Guest guest Posted December 10, 2008 Report Share Posted December 10, 2008 dear Siva devotees and sri Lalitjhisivayanamahai expected atleast a small contribution from all yr ends but not materialised however Shiova had His KUMBABISHEAGAM DONE IN very fitting way and photos wrt to thar are soon onm the nettpls see if you can be still a part of this noble cause where a compound wall has been neccessary thanks alot sivayanamaha--- On Sun, 7/9/08, litsol <litsol wrote:litsol <litsol[Vedic Astrologyandhealing] Re: nambarai sivalaya renovation…Vedic Astrologyandhealing Date: Sunday, 7 September, 2008, 6:38 PM Dear Sri lakshminarayanan Ji, Namaskar, Yes I have seen the news published in Hindu and posting same in this mail, You are donig great service - Lalit. Renovation at Nambarai Tiruppani Kuzhu of Nanmangalam has undertaken the renovation of Sri Gowriswarar temple, at Nambarai village, three km from Thimiri ( on the road between Arcot and Arani) in Vellore district. The temple is dedicated to Lord Gowriswarar and his Consort Devi Kamakshi (also called Devi Maragathavalli) . According to sthapatis the temple is more than 900 years old. The kodimaram is about 50-60 ft tall. Despite its present dilapidated state, the temple offers glimpses of the architectural and sculptural splendour that once existed. With initiative from local villagers, renovation work has begun. A rarity found here is that both deities face east — generally the goddess is seen facing south. This is a prarthanai stalam where Nandi Bhagawan faces the Lord directly. Devotees believe that their prayers are fulfilled within a period of 11 pradoshams. Thimiri and Nambarai are in the vicinity of the shataranya kshetrams worshipped by six great rishis coming within the radius of the Arunachala Hills, Parvata Malai and Kamandala Naga Nadhi. The estimated cost for renovation and consecration is about Rs.3.6 lakhs, The consecration is being planned for January 2009. For details, call S. Lakshminarayanan, Tiruppani Kuzhu, 207, Elumalai Salai, Nanmangalam, — Chennai 600117. siva2sivan (Ph: 98841 26417). Vedic Astrologyandhe aling@ s.com, subramanian lakshminarayanan <siva2shiva@. ..> wrote:>> dear sriLalith> sivayanamaha> it has been time past we spoke on the above renovation of siva temple in this part of the universe> now the hindu a leading newspaper carried a news item on the above > you can see that from the following> > > > : http://www.hinduonn et.com/fr/ 2008/09/05/ stories/20080905 51090200. htm> May i request you to please go thru the above and revert back as early as possible> thanking you > sivayanamaha> > > --- On Sat, 6/9/08, litsol <litsol wrote:> litsol <litsol> [Vedic Astrologyandh ealing] Re: To Prabodh Ji --- Fuctional malefic or benefic…> Vedic Astrologyandhe aling@ s.com> Saturday, 6 September, 2008, 2:39 PM> > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Mr. Prabodh,> > > > I did a typing mistake which i corrected in the next mail, i happen > > to type 'lordship' in place of 'placement', didn't u understand that ?> > > > Why jyotish makes people opportunistic like this, I really do not > > understand.> > > > Now come forward to analyse, the same context, of Mangal's behavior > > which is placed in 6'th house being 9'th and 2nd lord and that caused > > decay of my 6'th teeth as well as puts me in debate with people like > > u who dont study and are not open to correct their approach.> > > > ~Lalit.> > > > Vedic Astrologyandhe aling@ s.com, "Amol Mandar" > > <amolmandar@ ...> wrote:> > >> > > Dear Lalit ji Namste> > > >One's perception can not change the object itself, it's not like> > > >that, I want to let u one thing -> > > > > > This is exactly what I wanted to say. At least seniors should know > > this and> > > stop spreading 'wrong' astrology.> > > Giving correct predictions and applying correct principles these are> > > altogether different matters. 9th lord is benefic is not my theory.