Navamsa and other Divisional Charts

January 31, 2010

// KINDLY READ YOUR MAIL AGAIN AND AGAIN, AND SEE ANYWHERE YOU HAVE TOLD ANY METHOD TO SEE D-9. //

Kindly read above line as below:-

KINDLY READ YOUR OWN MAIL AGAIN AND AGAIN, AND SEE ANYWHERE HAVE YOU TALKED ANY METHOD TO SEE D-9 or D-10??

Some interesting link about K N Rao, chairman BVB....

http://sify.com/astrology/fullstory.php?id=14558014

http://www.journalofastrology.com/article.php?article_id=89

In one magazine B V Raman had predicted that after assassination of Rajiv Gandhi, Congress party will never come to power, but now congress is about to come in centre with full majority in next election without any crutch or alliance, though it is still in power for consecutively second time...

So, i would like to suggest, everybody should read only CLASSICS, instead of modern authorâ€™s books.

EVERYBODY SHOULD READ ONLY AND ONLY CLASSICS.

EVERYBODY SHOULD WORK TO DONATE THEIR EFFORTS IN ASTROLOGY FOR ANCIENT CLASSICS INSTEAD OF MAKING THEIR OWN BRAND NAME, JUST BY MAKING FOOLISH THEORIES.

LIKE PPL FROM ANCIENT HOLY LAND VARANASI, DONATED THEIR EFFORTS IN THE NAME OF PARASHARA, AND INSTEAD OF MAKING THEIR NAME THEY SAID IT IS OF PARASHARA'S MANUSCRIPT, THOUGH BPHS IS NO DOUBT FIRST AND ANCIENT CLASSIC OF ASTROLOGY WHICH WAS COPIED IN THE FORM OF SKANDA HORA BY SOUTH INDIAN BRAHMINS.

IN ANCIENT TIME PPL USED TO DONATE THEIR EFFORTS IN THE NAME OF THEIR PARAMPARA, LIKE OF ATRI, VISWAMITRA, VASHISHTA, KASHYAP, BHRIGU.

BUT IN KALIYUGA WE SEE THAT PPL ERECT BUSINESS, AND MAKE THEIR OWN BRAND NAME AND SO THEY SEE THE TURN AROUND OF THEIR FORTUNE.

STILL IN HOLY LAND (NOT IN METRO CITIES), PPL READ CLASSICS AND ENCORAGE PPL TO READ THOSE SAME.

ASTROLOGY IS GETTING ABUSED AND PREDICTIONS ARE NOT COMING CORRECT AS PPL HAVE MIXED THEIR CORRUPT VIEWS IN IT, INSTEAD OF FOLLOWING ANCIENT VIEWS.

Pawan

--- On Sun, 31/1/10, Astro Talk <astro.talk wrote:

Astro Talk <astro.talk[Vedic Astrologyandhealing] Navamsa and other Divisional ChartsVedic Astrologyandhealing Date: Sunday, 31 January, 2010, 5:46 PM

// Thanks for taking a nice topic.I have learned in BVB that navamsha can be read as independent chart and conjunction and aspects are taken in account.. //

Even if you read '300 hundred combinations' of BVB Raman, You will find that Navaamsa is seen just with the help of Rashi chart.

Have a look at page number 84 or 86 and 90 or 92 for 'Chandika Yoga' and 'Vishnu Yoga'.

Though there are many examples which will give you enlightment to the way how one should see D-9 with the help of D-1.

I am amazed to see that you learnt WRONG METHOD at BVB. Kindly follow ancinet scriptures and methods instead of BVB or ICAS.

Now see how one should see any planets functioning in chart.

Let me take your Venus as example.

Check in your chart, Venus is placed in which Navamsa, and take its lordship and see that how it is placed in D-1 and D-9.

I am amazed to see that you were not taught CORRECT ANCIENT METHOD that how to see the D-Charts.

KINDLY READ YOUR MAIL AGAIN AND AGAIN, AND SEE ANYWHERE YOU HAVE TOLD ANY METHOD TO SEE D-9.

