Guest guest Posted September 6, 2009 Report Share Posted September 6, 2009 Dear Sonali ji,As per my limited knowledge, in a chart Badhaka Sthana is to be considered only for the questions related to longivity. For other matters these sthanas are not Badhaka. For example, for movable signs 11th house is Badhaka when matters related to logivity are to be considered; otherwise 11th house is the most important house in all other matters. If your contenetion is accepted that for charts having ascendant in movable signs 11th is a Badhaka Sthana and will create problems, then natives having Aries, Cancer, Libra and Capricorn ascendants are doomed forever because for any matter to fructify 11th house must be involved in DBAS.Again as per my limited knowledge, Shri Shahasane has not considered aspects of Rahu and Ketu ANYWHERE in his excellent book Krishnamuti Jyotish Rahasya. If you have come across such a reference, which I may have overlooked, please give me the page number and the topic where he has considered such aspects. You must have, no doubt, read a recent posting by shri Tinwin ji. In case you have overlooked it, her is the link: /message/27227Here, he has categorically stated that in KP Rahu and Ketu do not have any aspects.Regards,Sandeep Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 6, 2009 Report Share Posted September 6, 2009 Dear Sandeepji, PL CORRECT THE FOLLOWING AS I’VE NEVER CONTENDED THIS: If your contenetion is accepted that for charts having ascendant in movable signs 11th is a Badhaka Sthana and will create problems, then natives having Aries, Cancer, Libra and Capricorn ascendants are doomed forever because for any matter to fructify 11th house must be involved in DBAS. This was as per analysis of Singhji: 1. “Moon the ascendant lord is in Ketu's nakhsatra and Venus sub. Venus is the badhaka planet for Cancer ascendant and there is no planet in Venus's nakshatra. So Moon the lagna lord being in Venus's sub is a very strong Badhaka planet. So Moon will give struggle, obstruction, road blocks in its dasha.” My reply to above: if same is considered true, whenever mo is under str of Ve, native should face struggle, obstruction, road blocks. But actual observation is as under: At the time of Money inflow: MO'S (asc’s) POSITION UNDER STR OF DIFFERENT PLANETS STAR LORD % RANK Sun 10 3 Mon (0) 11 Sat 2 8 Mar 50 1 Jup 3 6 Jup: R (1) 13 Ket 7 5 Mar: R 0 10 Mer 3 7 Mer: R 0 9 Rah 8 4 Sat: R (1) 12 Ven 18 2 Grand Total 100 Above Table mean that 10% of total money recd was recd when mo was under str of Su. & based on above table, ranking of Ve is 2, which is next to best. Plz Comment. Thanks & Regards, Sonali On Behalf Of sandeep patel Sunday, September 06, 2009 11:51 PM Re: MAHADASHA NOT YILEDING DESIRED RESULTS Dear Sonali ji, As per my limited knowledge, in a chart Badhaka Sthana is to be considered only for the questions related to longivity. For other matters these sthanas are not Badhaka. For example, for movable signs 11th house is Badhaka when matters related to logivity are to be considered; otherwise 11th house is the most important house in all other matters. If your contenetion is accepted that for charts having ascendant in movable signs 11th is a Badhaka Sthana and will create problems, then natives having Aries, Cancer, Libra and Capricorn ascendants are doomed forever because for any matter to fructify 11th house must be involved in DBAS. Again as per my limited knowledge, Shri Shahasane has not considered aspects of Rahu and Ketu ANYWHERE in his excellent book Krishnamuti Jyotish Rahasya. If you have come across such a reference, which I may have overlooked, please give me the page number and the topic where he has considered such aspects. You must have, no doubt, read a recent posting by shri Tinwin ji. In case you have overlooked it, her is the link: /message/27227 Here, he has categorically stated that in KP Rahu and Ketu do not have any aspects. Regards, Sandeep Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 7, 2009 Report Share Posted September 7, 2009 1. Badhaka may effect only the health if its Dasa or Bhukti is operating... KP Reader V p 263 para 2 (Old Edition p 226 para 1} 2. In Jathaka Chandrika the author claims that the lords of the houses 3,6,8 and 11 are malefic. By that he means, according to me, that these are evil only for one's heath and longevity and not for other aspects in one's life. KP Reader V p 131 para 1 (Old Edition p 125 para 1} 3. Badhaka lord Me, by being star lord of Dasa lord Ra, didn't hinder monetary gains by lottery in Ra Dasa of the chart below. /message/27194 , sandeep patel <sandeeppatel21 wrote: > > Dear Sonali ji, > As per my limited knowledge, in a chart Badhaka Sthana is to be considered only for the questions related to longivity. For other matters these sthanas are not Badhaka. For example, for movable signs 11th house is Badhaka when matters related to logivity are to be considered; otherwise 11th house is the most important house in all other matters. If your contenetion is accepted that for charts having ascendant in movable signs 11th is a Badhaka Sthana and will create problems, then natives having Aries, Cancer, Libra and Capricorn ascendants are doomed forever because for any matter to fructify 11th house must be involved in DBAS. > Again as per my limited knowledge, Shri Shahasane has not considered aspects of Rahu and Ketu ANYWHERE in his excellent book Krishnamuti Jyotish Rahasya. If you have come across such a reference, which I may have overlooked, please give me the page number and the topic where he has considered such aspects. You must have, no doubt, read a recent posting by shri Tinwin ji. In case you have overlooked it, her is the link: /message/27227Here, he has categorically stated that in KP Rahu and Ketu do not have any aspects. > Regards,Sandeep > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 7, 2009 Report Share Posted September 7, 2009 respected Mr.Sandeep, Sir, Sorry for intervening in the discussion .Whether according to KP, Rahu/Ketu have aspect or not, is a different thing . But I distinctly remember that in his classic work " Krishnimurty Jyotish Rahasya " Mr.Shahasane has on occasions used Rahu/Ketu,s aspects while analysing some charts. At present my book is not with me and therefore I cannot quote page numbers.But I am sure my memory would not fail me. Regards, sujat karambelkar. , sandeep patel <sandeeppatel21 wrote: > > Dear Sonali ji, > As per my limited knowledge, in a chart Badhaka Sthana is to be considered only for the questions related to longivity. For other matters these sthanas are not Badhaka. For example, for movable signs 11th house is Badhaka