> > > Parashara is stated that. You may be selective in advocating > > Parashara or> > > any other text or proclaim your divinity but that is bad way of > > Jyotish.> > > > > > Mangal is my 9'th lord, aspected by Guru the lagna> > > lord, placed in 6'th house, it always try to show it's lordship of> > > 6'th house> > > > > > Who is trying to show 6th lordship? Mangal for Meena lagna as it is > > placed> > > in 6th house? This is what you want to correct my views? To tell > > you fact I> > > am ready to change my views but unfortunately others are not. Your > > teeth> > > problem is not because of Mars being 2nd lord placed in 6th. 2nd > > Bhava> > > indicates mouth/face and not the 2nd lord. Karatatwa of teeth will > > be with> > > Surya and in your case it is afflicted by Mars. Was loss of teeth > > because of> > > blow(mars) on nose(Rahu) ?> > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks a lot for your Time and Space.> > > > > > Prabodh Vekhande> > > Jai Jai Shankar> > > Har Har Shankar> > > > > > > > > > > > 2008/9/5 litsol <litsol@>> > > > > > > Dear Prabodh ji,> > > >> > > > One's perception can not change the object itself, it's not like> > > > that, I want to let u one thing -> > > >> > > > The theory that u derive from BPHS or from whatsoever place that > > 9'th> > > > lord is always benefic, is imperfect.> > > >> > > > Look at my chart, Mangal is my 9'th lord, aspected by Guru the > > lagna> > > > lord, placed in 6'th house, it always try to show it's lordship of> > > > 6'th house and in every pratyantar and shukschhma, I get bad > > effects.> > > > I see myself in dispute with bad people.> > > >> > > > I have lost 6 teeth of mine, due to Mangal's placement in 6'th > > house> > > > and being 2nd lord too, however, 2nd house itself aspected by > > Guru.> > > >> > > > Hope u will correct ur views.> > > >> > > > regards,> > > > Lalit.> > > >> > > > > > Vedic Astrologyandhe aling@ s.com<Vedic Astrologyandh ealing%> > 40. com>,> > > > "Amol Mandar"> > > > <amolmandar@ > wrote:> > > > >> > > > > Dear Chandrashekhar ji Namste> > > > >> > > > > Yes you are right. It all depends on how you look at the chart > > and> > > > > astrology. Even with entire text interpretation it is difficult > > to> > > > say that> > > > > Parashara has advised Maitreya to consider Jupiter as malefic > > for> > > > Cancer> > > > > lagna. But,with your accumulation of knowledge and skill gained> > > > from direct> > > > > participation in events or activities related to Vedic Jyotish > > I am> > > > sure one> > > > > day everybody will know true aspects of Parashara-Maitreya > > Samvad.> > > > >> > > > > Thanks a lot for your Time and Space.> > > > >> > > > > Prabodh Vekhande> > > > > Jai Jai Shankar> > > > > Har Har Shankar> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > 2008/9/4, Chandrashekhar <sharma.chandrashek har@>:> > > > > >> > > > > > Dear Prabodh,> > > > > >> > > > > > The discussion at least on my part is about effects in dashas > > of> > > > certain> > > > > > lords of bhavas. And I hold my opinion on the basis of what> > > > Parashara says> > > > > > in BPHS. If one only reads the chapter on what graha is> > > > functional malefic> > > > > > or benefic with respect to a certain lagna, one could get the> > > > impression> > > > > > that you appear to carry. No problem with that. However I > > prefer> > > > to read the> > > > > > entire text to interpret what Parashara meant to convey to> > > > Maitreya. In> > > > > > chapter 34 about Yogakarakas to which the original query and> > > > perhaps, also> > > > > > you are referring to also mentions that the lords o trishadaya> > > > sthanas which> > > > > > certainly include the 6th bhava are inauspicious or malefic. > > It> > > > might> > > > > > interest you to read what Parashara says at Adhyaaya 48 > > shlokas 3> > > > and 4 and> > > > > > 14 to 17. You may not find Parashara giving any exception to> > > > Jupiter as 6th> > > > > > lord therein.