Guest guest Posted June 5, 2009 Report Share Posted June 5, 2009 Group, I m in deep distress, A whole group of intellectuals started talking about application of free will as their predictions dont come true to their expectation. Why this is happening coz of wrong fundamentals, wrong parameters, as of now, I w'd have seen some 2000-3000 horoscopes and didnt came across a single case where 365 days vimshottary, gochara and fundamentals of vedic astrology gone wrong a bit. Jyotish can never be wrong, We should know how to read a chart and have confidence on our study. If somebody applies KP or Annual charts or conditional dashas and thinks he can conclude correctly and completely, He is only wasting his time, First Apply Vimshottary and Basics of Vedic astrology then you can try other secondary tools. regards, Lalit Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 8, 2009 Report Share Posted June 8, 2009 Mr. Misra, I am new to astrology. Possible for you to write on concepts of astrology, how the zodaic is formed, its relation to astronomy and effects of planets on humans. Can you mail me the 3,000 -4,000 charts that you have or upload to files section for downloading. Sorry, asking a silly question. In the mail you said about 365 days a year can you not publish it in any technical magazine complete with your case studies without which your great research would die without being heard or read. Your goal to spread astrology also would come to nought. I request you to please on this. rds chibu Vedic Astrologyandhealing , " litsol " <mishra.lalit wrote: > > > Group, > > I m in deep distress, A whole group of intellectuals started talking > about application of free will as their predictions dont come true to > their expectation. > > Why this is happening coz of wrong fundamentals, wrong parameters, as of > now, I w'd have seen some 2000-3000 horoscopes and didnt came across a > single case where 365 days vimshottary, gochara and fundamentals of > vedic astrology gone wrong a bit. > > Jyotish can never be wrong, We should know how to read a chart and have > confidence on our study. > > If somebody applies KP or Annual charts or conditional dashas and thinks > he can conclude correctly and completely, He is only wasting his time, > First Apply Vimshottary and Basics of Vedic astrology then you can try > other secondary tools. > > regards, > Lalit > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 8, 2009 Report Share Posted June 8, 2009 In india there is no open technical magazine on astrology, almost all the magazines are published by some or other groups. Like you cant write where KN Rao or his students are wrong, like 10'th as fathers house, count how many horoscopes they w'd have seen, how many times they have been asked abt one's father, and how many times they w'd have given wrong replies to people. There are concepts in astrology having no significance like kendradhipatya dosha, paap kartari Dosha etc, people blindly folllows such concepts with no review of degree of applicability. I w'd have posted some 250 - 300 key horoscopes in groups, horoscopes which highlights basics and right fundamentals or need or discovering more but including you, how many people have discussed. Astrologers and Astrology has become tools of narrow minded people, you need to say he is great so that in the return he can say you are also great. See, astrology is neither my profession, nor a source of revenue rather when i came to know it's a part of vedangas I decided that i w'd my best effort to clean astrology. I found the beginning of corruption happened by VarahMihira himself, perhapse, he didn't want others to learn correct things therefore he mixed so many things which misleads, after him, india didn't have a great astrologer in prediction. This approach is continued, in almost all the groups there are people who never discuss how to fine tune quality of predictions but w'd discuss shlokas of this or that classics, hardly any body in the net world w'd have studied books more than i studied, I have some 700 books on astrology, but i avoid discussing shlokas, coz that's a stupid way of showing how much you are read. people do it with a purpose of popularity gains. I know, astrology is a divine science, so, dont bother popularity and popularity oriented writings, I speak what's true. Let me tell you very basic things venus in lagna doesnt give fair color but mars can give the fairness. venus gives only a tinge of attractiveness but when i told this to an experienced astrologer, he questioned my years of experience in astrology, so, this is how astrologers are, every body is great here. but hardly any body predicts correctly. regards, Lalit