahu star and also Moon star is capable of favoring marriage. The planets who in the sub of planets who are in the star of Rahu or Moon also capable of giving marriage. (But the panets should not negate strongly .)As said Guru in the star of Rahu is a strong significator of Marriage.Saturn has the following significations:Saturn signifies 2 as lordship (though it is occupied by Jupiter, Saturn is in its own sign). But as no planet in its star, it also signifies secondarily the 2nd.Moreover it is in the star of Moon (represented by Rahu posited in its

sign). It is in the sub of Mercury (feebly signifies 7 as lordship) posited in 5. But Mercury is in Sun star signfies 4,8 and also 5 through its star lord Venus. This 5 is also favorable for marriage.Saturn is also aspected by Rahu from 7 also.The other strong planet in Moon star is Venus who signifies 5, and also 2,7 though its sublord Jupiter.Mercury is in the sub of Venus who is in the star of Moon. Hence Mercury is also capable of favoring marraige provided they do not negate the event. Mercury is the lord of 7 posited in Sun star in4. But Sun is in Venus star in 5. Mercury is in Venus star in 5. Venus is in Moon star (in 4. but signfies 7 through Rahu). The DBAS as per my sw on 9/Feb/2005 is Jup-Sat-Sat- Venusthe day was Mercury day.Transit : Sign-star-subMoon -Sat -Mars (Mars in Mer star in 5)-Sat Jupiter-Mercury- Mars-RahuSat- Mercury-Jupiter-

venusVenus-Sat-Moon- JupiterRegardsAdithwww.thebestastro. com

On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 11:30 PM, S.Ghosh <suprakash.ghosh@ cesc.co.in> wrote:

 

 

 

Dear allI seek comments from all members particularly elder KP lovers regarding a chart for which I could not find any clue regarding the marriage time.DOB 04-05-196210:58 PMHowrahMaleHis marriage was on 09-02-2005 during Jup-Sat-sat- KetJupiter is a strong significator for marriage, no doubt about it.But why Saturn? Saturn is so strong that it triggered the event in its own antara.RegardsSuprakash

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

I agree with Sri Ramaniji.

Dr. Rath

 

 

 

kadavasal ramani <kadavasalramani Sent: Wednesday, August 5, 2009 2:22:31 PMRe: One riddle I could't solveMoon in 7th in plazce of

 

Dear Sri Adithji,

 

The node unless it is in August 1in its own star or sub, attains the full signification o its Rasi lord. Late Sri K.M.Subramanian has in his article "Sub Lord Speaks IV" in K.P.Astrology monthly magazine opf August 1990, has while analysing Dasa lord Rahu's effects on a chart has observed that "look at ther sub lord of Rahu. Rahu is in his own sub. As node,is in own star or sub. Rahattains the full significaton of its Rasi Lod. Here the Rasi Lord is Sun, who is full significaor of 2, 6 and 11.(Sun is in th star of Jupiter in 2 owning 11. Jupiter is in its own star in 2 and no planet in 11. Further Sun is in 6 and no planet in its stars).

 

Normally, the node's significations are in order of priority (1) planets conjoined with it; (2) Planets aspecting it; (3) the star lord in which the node is posited (4) Irs sign lord. Mr. Tin Winji has categorically stated that th Node will not signify the planets who are

in the star of Node and it is not a K.P.Rule.

 

Your statement that say Rahu will signify its Rasi lord and planets in the Rasi will signify Rahu is just unheard. The other planets

in the Rasi in which the node is present will signify only their star lord's signification and not the node. Suppose Rahu is in Cancer sign, he will signify Moon and the Bhavam in which Moon isa placed. Moon will not signify Rahu. Similarly if any other planet is

in the same sign viz. Cancer, then if it is in the star of Moon, it will signify Moon and the Bhavam in which it is placed and not Rahu and if the other planet is in the star other than Moon, then it will signify that star lord and Bhavam and not Rahu. The special Rule is only for Node. Kindly correct me if I am wrong along with Rule for your views. Kindly do not think that I am challenging you.