Pawan--- On Sun, 31/1/10, S.C. Kursija <sckursija > wrote:

S.C. Kursija <sckursija >Re: [Vedic Astrologyandh ealing] Navamsa and other Divisional ChartsVedic Astrologyandhe aling@ s.comSunday, 31 January, 2010, 2:49 PM

Dear Lalit Mishra,

Thanks for taking a nice topic.I have learned in BVB that navamsha can be read as independent chart and conjunction and aspects are taken in account.. But I am sorry write that it is wrong. With experience I have learned that the divisional chart indicates a micro influence of the planet with view of a aspect of life. Suppose I want to know why I am a homeopathic doctor and a teacher in astrology. I did not earn from my teaching and writing on astrology. My lagna lord Jupiter is posited in 5thwith Sun,Venus, and Saturn in Aries. Lagna lord is not combust.10th lord Mercury is posited in R/K axis debilitated in 4th but aspecting 10th. Rahu will give the results of lord of 10th, debilitated Mercury.In trine to10th, Mars is exalted in 2nd. See navamsha lagna Gemini. 10th is occupied by Rahu in Pisces.Sun and Venus in lagna and Jupiter in 7th in Sagittarius. Saturn is exalted in 5th and mercury in 8th. I understand that afflicted Rahu in 10th in D/9

and in own sign in Rashi chart and debilitated Mercury in Rashi chart with Ketu and 8th house in D/9 is giving homoeopathic practice and Jupiter in own sign in D/9 with the help of mercury is giving teaching.Now verify the same in D/10 The lagna is Virgo and Sun, Venus and Mercury is posited in 10th house.and Jupiter in 5th with Ketu in poor state.So Teaching of astrology Jupiter, and writing on astrology is not giving but being in 10th house in D/10 is making me to write. Mercury is debilitated in rashi chart. So strength of planet in divisional chart makes the picture clear. But the results will be based on the strength of planet in rashi chart. Though the Mars is exalted in rashi chart but debilitated in D/9 and Pisces in D/10 in 7th, maraka place is not giving earning much.Combust Venus with Sun making me earn through medical 6th and 11th lord in rashi chart. Rashi char is our base. The power of a planet to give is clear in divisional

chart.

--- On Sat, 1/30/10, litsol <mishra.lalit@ gmail.com> wrote:

litsol <mishra.lalit@ gmail.com>[Vedic Astrologyandh ealing] Navamsa and other Divisional ChartsVedic Astrologyandhe aling@ s.comSaturday, January 30, 2010, 12:51 AM

Our sages identified that Rashi is the basic unit of phalit jyotish orpredictive astrology.If you look at navamsa, they are sequential subdivisions of 3.20degrees, you can take each navamsa as a pocket of 3.20 degrees, eachpocket denotes one rashi, thus, 12 rashis are denoted by 12 navamsas insequence, and 13th navamsa again denotes the first rashi which is mesha,this way it gets repeated from mesha to meena.Meena Rasi's last navamsa is Meena navamsa and Mesha rashi's firstnavamsa is Mesha navamsa.Navamsa and other sub-divisions of 30 degrees rashi do have predictiveimplications internal to the that rashi,As we see that each rasi has 9 navamsas denoting 9 rashis within therasi in question, we can easily understand that navamsa is no wayeqvivalent to independant rashi, In vedic astrology, Planets cast theiraspects from a rashi to another rashi, that means, if a rashi

receivesaspect of a planet, all the navamsas of that rashi receives same aspect,aspects are casted on whole of 30 degrees.When we go a step further from Navamsa or any Division and make a chart,we get to have easier visualization of all the navamsas puttoghather,navamsa chart is in fact only diagrammatic presentation ofthose navamsas or 3.20 degree's pocket of a rashi where a planet reachedat the time of birth, In fact, all such pockets of 3.20 degrees having aplanet denoting a rashi are integrated into a chart for the ease of theastrologer only, as such there is nothing like navmasa chart, our sageshave not considered Navamsa or any D chart as a chart, they only talkedabout division or amsa.The navamsa and other such charts which came into existence for the easeof the astrologers over the period misunderstood as seperate charts andtherefore question of aspects and conjunction etc

emerged.As far as astrologer's ease is concerned, navamsa and other divisionalcahrts are ok but they have their own in built hazards, like take acase, suppose, in a chart Sun is placed in Mesha navamsa of simha (Leo),and mars is placed in mesha navamsa of vrisabha (Taurus), now, you w'dfind in navamsa chart, Sun and Mars are conjunct to each other in Mesha,whereas, they are in different houses in rashi or lagna chart, noconjunction at all.At this point, such divisional charts are misleading, this is thereason, our sages talked about only navamsas or other divisions and havegiven phaladesh or results on the basis of navamsa or other divisions,they have not given phaladesh (RESULT) on the basis of NAVAMSA CHART orANY DIVISIONAL CHART because that could create further confusions inmaking predictionslike most astrologers are having today.Hope it helps to everybody and I think our

astrologers w'd stop takingnavamsas either in Raman's manner or Rao's manner or Iyear'smanner,rather, they w'd take navamsa as navamsa's manner of Jyotish asstated by sages, however, it depends on themregards,Lalit Mishra

Your Mail works best with the New Optimized IE8. Get it NOW!.