Native Lost job 12 Months Ago, Dasa Pravesh

September 30, 2003

In a message dated 9/30/2003 12:25:22 AM Eastern Standard Time, Bpfeeley writes:

Hare Rama Krishna

Dear Rao,

Again, this is a great example where the badhakesh is causing great obstruction to the life of this native. The badhakesh is in the lagna and has the association with Mars and Ketu and is aspected by Saturn and Rahu. This is a severe curse on Venus and since Venus is in parivarthna with the Moon, the LL, and the curse to the badakesh is in the lagna, it becomes a case where there is extreme obstruction in my opinion.

We are using Vimsottari dasa based on lagna sputa, as Karen pointed out this dasa was appropriate in this case.

Venus is also the kahresa, the lord of the 22nd drekkana, and he lost his job/income in Moon/Saturn. Because of the parivarthna, the Moon is doing the work of Venus, and since Saturn is the 8th lord, placed in the sign of Venus, it activated the obstruction and in my opinion may not end until Moon/Venus is over. The curse has to do with loss of income. The badakesh is also associated with the 10th lord.

The affliction to Venus shows the curse of wife from the last birth and this has to be the cause. I'm curious, was the person involved in losing his job a woman? In VRA Sanjay tells us that the remedy lies in the donation of an idol of Lakshmi-Narayana. He also suggests other remedies such as helping newly married couples or helping people come together and marry.

Regards,

Brendan

Dear Rao,

OK, let''s see if we can solve this case. First, i want to see why the native lost the job in Oct 2002! Let's start there.

He was in Ju/Mars (from Jamna Tara (Moon)) and Moon/Saturn/Moon from lagna sputa.

In October, Saturn was at 5 deg Ge, and R on 10/12/2002.

As we see, he was in Moon dasa from lagna sputa and the Moon is placed in the 11th house, a badhak for Cancer lagna. The Moon is aspected by Mars, Venus, Saturn, Rahu/Ketu. In fact Rahu throws an exact aspect on the Moon. There is parivarthana between Moon and Venus but this means the badhak has even greater capacity to cause obstruction to the native.

Saturn was the bhukti. He is also a badhak lord from the Moon. I believe the event happened in Mo/Sa/Mo.

Saturn is the lord of the 7th and 8th in the chart and is very malefic for the native. He is a planet of obstruction and delay. He is placed in the 4th house natally, and from there, he throws his malefic aspect on the 6th, 10th (his fallen sign) and 1st. He will cause problems for the native (1st) at work (6th) and his professional life (10th). Since the 10th house is also the GL, it will diminish his power and status.

He also aspects Mars (10th lord), Venus (4th and 11th lord) and Ketu. Note also that Saturn disposits Rahu (8L).

He is placed in the UL and in the 8th from the AL and again, this brings worry to the spouse and problems with his image and reputation. Saturn is exalted but very weak by degree.

As Karen pointed out, Vimsottari dasa from lagna sputa is more appropriate to this.

Moon rules the lagna and is placed in the 11th house of income. Saturn bhukti started on October 8th, while Saturn was transiting the 12th house of loss in the nakshatra of Mars, the ruler of the 10th house, and in the 2nd house from the Moon.

Saturn was also transiting over natal Jupiter, the karaka for 2nd and 11th houses.

Saturn is aspecting the 6th house natally as well as by transit, and he was also transiting over the 6th lord. Saturn is in the 6th from the Moon, natally, and in the nakshatra of Mars, an unfavorable star from the Moon. Was there a problem with fellow employees and boss?

The native was still in Sade Sati.

Rahu was transiting Taurus at the time, in the nakshatra of Rohini, ruled by the Moon and not at all favorable for the native.

The Moon was severly afflicted by transit.

The relationship between the dasa/bhukti lord was shashtashtaka (6/8) and this meant some enmity at work.

This 6/8 relationship exists in D-9 and D-10 also.

So, Saturn/Moon was not easy for him.

Getting late!

Regards,

Brendan

Dear Brendan Ji,

Namaste,

Thanks for the note and the birth details I have are the same.

I shall wait for your analysis. As I have requested earlier,

please educate us on when this native will get a job using

D-10 Narayana Dasa and Dasa Pravesh Charts.

If possible please go upto the Deha AntarDasa level. Becauase,

I have not seen any examples upto this level any where, and

this would be a good example for learning for me and other,

if you can spare a little more time on this native's chart.

I know, I may sound asking too much but, I wanted to see how

the principles will be applied upto the lowest levels.

Thanks for all you help.