 

Truly Yours,

 

K.S.V.Ramani

 

l

 

 

 

 

-

adith kasinath.g.k

@gro ups.com

Monday, August 03, 2009 1:37 PM

Re: One riddle I could't solveMoon in 7th in plazce of

Dear Ramani ji,Pls note the node will act as its signlord. Hence the planet in its signlord will also reflect the signfication of Rahu. I know most of us will not agree this. But I have read analysis in few examples in KP books (not 6 readers). In that Mars in whose sign Rahu is posited, acts as Rahu also. In the other way, Rahu representing Mars, acts for Mars and so. I dont remember the book names. I shall tell you when I recollect or find it from my collections.Also pls note Nodes will represent the planets who are in thier star also. But all are depending on the other points also that strengthen or weaken the signfications Reg: The marraige at the late age: of cource I did not look into that. We shall wait for the feed back.With RegardsAdith www.thebestastro. com

On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 9:26 AM, kadavasal ramani <kadavasalramani@ gmail.com> wrote:

 

 

 

 

Dear Adithji,

 

I request you kindly to see my mail to Shri VGR Pavanji this morning. I agree that RAHU, a node in the sign of Moon is agent of

Moon and not Moon is to follow Rahu's signification. Rahu's Rasi lord Moon is in 4th a negative house for marriage. So Rahu is to give the result of 4th only. Reg. Saturn, a self strength planet (no planet is in its stars), his occupation sign only isd to be considered in KP system aznd not lordship. He is the CSL of 10th cusp, a negative houxe for marriage. In KP system, node

has no aspect of his own. Aspect of other planets only on it is considered. As such your statement that Rahu aspects Saturn

from 7th is confusing me. Because of this, we cannot assume that Saturn gets the signification of 7th.

Saturn is in the star of Moon in 4th a negative houe. We cannot assume that Moon is in 7th in place of Rahu. On the contrary, Rahu will signify as agent 4th house where Moon occupies. I request you kindly to correct me, if I am wrong. For the reasons sta\ted in my mail to shri VGR Pavan, this chart is really puzzle to me so far as Saturn coming as

Bhukthi and Anthara lord on the date of marriage. I very much doubt whether it is a first marriage or second one,

as on the dat e of marriage the native has completed his 42 years of age. I have sought for clarification from him.

I request for your comment please.

 

Thanking you,

 

Astrologically yours,

 

K.S.V.Ramani

 

 

-

adith kasinath.g.k

@gro ups.com

Sunday, August 02, 2009 6:59 PM

Re: One riddle I could't solve

Dear Suprakash ji,First of all I like to convey that I am not an elder Kp lover! (39 yrs). Hope I am still young!!!My analysis is follows:Rahu is posited in Moon sign and in 7th house.Hence if any planet is in Moon star, Rahu representing Moon will play role also. ( as I ever say nodes are "Multi faced Weapons")Hence the planets in Rahu star and also Moon star is capable of favoring marriage. The planets who in the sub of planets who are in the star of Rahu or Moon also capable of giving marriage. (But the panets should not negate strongly .)As said Guru in the star of Rahu is a strong significator of Marriage.Saturn has the following significations:Saturn signifies 2 as lordship (though it is occupied by Jupiter, Saturn is in its own sign). But as no planet in its star, it also signifies secondarily the 2nd.Moreover it is in the star of Moon (represented by Rahu posited in its

sign). It is in the sub of Mercury (feebly signifies 7 as lordship) posited in 5. But Mercury is in Sun star signfies 4,8 and also 5 through its star lord Venus. This 5 is also favorable for marriage.Saturn is also aspected by Rahu from 7 also.The other strong planet in Moon star is Venus who signifies 5, and also 2,7 though its sublord Jupiter.Mercury is in the sub of Venus who is in the star of Moon. Hence Mercury is also capable of favoring marraige provided they do not negate the event. Mercury is the lord of 7 posited in Sun star in4. But Sun is in Venus star in 5. Mercury is in Venus star in 5. Venus is in Moon star (in 4. but signfies 7 through Rahu). The DBAS as per my sw on 9/Feb/2005 is Jup-Sat-Sat- Venusthe day was Mercury day.Transit : Sign-star-subMoon -Sat -Mars (Mars in Mer star in 5)-Sat Jupiter-Mercury- Mars-RahuSat- Mercury-Jupiter-

