Guest guest Posted September 5, 2003 Report Share Posted September 5, 2003 Om Gurave Namah Dear Hari, This is what I know and hope to be corrected incase I am wrong: Dwikalatra yoga: Dwi means two and Kalatra means wife or consort,so the term Dwikalatra yoga is the yoga which can give the native two spouses.I am not sure if Saturn in the 7th causes this.Saturn in the 7th will indicate that the spouse may be much older and detached. Best Wishes, Kanupriya onlyhari <onlyhari wrote: ||Om Brihaspataye Namah||Dear Jyotishas,Recently I read in an article that Saturn in 7th house causes dwikalatra yoga (if my spelling is correct?).Could you please say what is this yoga?regardsHari|Om Tat Sat|http://www.varahamihira Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 7, 2003 Report Share Posted September 7, 2003 ||Om Brihaspataye Namah|| Namaste Kanupriya, Thanks for clarifying the meaning. The statement was from Iranganti Rangacharya's article " Is Vrischika your Janma Lagna " published in the Express Starteller, October 1993 wherein it is written under " Saturn in 12 bhavas of Vrischika Lagna " that " by Saturn in 7th house, the native has dwikalatra yoga " . Based on this we can understand this is applicable only to Scorpio lagna. With out reference to lagna, what you say about the effect of Saturn in 7th house may be generally applicable (older, plain looking and industrious wife). Interestingly Irangati Rangacharya says for Mithuna lagna (Gemini) that Saturn in 7th house MAY cause dwikalatra yoga whereupon the first wife is stout and ugly while the second is fair if both are alive (Dwijeeva kalatra yoga)! Note the subtle distinctions that Rangacharya makes between the same term for the two lagnas. regards Hari varahamihira , kanu priya <kanupriya003> wrote: > Om Gurave Namah > Dear Hari, > This is what I know and hope to be corrected incase I am wrong: > Dwikalatra yoga: Dwi means two and Kalatra means wife or consort,so the term Dwikalatra yoga is the yoga which can give the native two spouses.I am not sure if Saturn in the 7th causes this.Saturn in the 7th will indicate that the spouse may be much older and detached. > Best Wishes, > Kanupriya > > > onlyhari <onlyhari> wrote: > ||Om Brihaspataye Namah|| > > Dear Jyotishas, > > Recently I read in an article that Saturn in 7th house causes > dwikalatra yoga (if my spelling is correct?). > > Could you please say what is this yoga? > > regards > Hari > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 30, 2004 Report Share Posted January 30, 2004 OM NAMO GURUBRIHASPATHAYE, Dear Hari, > Namaste.> > Is ||Om Namasshivaaya Namo Rameswaraaya|| a dwadakshari mantra? > > My analysis is as follows:> > Om| Na|ma|sshi|vaa|ya/ Na|mo /Ra|mei|shwa|raa|ya> > There are 11 bars, hence it is 12 phonemes or aksharas. Is it > correct? As far as my understanding, these manthras are for worship Jyotir Linga. When ever you want to worship Jyotir linga related to a Graha, you can chant this manthra regardless the number of akshara. It help exalt the said Graha. But Maranakaraka Avasta shows differant story. For example, Taurus Lagna say Sun is in 12th. No matter the strength, Sun is still in MKA. In such chart, Sun cannot protect his own house as well as his karakatwa, say Lagna, 9th house as well as 10th house matters. Results can be expected only in Simha Narayana dasa. How ever we have to look specific areas of life he is going to suffer and remedy is always come from 9th from afflicted house/ Grahas. No Jyotir Linga Manthra, as far as my understanding. Hope you got it. > > The reason I am asking (actually I asked a general question on this > earlier but no reply) is one of my friends has Sun in > maranakarakasthana (12th); his name is Raghuraman and hence I feel > this mantra would be perfect for him as the mantra matches the > starting akshara of his name.> > Doubt: How does ||Om Namo Bhagavate Vasudevaaya|| qualify to be a > dwadakshari mantra?