dear group members - determining male/female

[Guest guest]

Resp Sri P.S Ramnarainan Ji,

 

I m so happy to find u back in the group and that with such a

illuminating post to enrich our knowledge. I hope other emonent

Jyotishi's will try the method given by you.

 

Mr. Raja has asked same question in too, there somebody

gave following information -

 

" I've found the document about determining gender which I posted about

earlier.

It is taken from an English translation of a book.The book is Jyotisha

Siddhantammu published in 1970 written by Divakaruni Venkata Subbarao.

best wishes

Margaret " .

 

Now the work remains is to search this book in Delhi, I hope RK Daa will

help me, Me and he, we both have purchased some 135+ books this year.

 

regards,

Lalit.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Vedic Astrologyandhealing , " sree88ganesha "

<sree88ganesha wrote:

>

>

> SARVAM GYANANANDAMAYAM

> AUM GURUBYO NAMAH

>

> Dear Shri Lalit ji & Raja ji,

>

> Namaste. May i attempt to write a few lines to identify the gender

> based on the basic information viz., birthtime and sunrise time?

>

> Step 1. Take the time elapsed between the birth time and Sunrise time.

> Step 2. Convert this into ghatis. This is known as janma gati.

> (if you are using J Hora software then this janma ghatis is already

> given/readily calculated for you)

> Step 3. Convert this into vighatis.

> Step 4. Divide this by 9(we have 9 grahas).

> Step 5. Note the remainder and treat the gender as per what is given

> below. You may then call this as Janma Vighati graha.

> If the remainder is 1 - then consider this as Sun.

> 2 - Moon

> 3 - Mars

> 4 - Buda

> 5 - Guru

> 6 - Sukra

> 7 - Sani

> 8 - Rahu

> 9 - Ketu

> Step 6. Treat the following grahas as male

> 1 - Sun

> 2 - Mars

> 3 - Guru

> 4 - Sani

> 5 - Rahu

> Step 7. Treat the following grahas as female

> 1 - Moon

> 2 - Buda

> 3 - Sukra

> 4 - Ketu

> Step 8. See whether the graha is associated with any graha. If so

> treat the gender of the graha as that of the one with whom he is

> associated.

> Step 9. When the graha is alone see whether the graha is exalted or

> debilitated. Treat the exalted graha as male even if it is a female

> graha as per our above consideration. Treat the debilitated graha as

> female even if it is a male graha as per our above consideration.

> Step 10. When the graha is neither exalted nor debilitated take the

> gender of the sign where he is posited. All odd signs other than

> Mithuna and Kumbha are male signs. All even signs other than Karka

> and Meena are female signs.

> Step 11. Whenever the vighati graha has exchanged signs with another

> graha treat the gender as the one pertaining to the other graha.

>

> Observe this graha closely. Worship the pratyadhi devatha pertaining

> to this graha to transcend the body consciousness/ to become a videha.

>

> i am using the sunrise time as the one given for the option 'the tip

> of the Sun's disk appears to be on the eastern horizon'.

>

> This is one of the birth time rectification tool.

>

> i hope this helps.

>

> Best wishes.

>

> May Mother Bless.

>

> Astrologically & spiritually yours,

> p.s.ramanarayanan.

>

>

>

> Vedic Astrologyandhealing , " litsol " litsol@

> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Mr. Raja,

> >

> > Thanx a lot for sharing such a wonderful information with us, If u

> > tell where this astrologer is based out, we can plan a trip.

> >

> > I met one astrologer in Bhopal, who is able to make your's horoscope

> > based on lines of the palm, but level of accuracy is only 65%-70%,

> > he does further approximation by asking past events etc.

> >

> > I can arrange his contact nos, if group has interest in him, problem

> > with these people is they are not open to share what little more thy

> > know.

> >

> > regards,

> > Lalit.

> >

> > Vedic Astrologyandhealing , " Raja Gursahani "

> > <rajagursahani@> wrote:

> > >

> > > there is a certain astrologer who i know who claims the ability to

> > determine

> > > whether the chart is that of a female or male. i referred a male

> > friend of

> > > mine to this fellow astrologer and he told the person that

> > according to the

> > > time of birth and date that this coudn't be the chart of a male

> > person. the

> > > male friend says that this time is all he has and that it is

> > correct

> > > according to the best of his knowledge, he is obviously for

> > certain that the

> > > date is of course at least corret. is anyone aware of this

> > ability and does

> > > anyone else claim the ability and method to determine such a

> > matter.