venusVenus-Sat-Moon- JupiterRegardsAdithwww.thebestastro. com

On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 11:30 PM, S.Ghosh <suprakash.ghosh@ cesc.co.in> wrote:

 

 

 

Dear allI seek comments from all members particularly elder KP lovers regarding a chart for which I could not find any clue regarding the marriage time.DOB 04-05-196210:58 PMHowrahMaleHis marriage was on 09-02-2005 during Jup-Sat-sat- KetJupiter is a strong significator for marriage, no doubt about it.But why Saturn? Saturn is so strong that it triggered the event in its own antara.RegardsSuprakash

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Dear Luther ji,I never misunderstand you or any one in the forum. We are discussing or sharing our thoughts/ knowledge.I just shared my opinion from the points I gathered from some books.As you said, that was the reason I said this is not the exact reference but related.

 But I shall one day give the reference where I read my statement when I could find it backThanks and RegardsAdith. On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Luther Rath <rathluther wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Adithji,

Thanks a lot.

Now I understand your point. In the example given, the event took place in running Mars Dasa. When a dasa of a planet is already running a strict 'Kashauti' of the planet has to be done. It might not signify the concerned houses. We have to see whether it negates the event. If it does not signify and it does not negate too, then it is neutral on the mater. In such an instance the Bhukti, Antra and Sookshma lord will give the result during the running dasa. If the paricular example simulates my statement then we have to consider that since Mars in sub of Rahu as said, Mars allows all maters signifies by Rahu. Since Rahu is a strong significator for the event the event took place during the running Mars dasa.

Please do not mi-understand me but tell e if you do not agree for any reason.

Dr. Rath

 

 

 

adith kasinath.g.k <gkadithkasinath

Thursday, August 6, 2009 10:09:24 PMRe: One riddle I could't solveMoon in 7th in plazce of

 

Dear Dr. rath,Thanks.Did you go through my reference I have given in the reply to KSV Ramani ji? The example is not exactly stating the point which I raised but related to that only. You can give your comments also.

 For your review I just past it here://But I have read in a KP book for sure , this type of statement which I got confused and later I thought the above could be the reason . But I dont recall the book.

But I shall state an another example from a book . It is not exactly the same, but related only.Book: How KP pin point the events? Edition 1997Page 84: case: Return of Missin SonAuthour: Shri.K.Hariharan

Mars is in Capricon in 6 from the Lagana of Son (5)Rahu is in 8( from 5) in Mars Sign- Aries. Rahu has no planet in its star.Mars has ketu , MOOn and also Mars in its star.I shall reproduce the lines given:

" Judge the houses 2,8

and 11. 2nd house is occupied by Ketu. Rahu,Ketu,Mercury and Sun are in Ketu star.8th House is occupied by Rahu and none in Rahu star.11th house and no planet in Mercury star.Therefore Rahu, Mercury (Rahu Indicates Mars) conjoined period will bring hin back,

i.e., Mars Dasa, Rahu bukthi, Mercury andra ie., between 3rd Nov a1968 annd 25/Dec/1968. " If you see, as per the statement, Mars though no a signficator , but predcited that will give give result as Rahu (the signficator) will play role for Mars.

But when I checked the chart Mars is in the sub of Rahu and that could be the reason for the signfications.Hence I did not take it seriously. But the Authour has not mentined that. In stead he has said within bracket (Rahu presents Mars) and taken the Mars Dasa.