> > > > > >> > > > > > Of course it is up to the astrologers to apply my opinion to > > real> > > > life> > > > > > charts and find out what is right. I do not insist that others> > > > should follow> > > > > > only what I opine.> > > > > >> > > > > > Chandrashekhar.> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > Amol Mandar wrote:> > > > > >> > > > > > Dear Chandrashekharji Namaste> > > > > >> > > > > > I hope you wont mind I coming in!> > > > > >> > > > > > Does that mean Parashara has advised to consider Jupiter as> > > > malefic for> > > > > > Cancer lagna?> > > > > >> > > > > > I was under the impression that 9th lord if not 8th lord as > > well> > > > (Mithuna> > > > > > Lagna), Parashara has always treated it as benefic. Even with> > > > Mithuna lagna,> > > > > > if 9th lord is with 10th Parashara treats it as benefic.> > > > > >> > > > > > Thanks a lot for your Time and Space.> > > > > >> > > > > > Prabodh Vekhande> > > > > > Jai Jai Shankar> > > > > > Har Har Shankar> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > 2008/9/4, Chandrashekhar <sharma.chandrashek har@>:> > > > > >>> > > > > >> Dear Saurabh,> > > > > >>> > > > > >> In the Cancer lagna case cited, Jupiter is more of a > > functional> > > > malefic> > > > > >> than benefic, per Parashara. I think in its period the 1st > > half> > > > of dasha> > > > > >> will not be good whereas the second half will be good.> > > > > >>> > > > > >> Saturn, in my opinion, is certainly functional malefic.> > > > > >>> > > > > >> take care,> > > > > >> Chandrashekhar.> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >> saurabh chaturvedi wrote:> > > > > >>> > > > > >> Respected Sir,> > > > > >>> > > > > >> Consider a case of Cancer Ascendant.> > > > > >>> > > > > >> a) Related to Jupiter--- (i) Jupiter is the lord of 6th as > > well> > > > as 9th,> > > > > >> (ii) the mooltrikona sign of Jupiter lies in the 6th house > > (so> > > > 6th house is> > > > > >> more effective for Jupiter as a lord), (iii) Jupiter is not > > the> > > > enemy of the> > > > > >> ascendant lord (Moon).> > > > > >>> > > > > >> So if we consider all the 3 above points, the Jupiter should> > > > be 'Neutral'> > > > > >> in this case (This is my opinion).> > > > > >> But Dr. Raman says it as a functional benefic and Dr. > > Shrimali as> > > > > >> functional malefic.> > > > > >>> > > > > >> What do you say, sir?> > > > > >>> > > > > >> b) Related to Saturn--- (i) Lord of the 7th (Kendradhipati) > > and> > > > the lord> > > > > >> of 8th, (ii) Mooltrikona sign lies in the 8th house (so 8th> > > > house is more> > > > > >> effective for Saturn as a lord), (iii) Enemy of the Ascendant> > > > lord.> > > > > >>> > > > > >> So according to me, Saturn should be the functional malefic > > in> > > > this case.> > > > > >> But Dr. Raman as well as Dr. Shrimali identify it > > as 'Neutral'.> > > > > >>> > > > > >> Please guide me.> > > > > >>> > > > > >> Thanks and Regards,> > > > > >> saurabh> > > > > >>> > > > > >> > > ************ ********* ********* ********* ********* ********* *****> > > > > >> "Kuchh Sapanon Ke Mar Jaane Se, Jeevan Nahin Maraa Karataa > > Hai"> > > > > >>> > > > > >> Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Go to> > > > > >> http://in.messenger ./ invite/> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Unlimited freedom, unlimited storage. Get it now, on http://help. / l/in// mail/mail/ tools/tools- 08.html/>> Why jyotish makes people opportunistic like this, I really do not > > understand.> > > > Now come forward to analyse, the same context, of Mangal's behavior > > which is placed in 6'th house being 9'th and 2nd lord and that caused > > decay of my 6'th teeth as well as puts me in debate with people like > > u who dont study and are not open to correct their approach.> > > > ~Lalit.> > > > Vedic Astrologyandhe aling@ s.com, "Amol Mandar" > > <amolmandar@ ...