To Prabodh Ji --- Fuctional malefic or benefic…

[Guest guest]

Dear Prabodh ji,

 

One's perception can not change the object itself, it's not like

that, I want to let u one thing -

 

The theory that u derive from BPHS or from whatsoever place that 9'th

lord is always benefic, is imperfect.

 

Look at my chart, Mangal is my 9'th lord, aspected by Guru the lagna

lord, placed in 6'th house, it always try to show it's lordship of

6'th house and in every pratyantar and shukschhma, I get bad effects.

I see myself in dispute with bad people.

 

I have lost 6 teeth of mine, due to Mangal's placement in 6'th house

and being 2nd lord too, however, 2nd house itself aspected by Guru.

 

Hope u will correct ur views.

 

regards,

Lalit.

 

 

 

 

 

Vedic Astrologyandhealing , " Amol Mandar "

<amolmandar wrote:

>

> Dear Chandrashekhar ji Namste

>

> Yes you are right. It all depends on how you look at the chart and

> astrology. Even with entire text interpretation it is difficult to

say that

> Parashara has advised Maitreya to consider Jupiter as malefic for

Cancer

> lagna. But,with your accumulation of knowledge and skill gained

from direct

> participation in events or activities related to Vedic Jyotish I am

sure one

> day everybody will know true aspects of Parashara-Maitreya Samvad.

>

> Thanks a lot for your Time and Space.

>

> Prabodh Vekhande

> Jai Jai Shankar

> Har Har Shankar

>

>

> 2008/9/4, Chandrashekhar <sharma.chandrashekhar:

> >

> > Dear Prabodh,

> >

> > The discussion at least on my part is about effects in dashas of

certain

> > lords of bhavas. And I hold my opinion on the basis of what

Parashara says

> > in BPHS. If one only reads the chapter on what graha is

functional malefic

> > or benefic with respect to a certain lagna, one could get the

impression

> > that you appear to carry. No problem with that. However I prefer

to read the

> > entire text to interpret what Parashara meant to convey to

Maitreya. In

> > chapter 34 about Yogakarakas to which the original query and

perhaps, also

> > you are referring to also mentions that the lords o trishadaya

sthanas which

> > certainly include the 6th bhava are inauspicious or malefic. It

might

> > interest you to read what Parashara says at Adhyaaya 48 shlokas 3

and 4 and

> > 14 to 17. You may not find Parashara giving any exception to

Jupiter as 6th

> > lord therein.

> >

> > Of course it is up to the astrologers to apply my opinion to real

life

> > charts and find out what is right. I do not insist that others

should follow

> > only what I opine.

> >

> > Chandrashekhar.

> >

> >

> > Amol Mandar wrote:

> >

> > Dear Chandrashekharji Namaste

> >

> > I hope you wont mind I coming in!

> >

> > Does that mean Parashara has advised to consider Jupiter as

malefic for

> > Cancer lagna?

> >

> > I was under the impression that 9th lord if not 8th lord as well

(Mithuna

> > Lagna), Parashara has always treated it as benefic. Even with

Mithuna lagna,

> > if 9th lord is with 10th Parashara treats it as benefic.

> >

> > Thanks a lot for your Time and Space.

> >

> > Prabodh Vekhande

> > Jai Jai Shankar

> > Har Har Shankar

> >

> >

> >

> > 2008/9/4, Chandrashekhar <sharma.chandrashekhar:

> >>

> >> Dear Saurabh,

> >>

> >> In the Cancer lagna case cited, Jupiter is more of a functional

malefic

> >> than benefic, per Parashara. I think in its period the 1st half

of dasha

> >> will not be good whereas the second half will be good.

> >>

> >> Saturn, in my opinion, is certainly functional malefic.

> >>

> >> take care,

> >> Chandrashekhar.

> >>

> >>

> >>

> >>

> >> saurabh chaturvedi wrote:

> >>

> >> Respected Sir,

> >>

> >> Consider a case of Cancer Ascendant.