Here we must conside one more point. Mars Dasa is the running Dasa. Hence we must for any chance for the event within the Mars

Dasa before moving to the Rahu Dasa. So we have to look into all the possibilities. //

On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 9:29 PM, Luther Rath <rathluther > wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Adit,

The second part is not in KP. If it is proven it shall be acceptable, no doubt.

Dr. Rath

 

 

 

 

adith kasinath.g.k <gkadithkasinath@ gmail.com>@gro ups.com

Tuesday, August 4, 2009 10:39:38 AM

Re: One riddle I could't solveMoon in 7th in plazce of 

Dear Dr.Rath,

When nodes are capable of giving the result of the signlord and represents or replaces the signlord, why cant they influence on the planets who are in the star of the Signlord? Yes. A lot of findings to be anlalysed further,. And nothing can be confirmed as a rule. Because we have to look into other factors in that case also which supports or not..and many practical results needed.

RegardsAdith

 

On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 8:13 AM, Luther Rath <rathluther > wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yes, Adithji,

In the rules for Rahu and Kethu brought forth by Sri Lajmiji also I did not find that any planet offers the results of nodes. But in all rules the nodes offer results of other planets. Your statement needs further appliction to confirm it.

Dr. Rath

 

 

 

 

 

adith kasinath.g.k <gkadithkasinath@ gmail.com>

 

 

@gro ups.com

 

 

Monday, August 3, 2009 7:19:17 PM Re: One riddle I could't solveMoon in 7th in plazce of

 

 

 

Dear Dr.Rath,

Yes. I agree with youBut this is not a rule! Many things are yet to be examined with practical experiences.I have seen it is applied in few cases in some KP books. I dont recall.I shall furnish once I get it.

My opnion is : Why should we take " Mars will play the role of Rahu? " . In stead, we take " Rahu the representative of Mars will act for Mars " .hope practical experiments need for further affirmation.

But Nodes are the strongest to give such unexpected results.RegardsAdith

 

On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 4:38 PM, Luther Rath <rathluther > wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Adithji,

I remember to have read that when a node is posited in any sign consider that the sign lord and Star lord are posited at that point. So theoritically all three are posited at that point of zodiac and all are significatrs of that house. But I do not remember to have ever read that if Rahu is in Mars sign Mars acts as Rahu. So I do not think that it is a rule but some one might have applied so. It needs to be examined and verified whether it is genuin. Let us wait to see opinion of others.

Dr. Rath.

 

 

 

 

adith kasinath.g.k <gkadithkasinath@ gmail.com>

@gro ups.com

 

 

Monday, August 3, 2009 1:37:40 PM Re: One riddle I could't solveMoon in 7th in plazce of

 

 

 

Dear Ramani ji,

Pls note the node will act as its signlord. Hence the planet in its signlord will also reflect the signfication of Rahu. I know most of us will not agree this. But I have read analysis in few examples in KP books (not 6 readers). In that Mars in whose sign Rahu is posited, acts as Rahu also. In the other way, Rahu representing Mars, acts for Mars and so. I dont remember the book names. I shall tell you when I recollect or find it from my collections.

Also pls note Nodes will represent the planets who are in thier star also. But all are depending on the other points also that strengthen or weaken the signfications Reg: The marraige at the late age: of cource I did not look into that. We shall wait for the feed back.

With RegardsAdith   www.thebestastro. com

 

On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 9:26 AM, kadavasal ramani <kadavasalramani@ gmail.com> wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Adithji,

 

I request you  kindly to see my mail to Shri VGR Pavanji this morning.  I agree that RAHU, a node in the sign of Moon is agent of

Moon and not Moon is to follow Rahu's signification.  Rahu's Rasi lord Moon is in 4th a negative house for marriage. So Rahu is to give the result of 4th only.  Reg. Saturn, a self strength planet (no planet is in its stars), his occupation sign only isd to be considered in KP system aznd not lordship.  He is the CSL of 10th cusp, a negative houxe for marriage.  In KP system, node

has no aspect of his own.  Aspect of other planets only on it is considered. As such your statement that Rahu aspects Saturn

from 7th is confusing me. Because of this, we cannot assume that Saturn gets the signification of 7th.