Regards

Raghunadha Rao

parasari_jyotish , Bpfeeley@A... wrote:

>In a message dated 9/28/2003 10:20:47 PM Eastern Standard Time,

>raon1008 writes:

>

>Rao,

>

>Wow, I just noticed that you are right. Don't know what happened.

Yes, I now

>get Li dasa. Will analyze later.

>

>Look at the Dasa Pravesh for Libra n-dasa and also the AntaraDasa

Pravesh for

>Cp. It should give some clues.

>

>Regards,

>Brendan

>

>This is the data I have:

>

> August 31, 1953

>Time: 4:08:35

>Time Zone: 5:30:00 (East of GMT)

>Place: 83 E 18' 00", 17 N 42' 00"

>

>Lagna 21 Cn 29' 05.60" Asre 2 Cn Cp

>Sun - BK 14 Le 01' 38.04" PPha 1 Le Le

>Moon - PiK 7 Ta 39' 37.06" Krit 4 Ta Pi

>Mars - AK 27 Cn 24' 07.99" Asre 4 Cn Pi

>Mercury - PK 6 Le 46' 23.26" Makh 3 Le Ge

>Jupiter - DK 0 Ge 06' 19.70" Mrig 3 Ge Li

>Venus - MK 7 Cn 49' 41.34" Push 2 Cn Vi

>Saturn - GK 0 Li 52' 43.00" Chit 3 Li Li

>Rahu - AmK 8 Cp 03' 15.27" USha 4 Cp Pi

>Ketu 8 Cn 03' 15.27" Push 2 Cn Vi

>

>>Dear Brendan Ji,

>>

>>Namaste,

>>

>>That was an excellent analysis, but I was having a little trouble

to

>>match with your Narayana dasa in D-10 is Pi and antara is Leo. I

am

>>getting Li-Cp, how come mine is not matching with yours.

>>

>>Narayana Dasa of D-10 chart (a versatile phalita rasi dasa):

>>

>>Narayana Dasa of D-10 chart (a versatile phalita rasi dasa):

>>

>>Li MD: 1998-08-31 (16:47:19) - 2005-08-31 (12:02:12)

>>

>> Antardasas in this MD:

>>

>> Ta: 1998-08-31 (16:47:19) - 1999-03-29 (5:40:51)

>> Ge: 1999-03-29 (5:40:51) - 1999-10-31 (23:45:14)

>> Cn: 1999-10-31 (23:45:14) - 2000-05-29 (4:12:28)

>> Le: 2000-05-29 (4:12:28) - 2000-12-29 (12:51:34)

>> Vi: 2000-12-29 (12:51:34) - 2001-07-31 (6:13:35)

>> Li: 2001-07-31 (6:13:35) - 2002-02-26 (22:09:25)

>> Sc: 2002-02-26 (22:09:25) - 2002-10-01 (12:02:47)

>> Sg: 2002-10-01 (12:02:47) - 2003-04-28 (20:39:00)

>> Cp: 2003-04-28 (20:39:00) - 2003-11-30 (19:15:11)

>> Aq: 2003-11-30 (19:15:11) - 2004-06-29 (14:11:57)

>> Pi: 2004-06-29 (14:11:57) - 2005-01-28 (0:27:23)

>> Ar: 2005-01-28 (0:27:23) - 2005-08-31 (12:02:12)

>>

>>See, if you can help me to sync with your dasa and antar dasa.

>>

Namaste Rao,

Dasa Pravesh is a second order effect in my opinion and I use the N-dasa, V-dasa or any other graha dasas that apply, and TP chart.

I rarely use Dasa Pravesh and the analysis is the same as any dasa analysis.

Some brief comments. Narayana dasa in D-10 is Pi and antara is Leo?

Now, let's use argala. Who is obstructing Jupiter? Jupiter has argala on the dasa rasi and Sun and Mars are obstructing from AL? There must be somethng about his image that is obstructing his efforts. This is going to be very strong during Leo antara as Sun/AL is paaka and obstructing.

Also, Sani is transiting over the dasa lord in D-1 and D-10 and causing delay. He is lord of 8th house in rasi.

He is also aspecting the dasa rasi and AL in D-10 by transit. Not good.

Look at D-10 in the Dasa Pravesh chart for the Pi Narayana dasa. See the parivarthna between Saturn and the Moon, 1st and 8th lord. Thisis not good and explains the dasa in my opinion.

Now look at D-10 AntaraDasa Pravesh in the Leo antara (of D-10 in main chart) and see all the paapakartari yogas around 1st and 7th and karaka Sun in the 8th house. Saturn could also be taken as Karaka and he is in the 12th.

These are some of my superficial observations but I can see the wonderful benefit of these chart myself now as in his case, they explain a lot.

Hope this helps.... for starters.

Regards,

Brendan