> >>

> >> a) Related to Jupiter--- (i) Jupiter is the lord of 6th as well

as 9th,

> >> (ii) the mooltrikona sign of Jupiter lies in the 6th house (so

6th house is

> >> more effective for Jupiter as a lord), (iii) Jupiter is not the

enemy of the

> >> ascendant lord (Moon).

> >>

> >> So if we consider all the 3 above points, the Jupiter should

be 'Neutral'

> >> in this case (This is my opinion).

> >> But Dr. Raman says it as a functional benefic and Dr. Shrimali as

> >> functional malefic.

> >>

> >> What do you say, sir?

> >>

> >> b) Related to Saturn--- (i) Lord of the 7th (Kendradhipati) and

the lord

> >> of 8th, (ii) Mooltrikona sign lies in the 8th house (so 8th

house is more

> >> effective for Saturn as a lord), (iii) Enemy of the Ascendant

lord.

> >>

> >> So according to me, Saturn should be the functional malefic in

this case.

> >> But Dr. Raman as well as Dr. Shrimali identify it as 'Neutral'.

> >>

> >> Please guide me.

> >>

> >> Thanks and Regards,

> >> saurabh

> >>

> >> **************************************************************

> >> " Kuchh Sapanon Ke Mar Jaane Se, Jeevan Nahin Maraa Karataa Hai "

> >>

> >> Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Go to

> >> http://in.messenger./invite/

> >>

> >>

> >

> >

> >

> >

>

[Guest guest]

Dear Lalit ji Namste>One's perception can not change the object itself, it's not like >that, I want to let u one thing -This is exactly what I wanted to say. At least seniors should know this and stop spreading 'wrong' astrology.

Giving correct predictions and applying correct principles these are altogether different matters. 9th lord is benefic is not my theory. Parashara is stated that. You may be selective in advocating Parashara or any other text or proclaim your divinity but that is bad way of Jyotish.

Mangal is my 9'th lord, aspected by Guru the lagna lord, placed in 6'th house, it always try to show it's lordship of 6'th houseWho is trying to show 6th lordship? Mangal for Meena lagna as it is placed in 6th house? This is what you want to correct my views? To tell you fact I am ready to change my views but unfortunately others are not. Your teeth problem is not because of Mars being 2nd lord placed in 6th. 2nd Bhava indicates mouth/face and not the 2nd lord. Karatatwa of teeth will be with Surya and in your case it is afflicted by Mars. Was loss of teeth because of blow(mars) on nose(Rahu) ?

Thanks a lot for your Time and Space.Prabodh VekhandeJai Jai ShankarHar Har Shankar

2008/9/5 litsol <litsol

 

 

 

 

Dear Prabodh ji,

 

One's perception can not change the object itself, it's not like

that, I want to let u one thing -

 

The theory that u derive from BPHS or from whatsoever place that 9'th

lord is always benefic, is imperfect.

 

Look at my chart, Mangal is my 9'th lord, aspected by Guru the lagna

lord, placed in 6'th house, it always try to show it's lordship of

6'th house and in every pratyantar and shukschhma, I get bad effects.

I see myself in dispute with bad people.

 

I have lost 6 teeth of mine, due to Mangal's placement in 6'th house

and being 2nd lord too, however, 2nd house itself aspected by Guru.

 

Hope u will correct ur views.

 

regards,

Lalit.

 

Vedic Astrologyandhealing , " Amol Mandar "

<amolmandar wrote:

>

> Dear Chandrashekhar ji Namste

>

> Yes you are right. It all depends on how you look at the chart and

> astrology. Even with entire text interpretation it is difficult to

say that

> Parashara has advised Maitreya to consider Jupiter as malefic for

Cancer

> lagna. But,with your accumulation of knowledge and skill gained

from direct

> participation in events or activities related to Vedic Jyotish I am

sure one

> day everybody will know true aspects of Parashara-Maitreya Samvad.

>

> Thanks a lot for your Time and Space.

