Reply Given to RUP Sir

[Guest guest]

Note : This Bhaskar itself doesnt know anything down the 2 first inches from the Surface, When I posted my relatives horoscope who was brutally murdered, He was suggesting good career and enough longevity, but to confuse people more, He behaves like a knowledgable astrologer.

====================== Bhaskar's Reply to Rup Sir =====================

// It is a well known rule that if a planet's owninterperiod in its > mahadasha is good then the restof the mahadasha will not be good //There is no such rule, either wellknown or remotely known. Please let meknow where is this written.// However i have not been able to find anyrules in astrology > books as to how to determineby looking at a horoscope itself as to > whetherthe mahadasha of a particular planet will givegood results in > its own bhukti or otherwise.This is something which has remained a> mystery to me inspite of having been astudent of the subject for about 25 years now.//What type of studies you have beendoing for quarter of a century, I cannotunderstand. One should be able to checkhow a planet would behave, as a mahadashaor antardasha Lord, in few minutes.Okay, but forget the past.Please startreading the discussions onthese Forums, read why a astrologer replieswhat he has to anyone, and search for thelogic behind it, by makingthe chart at your end, to which he hasreplied. You may start by reading all myreplies of today to various natives.To illustrate you with a example at the momentwould be a tedious job.anything else,please feelfree to write back, but some homework tobe done by you, before you write to me.basic rules for any planet tobe good in Mahadasha or antardasha.1) Must be benefic for the Ascendant.2) Must be well placed.3) Well conjuncted.4) Exalted,in own house, but notdebilitated.5) Must be aspected well.6) Must not behemmed between malefis.7) Dispositor of the planet must be checked.8) Constellation must be benefic .etc.etc.best wishes,Bhaskar.