Vedic Astrologyandhealing , " chiburdanidzemaia " <chiburdanidzemaia wrote: > > > Mr. Misra, > > I am new to astrology. Possible for you to write on concepts of > astrology, how the zodaic is formed, its relation to astronomy and > effects of planets on humans. > > Can you mail me the 3,000 -4,000 charts that you have or upload to > files section for downloading. > > Sorry, asking a silly question. In the mail you said about 365 days a > year can you not publish it in any technical magazine complete with > your case studies without which your great research would die without > being heard or read. Your goal to spread astrology also would come to > nought. I request you to please on this. > > > > rds > > chibu > > > > > Vedic Astrologyandhealing , " litsol " > <mishra.lalit@> wrote: > > > > > > Group, > > > > I m in deep distress, A whole group of intellectuals started talking > > about application of free will as their predictions dont come true to > > their expectation. > > > > Why this is happening coz of wrong fundamentals, wrong parameters, as > of > > now, I w'd have seen some 2000-3000 horoscopes and didnt came across a > > single case where 365 days vimshottary, gochara and fundamentals of > > vedic astrology gone wrong a bit. > > > > Jyotish can never be wrong, We should know how to read a chart and > have > > confidence on our study. > > > > If somebody applies KP or Annual charts or conditional dashas and > thinks > > he can conclude correctly and completely, He is only wasting his time, > > First Apply Vimshottary and Basics of Vedic astrology then you can try > > other secondary tools. > > > > regards, > > Lalit > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 9, 2009 Report Share Posted June 9, 2009 mr. misra, I searched the archives and could find only 50-60 sets of birth details, many of them were analysed by others, very few had your notes. Varahamihira as per history the greatest predictor, how can you claim he is wrong. where did he go wrong and can you share details. rds chibu Vedic Astrologyandhealing , " litsol " <mishra.lalit wrote: > > In india there is no open technical magazine on astrology, almost all the magazines are published by some or other groups. > > Like you cant write where KN Rao or his students are wrong, like 10'th as fathers house, count how many horoscopes they w'd have seen, how many times they have been asked abt one's father, and how many times they w'd have given wrong replies to people. > > There are concepts in astrology having no significance like kendradhipatya dosha, paap kartari Dosha etc, people blindly folllows such concepts with no review of degree of applicability. > > I w'd have posted some 250 - 300 key horoscopes in groups, horoscopes which highlights basics and right fundamentals or need or discovering more but including you, how many people have discussed. > > Astrologers and Astrology has become tools of narrow minded people, you need to say he is great so that in the return he can say you are also great. > > See, astrology is neither my profession, nor a source of revenue rather when i came to know it's a part of vedangas I decided that i w'd my best effort to clean astrology. > > I found the beginning of corruption happened by VarahMihira himself, perhapse, he didn't want others to learn correct things therefore he mixed so many things which misleads, after him, india didn't have a great astrologer in prediction. > > This approach is continued, in almost all the groups there are people who never discuss how to fine tune quality of predictions but w'd discuss shlokas of this or that classics, hardly any body in the net world w'd have studied books more than i studied, I have some 700 books on astrology, but i avoid discussing shlokas, coz that's a stupid way of showing how much you are read. people do it with a purpose of popularity gains. > > I know, astrology is a divine science, so, dont bother popularity and popularity oriented writings, I speak what's true. > > Let me tell you very basic things venus in lagna doesnt give fair color but mars can give the fairness. venus gives only a tinge of attractiveness but when i told this to an experienced astrologer, he questioned my years of experience in astrology, so, this is how astrologers are, every body is great here. > > but hardly any body predicts correctly. > > regards, > Lalit > > > > Vedic Astrologyandhealing , " chiburdanidzemaia " chiburdanidzemaia@ wrote: > > > > > > Mr. Misra, > > > > I am new to astrology. Possible for you to write on concepts of > > astrology, how the zodaic is formed, its relation to astronomy and > > effects of planets on humans. > > > > Can you mail me the 