>

> Prabodh Vekhande

> Jai Jai Shankar

> Har Har Shankar

>

>

> 2008/9/4, Chandrashekhar <sharma.chandrashekhar:

> >

> > Dear Prabodh,

> >

> > The discussion at least on my part is about effects in dashas of

certain

> > lords of bhavas. And I hold my opinion on the basis of what

Parashara says

> > in BPHS. If one only reads the chapter on what graha is

functional malefic

> > or benefic with respect to a certain lagna, one could get the

impression

> > that you appear to carry. No problem with that. However I prefer

to read the

> > entire text to interpret what Parashara meant to convey to

Maitreya. In

> > chapter 34 about Yogakarakas to which the original query and

perhaps, also

> > you are referring to also mentions that the lords o trishadaya

sthanas which

> > certainly include the 6th bhava are inauspicious or malefic. It

might

> > interest you to read what Parashara says at Adhyaaya 48 shlokas 3

and 4 and

> > 14 to 17. You may not find Parashara giving any exception to

Jupiter as 6th

> > lord therein.

> >

> > Of course it is up to the astrologers to apply my opinion to real

life

> > charts and find out what is right. I do not insist that others

should follow

> > only what I opine.

> >

> > Chandrashekhar.

> >

> >

> > Amol Mandar wrote:

> >

> > Dear Chandrashekharji Namaste

> >

> > I hope you wont mind I coming in!

> >

> > Does that mean Parashara has advised to consider Jupiter as

malefic for

> > Cancer lagna?

> >

> > I was under the impression that 9th lord if not 8th lord as well

(Mithuna

> > Lagna), Parashara has always treated it as benefic. Even with

Mithuna lagna,

> > if 9th lord is with 10th Parashara treats it as benefic.

> >

> > Thanks a lot for your Time and Space.

> >

> > Prabodh Vekhande

> > Jai Jai Shankar

> > Har Har Shankar

> >

> >

> >

> > 2008/9/4, Chandrashekhar <sharma.chandrashekhar:

> >>

> >> Dear Saurabh,

> >>

> >> In the Cancer lagna case cited, Jupiter is more of a functional

malefic

> >> than benefic, per Parashara. I think in its period the 1st half

of dasha

> >> will not be good whereas the second half will be good.

> >>

> >> Saturn, in my opinion, is certainly functional malefic.

> >>

> >> take care,

> >> Chandrashekhar.

> >>

> >>

> >>

> >>

> >> saurabh chaturvedi wrote:

> >>

> >> Respected Sir,

> >>

> >> Consider a case of Cancer Ascendant.

> >>

> >> a) Related to Jupiter--- (i) Jupiter is the lord of 6th as well

as 9th,

> >> (ii) the mooltrikona sign of Jupiter lies in the 6th house (so

6th house is

> >> more effective for Jupiter as a lord), (iii) Jupiter is not the

enemy of the

> >> ascendant lord (Moon).

> >>

> >> So if we consider all the 3 above points, the Jupiter should

be 'Neutral'

> >> in this case (This is my opinion).

> >> But Dr. Raman says it as a functional benefic and Dr. Shrimali as

> >> functional malefic.

> >>

> >> What do you say, sir?

> >>

> >> b) Related to Saturn--- (i) Lord of the 7th (Kendradhipati) and

the lord

> >> of 8th, (ii) Mooltrikona sign lies in the 8th house (so 8th

house is more

> >> effective for Saturn as a lord), (iii) Enemy of the Ascendant

lord.

> >>

> >> So according to me, Saturn should be the functional malefic in

this case.

> >> But Dr. Raman as well as Dr. Shrimali identify it as 'Neutral'.

> >>

> >> Please guide me.

> >>

> >> Thanks and Regards,

> >> saurabh

> >>

> >> **************************************************************

> >> " Kuchh Sapanon Ke Mar Jaane Se, Jeevan Nahin Maraa Karataa Hai "

> >>

> >> Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Go to

> >> http://in.messenger./invite/

> >>

> >>

> >

> >

> >

> >

>

[Guest guest]

Dear Mr. Prabodh,

 

I did a typing mistake which i corrected in the next mail, i happen

to type 'lordship' in place of 'placement', didn't u understand that ?

 

Why jyotish makes people opportunistic like this, I really do not

understand.