when matters related to logivity are to be considered; otherwise 11th house is the most important house in all other matters. If your contenetion is accepted that for charts having ascendant in movable signs 11th is a Badhaka Sthana and will create problems, then natives having Aries, Cancer, Libra and Capricorn ascendants are doomed forever because for any matter to fructify 11th house must be involved in DBAS. > Again as per my limited knowledge, Shri Shahasane has not considered aspects of Rahu and Ketu ANYWHERE in his excellent book Krishnamuti Jyotish Rahasya. If you have come across such a reference, which I may have overlooked, please give me the page number and the topic where he has considered such aspects. You must have, no doubt, read a recent posting by shri Tinwin ji. In case you have overlooked it, her is the link: /message/27227Here, he has categorically stated that in KP Rahu and Ketu do not have any aspects. > Regards,Sandeep > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 7, 2009 Report Share Posted September 7, 2009 Dear Sujatji,I have read and re-read the book "Krishnamurti Jyotish Rahasya" a number of times and I have not come across a single instance where Shri Shahasane Sir has used aspects of Rahu and Ketu. But since you are so confident that he did, may be I am mistaken. However, I would appreciate it very much if you could tell me on which page and under which topic he has used aspects of Rahu and Ketu.In the meantime, I would also go through the entire book once again and try to locate that instance, if at all it is there.Regards,Sandeep Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 8, 2009 Report Share Posted September 8, 2009 dear sandeep, mr.shahasane lerned kp thr Hasbe Guruji and i know very well that hasbe guruji was using aspects of rahu/ketu in one seminar he quotes " 7th sub is ketu.it is in first house and aspecting 7th house,so marriage is assured " thanks -sunil gondhalekar On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 7:51 PM, sandeep patel <sandeeppatel21 wrote: Dear Sujatji, I have read and re-read the book " Krishnamurti Jyotish Rahasya " a number of times and I have not come across a single instance where Shri Shahasane Sir has used aspects of Rahu and Ketu. But since you are so confident that he did, may be I am mistaken. However, I would appreciate it very much if you could tell me on which page and under which topic he has used aspects of Rahu and Ketu. In the meantime, I would also go through the entire book once again and try to locate that instance, if at all it is there. Regards, Sandeep -- Sunil Gondhalekarwww.astrologyask.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 8, 2009 Report Share Posted September 8, 2009 Dear Mr.Sunil Gondhlekar Since Rahu/Ketu signify the houses signified by the aspecting planets,if you consider their 7th aspect they will signify the same houses as they will aspect each other.Normally their 5,9 aspects are considered.Ref.Accurate Predictive Methodology by Umang Taneja. Regards A.K.Sehgal--- On Tue, 8/9/09, sunil gondhalekar <sunilalaka wrote: sunil gondhalekar <sunilalakaRe: Re: MAHADASHA NOT YILEDING DESIRED RESULTS Date: Tuesday, 8 September, 2009, 11:14 AM dear sandeep, mr.shahasane lerned kp thr Hasbe Guruji and i know very well that hasbe guruji was using aspects of rahu/ketu in one seminar he quotes"7th sub is ketu.it is in first house and aspecting 7th house,so marriage is assured" thanks -sunil gondhalekar On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 7:51 PM, sandeep patel <sandeeppatel21@ > wrote: Dear Sujatji, I have read and re-read the book "Krishnamurti Jyotish Rahasya" a number of times and I have not come across a single instance where Shri Shahasane Sir has used aspects of Rahu and Ketu. But since you are so confident that he did, may be I am mistaken. However, I would appreciate it very much if you could tell me on which page and under which topic he has used aspects of Rahu and Ketu. In the meantime, I would also go through the entire book once again and try to locate that instance, if at all it is there. Regards, Sandeep -- Sunil Gondhalekarwww.astrologyask. com Need a taxi? Check out taxi service listings on India Local Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 8, 2009 Report Share Posted September 8, 2009 Dear shree Sunil ji,Whether Ketu a node can aspect a house ?Regards,Naidu KPK. P. Naidu,Flat E-1, Prince Aptmts.,Nowroji Road,Maharanipeta,VISAKHAPATNAM 530002.Phone Resi: 0891-2712591.--- On Tue, 8/9/09, sunil gondhalekar <sunilalaka wrote:sunil gondhalekar <sunilalakaRe: Re: MAHADASHA NOT YILEDING DESIRED RESULTS Date: Tuesday, 8 September, 2009, 11:14 AM dear sandeep, mr.shahasane lerned kp thr Hasbe Guruji and i know very well that hasbe guruji was using aspects of rahu/ketu in one seminar he quotes"7th sub is ketu.it is in first house and aspecting 7th house,so marriage is assured" thanks -sunil gondhalekar On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 7:51 PM, sandeep patel <sandeeppatel21@ > wrote: Dear Sujatji, I have read and re-read the book "Krishnamurti Jyotish Rahasya" a number of times and I have not come across a single instance where Shri Shahasane Sir has used aspects of Rahu and Ketu. But since you are so confident that he did, may be I am mistaken. However, I would appreciate it very much if you could tell me on which page and under which topic he has used aspects of Rahu and Ketu. In the meantime, I would also go through the entire book once again and try to locate that instance, if at all it is there. Regards, Sandeep -- Sunil Gondhalekarwww.astrologyask. com Love Cricket? Check out live scores, photos, video highlights and more. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 8, 2009 Report Share Posted September 8, 2009 Dear friends As far as Rahu and Ketu's aspects are concerned, in traditional astrology, it is supposed that Rahu and Ketu will aspect by 5, 7 and 9th houses. Do you know why this is? It is simple to understand that Rahu and Ketu transit retrogradely and 5 and 9th houses will be the same as you go forward or backward. Other planets transit forward. If you have gone through the Rahu/Ketu's signification, you will come to know that Rahu/ketu will offer the results by its starlord also. And the same is said by KSK in every sentence of 6 readers especially Predictive Stellar Astrology, Horary Astrology and Transit, where he says " for marriage, if the 7th cuspal sub lord be deposited in the star of the planet who is the significator of 2, 5, or 11." Especially in Horary astrology last pages, where the rules for certain things have been given In one of the rule : If I get the honest servent? If I will be a Prime minister Mr. KSK has given these maxims. It means in other words, star lord of the planet must be the significator of prime and secondary cusps for the thing under consideration. As you go through this sentence, you will know how we had been omitting the things that we ought to have consider. Vijayanand Patil, President, Astrovision, The Scientific Society for Research and Devt. in Astrology, Kolhapur Cell No. +91 9422582853/+91 9673746303 Visit me at : physics Write to me : guide_vijayanand On Tue, 08 Sep 2009 13:03:08 +0530 wrote > Dear Mr.Sunil Gondhlekar Since Rahu/Ketu signify the houses signified by the aspecting planets,if you consider their 7th aspect they will signify the same houses as they will aspect each other.Normally their 5,9 aspects are considered.Ref.Accurate Predictive Methodology by Umang Taneja. Regards A.K.Sehgal > >--- On Tue, 8/9/09, sunil gondhalekar wrote: > >sunil gondhalekar >Re: Re: MAHADASHA NOT YILEDING DESIRED RESULTS > >Tuesday, 8 September, 2009, 11:14 AM > > dear sandeep, mr.shahasane lerned kp thr Hasbe Guruji and i know very well that hasbe guruji was using aspects of rahu/ketu in one seminar he quotes"7th sub is ketu.it is in first house and aspecting 7th house,so marriage is assured" thanks -sunil gondhalekar > > On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 7:51 PM, sandeep patel wrote: > Dear Sujatji, > I have read and re-read the book "Krishnamurti Jyotish Rahasya" a number of times and I have not come across a single instance where Shri Shahasane Sir has used aspects of Rahu and Ketu. But since you are so confident that he did, may be I am mistaken. However, I would appreciate it very much if you could tell me on which page and under which topic he has used aspects of Rahu and Ketu. > In the meantime, I would also go through the entire book once again and try to locate that instance, if at all it is there. > Regards, > Sandeep > > >-- >Sunil Gondhalekar >www.astrologyask. com > Need a taxi? Check out taxi service listings on India Local Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 8, 2009 Report Share Posted September 8, 2009 Dear Naidu, As Shri Sunil Gondhalekarji has said, Mr. Jyotindra Hasbe of Mumbai had used the aspects of Rahu/Ketu when he felt that the it is appropriate. As I had not occasion to hear Mr. HASBEJI, but I have heard from my so many friends including Sunil Gondhalekar, Suresh Shahasaneji, Kantilal Munot of Pune, and others where it was learnt that by simple way shri Hasbeji used to solve the queries. It may come under the term astrologically or not, but his predictions used to be correct. So, there is nothing in questioning on this. In KP readers as well as old issues of Astrology and Adhrishta, there are certain incidences where Shri KSK also utilised so many vedic astrological principles and reached to the pin point predictions. It is the conscientiousness of the astrologer that helps what to accept and what not to accept at the time of judgement of the query. As I have already stated in other posting why vedic astrology says that Rahu/ketu is having the aspect of 5, 7, and 9. Because they moves backwards and 5 and 9 th houses are 5th and 9th houses respectively. Or otherwise the difference longitudal distance in between 1 to 5 house/cusp will be of Navpancham Yoga. As the principles of aspects or yoga, this will automatically come to help the needy astrologer, and the astrologer with the help of this type reach the destination of predicting the things upto Day, Lagna, Minute and Second in other words DLMS theory. With regards On Tue, 08 Sep 2009 14:12:20 +0530 wrote > Dear shree Sunil ji,Whether Ketu a node can aspect a house ?Regards,Naidu KPK. P. Naidu,Flat E-1, Prince Aptmts.,Nowroji Road,Maharanipeta,VISAKHAPATNAM 530002.Phone Resi: 0891-2712591.--- On Tue, 8/9/09, sunil gondhalekar wrote:sunil gondhalekar Re: Re: MAHADASHA NOT YILEDING DESIRED RESULTS: Tuesday, 8 September, 2009, 11:14 AM dear sandeep, mr.shahasane lerned kp thr Hasbe Guruji and i know very well that hasbe guruji was using aspects of rahu/ketu in one seminar he quotes"7th sub is ketu.it is in first house and aspecting 7th house,so marriage is assured" thanks -sunil gondhalekar On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 7:51 PM, sandeep patel wrote: Dear Sujatji, I have read and re-read the book "Krishnamurti Jyotish Rahasya" a number of times and I have not come across a single instance where Shri Shahasane Sir has used aspects of Rahu and Ketu. But since you are so confident that he did, may be I am mistaken. However, I would appreciate it very much if you could tell me on which page and under which topic he has used aspects of Rahu and Ketu. In the meantime, I would also go through the entire book once again and try to locate that instance, if at all it is there. Regards, Sandeep -- Sunil Gondhalekarwww.astrologyask. com Love Cricket? Check out live scores, photos, video highlights and more. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 8, 2009 Report Share Posted September 8, 2009 Dear Patil jiYou said...."As I have already stated in other posting why vedic astrology says that Rahu/ketu is having the aspect of 5, 7, and 9. Because they moves backwards and 5 and 9 th houses are 5th and 9th houses respectively. Or otherwise the difference longitudal distance in between 1 to 5 house/cusp will be of Navpancham Yoga." Since I could not catch the exact meaning of this, I request you to please elaborate this point.Thanks and RegardsSubhash EktareVIJAYANAND PATIL <guide_vijayanand Cc: konathalanSent: Tuesday, September 8, 2009 10:58:22 AMRe: Re: Re: MAHADASHA NOT YILEDING DESIRED RESULTS Dear Naidu, As Shri Sunil Gondhalekarji has said, Mr. Jyotindra Hasbe of Mumbai had used the aspects of Rahu/Ketu when he felt that the it is appropriate. As I had not occasion to hear Mr. HASBEJI, but I have heard from my so many friends including Sunil Gondhalekar, Suresh Shahasaneji, Kantilal Munot of Pune, and others where it was learnt that by simple way shri Hasbeji used to solve the queries. It may come under the term astrologically or not, but his predictions used to be correct. So, there is nothing in questioning on this. In KP readers as well as old issues of Astrology and Adhrishta, there are certain incidences where Shri KSK also utilised so many vedic astrological principles and reached to the pin point predictions. It is the conscientiousness of the astrologer that helps what to accept and what not to accept at the time of judgement of the query. As I have already stated in other posting why vedic astrology says that Rahu/ketu is having the aspect of 5, 7, and 9. Because they