3,000 -4,000 charts that you have or upload to > > files section for downloading. > > > > Sorry, asking a silly question. In the mail you said about 365 days a > > year can you not publish it in any technical magazine complete with > > your case studies without which your great research would die without > > being heard or read. Your goal to spread astrology also would come to > > nought. I request you to please on this. > > > > > > > > rds > > > > chibu > > > > > > > > > > Vedic Astrologyandhealing , " litsol " > > <mishra.lalit@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Group, > > > > > > I m in deep distress, A whole group of intellectuals started talking > > > about application of free will as their predictions dont come true to > > > their expectation. > > > > > > Why this is happening coz of wrong fundamentals, wrong parameters, as > > of > > > now, I w'd have seen some 2000-3000 horoscopes and didnt came across a > > > single case where 365 days vimshottary, gochara and fundamentals of > > > vedic astrology gone wrong a bit. > > > > > > Jyotish can never be wrong, We should know how to read a chart and > > have > > > confidence on our study. > > > > > > If somebody applies KP or Annual charts or conditional dashas and > > thinks > > > he can conclude correctly and completely, He is only wasting his time, > > > First Apply Vimshottary and Basics of Vedic astrology then you can try > > > other secondary tools. > > > > > > regards, > > > Lalit > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 9, 2009 Report Share Posted June 9, 2009 Have u studied Indian History and Particularly History of Astrology in India ? Just take one example - Varahmihira said " Guru in kumbha gives results as good as it's in Karka " . This is false. I said, net is full of people with no self study. So, you find only 50-60 horoscopes, Check again, you will find more. regards, Lalit Vedic Astrologyandhealing , " chiburdanidzemaia " <chiburdanidzemaia wrote: > > > mr. misra, > > I searched the archives and could find only 50-60 sets of birth details, > many of them were analysed by others, very few had your notes. > > Varahamihira as per history the greatest predictor, how can you claim he > is wrong. where did he go wrong and can you share details. > > rds > > chibu > > > Vedic Astrologyandhealing , " litsol " > <mishra.lalit@> wrote: > > > > In india there is no open technical magazine on astrology, almost all > the magazines are published by some or other groups. > > > > Like you cant write where KN Rao or his students are wrong, like 10'th > as fathers house, count how many horoscopes they w'd have seen, how many > times they have been asked abt one's father, and how many times they w'd > have given wrong replies to people. > > > > There are concepts in astrology having no significance like > kendradhipatya dosha, paap kartari Dosha etc, people blindly folllows > such concepts with no review of degree of applicability. > > > > I w'd have posted some 250 - 300 key horoscopes in groups, horoscopes > which highlights basics and right fundamentals or need or discovering > more but including you, how many people have discussed. > > > > Astrologers and Astrology has become tools of narrow minded people, > you need to say he is great so that in the return he can say you are > also great. > > > > See, astrology is neither my profession, nor a source of revenue > rather when i came to know it's a part of vedangas I decided that i w'd > my best effort to clean astrology. > > > > I found the beginning of corruption happened by VarahMihira himself, > perhapse, he didn't want others to learn correct things therefore he > mixed so many things which misleads, after him, india didn't have a > great astrologer in prediction. > > > > This approach is continued, in almost all the groups there are people > who never discuss how to fine tune quality of predictions but w'd > discuss shlokas of this or that classics, hardly any body in the net > world w'd have studied books more than i studied, I have some 700 books > on astrology, but i avoid discussing shlokas, coz that's a stupid way of > showing how much you are read. people do it with a purpose of popularity > gains. > > > > I know, astrology is a divine science, so, dont bother popularity and > popularity oriented writings, I speak what's true. > > > > Let me tell you very basic things venus in lagna doesnt give fair > color but mars can give the fairness. venus gives only a tinge of > attractiveness but when i told this to an experienced astrologer, he > questioned my years of experience in astrology, so, this is how > astrologers are, every body is great here. > > > > but hardly any body