 

Now come forward to analyse, the same context, of Mangal's behavior

which is placed in 6'th house being 9'th and 2nd lord and that caused

decay of my 6'th teeth as well as puts me in debate with people like

u who dont study and are not open to correct their approach.

 

~Lalit.

 

Vedic Astrologyandhealing , " Amol Mandar "

<amolmandar wrote:

>

> Dear Lalit ji Namste

> >One's perception can not change the object itself, it's not like

> >that, I want to let u one thing -

>

> This is exactly what I wanted to say. At least seniors should know

this and

> stop spreading 'wrong' astrology.

> Giving correct predictions and applying correct principles these are

> altogether different matters. 9th lord is benefic is not my theory.

> Parashara is stated that. You may be selective in advocating

Parashara or

> any other text or proclaim your divinity but that is bad way of

Jyotish.

>

> Mangal is my 9'th lord, aspected by Guru the lagna

> lord, placed in 6'th house, it always try to show it's lordship of

> 6'th house

>

> Who is trying to show 6th lordship? Mangal for Meena lagna as it is

placed

> in 6th house? This is what you want to correct my views? To tell

you fact I

> am ready to change my views but unfortunately others are not. Your

teeth

> problem is not because of Mars being 2nd lord placed in 6th. 2nd

Bhava

> indicates mouth/face and not the 2nd lord. Karatatwa of teeth will

be with

> Surya and in your case it is afflicted by Mars. Was loss of teeth

because of

> blow(mars) on nose(Rahu) ?

>

>

>

> Thanks a lot for your Time and Space.

>

> Prabodh Vekhande

> Jai Jai Shankar

> Har Har Shankar

>

>

>

> 2008/9/5 litsol <litsol

>

> > Dear Prabodh ji,

> >

> > One's perception can not change the object itself, it's not like

> > that, I want to let u one thing -

> >

> > The theory that u derive from BPHS or from whatsoever place that

9'th

> > lord is always benefic, is imperfect.

> >

> > Look at my chart, Mangal is my 9'th lord, aspected by Guru the

lagna

> > lord, placed in 6'th house, it always try to show it's lordship of

> > 6'th house and in every pratyantar and shukschhma, I get bad

effects.

> > I see myself in dispute with bad people.

> >

> > I have lost 6 teeth of mine, due to Mangal's placement in 6'th

house

> > and being 2nd lord too, however, 2nd house itself aspected by

Guru.

> >

> > Hope u will correct ur views.

> >

> > regards,

> > Lalit.

> >

> > --- In

Vedic Astrologyandhealing <Vedic Astrologyandhealing%

40>,

> > " Amol Mandar "

> > <amolmandar@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Chandrashekhar ji Namste

> > >

> > > Yes you are right. It all depends on how you look at the chart

and

> > > astrology. Even with entire text interpretation it is difficult

to

> > say that

> > > Parashara has advised Maitreya to consider Jupiter as malefic

for

> > Cancer

> > > lagna. But,with your accumulation of knowledge and skill gained

> > from direct

> > > participation in events or activities related to Vedic Jyotish

I am

> > sure one

> > > day everybody will know true aspects of Parashara-Maitreya

Samvad.

> > >

> > > Thanks a lot for your Time and Space.

> > >

> > > Prabodh Vekhande

> > > Jai Jai Shankar

> > > Har Har Shankar

> > >

> > >

> > > 2008/9/4, Chandrashekhar <sharma.chandrashekhar@>:

> > > >

> > > > Dear Prabodh,

> > > >

> > > > The discussion at least on my part is about effects in dashas

of

> > certain

> > > > lords of bhavas. And I hold my opinion on the basis of what

> > Parashara says

> > > > in BPHS. If one only reads the chapter on what graha is

> > functional malefic

> > > > or benefic with respect to a certain lagna, one could get the

> > impression

> > > > that you appear to carry. No problem with that. However I

prefer

> > to read the

> > > > entire text to interpret what Parashara meant to convey to

> > Maitreya. In

> > > > chapter 34 about Yogakarakas to which the original query and

> > perhaps, also

> > > > you are referring to also mentions that the lords o trishadaya

> > sthanas which

> > > > certainly include the 6th bhava are inauspicious or malefic.