  Saturn is in the star of Moon in 4th a negative houe.  We cannot assume that Moon is in 7th in place of Rahu.  On the contrary, Rahu will signify as agent 4th house where Moon occupies.    I request you kindly to correct me, if I am wrong.  For the reasons sta\ted in my mail to shri VGR Pavan, this chart is really puzzle to me so far as Saturn coming as

Bhukthi and Anthara lord on the date of marriage.  I very much doubt whether it is a first marriage or second one,

as on the dat e of marriage the native has completed his 42 years of age.  I have sought for clarification from him.

I request for your comment please.

 

Thanking you,

 

Astrologically yours,

 

K.S.V.Ramani

 

 

 

-

adith kasinath.g.k

 

 

 

 

@gro ups.com

Sunday, August 02, 2009 6:59 PM

Re: One riddle I could't solve

 

Dear Suprakash ji,First of all I like to convey that I am not an elder Kp lover! (39 yrs). Hope I am still young!!!My analysis is follows:Rahu is posited in Moon sign and in 7th house.Hence if any planet is in Moon star, Rahu representing Moon will play role also. ( as I ever say nodes are " Multi faced Weapons " )

Hence the planets in Rahu star and also Moon star is capable of favoring marriage. The planets who in the sub of planets who are in the star of Rahu or Moon also capable of giving marriage. (But the panets should not negate strongly .)

As said Guru in the star of Rahu is a strong significator of Marriage.Saturn has the following significations:Saturn signifies 2 as lordship (though it is occupied by Jupiter, Saturn is in its own sign). But as no planet in its star, it also signifies secondarily the 2nd.

Moreover it is in the star of Moon (represented by Rahu posited in its

sign). It is in the sub of Mercury (feebly signifies 7 as lordship) posited in 5. But Mercury is in Sun star signfies 4,8 and also 5 through its star lord Venus. This 5 is also favorable for marriage.Saturn is also aspected by Rahu from 7 also.

The other strong planet in Moon star is Venus who signifies 5, and also 2,7 though its sublord Jupiter.Mercury is in the sub of Venus who is in the star of Moon. Hence Mercury is also capable of favoring marraige provided they do not negate the event. Mercury is the lord of 7 posited in Sun star in4. But Sun is in Venus star in 5. Mercury is in Venus star in 5. Venus is in Moon star (in 4. but signfies 7 through Rahu).

The DBAS as per my sw on 9/Feb/2005 is Jup-Sat-Sat- Venusthe day was Mercury day.Transit : Sign-star-subMoon -Sat -Mars (Mars in Mer star in 5)-Sat Jupiter-Mercury- Mars-RahuSat- Mercury-Jupiter-

venusVenus-Sat-Moon- JupiterRegardsAdithwww.thebestastro. com

On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 11:30 PM, S.Ghosh <suprakash.ghosh@ cesc.co.in> wrote:

 

 

 

 

Dear allI seek comments from all members particularly elder KP lovers regarding a chart for which I could not find any clue regarding the marriage time.DOB 04-05-196210:58 PMHowrahMale

His marriage was on 09-02-2005 during Jup-Sat-sat- KetJupiter is a strong significator for marriage, no doubt about it.But why Saturn? Saturn is so strong that it triggered the event in its own antara.

RegardsSuprakash

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Dear TW ji,Noted with Thanks!RegardsAdithOn Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 9:35 AM, tw853 <tw853 wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Friends,

1. One can use whatever system or mltisystem as he prefers by mentioning Traditional, KB, KCIL, 4 Step, anyone's own way rule etc without mixing up with KP, not to make confusion for the KP beginners.