> wrote:> > >> > > Dear Lalit ji Namste> > > >One's perception can not change the object itself, it's not like> > > >that, I want to let u one thing -> > > > > > This is exactly what I wanted to say. At least seniors should know > > this and> > > stop spreading 'wrong' astrology.> > > Giving correct predictions and applying correct principles these are> > > altogether different matters. 9th lord is benefic is not my theory.> > > Parashara is stated that. You may be selective in advocating > > Parashara or> > > any other text or proclaim your divinity but that is bad way of > > Jyotish.> > > > > > Mangal is my 9'th lord, aspected by Guru the lagna> > > lord, placed in 6'th house, it always try to show it's lordship of> > > 6'th house> > > > > > Who is trying to show 6th lordship? Mangal for Meena lagna as it is > > placed> > > in 6th house? This is what you want to correct my views? To tell > > you fact I> > > am ready to change my views but unfortunately others are not. Your > > teeth> > > problem is not because of Mars being 2nd lord placed in 6th. 2nd > > Bhava> > > indicates mouth/face and not the 2nd lord. Karatatwa of teeth will > > be with> > > Surya and in your case it is afflicted by Mars. Was loss of teeth > > because of> > > blow(mars) on nose(Rahu) ?> > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks a lot for your Time and Space.> > > > > > Prabodh Vekhande> > > Jai Jai Shankar> > > Har Har Shankar> > > > > > > > > > > > 2008/9/5 litsol litsol@> > > > > > > Dear Prabodh ji,> > > >> > > > One's perception can not change the object itself, it's not like> > > > that, I want to let u one thing -> > > >> > > > The theory that u derive from BPHS or from whatsoever place that > > 9'th> > > > lord is always benefic, is imperfect.> > > >> > > > Look at my chart, Mangal is my 9'th lord, aspected by Guru the > > lagna> > > > lord, placed in 6'th house, it always try to show it's lordship of> > > > 6'th house and in every pratyantar and shukschhma, I get bad > > effects.> > > > I see myself in dispute with bad people.> > > >> > > > I have lost 6 teeth of mine, due to Mangal's placement in 6'th > > house> > > > and being 2nd lord too, however, 2nd house itself aspected by > > Guru.> > > >> > > > Hope u will correct ur views.> > > >> > > > regards,> > > > Lalit.> > > >> > > > > > Vedic Astrologyandhe aling@ s.com<Vedic Astrologyandh ealing%> > 40. com>,> > > > "Amol Mandar"> > > > <amolmandar@ > wrote:> > > > >> > > > > Dear Chandrashekhar ji Namste> > > > >> > > > > Yes you are right. It all depends on how you look at the chart > > and> > > > > astrology. Even with entire text interpretation it is difficult > > to> > > > say that> > > > > Parashara has advised Maitreya to consider Jupiter as malefic > > for> > > > Cancer> > > > > lagna. But,with your accumulation of knowledge and skill gained> > > > from direct> > > > > participation in events or activities related to Vedic Jyotish > > I am> > > > sure one> > > > > day everybody will know true aspects of Parashara-Maitreya > > Samvad.> > > > >> > > > > Thanks a lot for your Time and Space.> > > > >> > > > > Prabodh Vekhande> > > > > Jai Jai Shankar> > > > > Har Har Shankar> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > 2008/9/4, Chandrashekhar <sharma.chandrashek har@>:> > > > > >> > > > > > Dear Prabodh,> > > > > >> > > > > > The discussion at least on my part is about effects in dashas > > of> > > > certain> > > > > > lords of bhavas. And I hold my opinion on the basis of what> > > > Parashara says> > > > > > in BPHS. If one only reads the chapter on what graha is> > > > functional malefic> > > > > > or benefic with respect to a certain lagna, one could get the> > > > impression> > > > > > that you appear to carry. No problem with that. However I > > prefer> > > > to read the> > > > > > entire text to interpret what Parashara meant to convey to> > > > Maitreya. In> > > > > > chapter 34 about Yogakarakas to which the original query and> > > > perhaps, also> > > > > > you are referring to also mentions that the lords o trishadaya> > > > sthanas which> > > > > > certainly include the 6th bhava are inauspicious or malefic. > > It> > > > might> > > > > > interest you to read what Parashara says at Adhyaaya 48 > > shlokas 3> > > > and 4 and> > > > > > 14 to 17. You may not find Parashara giving any exception to> > > > Jupiter as 6th> > > > > > lord therein.