It

> > might

> > > > interest you to read what Parashara says at Adhyaaya 48

shlokas 3

> > and 4 and

> > > > 14 to 17. You may not find Parashara giving any exception to

> > Jupiter as 6th

> > > > lord therein.

> > > >

> > > > Of course it is up to the astrologers to apply my opinion to

real

> > life

> > > > charts and find out what is right. I do not insist that others

> > should follow

> > > > only what I opine.

> > > >

> > > > Chandrashekhar.

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Amol Mandar wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Dear Chandrashekharji Namaste

> > > >

> > > > I hope you wont mind I coming in!

> > > >

> > > > Does that mean Parashara has advised to consider Jupiter as

> > malefic for

> > > > Cancer lagna?

> > > >

> > > > I was under the impression that 9th lord if not 8th lord as

well

> > (Mithuna

> > > > Lagna), Parashara has always treated it as benefic. Even with

> > Mithuna lagna,

> > > > if 9th lord is with 10th Parashara treats it as benefic.

> > > >

> > > > Thanks a lot for your Time and Space.

> > > >

> > > > Prabodh Vekhande

> > > > Jai Jai Shankar

> > > > Har Har Shankar

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > 2008/9/4, Chandrashekhar <sharma.chandrashekhar@>:

> > > >>

> > > >> Dear Saurabh,

> > > >>

> > > >> In the Cancer lagna case cited, Jupiter is more of a

functional

> > malefic

> > > >> than benefic, per Parashara. I think in its period the 1st

half

> > of dasha

> > > >> will not be good whereas the second half will be good.

> > > >>

> > > >> Saturn, in my opinion, is certainly functional malefic.

> > > >>

> > > >> take care,

> > > >> Chandrashekhar.

> > > >>

> > > >>

> > > >>

> > > >>

> > > >> saurabh chaturvedi wrote:

> > > >>

> > > >> Respected Sir,

> > > >>

> > > >> Consider a case of Cancer Ascendant.

> > > >>

> > > >> a) Related to Jupiter--- (i) Jupiter is the lord of 6th as

well

> > as 9th,

> > > >> (ii) the mooltrikona sign of Jupiter lies in the 6th house

(so

> > 6th house is

> > > >> more effective for Jupiter as a lord), (iii) Jupiter is not

the

> > enemy of the

> > > >> ascendant lord (Moon).

> > > >>

> > > >> So if we consider all the 3 above points, the Jupiter should

> > be 'Neutral'

> > > >> in this case (This is my opinion).

> > > >> But Dr. Raman says it as a functional benefic and Dr.

Shrimali as

> > > >> functional malefic.

> > > >>

> > > >> What do you say, sir?

> > > >>

> > > >> b) Related to Saturn--- (i) Lord of the 7th (Kendradhipati)

and

> > the lord

> > > >> of 8th, (ii) Mooltrikona sign lies in the 8th house (so 8th

> > house is more

> > > >> effective for Saturn as a lord), (iii) Enemy of the Ascendant

> > lord.

> > > >>

> > > >> So according to me, Saturn should be the functional malefic

in

> > this case.

> > > >> But Dr. Raman as well as Dr. Shrimali identify it

as 'Neutral'.

> > > >>

> > > >> Please guide me.

> > > >>

> > > >> Thanks and Regards,

> > > >> saurabh

> > > >>

> > > >>

**************************************************************

> > > >> " Kuchh Sapanon Ke Mar Jaane Se, Jeevan Nahin Maraa Karataa

Hai "

> > > >>

> > > >> Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Go to

> > > >> http://in.messenger./invite/

> > > >>

> > > >>

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > >

> >

> >

> >

>

[Guest guest]

Dear Lalit NamasteThere are many things which are difficult for you to understand in life and certainly in Vedic Jyotish. If at all you want to understand get out of your blatant or sensational self promotion. Sooner the better.