> > My analysis is:> > Om| Na|mo Bha|ga|va|te Va|su|de|vaa|ya A little mistake ! Om/ Na/mo/ Bha/ga/va/te/Va/su/de/vaa/ya Karu > > I am getting 9 bars and hence 10 aksharas only. Where are the > remaining two aksharas?> > regards> Hari Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 30, 2004 Report Share Posted January 30, 2004 Om Gurave Namah Dear Mayapur Das, Om = AUM.This should make it 12 in all. Best Wishes, Kanupriya. MayapurDas <MayapurDas wrote: Jaya JagannathaDear Hari> Doubt: How does ||Om Namo Bhagavate Vasudevaaya|| qualify to be a> dwadakshari mantra?>> My analysis is:>> Om| Na|mo Bha|ga|va|te Va|su|de|vaa|yaOm / Na/mo / Bha/ga/va/te /Va/su/de/va/yaysMayapur das> I am getting 9 bars and hence 10 aksharas only. Where are the> remaining two aksharas?>> regards> Hari>>> |Om Tat Sat|> http://www.varahamihira>> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 30, 2004 Report Share Posted January 30, 2004 Hare Rama Krishna Dear Friends, Use devanagari scripts and the whole exercise becomes easy.Sanjay ji reccomends Devanagari as the chance of commiting mistakes are very low and contradictions are non-existent. For example, we have two ways to spell the pranava manthra, 1) OM and 2) AUM. In the second case we see it as two syallables but in reality sanskrit treats the pranava manthra as only one syllable. OM NAMO BHAGAVATE VASUDEVAYA 1 2 4 5 == 12 syllables The above is more apparent in devanagari. HAre Krishna Sudharsankanu priya <kanupriya003 wrote: Om Gurave Namah Dear Mayapur Das, Om = AUM.This should make it 12 in all. Best Wishes, Kanupriya. MayapurDas <MayapurDas wrote: Jaya JagannathaDear Hari> Doubt: How does ||Om Namo Bhagavate Vasudevaaya|| qualify to be a> dwadakshari mantra?>> My analysis is:>> Om| Na|mo Bha|ga|va|te Va|su|de|vaa|yaOm / Na/mo / Bha/ga/va/te /Va/su/de/va/yaysMayapur das> I am getting 9 bars and hence 10 aksharas only. Where are the> remaining two aksharas?>> regards> Hari>>> |Om Tat Sat|> http://www.varahamihira>> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 30, 2004 Report Share Posted January 30, 2004 Dear Hari, I do not know much about mantras. However when one says Akshara it means precisely that and the aksharas are the devanagari aksharas. So I doubt whether the first mantra would qualify as dwadashakshari, apart from the fact that it should be namaH shivaya(Salutation to shiva) and namasshivaaya, as far as my understanding of Sanskrit goes. Perhaps Sanjay can comment on this. The second mantra is the dwadashakshari mantra. Chandrashekhar. onlyhari wrote: > ||Om Brihaspataye Namah|| > > Dear Gurus/Jyotishas, > > Namaste. > > Is ||Om Namasshivaaya Namo Rameswaraaya|| a dwadakshari mantra? > > My analysis is as follows: > > Om| Na|ma|sshi|vaa|ya Na|mo Ra|me|i|shwa|raa|ya > > There are 11 bars, hence it is 12 phonemes or aksharas. Is it > correct? > > The reason I am asking (actually I asked a general question on this > earlier but no reply) is one of my friends has Sun in > maranakarakasthana (12th); his name is Raghuraman and hence I feel > this mantra would be perfect for him as the mantra matches the > starting akshara of his name. > > Doubt: How does ||Om Namo Bhagavate Vasudevaaya|| qualify to be a > dwadakshari mantra? > > My analysis is: > > Om| Na|mo Bha|ga|va|te Va|su|de|vaa|ya > > I am getting 9 bars and hence 10 aksharas only. Where are the > remaining two aksharas? > > regards > Hari > > > > |Om Tat Sat| > http://www.varahamihira > > > ------ > * Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 31, 2004 Report Share Posted January 31, 2004 ||Om Brihaspataye Namah|| Dear Karu/Mayapur/Kanu/Sudharsan/Chandrasekhar, Many thanks for your explanations and clarifications. Karu, your explanation about mantras for Maranakaraka avastha is a bit different and I will await further comments from the Learned Gurus on what you have said. I hope someone can answer