> > > > > >> > > > > > Of course it is up to the astrologers to apply my opinion to > > real> > > > life> > > > > > charts and find out what is right. I do not insist that others> > > > should follow> > > > > > only what I opine.> > > > > >> > > > > > Chandrashekhar.> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > Amol Mandar wrote:> > > > > >> > > > > > Dear Chandrashekharji Namaste> > > > > >> > > > > > I hope you wont mind I coming in!> > > > > >> > > > > > Does that mean Parashara has advised to consider Jupiter as> > > > malefic for> > > > > > Cancer lagna?> > > > > >> > > > > > I was under the impression that 9th lord if not 8th lord as > > well> > > > (Mithuna> > > > > > Lagna), Parashara has always treated it as benefic. Even with> > > > Mithuna lagna,> > > > > > if 9th lord is with 10th Parashara treats it as benefic.> > > > > >> > > > > > Thanks a lot for your Time and Space.> > > > > >> > > > > > Prabodh Vekhande> > > > > > Jai Jai Shankar> > > > > > Har Har Shankar> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > 2008/9/4, Chandrashekhar <sharma.chandrashek har@>:> > > > > >>> > > > > >> Dear Saurabh,> > > > > >>> > > > > >> In the Cancer lagna case cited, Jupiter is more of a > > functional> > > > malefic> > > > > >> than benefic, per Parashara. I think in its period the 1st > > half> > > > of dasha> > > > > >> will not be good whereas the second half will be good.> > > > > >>> > > > > >> Saturn, in my opinion, is certainly functional malefic.> > > > > >>> > > > > >> take care,> > > > > >> Chandrashekhar.> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >> saurabh chaturvedi wrote:> > > > > >>> > > > > >> Respected Sir,> > > > > >>> > > > > >> Consider a case of Cancer Ascendant.> > > > > >>> > > > > >> a) Related to Jupiter--- (i) Jupiter is the lord of 6th as > > well> > > > as 9th,> > > > > >> (ii) the mooltrikona sign of Jupiter lies in the 6th house > > (so> > > > 6th house is> > > > > >> more effective for Jupiter as a lord), (iii) Jupiter is not > > the> > > > enemy of the> > > > > >> ascendant lord (Moon).> > > > > >>> > > > > >> So if we consider all the 3 above points, the Jupiter should> > > > be 'Neutral'> > > > > >> in this case (This is my opinion).> > > > > >> But Dr. Raman says it as a functional benefic and Dr. > > Shrimali as> > > > > >> functional malefic.> > > > > >>> > > > > >> What do you say, sir?> > > > > >>> > > > > >> b) Related to Saturn--- (i) Lord of the 7th (Kendradhipati) > > and> > > > the lord> > > > > >> of 8th, (ii) Mooltrikona sign lies in the 8th house (so 8th> > > > house is more> > > > > >> effective for Saturn as a lord), (iii) Enemy of the Ascendant> > > > lord.> > > > > >>> > > > > >> So according to me, Saturn should be the functional malefic > > in> > > > this case.> > > > > >> But Dr. Raman as well as Dr. Shrimali identify it > > as 'Neutral'.> > > > > >>> > > > > >> Please guide me.> > > > > >>> > > > > >> Thanks and Regards,> > > > > >> saurabh> > > > > >>> > > > > >> > > ************ ********* ********* ********* ********* ********* *****> > > > > >> "Kuchh Sapanon Ke Mar Jaane Se, Jeevan Nahin Maraa Karataa > > Hai"> > > > > >>> > > > > >> Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Go to> > > > > >> http://in.messenger ./ invite/> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Unlimited freedom, unlimited storage. Get it now, on http://help. / l/in// mail/mail/ tools/tools- 08.html/> Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Invite them now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.