2. KP= Krishnamurti Padhdhati= mainly Guruji KSK's writing in the 6 KP readers

3. Non KP= contradicting or not in line with KP or giving different result from KP

4. " Node will give the result of the planet that is in its star " is not KP because it is opposite to KP which is invented on the basis principle that the planet gives mainly the result of its starlord and whether the result is desirable or undesirable is decided by its sublord.

5. One or two learned article contributors to the KPE-zine are found using this opposite rule which is not accepted there.

6. N. Pandu and N. Santhanalingam are only one person; the only one time article contributor said at the end of article " Thanking you, N Pandu (K.P. Astrologer " ) and after that his address is given N. Santhanalingam M.A.B.T., Vadakkalur P.O., Annur, (Via) Coimbatore, Pin- 641653.

7. " > Book: How KP pin point the events? Edition 1997

> Page 84: case: Return of Missin Son

> Authour: Shri.K.Hariharan "

is just reprint from KP Reader VI pp 309-311 under Return of Missin Son. In that example chart Rahu is placed in Aries and so(Rahu Indicates Mars) which is signlord of Aries, nothing else.

Regards,

tw

 

 

, " kadavasal ramani " <kadavasalramani wrote:

>

> Dear Adithji,

>

> I am also inclined to agree with the concept of " node will give the result pof the planet that is in its star " , as learned and much

> experienced person like Sri M.P.Shanmug'in his book Astro Secrets' Vol.I, and two others.M/s N.Pandu and N Santhanalingam in K.P. & Astrology Magazine as confirmed by Mr.Tin Winji are strong voters for the above concept.I will try to search for the address

> of 2 later persons and ascertain the basis or Rule for it, as Mr.Sh\anmugam is no more now.

>

> Thanking you,

>

> Truly, yours,

>

> K.S.V.Ramani

> magazine

> Original Message -----

> adith kasinath.g.k

>

> Wednesday, August 05, 2009 10:41 PM

> Re: One riddle I could't solveMoon in 7th in plazc e of

>

>

> Dear KSV Ramani ji,

>

> reg: Node representing the planet in its star:

> Please note TinwinJi has said this is not KP rule. But it has been suggested by a stalwart in the magazine.

> After our Guruju, many astrologers are finding new inventions as per thier experience. (like the sublords in the RPs).

>

> I have also seen the few cases of my clients the role of Rahu (Bukthi Lord) plays the role of a planet in its star. Because sometime Rahu will not signify the factors, while analysing, a planet in its star will be signfying the factor, hence I had thought that could be the reason ? Later when I studied the statement as Tw ji said in some books and also in the forum, I thought that could be the reason.

> But it needs a lot of reseaches yet to find in what are all the situation this works out.

>

>

> Reg: The Sign Lord replced by Rahu:

> Further, I have said when Rahu represents a signlord (we replace the sign lord for Node on many occasions), a node may also represents the signlord in whose star a planet is traveling. It is my opinion also. This can also be a last grade signfications? Moreover, as I have said clearly we have look into the planet should not negate the matter by otehr factors.

>

> But I have read in a KP book for sure , this type of statement which I got confused and later I thought the above could be the reason . But I dont recall the book.

>

> But I shall state an another example from a book . It is not exactly the same, but related only.

>

> Book: How KP pin point the events? Edition 1997

> Page 84: case: Return of Missin Son

> Authour: Shri.K.Hariharan

>

> Mars is in Capricon in 6 from the Lagana of Son (5)

> Rahu is in 8( from 5) in Mars Sign- Aries. Rahu has no planet in its star.

> Mars has ketu , MOOn and also Mars in its star.

>

> I shall reproduce the lines given:

>

> " Judge the houses 2,8 and 11. 2nd house is occupied by Ketu. Rahu,Ketu,Mercury and Sun are in Ketu star.

> 8th House is occupied by Rahu and none in Rahu star.

> 11th house and no planet in Mercury star.

> Therefore Rahu, Mercury (Rahu Indicates Mars) conjoined period will bring hin back,

> i.e., Mars Dasa, Rahu bukthi, Mercury andra ie., between 3rd Nov a1968 annd 25/Dec/1968. "

>

> If you see, as per the statement, Mars though no a signficator , but predcited that will give give result as Rahu (the signficator) will play role for Mars.