predicts correctly. > > > > regards, > > Lalit > > > > > > > > Vedic Astrologyandhealing , " chiburdanidzemaia " > chiburdanidzemaia@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > Mr. Misra, > > > > > > I am new to astrology. Possible for you to write on concepts of > > > astrology, how the zodaic is formed, its relation to astronomy and > > > effects of planets on humans. > > > > > > Can you mail me the 3,000 -4,000 charts that you have or upload to > > > files section for downloading. > > > > > > Sorry, asking a silly question. In the mail you said about 365 days > a > > > year can you not publish it in any technical magazine complete with > > > your case studies without which your great research would die > without > > > being heard or read. Your goal to spread astrology also would come > to > > > nought. I request you to please on this. > > > > > > > > > > > > rds > > > > > > chibu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Vedic Astrologyandhealing , " litsol " > > > <mishra.lalit@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Group, > > > > > > > > I m in deep distress, A whole group of intellectuals started > talking > > > > about application of free will as their predictions dont come true > to > > > > their expectation. > > > > > > > > Why this is happening coz of wrong fundamentals, wrong parameters, > as > > > of > > > > now, I w'd have seen some 2000-3000 horoscopes and didnt came > across a > > > > single case where 365 days vimshottary, gochara and fundamentals > of > > > > vedic astrology gone wrong a bit. > > > > > > > > Jyotish can never be wrong, We should know how to read a chart and > > > have > > > > confidence on our study. > > > > > > > > If somebody applies KP or Annual charts or conditional dashas and > > > thinks > > > > he can conclude correctly and completely, He is only wasting his > time, > > > > First Apply Vimshottary and Basics of Vedic astrology then you can > try > > > > other secondary tools. > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > Lalit > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 10, 2009 Report Share Posted June 10, 2009 mr. misra, Is there any research study made on Jupiter in Aquarius (if my understanding of kumbha is aquarius) to prove it is wrong. Many european astrologers also agree on this point of Varahmihira. Please give more details and explanations on this. i systematically went through mails from begining and then said about those 50-60 birth sets now searching in other groups for data rds, chibu Vedic Astrologyandhealing , " litsol " <mishra.lalit wrote: > > Have u studied Indian History and Particularly History of Astrology in India ? > > Just take one example - Varahmihira said " Guru in kumbha gives results as good as it's in Karka " . > > This is false. > > I said, net is full of people with no self study. > > So, you find only 50-60 horoscopes, Check again, you will find more. > > regards, > Lalit > > > > Vedic Astrologyandhealing , " chiburdanidzemaia " chiburdanidzemaia@ wrote: > > > > > > mr. misra, > > > > I searched the archives and could find only 50-60 sets of birth details, > > many of them were analysed by others, very few had your notes. > > > > Varahamihira as per history the greatest predictor, how can you claim he > > is wrong. where did he go wrong and can you share details. > > > > rds > > > > chibu > > > > > > Vedic Astrologyandhealing , " litsol " > > <mishra.lalit@> wrote: > > > > > > In india there is no open technical magazine on astrology, almost all > > the magazines are published by some or other groups. > > > > > > Like you cant write where KN Rao or his students are wrong, like 10'th > > as fathers house, count how many horoscopes they w'd have seen, how many > > times they have been asked abt one's father, and how many times they w'd > > have given wrong replies to people. > > > > > > There are concepts in astrology having no significance like > > kendradhipatya dosha, paap kartari Dosha etc, people blindly folllows > > such concepts with no review of degree of applicability. > > > > > > I w'd have posted some 250 - 300 key horoscopes in groups, horoscopes > > which highlights basics and right fundamentals or need or discovering > > more but including you, how many people have discussed. > > > > > > Astrologers and Astrology has become tools of narrow minded people, > > you need to say he is great so that in the return he can say you are > > also great. > > > > > > See, astrology is neither my profession, nor a source of revenue > > rather when i came to know it's a part of vedangas I decided that i w'd > > my best effort to clean astrology. > > > > > > I found the beginning of corruption