moves backwards and 5 and 9 th houses are 5th and 9th houses respectively. Or otherwise the difference longitudal distance in between 1 to 5 house/cusp will be of Navpancham Yoga. As the principles of aspects or yoga, this will automatically come to help the needy astrologer, and the astrologer with the help of this type reach the destination of predicting the things upto Day, Lagna, Minute and Second in other words DLMS theory. With regards On Tue, 08 Sep 2009 14:12:20 +0530 wrote > Dear shree Sunil ji,Whether Ketu a node can aspect a house ?Regards,Naidu KPK. P. Naidu,Flat E-1, Prince Aptmts.,Nowroji Road,Maharanipeta, VISAKHAPATNAM 530002.Phone Resi: 0891-2712591. --- On Tue, 8/9/09, sunil gondhalekar wrote:sunil gondhalekar Re: Re: MAHADASHA NOT YILEDING DESIRED RESULTS@gro ups.comTuesday, 8 September, 2009, 11:14 AM dear sandeep, mr.shahasane lerned kp thr Hasbe Guruji and i know very well that hasbe guruji was using aspects of rahu/ketu in one seminar he quotes"7th sub is ketu.it is in first house and aspecting 7th house,so marriage is assured" thanks -sunil gondhalekar On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 7:51 PM, sandeep patel wrote: Dear Sujatji, I have read and re-read the book "Krishnamurti Jyotish Rahasya" a number of times and I have not come across a single instance where Shri Shahasane Sir has used aspects of Rahu and Ketu. But since you are so confident that he did, may be I am mistaken. However, I would appreciate it very much if you could tell me on which page and under which topic he has used aspects of Rahu and Ketu. In the meantime, I would also go through the entire book once again and try to locate that instance, if at all it is there. Regards, Sandeep -- Sunil Gondhalekarwww. astrologyask. com Love Cricket? Check out live scores, photos, video highlights and more. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 8, 2009 Report Share Posted September 8, 2009 Dear Sunilji,The point under discussion is not whether Hasbe Guruji used aspects of Rahu and Ketu but whether Shri Shahasane used those aspects.Also, Sonaliji and Sujatji have written that they have come across the use of such aspects by Shri Shahasane in his book 'Krishnamurti Jyotish Rahasya'; whereas I have been saying that I have been referring to that book for several years and I have not come across a single instance, not even a passing reference, where Shri Shahasane has used aspects of Rahu and Ketu in that particular book.I have requested both, Sonaliji and Sujatji to quote page number and topic where Shri Shahasane has used such aspects and I am awaiting their reply. If they cannot come up with that reference then that means that Shri Shahasane has not used aspects of Rahu and Ketu.As you have so rightly pointed out, Shri Shahasane learned KP from Hasbe Guruji but at the same time he was constantly reading and re-reading the KP readers in the initial years and he has mentioned this fact a number of times in various fora. And it is from these KP Readers that he drew the most.If you have come across such an instance where Shri Shahasane has used aspects of Rahu and Ketu in his book 'Krishnamurti Jyotish Rahasya' I would appreciate if you can let the members know.Aspects of Rahu and Ketu are not KP as pointed out by Shri Tinwinji and I am certain Shri Shahasane has never used them.Regards,Sandeep Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 8, 2009 Report Share Posted September 8, 2009 Respected Mr.Sandeep, Sir, Some of my books are at Dapoli and some at Kalyan. At present I am at Kalyan and have to remain here for about a month or so. Unfortunately the book in question is at Dapoli. Therefore I am unable to furnish any reference now. regards, sujatkaram. , sandeep patel <sandeeppatel21 wrote: > > Dear Sunilji, > The point under discussion is not whether Hasbe Guruji used aspects of Rahu and Ketu but whether Shri Shahasane used those aspects. > Also, Sonaliji and Sujatji have written that they have come across the use of such aspects by Shri Shahasane in his book 'Krishnamurti Jyotish Rahasya'; whereas I have been saying that I have been referring to that book for several years and I have not come across a single instance, not even a passing reference, where Shri Shahasane has used aspects of Rahu and Ketu in that particular book. > I have requested both, Sonaliji and Sujatji to quote page number and topic where Shri Shahasane has used such aspects and I am awaiting their reply. If they cannot come up with that reference then that means that Shri Shahasane has not used aspects of Rahu and Ketu. > As you have so rightly pointed out, Shri Shahasane learned KP from Hasbe Guruji but at the same time he was constantly reading and re-reading the KP readers in the initial years and he has mentioned this fact a number of times in various fora. And it is from these KP Readers that he drew the most. > If you have come across such an instance where Shri Shahasane has used aspects of Rahu and Ketu in his book 'Krishnamurti Jyotish Rahasya' I would appreciate if you can let the members know. > Aspects of Rahu and Ketu are not KP as pointed out by Shri Tinwinji and I am certain Shri Shahasane has never used them. > Regards, > Sandeep > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 8, 2009 Report Share Posted September 8, 2009 The point under discussion is not whether Hasbe Guruji used aspects of Rahu and Ketu but whether Shri Shahasane used those aspects. Also, Sonaliji and Sujatji have written that they have come across the use of such aspects by Shri Shahasane in his book 'Krishnamurti Jyotish Rahasya'; whereas I have been saying that I have been referring to that book for several years and I have not come across a single instance, not even a passing reference, where Shri Shahasane has used aspects of Rahu and Ketu in that particular book. I have requested both, Sonaliji and Sujatji to quote page number and topic where Shri Shahasane has used such aspects and I am awaiting their reply. If they cannot come up with that reference then that means that Shri Shahasane has not used aspects of Rahu and Ketu. KRISHNAMURTHY JYOTISH RAHASYA VOL I-PAGE 175-COLUMN (5)-HEADING-BHAV PAR DRUSHTI RAKHNE WALA GRUH, ROW 2- MANGAL,SHANI,RAHU ROW 8- KETU THIS ALL IS GIVEN UNDER THE HEADING – BHAVO KE KARYESH GRUH( SIG OF EACH HOUSE)-BASIC CONCEPTS. JUST ONE OF THE EXAMPLE TO QUOTE. HAVE U READ THIS HEADING??? Thanks & Regards, Sonali On Behalf Of sujatkaram Tuesday, September 08, 2009 10:17 PM Re: MAHADASHA NOT YILEDING DESIRED RESULTS Respected Mr.Sandeep, Sir, Some of my books are at Dapoli and some at Kalyan. At present I am at Kalyan and have to remain here for about a month or