>

> But when I checked the chart Mars is in the sub of Rahu and that could be the reason for the signfications.

> Hence I did not take it seriously. But the Authour has not mentined that. In stead he has said within bracket (Rahu presents Mars) and taken the Mars Dasa.

> Here we must conside one more point. Mars Dasa is the running Dasa. Hence we must for any chance for the event within the Mars Dasa before moving to the Rahu Dasa. So we have to look into all the possibilities.

>

> I ever take everything as a challenge and I need not worry for that as I just wanted to share my learning.

>

> With Regards

>

> Adith

>

> www.thebestastro.com

>

>

>

> On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 2:22 PM, kadavasal ramani <kadavasalramani wrote:

>

>

>

> Dear Sri Adithji,

>

> The node unless it is in August 1in its own star or sub, attains the full signification o its Rasi lord. Late Sri K.M.Subramanian has in his article " Sub Lord Speaks IV " in K.P.Astrology monthly magazine opf August 1990, has while analysing Dasa lord Rahu's effects on a chart has observed that " look at ther sub lord of Rahu. Rahu is in his own sub. As node,is in own star or sub. Rahattains the full significaton of its Rasi Lod. Here the Rasi Lord is Sun, who is full significaor of 2, 6 and 11.(Sun is in th star of Jupiter in 2 owning 11. Jupiter is in its own star in 2 and no planet in 11. Further Sun is in 6 and no planet in its stars).

>

> Normally, the node's significations are in order of priority (1) planets conjoined with it; (2) Planets aspecting it; (3) the star lord in which the node is posited (4) Irs sign lord. Mr. Tin Winji has categorically stated that th Node will not signify the planets who are

> in the star of Node and it is not a K.P.Rule.

>

> Your statement that say Rahu will signify its Rasi lord and planets in the Rasi will signify Rahu is just unheard. The other planets

> in the Rasi in which the node is present will signify only their star lord's signification and not the node. Suppose Rahu is in Cancer sign, he will signify Moon and the Bhavam in which Moon isa placed. Moon will not signify Rahu. Similarly if any other planet is

> in the same sign viz. Cancer, then if it is in the star of Moon, it will signify Moon and the Bhavam in which it is placed and not Rahu and if the other planet is in the star other than Moon, then it will signify that star lord and Bhavam and not Rahu. The special Rule is only for Node. Kindly correct me if I am wrong along with Rule for your views. Kindly do not think that I am challenging you.

>

> Truly Yours,

>

> K.S.V.Ramani

>

> l

>

>

>

> -

> adith kasinath.g.k

>

> Monday, August 03, 2009 1:37 PM

> Re: One riddle I could't solveMoon in 7th in plazce of

>

>

>

> Dear Ramani ji,

>

> Pls note the node will act as its signlord. Hence the planet in its signlord will also reflect the signfication of Rahu. I know most of us will not agree this. But I have read analysis in few examples in KP books (not 6 readers). In that Mars in whose sign Rahu is posited, acts as Rahu also. In the other way, Rahu representing Mars, acts for Mars and so. I dont remember the book names. I shall tell you when I recollect or find it from my collections.

>

> Also pls note Nodes will represent the planets who are in thier star also.

> But all are depending on the other points also that strengthen or weaken the signfications

>

> Reg: The marraige at the late age: of cource I did not look into that. We shall wait for the feed back.

>

> With Regards

> Adith

>

> www.thebestastro.com

>

>

>

> On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 9:26 AM, kadavasal ramani <kadavasalramani wrote:

>

>

>

> Dear Adithji,

>

> I request you kindly to see my mail to Shri VGR Pavanji this morning. I agree that RAHU, a node in the sign of Moon is agent of

> Moon and not Moon is to follow Rahu's signification. Rahu's Rasi lord Moon is in 4th a negative house for marriage. So Rahu is to give the result of 4th only. Reg. Saturn, a self strength planet (no planet is in its stars), his occupation sign only isd to be considered in KP system aznd not lordship. He is the CSL of 10th cusp, a negative houxe for marriage. In KP system, node

> has no aspect of his own. Aspect of other planets only on it is considered. As such your statement that Rahu aspects Saturn

> from 7th is confusing me. Because of this, we cannot assume that Saturn gets the signification of 7th.

