To Prabodh Ji --- Fuctional malefic or beneficâ€¦

September 6, 2008

Dear lalitji and Friends,

Basics of Astrology given on our texts of BHPS and Parasara are not to be disputed and as detailed/conveyed has great relevance even today.unfortunately we have our own ways of analysis and understanding core of Astrology..

Mars as lord of 9th house may not be as auspicious as that of benific planet.Rest of the things like loosing teeth,building bones and other incidentals have to be understood in their own perspective and accept realities.6th house representing for 9th to 9th is also known as house of diseases apart from several other things.Loosing teeth in dasa/anatar need not necessarily be good andbad of planets,excepting for sudden and abrupt events that happen 'coz of impact in gochara

vrkrishnan--- On Fri, 9/5/08, Amol Mandar <amolmandar wrote:

Amol Mandar <amolmandarRe: [Vedic Astrologyandhealing] Re: To Prabodh Ji --- Fuctional malefic or beneficâ€¦Vedic Astrologyandhealing Date: Friday, September 5, 2008, 3:05 PM

Dear Lalit ji Namste

>One's perception can not change the object itself, it's not like >that, I want to let u one thing -

This is exactly what I wanted to say. At least seniors should know this and stop spreading 'wrong' astrology.

Giving correct predictions and applying correct principles these are altogether different matters. 9th lord is benefic is not my theory. Parashara is stated that. You may be selective in advocating Parashara or any other text or proclaim your divinity but that is bad way of Jyotish.

Mangal is my 9'th lord, aspected by Guru the lagna lord, placed in 6'th house, it always try to show it's lordship of 6'th house

Who is trying to show 6th lordship? Mangal for Meena lagna as it is placed in 6th house? This is what you want to correct my views? To tell you fact I am ready to change my views but unfortunately others are not. Your teeth problem is not because of Mars being 2nd lord placed in 6th. 2nd Bhava indicates mouth/face and not the 2nd lord. Karatatwa of teeth will be with Surya and in your case it is afflicted by Mars. Was loss of teeth because of blow(mars) on nose(Rahu) ?

Thanks a lot for your Time and Space.

Prabodh Vekhande

Jai Jai Shankar

Har Har Shankar

2008/9/5 litsol <litsol >

Dear Prabodh ji,One's perception can not change the object itself, it's not like that, I want to let u one thing -The theory that u derive from BPHS or from whatsoever place that 9'th lord is always benefic, is imperfect.Look at my chart, Mangal is my 9'th lord, aspected by Guru the lagna lord, placed in 6'th house, it always try to show it's lordship of 6'th house and in every pratyantar and shukschhma, I get bad effects. I see myself in dispute with bad people.I have lost 6 teeth of mine, due to Mangal's placement in 6'th house and being 2nd lord too, however, 2nd house itself aspected by Guru.Hope u will correct ur views.regards,Lalit.Vedic Astrologyandhe aling@ s.com, "Amol Mandar" <amolmandar@. ..> wrote:>> Dear Chandrashekhar ji

Namste> > Yes you are right. It all depends on how you look at the chart and> astrology. Even with entire text interpretation it is difficult to say that> Parashara has advised Maitreya to consider Jupiter as malefic for Cancer> lagna. But,with your accumulation of knowledge and skill gained from direct> participation in events or activities related to Vedic Jyotish I am sure one> day everybody will know true aspects of Parashara-Maitreya Samvad.> > Thanks a lot for your Time and Space.> > Prabodh Vekhande> Jai Jai Shankar> Har Har Shankar> > > 2008/9/4, Chandrashekhar <sharma.chandrashekh ar:> >> > Dear Prabodh,> >> > The discussion at least on my part is about effects in dashas of certain> > lords of bhavas. And I hold my opinion on the basis of what

Parashara says> > in BPHS. If one only reads the chapter on what graha is functional malefic> > or benefic with respect to a certain lagna, one could get the impression> > that you appear to carry. No problem with that. However I prefer to read the> > entire text to interpret what Parashara meant to convey to Maitreya. In> > chapter 34 about Yogakarakas to which the original query and perhaps, also> > you are referring to also mentions that the lords o trishadaya sthanas which> > certainly include the 6th bhava are inauspicious or malefic. It might> > interest you to read what Parashara says at Adhyaaya 48 shlokas 3 and 4 and> > 14 to 17. You may not find Parashara giving any exception to Jupiter as 6th> > lord therein.> >> > Of course it is up to the astrologers to apply my opinion to real

life> > charts and find out what is right. I do not insist that others should follow> > only what I opine.> >> > Chandrashekhar.> >> >> > Amol Mandar wrote:> >> > Dear Chandrashekharji Namaste> >> > I hope you wont mind I coming in!> >> > Does that mean Parashara has advised to consider Jupiter as malefic for> > Cancer lagna?> >> > I was under the impression that 9th lord if not 8th lord as well(Mithuna> > Lagna), Parashara has always treated it as benefic. Even with Mithuna lagna,> > if 9th lord is with 10th Parashara treats it as benefic.> >> > Thanks a lot for your Time and Space.> >> > Prabodh Vekhande> > Jai Jai Shankar> > Har Har Shankar> >> >> >> >

2008/9/4, Chandrashekhar <sharma.chandrashekh ar:> >>> >> Dear Saurabh,> >>> >> In the Cancer lagna case cited, Jupiter is more of a functional malefic> >> than benefic, per Parashara. I think in its period the 1st half of dasha> >> will not be good whereas the second half will be good.> >>> >> Saturn, in my opinion, is certainly functional malefic.> >>> >> take care,> >> Chandrashekhar.> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> saurabh chaturvedi wrote:> >>> >> Respected Sir,> >>> >> Consider a case of Cancer Ascendant.> >>> >> a) Related to Jupiter--- (i) Jupiter is the lord of 6th as well as 9th,> >> (ii) the mooltrikona sign of Jupiter lies in the 6th

house (so 6th house is> >> more effective for Jupiter as a lord), (iii) Jupiter is not the enemy of the> >> ascendant lord (Moon).> >>> >> So if we consider all the 3 above points, the Jupiter should be 'Neutral'> >> in this case (This is my opinion).> >> But Dr. Raman says it as a functional benefic and Dr. Shrimali as> >> functional malefic.> >>> >> What do you say, sir?> >>> >> b) Related to Saturn--- (i) Lord of the 7th (Kendradhipati) and the lord> >> of 8th, (ii) Mooltrikona sign lies in the 8th house (so 8th house is more> >> effective for Saturn as a lord), (iii) Enemy of the Ascendant lord.> >>> >> So according to me, Saturn should be the functional malefic in this case.> >> But Dr. Raman as well as Dr. Shrimali

identify it as 'Neutral'.> >>> >> Please guide me.> >>> >> Thanks and Regards,> >> saurabh> >>> >> ************ ********* ********* ********* ********* ********* *****> >> "Kuchh Sapanon Ke Mar Jaane Se, Jeevan Nahin Maraa Karataa Hai"> >>> >> Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Go to> >> http://in.messenger ./ invite/> >>> >>> >> >> > > >>