so. Unfortunately the book in question is at Dapoli. Therefore I am unable to furnish any reference now. regards, sujatkaram. , sandeep patel <sandeeppatel21 wrote: > > Dear Sunilji, > The point under discussion is not whether Hasbe Guruji used aspects of Rahu and Ketu but whether Shri Shahasane used those aspects. > Also, Sonaliji and Sujatji have written that they have come across the use of such aspects by Shri Shahasane in his book 'Krishnamurti Jyotish Rahasya'; whereas I have been saying that I have been referring to that book for several years and I have not come across a single instance, not even a passing reference, where Shri Shahasane has used aspects of Rahu and Ketu in that particular book. > I have requested both, Sonaliji and Sujatji to quote page number and topic where Shri Shahasane has used such aspects and I am awaiting their reply. If they cannot come up with that reference then that means that Shri Shahasane has not used aspects of Rahu and Ketu. > As you have so rightly pointed out, Shri Shahasane learned KP from Hasbe Guruji but at the same time he was constantly reading and re-reading the KP readers in the initial years and he has mentioned this fact a number of times in various fora. And it is from these KP Readers that he drew the most. > If you have come across such an instance where Shri Shahasane has used aspects of Rahu and Ketu in his book 'Krishnamurti Jyotish Rahasya' I would appreciate if you can let the members know. > Aspects of Rahu and Ketu are not KP as pointed out by Shri Tinwinji and I am certain Shri Shahasane has never used them. > Regards, > Sandeep > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 8, 2009 Report Share Posted September 8, 2009 Dear Friends, 1. Could someone kindly translate what is siad here into Forum's language of English to be understandable for all. 2. Another thing that it is obliged to give the reference if quoted, otherwise it looks like misuse of one's name. Thanks and regards, tw , " SONALI.ME.2009 " <sonali.me.2009 wrote: > > The point under discussion is not whether Hasbe Guruji used aspects of Rahu > and Ketu but whether Shri Shahasane used those aspects. > Also, Sonaliji and Sujatji have written that they have come across the use > of such aspects by Shri Shahasane in his book 'Krishnamurti Jyotish > Rahasya'; whereas I have been saying that I have been referring to that book > for several years and I have not come across a single instance, not even a > passing reference, where Shri Shahasane has used aspects of Rahu and Ketu in > that particular book. > I have requested both, Sonaliji and Sujatji to quote page number and topic > where Shri Shahasane has used such aspects and I am awaiting their reply. If > they cannot come up with that reference then that means that Shri Shahasane > has not used aspects of Rahu and Ketu. > > > > KRISHNAMURTHY JYOTISH RAHASYA VOL I-PAGE 175-COLUMN (5)-HEADING-BHAV PAR > DRUSHTI RAKHNE WALA GRUH, > > ROW 2- MANGAL,SHANI,RAHU > > ROW 8- KETU > > > THIS ALL IS GIVEN UNDER THE HEADING - BHAVO KE KARYESH GRUH( SIG OF EACH > HOUSE)-BASIC CONCEPTS. > > JUST ONE OF THE EXAMPLE TO QUOTE. > > HAVE U READ THIS HEADING??? > > Thanks & Regards, > > Sonali > > > > On > Behalf Of sujatkaram > Tuesday, September 08, 2009 10:17 PM > > Re: MAHADASHA NOT YILEDING DESIRED RESULTS > > > > > > Respected Mr.Sandeep, > Sir, > Some of my books are at Dapoli and some at Kalyan. At present I am at Kalyan > and have to remain here for about a month or so. Unfortunately the book in > question is at Dapoli. Therefore I am unable to furnish any reference now. > regards, > sujatkaram. > <%40> , sandeep patel <sandeeppatel21@> > wrote: > > > > Dear Sunilji, > > The point under discussion is not whether Hasbe Guruji used aspects of > Rahu and Ketu but whether Shri Shahasane used those aspects. > > Also, Sonaliji and Sujatji have written that they have come across the use > of such aspects by Shri Shahasane in his book 'Krishnamurti Jyotish > Rahasya'; whereas I have been saying that I have been referring to that book > for several years and I have not come across a single instance, not even a > passing reference, where Shri Shahasane has used aspects of Rahu and Ketu in > that particular book. > > I have requested both, Sonaliji and Sujatji to quote page number and topic > where Shri Shahasane has used such aspects and I am awaiting their reply. If > they cannot come up with that reference then that means that Shri Shahasane > has not used aspects of Rahu and Ketu. > > As you have so rightly pointed out, Shri Shahasane learned KP from Hasbe > Guruji but at the same time he was constantly reading and re-reading the KP > readers in the initial years and he has mentioned this fact a number of > times in various fora. And it is from these KP Readers that he drew the > most. > > If you have come across such an instance where Shri Shahasane has used > aspects of Rahu and Ketu in his book 'Krishnamurti Jyotish Rahasya' I would > appreciate if you can let the members know. > > Aspects of Rahu and Ketu are not KP as pointed out by Shri Tinwinji and I > am certain Shri Shahasane has never used them. > > Regards, > > Sandeep > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 9, 2009 Report Share Posted September 9, 2009 Dear Naidu ji, As aware, answer to your question " Whether Ketu a node can aspect a house? " is " Yes " , as per references below. But how it can have such aspect since it is a shadowy planet and Rahu is already there in its opposition is to be answered, other than talking Guruji KSK had applied Traditional, what kind of Tradinals? Regards, tw " 7th sub is ketu.it is in first house and aspecting 7th house,so marriage is assured " -Hasbe Guruji In Four Step Theory, " Ketu in 1st house aspects 7th `cusp' within 30d:20m orb " to be 7th house significator. -Four Step Theory Lecture Notes p 34 -A Note on 4 Step Theory pt 15 under 4 Step Theory in File section , " VIJAYANAND PATIL " <guide_vijayanand wrote: > > Dear Naidu, > As Shri Sunil Gondhalekarji has said, Mr. Jyotindra Hasbe of Mumbai had used the aspects of Rahu/Ketu when he felt that the it is appropriate. As I had not occasion to hear Mr. HASBEJI, but I have heard from my so many friends including Sunil Gondhalekar, Suresh Shahasaneji, Kantilal Munot of Pune, and others where it was learnt that by simple way shri Hasbeji used to solve the queries. It may come under the term astrologically or not, but his predictions used to be correct. So, there is nothing in questioning on this. In KP readers as well as old issues of Astrology and Adhrishta, there are certain incidences where Shri KSK also utilised so many vedic astrological principles and reached to the pin point predictions. It is the conscientiousness of the astrologer that helps what to accept and what not to accept at the time of judgement of the query. As I have already stated in other posting why vedic astrology says that Rahu/ketu is having the aspect of 5, 7, and 9. Because they moves backwards and 5 and 9 th houses are 5th and 9th houses respectively. Or otherwise the difference longitudal distance in between 1 to 5 house/cusp will be of Navpancham Yoga. As the principles of aspects or yoga, this will automatically come to help the needy astrologer, and the astrologer with the help of this type reach the destination of predicting the things upto Day, Lagna, Minute and Second in other words DLMS theory. > With regards > > > On Tue, 08 Sep 2009 14:12:20 +0530 wrote > > Dear shree Sunil ji,Whether Ketu a node can aspect a house ?Regards,Naidu KPK. P. Naidu,Flat E-1, Prince Aptmts.,Nowroji Road,Maharanipeta,VISAKHAPATNAM 530002.Phone Resi: 0891-2712591.