> Saturn is in the star of Moon in 4th a negative houe. We cannot assume that Moon is in 7th in place of Rahu. On the contrary, Rahu will signify as agent 4th house where Moon occupies. I request you kindly to correct me, if I am wrong. For the reasons sta\ted in my mail to shri VGR Pavan, this chart is really puzzle to me so far as Saturn coming as

> Bhukthi and Anthara lord on the date of marriage. I very much doubt whether it is a first marriage or second one,

> as on the dat e of marriage the native has completed his 42 years of age. I have sought for clarification from him.

> I request for your comment please.

>

> Thanking you,

>

> Astrologically yours,

>

> K.S.V.Ramani

>

> -

> adith kasinath.g.k

>

> Sunday, August 02, 2009 6:59 PM

> Re: One riddle I could't solve

>

>

>

> Dear Suprakash ji,

>

> First of all I like to convey that I am not an elder Kp lover! (39 yrs). Hope I am still young!!!

>

> My analysis is follows:

>

> Rahu is posited in Moon sign and in 7th house.

>

> Hence if any planet is in Moon star, Rahu representing Moon will play role also. ( as I ever say nodes are " Multi faced Weapons " )

>

> Hence the planets in Rahu star and also Moon star is capable of favoring marriage. The planets who in the sub of planets who are in the star of Rahu or Moon also capable of giving marriage. (But the panets should not negate strongly .)

>

> As said Guru in the star of Rahu is a strong significator of Marriage.

> Saturn has the following significations:

>

> Saturn signifies 2 as lordship (though it is occupied by Jupiter, Saturn is in its own sign). But as no planet in its star, it also signifies secondarily the 2nd.

>

> Moreover it is in the star of Moon (represented by Rahu posited in its sign). It is in the sub of Mercury (feebly signifies 7 as lordship) posited in 5. But Mercury is in Sun star signfies 4,8 and also 5 through its star lord Venus. This 5 is also favorable for marriage.

>

> Saturn is also aspected by Rahu from 7 also.

>

> The other strong planet in Moon star is Venus who signifies 5, and also 2,7 though its sublord Jupiter.

>

> Mercury is in the sub of Venus who is in the star of Moon. Hence Mercury is also capable of favoring marraige provided they do not negate the event. Mercury is the lord of 7 posited in Sun star in4. But Sun is in Venus star in 5. Mercury is in Venus star in 5. Venus is in Moon star (in 4. but signfies 7 through Rahu).

>

> The DBAS as per my sw on 9/Feb/2005 is

> Jup-Sat-Sat-Venus

>

> the day was Mercury day.

> Transit : Sign-star-sub

> Moon -Sat -Mars (Mars in Mer star in 5)-Sat

> Jupiter-Mercury-Mars-Rahu

> Sat- Mercury-Jupiter-venus

> Venus-Sat-Moon-Jupiter

>

>

> Regards

> Adith

> www.thebestastro.com

>

>

>

> On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 11:30 PM, S.Ghosh <suprakash.ghosh wrote:

>

>

> Dear all

>

> I seek comments from all members particularly elder KP lovers regarding a chart for which I could not find any clue regarding the marriage time.

>

> DOB 04-05-1962

> 10:58 PM

> Howrah

> Male

>

> His marriage was on 09-02-2005 during Jup-Sat-sat-Ket

>

> Jupiter is a strong significator for marriage, no doubt about it.

> But why Saturn? Saturn is so strong that it triggered the event in its own antara.

>

> Regards

>

> Suprakash

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...