happened by VarahMihira himself, > > perhapse, he didn't want others to learn correct things therefore he > > mixed so many things which misleads, after him, india didn't have a > > great astrologer in prediction. > > > > > > This approach is continued, in almost all the groups there are people > > who never discuss how to fine tune quality of predictions but w'd > > discuss shlokas of this or that classics, hardly any body in the net > > world w'd have studied books more than i studied, I have some 700 books > > on astrology, but i avoid discussing shlokas, coz that's a stupid way of > > showing how much you are read. people do it with a purpose of popularity > > gains. > > > > > > I know, astrology is a divine science, so, dont bother popularity and > > popularity oriented writings, I speak what's true. > > > > > > Let me tell you very basic things venus in lagna doesnt give fair > > color but mars can give the fairness. venus gives only a tinge of > > attractiveness but when i told this to an experienced astrologer, he > > questioned my years of experience in astrology, so, this is how > > astrologers are, every body is great here. > > > > > > but hardly any body predicts correctly. > > > > > > regards, > > > Lalit > > > > > > > > > > > > Vedic Astrologyandhealing , " chiburdanidzemaia " > > chiburdanidzemaia@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Mr. Misra, > > > > > > > > I am new to astrology. Possible for you to write on concepts of > > > > astrology, how the zodaic is formed, its relation to astronomy and > > > > effects of planets on humans. > > > > > > > > Can you mail me the 3,000 -4,000 charts that you have or upload to > > > > files section for downloading. > > > > > > > > Sorry, asking a silly question. In the mail you said about 365 days > > a > > > > year can you not publish it in any technical magazine complete with > > > > your case studies without which your great research would die > > without > > > > being heard or read. Your goal to spread astrology also would come > > to > > > > nought. I request you to please on this. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > rds > > > > > > > > chibu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Vedic Astrologyandhealing , " litsol " > > > > <mishra.lalit@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Group, > > > > > > > > > > I m in deep distress, A whole group of intellectuals started > > talking > > > > > about application of free will as their predictions dont come true > > to > > > > > their expectation. > > > > > > > > > > Why this is happening coz of wrong fundamentals, wrong parameters, > > as > > > > of > > > > > now, I w'd have seen some 2000-3000 horoscopes and didnt came > > across a > > > > > single case where 365 days vimshottary, gochara and fundamentals > > of > > > > > vedic astrology gone wrong a bit. > > > > > > > > > > Jyotish can never be wrong, We should know how to read a chart and > > > > have > > > > > confidence on our study. > > > > > > > > > > If somebody applies KP or Annual charts or conditional dashas and > > > > thinks > > > > > he can conclude correctly and completely, He is only wasting his > > time, > > > > > First Apply Vimshottary and Basics of Vedic astrology then you can > > try > > > > > other secondary tools. > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > Lalit > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 10, 2009 Report Share Posted June 10, 2009 Namaskar Chibu ji I will only add one point - when Jupiter is in Aquarius - it is 12th to its own sign Pisces and 3rd from the own sign - Sagittarius . Which house Jupiter own in the chart will also be important. RegardsNandana 2009/6/10 chiburdanidzemaia <chiburdanidzemaia mr. misra, Is there any research study made on Jupiter in Aquarius (if my understanding of kumbha is aquarius) to prove it is wrong. Many european astrologers also agree on this point of Varahmihira. Please give more details and explanations on this. i systematically went through mails from begining and then said about those 50-60 birth sets now searching in other groups for data rds, chibu Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 10, 2009 Report Share Posted June 10, 2009 Dear Chibu, If europian astrologers are agreed on a false principle, will that be acceptable to destiny ? Certainly not. Just check world's status next year, why argue with me ? Every bit of words i do write or discuss in the group is based on hard work, research and study. My purpose is to educate astrologers. Not only europian astrologers but a whole lot of indian astrologers also thoughtlessly apply shlokas stated by Varahmihira and other classic author. Varahmihira