--- On Tue, 8/9/09, sunil gondhalekar wrote:sunil gondhalekar Re: Re: MAHADASHA NOT YILEDING DESIRED RESULTS: Tuesday, 8 September, 2009, 11:14 AM > dear sandeep, > mr.shahasane lerned kp thr Hasbe Guruji and i know very well > that hasbe guruji was using aspects of rahu/ketu > in one seminar he quotes " 7th sub is ketu.it is in first house and > aspecting 7th house,so marriage is assured " > thanks > -sunil gondhalekar > On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 7:51 PM, sandeep patel wrote: > > > Dear Sujatji, > > I have read and re-read the book " Krishnamurti Jyotish Rahasya " a number of times and I have not come across a single instance where Shri Shahasane Sir has used aspects of Rahu and Ketu. But since you are so confident that he did, may be I am mistaken. However, I would appreciate it very much if you could tell me on which page and under which topic he has used aspects of Rahu and Ketu. > > > In the meantime, I would also go through the entire book once again and try to locate that instance, if at all it is there. > > Regards, > > Sandeep > > -- Sunil Gondhalekarwww.astrologyask. com > > > Love Cricket? Check out live scores, photos, video highlights and more. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 9, 2009 Report Share Posted September 9, 2009 Dear shri TinWin Ji,What I learnt is that the nodes Rahu and Ketu (shadow planets) ONLY receive aspects from other planets, but they do not aspect other planets and houses. Hence confusion.Regards,Naidu KPK. P. Naidu,Flat E-1, Prince Aptmts.,Nowroji Road,Maharanipeta,VISAKHAPATNAM 530002.Phone Resi: 0891-2712591.--- On Wed, 9/9/09, tw853 <tw853 wrote:tw853 <tw853 Re: MAHADASHA NOT YILEDING DESIRED RESULTS Date: Wednesday, 9 September, 2009, 7:30 AM Dear Naidu ji, As aware, answer to your question "Whether Ketu a node can aspect a house?" is "Yes", as per references below. But how it can have such aspect since it is a shadowy planet and Rahu is already there in its opposition is to be answered, other than talking Guruji KSK had applied Traditional, what kind of Tradinals? Regards, tw "7th sub is ketu.it is in first house and aspecting 7th house,so marriage is assured" -Hasbe Guruji In Four Step Theory, "Ketu in 1st house aspects 7th `cusp' within 30d:20m orb" to be 7th house significator. -Four Step Theory Lecture Notes p 34 -A Note on 4 Step Theory pt 15 under 4 Step Theory in File section @gro ups.com, "VIJAYANAND PATIL" <guide_ vijayanand@ ...> wrote: > > Dear Naidu, > As Shri Sunil Gondhalekarji has said, Mr. Jyotindra Hasbe of Mumbai had used the aspects of Rahu/Ketu when he felt that the it is appropriate. As I had not occasion to hear Mr. HASBEJI, but I have heard from my so many friends including Sunil Gondhalekar, Suresh Shahasaneji, Kantilal Munot of Pune, and others where it was learnt that by simple way shri Hasbeji used to solve the queries. It may come under the term astrologically or not, but his predictions used to be correct. So, there is nothing in questioning on this. In KP readers as well as old issues of Astrology and Adhrishta, there are certain incidences where Shri KSK also utilised so many vedic astrological principles and reached to the pin point predictions. It is the conscientiousness of the astrologer that helps what to accept and what not to accept at the time of judgement of the query. As I have already stated in other posting why vedic astrology says that Rahu/ketu is having the aspect of 5, 7, and 9. Because they moves backwards and 5 and 9 th houses are 5th and 9th houses respectively. Or otherwise the difference longitudal distance in between 1 to 5 house/cusp will be of Navpancham Yoga. As the principles of aspects or yoga, this will automatically come to help the needy astrologer, and the astrologer with the help of this type reach the destination of predicting the things upto Day, Lagna, Minute and Second in other words DLMS theory. > With regards > > > On Tue, 08 Sep 2009 14:12:20 +0530 wrote > > > > > > > > > Dear shree Sunil ji,Whether Ketu a node can aspect a house ?Regards,Naidu KPK. P. Naidu,Flat E-1, Prince Aptmts.,Nowroji Road,Maharanipeta, VISAKHAPATNAM 530002.Phone Resi: 0891-2712591. --- On Tue, 8/9/09, sunil gondhalekar wrote:sunil gondhalekar Re: Re: MAHADASHA NOT YILEDING DESIRED RESULTS@. ..: Tuesday, 8 September, 2009, 11:14 AM > > > > > > > > dear sandeep, > mr.shahasane lerned kp thr Hasbe Guruji and i know very well > that hasbe guruji was using aspects of rahu/ketu > in one seminar he quotes"7th sub is ketu.it is in first house and > aspecting 7th house,so marriage is assured" > thanks > -sunil gondhalekar > On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 7:51 PM, sandeep patel wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Dear Sujatji, > > I have read and re-read the book "Krishnamurti Jyotish Rahasya" a number of times and I have not come across a single instance where Shri Shahasane Sir has used aspects of Rahu and Ketu. But since you are so confident that he did, may be I am mistaken. However, I would appreciate it very much if you could tell me on which page and under which topic he has used aspects of Rahu and Ketu. > > > In the meantime, I would also go through the entire book once again and try to locate that instance, if at all it is there. > > Regards, > > Sandeep > > -- Sunil Gondhalekarwww. astrologyask. com > > > > > > > > > > Love Cricket? Check out live scores, photos, video highlights and more. > Love Cricket? Check out live scores, photos, video highlights and more. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 9, 2009 Report Share Posted September 9, 2009 Respected TWJi I will translate all said in the forum as I am having speed in Marathi/Hindi/English Typewriting @ 100 w.p.m. and I have already translated all the KP material in English including Astrosecrets 1, 2, Further lights on Nakshatra Chintamani, Transit by KSK. Yours Vijayanand Patil, President, Astrovision, The Scientific Society for Research and Devt. in Astrology, Kolhapur 416 008 Cell No. +91 9693746303/+91 9422582853 Visit me at : physics On Wed, 09 Sep 2009 11:02:34 +0530 wrote > Dear Friends, 1. Could someone kindly translate what is siad here into Forum's language of English to be understandable for all. 2. Another thing that it is obliged to give the reference if quoted, otherwise it looks like misuse of one's name. Thanks and regards, tw , "SONALI.ME.2009" wrote: > > The point under discussion is not whether Hasbe Guruji used aspects of Rahu > and Ketu but whether Shri Shahasane used those aspects. > Also, Sonaliji and Sujatji have written that they have come across the use > of such aspects by Shri Shahasane in his book 'Krishnamurti Jyotish > Rahasya'; whereas I have been saying that I have been referring to that book > for several years and I have not come across a single instance, not even a > passing reference, where Shri Shahasane has used aspects of Rahu and Ketu in > that particular book. > I have requested both, Sonaliji and Sujatji to quote page number and topic > where Shri Shahasane has used such aspects and I am awaiting their reply. If > they cannot come up with that reference then that means that Shri Shahasane > has not used aspects of Rahu and Ketu. > > > > KRISHNAMURTHY JYOTISH RAHASYA VOL I-PAGE 175-COLUMN (5)-HEADING-BHAV PAR > DRUSHTI RAKHNE WALA GRUH, > > ROW 2- MANGAL,SHANI,RAHU > > ROW 8- KETU > > > THIS ALL IS GIVEN UNDER THE HEADING - BHAVO KE KARYESH GRUH( SIG OF EACH > HOUSE)-BASIC CONCEPTS. > > JUST ONE OF THE EXAMPLE TO QUOTE. > > HAVE U READ THIS HEADING??? > > Thanks Regards, > > Sonali > > > > On > Behalf Of sujatkaram > Tuesday, September 08, 2009 10:17 PM > > Re: MAHADASHA NOT YILEDING DESIRED RESULTS > > > > > > Respected Mr.Sandeep, > Sir, > Some of my books are at Dapoli and some at Kalyan. At present I am at Kalyan > and have to remain here for about a month or so. Unfortunately the book in > question is at Dapoli. Therefore I am unable to furnish any reference now. > regards, > sujatkaram. > , sandeep patel > wrote: > > > > Dear Sunilji, > > The point under discussion is not whether Hasbe Guruji used aspects of > Rahu and Ketu but whether Shri Shahasane used those aspects. > > Also, Sonaliji and Sujatji have written that they have come across the use > of such aspects by Shri Shahasane in his book 'Krishnamurti Jyotish > Rahasya'; whereas I have been saying that I have been referring to that book > for several years and I have not come across a single instance, not even a > passing reference, where Shri Shahasane has used aspects of Rahu and Ketu in > that particular book. > > I have requested both, Sonaliji and Sujatji to quote page number and topic > where Shri Shahasane has used such aspects and I am awaiting their reply. If > they cannot come up with that reference then that means that Shri Shahasane > has not used aspects of Rahu and Ketu. > > As you have so rightly pointed out, Shri Shahasane learned KP from Hasbe > Guruji but at the same time he was constantly reading and re-reading the KP > readers in the initial years and he has mentioned this fact a number of > times in various fora. And it is from these KP Readers that he drew the > most. > > If you have come across such an instance where Shri Shahasane has used > aspects of Rahu and Ketu in his book 'Krishnamurti Jyotish Rahasya' I would > appreciate if you can let the members know. > > Aspects of Rahu and Ketu are not KP as pointed out by Shri Tinwinji and I > am certain Shri Shahasane has never used them. > > Regards, > > Sandeep > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 9, 2009 Report Share Posted September 9, 2009 Dear Vijayanand Patil ji, Thanks. Here to make it clear whether the author means to consider Rahu/Ketu's aspects or not. Regards, tw , " VIJAYANAND PATIL " <guide_vijayanand wrote: > > > Respected TWJi > I will translate all said in the forum as I am having speed in Marathi/Hindi/English Typewriting @ 100 w.p.m. and I have already translated all the KP material in English including Astrosecrets 1, 2, Further lights on Nakshatra Chintamani, Transit by KSK. > Yours > Vijayanand Patil, President, Astrovision, The Scientific Society for Research and Devt. in Astrology, Kolhapur 416 008 > Cell No. +91 9693746303/+91 9422582853 > Visit me at : physics > > On Wed, 09 Sep 2009 11:02:34 +0530 wrote > > Dear Friends, > 1. Could someone kindly translate what is siad here into Forum's language of English to be understandable for all. > 2. Another thing that it is obliged to give the reference if quoted, otherwise it looks like misuse of one's name. > Thanks and regards, > tw > > , " SONALI.ME.2009 " wrote: > > > > The point under discussion is not whether Hasbe Guruji used aspects of Rahu > > and Ketu but whether Shri Shahasane used those aspects. > > Also, Sonaliji and Sujatji have written that they have come across the use > > of such aspects by Shri Shahasane in his book 'Krishnamurti Jyotish > > Rahasya'; whereas I have been saying that I have been referring to that book > > for several years and I have not come across a single instance, not even a > > passing reference, where Shri Shahasane has used aspects of Rahu and Ketu in > > that particular book. > > I have requested both, Sonaliji and Sujatji to quote page number and topic > > where Shri Shahasane has used such aspects and I am awaiting their reply. If > > they cannot come up with that reference then that means that Shri Shahasane > > has not used aspects of Rahu and Ketu. > > > > > > > > KRISHNAMURTHY JYOTISH RAHASYA VOL I-PAGE 175-COLUMN (5)-HEADING-BHAV PAR > > DRUSHTI RAKHNE WALA GRUH, > > > > ROW 2- MANGAL,SHANI,RAHU > > > > ROW 8- KETU > > > > > > THIS ALL IS GIVEN UNDER THE HEADING - BHAVO KE KARYESH GRUH( SIG OF EACH > > HOUSE)-BASIC CONCEPTS. > > > > JUST ONE OF THE EXAMPLE TO QUOTE. > > > > HAVE U READ THIS HEADING??? > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > > > Sonali > > > > > > > > On > > Behalf Of sujatkaram > > Tuesday, September 08, 2009 10:17 PM > > > > Re: MAHADASHA NOT YILEDING DESIRED RESULTS > > > > > > > > > > > > Respected Mr.Sandeep, > > Sir, > > Some of my books are at Dapoli and some at Kalyan. At present I am at Kalyan > > and have to remain here for about a month or so. Unfortunately the book in > > question is at Dapoli. Therefore I am unable to furnish any reference now. > > regards, > > sujatkaram. > > , sandeep