> > >

> > > thank you,

> > >

> > >

> > > __________

> > >

> > > Raja Gursahani

> > > (: 559.474.8576

> > > ,: rajagursahani@

> > >

> >

>

[Guest guest]

lalit,

 

135 books haveb been purchased by you with regards to astrology is that correct? well i think there should be such a method in those books you have. that is quite a large collection.

 

 

__________

Raja Gursahani (: 559.474.8576 ,: rajagursahani

 

[Guest guest]

Sorry,

 

I didnt find such a method in the books of my collection, In

Badarayan's book on prashna, there is a reference but as such no

method is given.

 

However, i m glad to find a hindi book - " Jyotish Prakash Nidhi "

written by Sri Neeljanth Joshi, the Raj Jyotishi of earstwhile

Holkar state, he has given mathemetical process of calculating

Aspects, therefore, we can say, aspects are not mere hypothesis, but

accepted angular distance among planets, the distance to which they

influence each other. In one of the book's it's mentioned that Week

Moon in the 10'th gives it's comlete results whereas strong moon

give partial results, and particularly for Acquarius lagna, such a

moon in 10'th is alone Raj Yogkarka.

 

regards,

Lalit.

 

 

 

Vedic Astrologyandhealing , " Raja Gursahani "

<rajagursahani wrote:

>

> lalit,

>

> 135 books haveb been purchased by you with regards to astrology is

that

> correct? well i think there should be such a method in those books

you have.

> that is quite a large collection.

>

>

> __________

>

> Raja Gursahani

> (: 559.474.8576

> ,: rajagursahani

>

[Guest guest]

SARVAM GYANANANDAMAYAM

AUM GURUBHYO NAMAH

 

Dear Shri Lalit ji,

 

Namaste. Hints and clues in this regard are available in Jaimini

Sutras.

 

Shri Raja ji,

 

i am happy to note that you have identified id as the name that is

given to me. i also understand that you have doubts about this method. i

have given the reference above. Any how this method is not my discovery

but is my understanding.

 

i am sorry if i had bored you with uncalled for step by step details and

if i had created an impression that i am trying to teach.

 

Best wishes.

 

May Mother Bless.

 

Astrologically & spiritually yours,

p.s.ramanarayanan.

Vedic Astrologyandhealing , " litsol " <litsol

wrote:

>

> Sorry,

>

> I didnt find such a method in the books of my collection, In

> Badarayan's book on prashna, there is a reference but as such no

> method is given.

>

> However, i m glad to find a hindi book - " Jyotish Prakash Nidhi "

> written by Sri Neeljanth Joshi, the Raj Jyotishi of earstwhile

> Holkar state, he has given mathemetical process of calculating

> Aspects, therefore, we can say, aspects are not mere hypothesis, but

> accepted angular distance among planets, the distance to which they

> influence each other. In one of the book's it's mentioned that Week

> Moon in the 10'th gives it's comlete results whereas strong moon

> give partial results, and particularly for Acquarius lagna, such a

> moon in 10'th is alone Raj Yogkarka.

>

> regards,

> Lalit.

>

>

>

> Vedic Astrologyandhealing , " Raja Gursahani "

> rajagursahani@ wrote:

> >

> > lalit,

> >

> > 135 books haveb been purchased by you with regards to astrology is

> that

> > correct? well i think there should be such a method in those books

> you have.

> > that is quite a large collection.

> >

> >

> > __________

> >

> > Raja Gursahani

> > (: 559.474.8576

> > ,: rajagursahani@

> >

>

[Guest guest]

no that wasn't my intention by what i have said. what i said was that method sounds very interesting and if it works great. i just have never heard of it. so please i wasn't trying to say that your method doesn't have validity. i am very glad there is a method out there. i was just wondering the source that is all.

 

sincerely,

 

 

__________

Raja Gursahani (: 559.474.8576 ,: rajagursahani