that general query of mine as I feel that it would be really useful for the entire list. regards Hari varahamihira , Sudharsan Srinivasan <sudhar108> wrote: > Hare Rama Krishna > > Dear Friends, > > Use devanagari scripts and the whole exercise becomes easy.Sanjay ji reccomends Devanagari as the chance of commiting mistakes are very low and contradictions are non-existent. For example, we have two ways to spell the pranava manthra, 1) OM and 2) AUM. In the second case we see it as two syallables but in reality sanskrit treats the pranava manthra as only one syllable. > > OM NAMO BHAGAVATE VASUDEVAYA > > 1 2 4 5 == 12 syllables > > The above is more apparent in devanagari. > > HAre Krishna > > Sudharsan > kanu priya <kanupriya003> wrote: > Om Gurave Namah > Dear Mayapur Das, > Om = AUM.This should make it 12 in all. > Best Wishes, > Kanupriya. > > > > MayapurDas <MayapurDas@p...> wrote: > Jaya Jagannatha > > Dear Hari > > > Doubt: How does ||Om Namo Bhagavate Vasudevaaya|| qualify to be a > > dwadakshari mantra? > > > > My analysis is: > > > > Om| Na|mo Bha|ga|va|te Va|su|de|vaa|ya > > Om / Na/mo / Bha/ga/va/te /Va/su/de/va/ya > > ys > Mayapur das > > I am getting 9 bars and hence 10 aksharas only. Where are the > > remaining two aksharas? > > > > regards > > Hari > > > > > > |Om Tat Sat| > > http://www.varahamihira > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 1, 2004 Report Share Posted February 1, 2004 ::Om Namo Bhagavate Vasudevaya::Dear Hari The mantra is om| na|maù| çi|vä|ya| na|maù| rä|me|çva|rä|ya There are 12 sticks i.e. it is a 13 akshari mantra and comes to lagna. Hence all the other arguments are not necessary.Best Regards,Sanjay RathSJC-Puri: 212 Gopal Ballav Road, Puri -752001, India----------------------------OM TAT SAT--------------------------- - Karu varahamihira Friday, January 30, 2004 2:54 PM Re: |Sri Varaha| Clarification sought OM NAMO GURUBRIHASPATHAYE, Dear Hari, > Namaste.> > Is ||Om Namasshivaaya Namo Rameswaraaya|| a dwadakshari mantra? > > My analysis is as follows:> > Om| Na|ma|sshi|vaa|ya/ Na|mo /Ra|mei|shwa|raa|ya> > There are 11 bars, hence it is 12 phonemes or aksharas. Is it > correct? As far as my understanding, these manthras are for worship Jyotir Linga. When ever you want to worship Jyotir linga related to a Graha, you can chant this manthra regardless the number of akshara. It help exalt the said Graha. But Maranakaraka Avasta shows differant story. For example, Taurus Lagna say Sun is in 12th. No matter the strength, Sun is still in MKA. In such chart, Sun cannot protect his own house as well as his karakatwa, say Lagna, 9th house as well as 10th house matters. Results can be expected only in Simha Narayana dasa. How ever we have to look specific areas of life he is going to suffer and remedy is always come from 9th from afflicted house/ Grahas. No Jyotir Linga Manthra, as far as my understanding. Hope you got it. > > The reason I am asking (actually I asked a general question on this > earlier but no reply) is one of my friends has Sun in > maranakarakasthana (12th); his name is Raghuraman and hence I feel > this mantra would be perfect for him as the mantra matches the > starting akshara of his name.> > Doubt: How does ||Om Namo Bhagavate Vasudevaaya|| qualify to be a > dwadakshari mantra?> > My analysis is:> > Om| Na|mo Bha|ga|va|te Va|su|de|vaa|ya A little mistake ! Om/ Na/mo/ Bha/ga/va/te/Va/su/de/vaa/ya Karu > > I am getting 9 bars and hence 10 aksharas only. Where are the > remaining two aksharas?> > regards> Hari|Om Tat Sat|http://www.varahamihira Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 16, 2008 Report Share Posted July 16, 2008 Pujaya Guruji, You have mentioned in the upayas for my Varsha pal that I have to apply Haldi between my eyebrows. I want to know if applying Sandalwood paste would be the same or not. regards chandramouli Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.