was a successful astrologer, an icon of indian astro world, but while writing book, he has not maintained honesty, he seem to have mixed several things which if applied on charts, analysis goes astray. This is the reason, after him, India didn't have astrologers with equal success. If you dont find more than 50 - 60 horoscopes in group, I w'd say, you lack concentration. These days i m pretty busy therefore not having time to put horoscopes togather. Vedic Astrologyandhealing , Nandana astro <nandanaastro wrote: > > Namaskar Chibu ji > > I will only add one point - when Jupiter is in Aquarius - it is 12th > to its own sign Pisces and 3rd from the own sign - Sagittarius . Which > house Jupiter own in the chart will also be important. > > > Regards > Nandana > > > 2009/6/10 chiburdanidzemaia <chiburdanidzemaia > > > > > mr. misra, > > > > Is there any research study made on Jupiter in Aquarius (if my > > understanding of kumbha is aquarius) to prove it is wrong. Many european > > astrologers also agree on this point of Varahmihira. Please give more > > details and explanations on this. > > > > i systematically went through mails from begining and then said about > > those 50-60 birth sets now searching in other groups for data > > > > rds, > > > > chibu > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 14, 2009 Report Share Posted June 14, 2009 Group, This is a horoscope worth analyzing, simplifies several critical points of vedic astrology- 29 .1980 /4.50, pratapgarh, up. Regards. Lalit. Vedic Astrologyandhealing , " litsol " <mishra.lalit wrote: > > Dear Chibu, > > If europian astrologers are agreed on a false principle, will that be acceptable to destiny ? Certainly not. > > Just check world's status next year, why argue with me ? Every bit of words i do write or discuss in the group is based on hard work, research and study. My purpose is to educate astrologers. > > > Not only europian astrologers but a whole lot of indian astrologers also thoughtlessly apply shlokas stated by Varahmihira and other classic author. > > Varahmihira was a successful astrologer, an icon of indian astro world, but while writing book, he has not maintained honesty, he seem to have mixed several things which if applied on charts, analysis goes astray. This is the reason, after him, India didn't have astrologers with equal success. > > If you dont find more than 50 - 60 horoscopes in group, I w'd say, you lack concentration. > > These days i m pretty busy therefore not having time to put horoscopes togather. Vedic Astrologyandhealing , Nandana astro <nandanaastro@> wrote: > > > > Namaskar Chibu ji > > > > I will only add one point - when Jupiter is in Aquarius - it is 12th > > to its own sign Pisces and 3rd from the own sign - Sagittarius . Which > > house Jupiter own in the chart will also be important. > > > > > > Regards > > Nandana > > > > > > 2009/6/10 chiburdanidzemaia <chiburdanidzemaia@> > > > > > > > > mr. misra, > > > > > > Is there any research study made on Jupiter in Aquarius (if my > > > understanding of kumbha is aquarius) to prove it is wrong. Many european > > > astrologers also agree on this point of Varahmihira. Please give more > > > details and explanations on this. > > > > > > i systematically went through mails from begining and then said about > > > those 50-60 birth sets now searching in other groups for data > > > > > > rds, > > > > > > chibu > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 18, 2009 Report Share Posted June 18, 2009 mr misra, what are the special things that you see in this horoscope can you tell me the critical points rds chibu Vedic Astrologyandhealing , " litsol " <mishra.lalit wrote: > > > Group, > > This is a horoscope worth analyzing, simplifies several critical points of vedic astrology- 29 .1980 /4.50, pratapgarh, up. > > Regards. > Lalit. > > Vedic Astrologyandhealing , " litsol " mishra.lalit@ wrote: > > > > Dear Chibu, > > > > If europian astrologers are agreed on a false principle, will that be acceptable to destiny ? Certainly not. > > > > Just check world's status next year, why argue with me ? Every bit of words i do write or discuss in the group is based on hard work, research and study. My purpose is to educate astrologers. > > > > > > Not only europian astrologers but a whole lot of indian astrologers also thoughtlessly apply shlokas stated by Varahmihira and other classic author. > > > > Varahmihira was a successful astrologer, an icon of indian astro world, but while writing book, he has not maintained honesty, he seem to have mixed several things which if applied on charts, analysis goes astray. This is the reason, after him, India didn't have astrologers with equal success. > > > > If you dont find more than 50 - 60 horoscopes in group, I w'd say, you lack concentration. > > > > These days i m pretty busy therefore not having time to put horoscopes togather. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Vedic Astrologyandhealing , Nandana astro <nandanaastro@> wrote: > > > > > > Namaskar Chibu ji > > > > > > I will only add one point - when Jupiter is in Aquarius - it is 12th > > > to its own sign Pisces and 3rd from the own sign - Sagittarius . Which > > > house Jupiter own in the chart will also be important. > > > > > > > > > Regards > > > Nandana > > > > > > > > > 2009/6/10 chiburdanidzemaia <chiburdanidzemaia@> > > > > > > > > > > > mr. misra, > > > > > > > > Is there any research study made on Jupiter in Aquarius (if my > > > > understanding of kumbha is aquarius) to prove it is wrong. Many european > > > > astrologers also agree on this point of Varahmihira. Please give more > > > > details and explanations on this. > > > > > > > > i systematically went through mails from begining and then said about > > > > those 50-60 birth sets now searching in other groups for data > > > > > > > > rds, > > > > > > > > chibu > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 18, 2009 Report Share Posted June 18, 2009 hi, Firstly let me complete the birth data, guy is born on 29 feb 1980, at 4.50 am, pratapgarh up. Most planets r retro nd he is terminated from his job in 11 jun 2009. Vimshottari dasha was : venus-venus-merc, if i remember correctly in transit jup is 8th from his natal moon bt placed in 8th house frm lagna in natal horo. See, long back in 1972 - 1975, when shekh mujibur rahman, the bangladesh prime minister was assasinated, the then eminent astrologers gave idea that this is due to majority of retro planets in his chart. Well, our guy's job gone in merc's period which is 9th as well as 6th lord. Thus, we can learn impact of dual lordship practical life. Lalit. Vedic Astrologyandhealing , " chiburdanidzemaia " <chiburdanidzemaia wrote: > > > mr misra, > > what are the special things that you see in this horoscope can you tell > me the critical points > > rds > > chibu > > > Vedic Astrologyandhealing , " litsol " > <mishra.lalit@> wrote: > > > > > > Group, > > > > This is a horoscope worth analyzing, simplifies several critical > points of vedic astrology- 29 .1980 /4.50, pratapgarh, up. > > > > Regards. > > Lalit. > > > > Vedic Astrologyandhealing , " litsol " mishra.lalit@ > wrote: > > > > > > Dear Chibu, > > > > > > If europian astrologers are agreed on a false principle, will that > be acceptable to destiny ? Certainly not. > > > > > > Just check world's status next year, why argue with me ? Every bit > of words i do write or discuss in the group is based on hard work, > research and study. My purpose is to educate astrologers. > > > > > > > > > Not only europian astrologers but a whole lot of indian astrologers > also thoughtlessly apply shlokas stated by Varahmihira and other classic > author. > > > > > > Varahmihira was a successful astrologer, an icon of indian astro > world, but while writing book, he has not maintained honesty, he seem to > have mixed several things which if applied on charts, analysis goes > astray. This is the reason, after him, India didn't have astrologers > with equal success. > > > > > > If you dont find more than 50 - 60 horoscopes in group, I w'd say, > you lack concentration. > > > > > > These days i m pretty busy therefore not having time to put > horoscopes togather. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Vedic Astrologyandhealing , Nandana astro > <nandanaastro@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Namaskar Chibu ji > > > > > > > > I will only add one point - when Jupiter is in Aquarius - it is > 12th > > > > to its own sign Pisces and 3rd from the own sign - Sagittarius . > Which > > > > house Jupiter own in the chart will also be important. > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > Nandana > > > > > > > > > > > > 2009/6/10 chiburdanidzemaia <chiburdanidzemaia@> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > mr. misra, > > > > > > > > > > Is there any research study made on Jupiter in Aquarius (if my > > > > > understanding of kumbha is aquarius) to prove it is wrong. Many > european > > > > > astrologers also agree on this point of Varahmihira. Please give > more > > > > > details and explanations on this. > > > > > > > > > > i systematically went through mails from begining and then said > about > > > > > those 50-60 birth sets now searching in other groups for data > > > > > > > > > > rds, > > > > > > > > > > chibu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.