Thanks a lot for your Time and Space.Prabodh VekhandeJai Jai ShankarHar Har Shankar2008/9/6 litsol <litsol

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Mr. Prabodh,

 

I did a typing mistake which i corrected in the next mail, i happen

to type 'lordship' in place of 'placement', didn't u understand that ?

 

Why jyotish makes people opportunistic like this, I really do not

understand.

 

Now come forward to analyse, the same context, of Mangal's behavior

which is placed in 6'th house being 9'th and 2nd lord and that caused

decay of my 6'th teeth as well as puts me in debate with people like

u who dont study and are not open to correct their approach.

 

~Lalit.

 

Vedic Astrologyandhealing , " Amol Mandar "

<amolmandar wrote:

>

> Dear Lalit ji Namste

> >One's perception can not change the object itself, it's not like

> >that, I want to let u one thing -

>

> This is exactly what I wanted to say. At least seniors should know

this and

> stop spreading 'wrong' astrology.

> Giving correct predictions and applying correct principles these are

> altogether different matters. 9th lord is benefic is not my theory.

> Parashara is stated that. You may be selective in advocating

Parashara or

> any other text or proclaim your divinity but that is bad way of

Jyotish.

>

> Mangal is my 9'th lord, aspected by Guru the lagna

> lord, placed in 6'th house, it always try to show it's lordship of

> 6'th house

>

> Who is trying to show 6th lordship? Mangal for Meena lagna as it is

placed

> in 6th house? This is what you want to correct my views? To tell

you fact I

> am ready to change my views but unfortunately others are not. Your

teeth

> problem is not because of Mars being 2nd lord placed in 6th. 2nd

Bhava

> indicates mouth/face and not the 2nd lord. Karatatwa of teeth will

be with

> Surya and in your case it is afflicted by Mars. Was loss of teeth

because of

> blow(mars) on nose(Rahu) ?

>

>

>

> Thanks a lot for your Time and Space.

>

> Prabodh Vekhande

> Jai Jai Shankar

> Har Har Shankar

>

>

>

> 2008/9/5 litsol <litsol

>

> > Dear Prabodh ji,

> >

> > One's perception can not change the object itself, it's not like

> > that, I want to let u one thing -

> >

> > The theory that u derive from BPHS or from whatsoever place that

9'th

> > lord is always benefic, is imperfect.

> >

> > Look at my chart, Mangal is my 9'th lord, aspected by Guru the

lagna

> > lord, placed in 6'th house, it always try to show it's lordship of

> > 6'th house and in every pratyantar and shukschhma, I get bad

effects.

> > I see myself in dispute with bad people.

> >

> > I have lost 6 teeth of mine, due to Mangal's placement in 6'th

house

> > and being 2nd lord too, however, 2nd house itself aspected by

Guru.

> >

> > Hope u will correct ur views.

> >

> > regards,

> > Lalit.

> >

> >

Vedic Astrologyandhealing <Vedic Astrologyandhealing%

40>,

> > " Amol Mandar "

> > <amolmandar@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Chandrashekhar ji Namste

> > >

> > > Yes you are right. It all depends on how you look at the chart

and

> > > astrology. Even with entire text interpretation it is difficult

to

> > say that

> > > Parashara has advised Maitreya to consider Jupiter as malefic

for

> > Cancer

> > > lagna. But,with your accumulation of knowledge and skill gained

> > from direct

> > > participation in events or activities related to Vedic Jyotish

I am

> > sure one

> > > day everybody will know true aspects of Parashara-Maitreya

Samvad.

> > >

> > > Thanks a lot for your Time and Space.

> > >

> > > Prabodh Vekhande

> > > Jai Jai Shankar

> > > Har Har Shankar

> > >

> > >

> > > 2008/9/4, Chandrashekhar <sharma.chandrashekhar@>:

> > > >

> > > > Dear Prabodh,

> > > >

> > > > The discussion at least on my part is about effects in dashas

of

> > certain

> > > > lords of bhavas. And I hold my opinion on the basis of what

> > Parashara says

> > > > in BPHS. If one only reads the chapter on what graha is

> > functional malefic

> > > > or benefic with respect to a certain lagna, one could get the

> > impression

> > > > that you appear to carry. No problem with that. However I

prefer

> > to read the

> > > > entire text to interpret what Parashara meant to convey to

> > Maitreya. In

> > > > chapter 34 about Yogakarakas to which the original query and

> > perhaps, also

> > > > you are referring to also mentions that the lords o trishadaya

> > sthanas which

> > > > certainly include the 6th bhava are inauspicious or malefic.