patel > > wrote: > > > > > > Dear Sunilji, > > > The point under discussion is not whether Hasbe Guruji used aspects of > > Rahu and Ketu but whether Shri Shahasane used those aspects. > > > Also, Sonaliji and Sujatji have written that they have come across the use > > of such aspects by Shri Shahasane in his book 'Krishnamurti Jyotish > > Rahasya'; whereas I have been saying that I have been referring to that book > > for several years and I have not come across a single instance, not even a > > passing reference, where Shri Shahasane has used aspects of Rahu and Ketu in > > that particular book. > > > I have requested both, Sonaliji and Sujatji to quote page number and topic > > where Shri Shahasane has used such aspects and I am awaiting their reply. If > > they cannot come up with that reference then that means that Shri Shahasane > > has not used aspects of Rahu and Ketu. > > > As you have so rightly pointed out, Shri Shahasane learned KP from Hasbe > > Guruji but at the same time he was constantly reading and re-reading the KP > > readers in the initial years and he has mentioned this fact a number of > > times in various fora. And it is from these KP Readers that he drew the > > most. > > > If you have come across such an instance where Shri Shahasane has used > > aspects of Rahu and Ketu in his book 'Krishnamurti Jyotish Rahasya' I would > > appreciate if you can let the members know. > > > Aspects of Rahu and Ketu are not KP as pointed out by Shri Tinwinji and I > > am certain Shri Shahasane has never used them. > > > Regards, > > > Sandeep > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 9, 2009 Report Share Posted September 9, 2009 Dear Naidu ji, As aware, this is the view of KP & many Vedic capable astrologers. If you don't mind, could you give me your source of learning to add in my presentation of differerent views on Rahu/Ketu's aspects. Regards, tw , " K. P. Naidu " <konathalan wrote: > > Dear shri TinWin Ji, > > What I learnt is that the nodes Rahu and Ketu (shadow planets) ONLY receive aspects from other planets, but they do not aspect other planets and houses. Hence confusion. > > Regards, > > Naidu KP > > K. P. Naidu, > Flat E-1, Prince Aptmts., > Nowroji Road, > Maharanipeta, > VISAKHAPATNAM 530002. > Phone Resi: 0891-2712591. > > --- On Wed, 9/9/09, tw853 <tw853 wrote: > > tw853 <tw853 > Re: MAHADASHA NOT YILEDING DESIRED RESULTS > > Wednesday, 9 September, 2009, 7:30 AM > > > > > > Dear Naidu ji, > > As aware, answer to your question " Whether Ketu a node can aspect a house? " is " Yes " , as per references below. But how it can have such aspect since it is a shadowy planet and Rahu is already there in its opposition is to be answered, other than talking Guruji KSK had applied Traditional, what kind of Tradinals? > > Regards, > > tw > > > > " 7th sub is ketu.it is in first house and aspecting 7th house,so marriage is assured " > > -Hasbe Guruji > > > > In Four Step Theory, " Ketu in 1st house aspects 7th `cusp' within 30d:20m orb " to be 7th house significator. > > -Four Step Theory Lecture Notes p 34 > > -A Note on 4 Step Theory pt 15 under 4 Step Theory in File section > > > > @gro ups.com, " VIJAYANAND PATIL " <guide_ vijayanand@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Naidu, > > > As Shri Sunil Gondhalekarji has said, Mr. Jyotindra Hasbe of Mumbai had used the aspects of Rahu/Ketu when he felt that the it is appropriate. As I had not occasion to hear Mr. HASBEJI, but I have heard from my so many friends including Sunil Gondhalekar, Suresh Shahasaneji, Kantilal Munot of Pune, and others where it was learnt that by simple way shri Hasbeji used to solve the queries. It may come under the term astrologically or not, but his predictions used to be correct. So, there is nothing in questioning on this. In KP readers as well as old issues of Astrology and Adhrishta, there are certain incidences where Shri KSK also utilised so many vedic astrological principles and reached to the pin point predictions. It is the conscientiousness of the astrologer that helps what to accept and what not to accept at the time of judgement of the query. As I have already stated in other posting why vedic astrology says that Rahu/ketu is having the > aspect of 5, 7, and 9. Because they moves backwards and 5 and 9 th houses are 5th and 9th houses respectively. Or otherwise the difference longitudal distance in between 1 to 5 house/cusp will be of Navpancham Yoga. As the principles of aspects or yoga, this will automatically come to help the needy astrologer, and the astrologer with the help of this type reach the destination of predicting the things upto Day, Lagna, Minute and Second in other words DLMS theory. > > > With regards > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 08 Sep 2009 14:12:20 +0530 wrote > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear shree Sunil ji,Whether Ketu a node can aspect a house ?Regards,Naidu KPK. P. Naidu,Flat E-1, Prince Aptmts.,Nowroji Road,Maharanipeta, VISAKHAPATNAM 530002.Phone Resi: 0891-2712591. --- On Tue, 8/9/09, sunil gondhalekar wrote:sunil gondhalekar Re: Re: MAHADASHA NOT YILEDING DESIRED RESULTS@ ..: Tuesday, 8 September, 2009, 11:14 AM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dear sandeep, > > > mr.shahasane lerned kp thr Hasbe Guruji and i know very well > > > that hasbe guruji was using aspects of rahu/ketu > > > in one seminar he quotes " 7th sub is ketu.it is in first house and > > > aspecting 7th house,so marriage is assured " > > > thanks > > > -sunil gondhalekar > > > On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 7:51 PM, sandeep patel wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Sujatji, > > > > > > I have read and re-read the book " Krishnamurti Jyotish Rahasya " a number of times and I have not come across a single instance where Shri Shahasane Sir has used aspects of Rahu and Ketu. But since you are so confident that he did, may be I am mistaken. However, I would appreciate it very much if you could tell me on which page and under which topic he has used aspects of Rahu and Ketu. > > > > > > > > > In the meantime, I would also go through the entire book once again and try to locate that instance, if at all it is there. > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Sandeep > > > > > > -- Sunil Gondhalekarwww. astrologyask. com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Love Cricket? Check out live scores, photos, video highlights and more. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Love Cricket? Check out live scores, photos, video highlights and more. Click here http://cricket. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.