It

> > might

> > > > interest you to read what Parashara says at Adhyaaya 48

shlokas 3

> > and 4 and

> > > > 14 to 17. You may not find Parashara giving any exception to

> > Jupiter as 6th

> > > > lord therein.

> > > >

> > > > Of course it is up to the astrologers to apply my opinion to

real

> > life

> > > > charts and find out what is right. I do not insist that others

> > should follow

> > > > only what I opine.

> > > >

> > > > Chandrashekhar.

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Amol Mandar wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Dear Chandrashekharji Namaste

> > > >

> > > > I hope you wont mind I coming in!

> > > >

> > > > Does that mean Parashara has advised to consider Jupiter as

> > malefic for

> > > > Cancer lagna?

> > > >

> > > > I was under the impression that 9th lord if not 8th lord as

well

> > (Mithuna

> > > > Lagna), Parashara has always treated it as benefic. Even with

> > Mithuna lagna,

> > > > if 9th lord is with 10th Parashara treats it as benefic.

> > > >

> > > > Thanks a lot for your Time and Space.

> > > >

> > > > Prabodh Vekhande

> > > > Jai Jai Shankar

> > > > Har Har Shankar

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > 2008/9/4, Chandrashekhar <sharma.chandrashekhar@>:

> > > >>

> > > >> Dear Saurabh,

> > > >>

> > > >> In the Cancer lagna case cited, Jupiter is more of a

functional

> > malefic

> > > >> than benefic, per Parashara. I think in its period the 1st

half

> > of dasha

> > > >> will not be good whereas the second half will be good.

> > > >>

> > > >> Saturn, in my opinion, is certainly functional malefic.

> > > >>

> > > >> take care,

> > > >> Chandrashekhar.

> > > >>

> > > >>

> > > >>

> > > >>

> > > >> saurabh chaturvedi wrote:

> > > >>

> > > >> Respected Sir,

> > > >>

> > > >> Consider a case of Cancer Ascendant.

> > > >>

> > > >> a) Related to Jupiter--- (i) Jupiter is the lord of 6th as

well

> > as 9th,

> > > >> (ii) the mooltrikona sign of Jupiter lies in the 6th house

(so

> > 6th house is

> > > >> more effective for Jupiter as a lord), (iii) Jupiter is not

the

> > enemy of the

> > > >> ascendant lord (Moon).

> > > >>

> > > >> So if we consider all the 3 above points, the Jupiter should

> > be 'Neutral'

> > > >> in this case (This is my opinion).

> > > >> But Dr. Raman says it as a functional benefic and Dr.

Shrimali as

> > > >> functional malefic.

> > > >>

> > > >> What do you say, sir?

> > > >>

> > > >> b) Related to Saturn--- (i) Lord of the 7th (Kendradhipati)

and

> > the lord

> > > >> of 8th, (ii) Mooltrikona sign lies in the 8th house (so 8th

> > house is more

> > > >> effective for Saturn as a lord), (iii) Enemy of the Ascendant

> > lord.

> > > >>

> > > >> So according to me, Saturn should be the functional malefic

in

> > this case.

> > > >> But Dr. Raman as well as Dr. Shrimali identify it

as 'Neutral'.

> > > >>

> > > >> Please guide me.

> > > >>

> > > >> Thanks and Regards,

> > > >> saurabh

> > > >>

> > > >>

**************************************************************

> > > >> " Kuchh Sapanon Ke Mar Jaane Se, Jeevan Nahin Maraa Karataa

Hai "

> > > >>

> > > >> Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Go to

> > > >> http://in.messenger./invite/

> > > >>

> > > >>

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > >

> >

> >

> >

>